
Pilot's chilling final words on board flight from Manchester to Tenerife moments before largest loss of life in British aviation history
The three pilots on board had years of experience under their belt but the rugged terrain and poor weather around the airport has made it a notoriously difficult place to land.
Only three years before the Dan-Air flight 1008 crashed, the worst aviation disaster in history tragically took place at Tenerife North when two planes collided on the run way, killing 583 people - partly due to poor visibility.
But in 1980, a change in wind direction forced Captain Arthur Whelan, 50, First Officer Michael Firth, 33, and Flight Engineer Raymond Carey, 33, to alter their landing plan and come in from the opposite side.
A tragic miscommunication in instructions then left the pilots asking one minute and six seconds before the crash 'b****y strange hold, isn't it?'.
As they dropped below the safe height of 14,500ft for the mountains, one pilot responded 'it doesn't parallel with the runway or anything'.
Having taken off from Manchester earlier that morning, the flight experienced no difficulty on the journey over the continent.
With winds typically coming across the Atlantic to the west, on April 25 1980 there was a change in direction, forcing the popular airliner to come in using the opposite runway.
There was not a single body that was found intact and most remains could not be identified
Another aircraft was ahead of the doomed flight and controller Justo Camin, 34, could see they were dangerously close to colliding mid-air.
He had to tell each flight how to fly along a predetermined route thanks to a lack of radar but improvised a holding pattern for the Dan Air flight.
Flight 1008 was told to enter a left-hand holding pattern and continue to make turns until the other flight was out of the way: 'Roger, the er, standard holding pattern overhead Foxtrot Papa is inbound heading one five zero, turn to the left, call you back shortly.'
But this is where Mr Camin's instructions proved fatal - he had meant to say 'turns' rather than 'turn' and had sent the plane onto a collision course.
So Captain Wheelan only made one small turn instead of the 150 degrees required for the holding pattern, heading straight for the mountain side invisible through the fog.
The recording from the cockpit shows the team begin to get uneasy and experts believe if they had asked the air controller to clarify the instructions there might have been time to veer themselves off their path to destruction.
Mr Camin, thinking the plane is over the sea, tells Flight 1008 that they can continue descending another 1,000ft, expecting them to slowly come in over the runway.
Captain Whelan says to his cop-pilot: 'I don't like that.'
He responds: 'They want us to keep going more round, don't they?'
Seconds later, the automatic ground alarm begins blaring 'pull up, pull up!'
Captain Whelan quickly turns into a sharp right instead of pulling up as co-pilot Firth suggests other routes after reading the charts.
Flight engineer Carey tells them 'let's get out of here' as Captain Whelan continues turning to the right as they continued to lose 300ft of altitude.
This was the last chance for the plane to save itself from its tragic fate.
The flight engineer begins shouting 'bank angle, bank angle!' before the CVR cuts out as the plan slams headlong into La Esperanza.
Debris was scattered across the mountain range and the tail section careened onwards for several hundred metres before plummeting into a ravine.
There was not a single body that was found intact and most remains could not be identified.
At 5,450ft, the plane was only 92ft from the summit and it obliterated instantly.
Spanish investigators tried to pin all the blame on the Dan-Air crew despite admitting fault with the controller's instructions while the Brits argued Mr Camin should have used a published holding pattern that kept flights at 7,000ft and realised earlier there was a problem with between the separation of the two planes.
They did acknowledge however that the Dan-Air crew should have queried the controllers instructions or requested clarification.
After the tragedy, a standardised procedure for all flight operations was established as well as the need for clear communication between pilots and air traffic controllers that is repeated.
Dan-Air, which has popular during the 60s and 70s, was able to recover from the disaster before it was taken over by British Airways in 1992.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Lincs & Notts Air Ambulance to undergo an inspection in Germany
An air ambulance that covers the East Midlands is to be sent to Germany for a major service, the charity that operates it has said. Lincs & Notts Air Ambulance said a black AW109 Grand New helicopter would provide cover for the iconic yellow AW169 aircraft as it undergoes work in pilot Llewis Ingamells said: "The service includes a complete strip-down of the aircraft to ensure every component is thoroughly inspected, operational and safe."The charity said the relief helicopter, though slightly smaller than the AW169, was considered a "capable and reliable" aircraft. Mr Ingamells said: "This work ensures that the aircraft continues to meet the highest standards of safety and performance."The yellow aircraft will return to the skies "in the coming months", the charity said. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices


Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
The British public will never forgive Labour's latest cruel pension raid
We're not going to the dogs: 12 reasons why Britain remains the greatest place to live


The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
The best portable neck and handheld fans, tested: six expert picks to keep you cool
Most people were hoping we wouldn't see a repeat of June and July's heatwaves this year, according to a recent YouGov survey of 5,148 British adults. Well, another one is already upon us. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. Thanks to the climate crisis, we know that things are hotting up year on year, and while we can hide in air-conditioned shops and offices, our homes can get uncomfortably – sometimes dangerously – hot. And we also have to go outside – or worse, voluntarily pack ourselves like sweaty sardines on dangerously hot public transport. On those occasions, a portable fan can make all the difference between manageable discomfort and indulging in an inadvisable quantity of ice-cream. Which one should you buy? I've spent the past few weeks testing handheld and neck fans from the likes of John Lewis, Dunelm and Bush, assessing them for power, noise, battery life and portability. Here's what I've found. Best handheld fan overall: John Lewis handheld and foldable fan Best budget handheld fan:Fine Elements folding rechargeable mini travel fan Best for power:Diveblues Jetforce Best neck fan: Jialexin three-speed neck fan I've been testing consumer technology for more than a decade now, including electric toothbrushes and water flossers for the Filter. Yet, without wanting to shatter the illusion that this makes me uniquely qualified for the task, portable fans are among the easiest things to test. There's little subjectivity involved, as you can measure power, noise, weight and battery life. All you really need is a working hypothalamus and fingers that can manoeuvre buttons – which I have. You also need hot weather, of course, but the Great British Summer has been, if anything, a little too accommodating in that regard. It also helps that my PC can turn my tiny office into an overheated sauna in 20 minutes. Each of the 13 fans I tested was assessed for measures that can be objectively tested. Power was not only measured by active use, but via a dedicated digital anemometer to measure wind speed at the highest and lowest supported speeds. More power equals more volume, so I used a sound measurement app held 15cm from the source to assess the decibel level at high, medium and low speeds. I timed how long it took each fan to empty its battery at the lowest and highest speeds (a test my three cats hated even more than I did, due to the constant noise for hours at a time), and popped each one on the scale to get an idea of portability. I also assessed them for more subjective things. Is the fan nice to hold? Can it be folded for increased portability or hands-free use? Does it look visually appealing? Finally, there's the biggie: price. With portable fans costing between £3 and £100, there's a huge range of options. It's simplistic to suggest that a higher cost automatically equals a better experience, though there is naturally a correlation. Nonetheless, I'm more forgiving of odd quirks in cheap fans than I would be in more expensive ones. There's also the sticky issue of repairability, and the growing waste problem of fast tech. Tough-to-replace lithium-ion batteries were present in all but two of the fans tested, which is far from ideal. With that in mind, I kept an eye on build quality too, hoping to endorse fans that will have a long and productive life before they need to be disposed of (electrical recycling, please – you can find a local spot here). After testing, the fans were either returned to the manufacturer or donated to charity. Here are the six best portable fans from my tests. It may not look that special, but John Lewis's offering is a well-made product at a reasonable price that doesn't put a blade wrong. The handle is a good size for a comfortable grip, and the sage colour my review unit came in is rather stylish. You can also get it in white, light blue or an eye-searing orange if you prefer. Why we love itLooks and build quality aside, the fan provides what you need without fuss. It has three power settings, putting out between 2.5 and 3.7 metres a second (m/s) of wind speed, and the 10cm head covers your whole face at a sensible distance without needing constant adjustment. I measured a peak volume of 62.4dB, which isn't the lowest, but is still quieter than some of the chunkier fans at their lowest levels. The battery lasted more than four hours on its highest setting, which should be sufficient for most journeys, and it can be charged up via a USB-C cable when it's empty. Pleasingly, the handle can also be folded down to make it a handy desktop fan with or without a cable attached. It works well, as long as you have space to keep it close enough to be refreshing. It's a shame that … at 25cm, it's a little on the tall side. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 2.5-3.7m/sMeasured volume: 51.1-62.4dBTested battery life: maximum, 4hrs 11mins; minimum, 9hrs 37minsMeasured weight: 181g Cheap and cheerful, this folding fan may feel a little rough around the edges, but it gets the job done. It's not the cheapest fan I tested, but it proved superior to Dunelm's £3 offering (which dropped to a barely noticeable 0.5m/s power as the AA batteries drained) and beat Superdrug's £5 fan on battery life (a disappointing 45 minutes at maximum and two hours on minimum). Why we love itIt's flimsy, but the fan delivers the basics pretty well. It has three speeds, giving between 2.6 and 3.7m/s of wind speed, while the battery lasted six hours at the lowest setting, and just short of three at its highest. It's a touch noisier than the John Lewis model, maxing out at 64.8dB, but it's more travel-friendly, folding in half for portability and weighing 48g lighter. That folding hinge means you can also use it as a desk fan, if you like, and there's even a small flashlight on the bottom for looking around in the dark (though it's easy to leave this on by mistake). It's a shame that … the build quality isn't all that, with some rough plastic moulding. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 2.6-3.7m/sMeasured volume: 54.3-64.8dBTested battery life: maximum, 2hrs 50mins; minimum, 6hrsMeasured weight: 133g If you want power for a reasonable price, then the Jetforce is the answer. Even at its lowest of five speeds, it narrowly betters the speeds of the two fans above by hitting a breezy 3.8m/s. Why we love itA refreshing breeze even at the lowest settings, but when you're really struggling with the heat, crank it up all the way to level five, and it hits a massive 6.6m/s. In truth, you likely won't need to max it out, and that's just as well because the noise levels really pick up on the higher settings. Starting at an already noisy 66dB, put it all the way up to level five, and it reaches 74.3dB, about the level of a vacuum cleaner – a vacuum cleaner uncomfortably close to your ears. It'll also hit the battery hard: at level 1, you can eke out nearly 11-and-a-half hours, but that drops to 2hrs 37mins on max. Still, if you can cope with the noise or routinely wear headphones, it's a nice option to have in really hot weather. Plus, the flexible head means you can use it as a desk fan, and it has an attachable lanyard so it can be worn around the neck, blasting air upwards. It's a shame that … it gets noisy fast. Power levels: 5Measured air speed: 3.8-6.6m/sMeasured volume: 66-74.3dBTested battery life: maximum, 2hrs 37mins; minimum, 11hrs 25minsMeasured weight: 184g Sign up to The Filter Get the best shopping advice from the Filter team straight to your inbox. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. after newsletter promotion Want something hands-free to keep you cool? A fan worn around the neck does that, while targeting the body's thermoregulation centre, which can, in theory, make you feel cooler. The Jialexin three-speed neck fan certainly delivered that, if you can cope with fans running so close to your ears. Why we love itIt really does make you feel cooler, even if the fans don't appear to be more powerful when compared with regular handheld fans. My anemometer test revealed seemingly low speeds of 1.7 to 2.2m/s, but there are more air sources and, as a result, the cooling effect felt more consistent and less disruptive than a jet of constant air to the face. The downside of this, however, is the noise. While the measured volume of 52 to 64.1dB doesn't sound too bad – around the sound of a busy office – having it this close to your ears for an extended period is tiring, and you do feel a sense of calm when it's switched off again. That said, if you're wearing headphones, it becomes a non-issue. This neck fan is extremely comfortable to wear, and it's more flexible than solid plastic ones, so you can shape it around your neck for more comfortable cooling. That, for me, makes it stand out from its competitors. It's a shame that … by design, neck fans have to be quite close to your ears. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 1.7-2.2m/sMeasured volume range: 52-64.1dBTested battery life: maximum, 3hrs 19mins; minimum, 8hrsMeasured weight: 291g Best for: a multi-function fan If you've got money to burn, then the JisuLife handheld fan Ultra2 is both ridiculously powerful and extremely versatile. Starting with the power, it has 100 different speeds, ranging from 2.8m/s all the way up to 9.8m/s at full blast, with 98 increments in between. The battery is impressive too, lasting well over a day at the lowest speed – though this did drop to 1hr 34mins when running at full blast. I was secretly quite pleased about that, as the 88.8dB volume (similar to a hairdryer) wasn't a particularly fun time for my ears, even from a decent distance away. In truth, that kind of power is uncomfortably like staring down a wind tunnel anyway, and the lower settings are considerably easier on the ears: 59.5dB at level 1, rising to 79.1dB at 50. The high price of entry is made a little easier to swallow, though, since the Ultra 2 brings a few extra features for the money. There are a couple of adapters in the box to turn the fan into an air cushion inflater pump or to help kickstart campfires by pushing in more air. A powerful torch on the back can flick between different lighting modes, including a flashing one to attract attention in an emergency. For those of us allergic to camping, there are more sedate indoor uses. One of the adapters is a dust cleaner, which has removed an unspeakable amount of gunk from my keyboard, and the USB-C charging port is two way, meaning you can steal some of the 9,000mAh battery for your other devices too. It didn't make the final cut because … you could buy 15 Fine Elements fans for the Jisulife's RRP of £95. Power levels: 100; measured air speed: 2.8-9.8m/s; measured volume: 59.5-88.8dB; tested battery life: maximum, 1hr 34mins; minimum, 26hrs 49mins; measured weight: 294g Best for: peace and quiet Take it from someone who's listened to the incessant hum of fans for weeks now: the noise can become grating. If keeping sound to a minimum is your priority, then this VonHaus 3-in-1 fan might be the one for you. At its lowest setting, it registered just 41dB – less than the sound of a fridge humming. At that volume, you're looking at a limited power of 2.7m/s, of course, but you can increase that to 4.3m/s over five incrementally louder settings if you need something more. It's worth noting that by the time you hit maximum, the volume reaches 61.9dB – more comparable with the other fans on test. Overall, it's a well-designed fan: comfortable in the hand, with a stand to put it upright on your desk, including a phone holder at the base if you want to watch something over the fan's whisper. You can even use it as a makeshift neck fan with the detachable lanyard, and the head pointed upwards. This isn't a direct substitute for a neck fan, as it's still aimed at the face, but it's a nice added use case all the same. It didn't make the final cut because … the smaller head doesn't cover quite as much of the face as other models. Power levels: 5; measured air speed: 2.7-4.3m/s; measured volume: 41-61.9dB; tested battery life: maximum, 3hrs 45mins; minimum, 13hrs 20mins; measured weight: 129g Look out for fans with different uses. While the traditional way to use a handheld fan is, of course, in the hand, some models can double as desktop fans, either by folding in half or with a bundled stand. Some even come with a lanyard attachment so they can be worn hands-free around the neck. While power might seem like the key feature, remember this is always a trade-off. Higher fan speeds will make you feel nominally cooler, but will come at the expense of battery life and more subtle noise levels. Neck fans have two advantages over regular handheld fans. The first is that they're entirely hands-free, meaning you can wear them without temporarily losing the use of a hand in the process. The second advantage is that as they target the neck, there's evidence to suggest they may make you feel cooler overall. This is because the thermoregulation centre is at the base of the brain, so a neck fan may make you feel cooler than a regular handheld one, even if your actual body temperature isn't dropping all that much. The downside to this is that the positioning directly below your ears can be a little tiring, given the constant volume (although this is a problem that's easily sidestepped with a pair of headphones). Alan Martin is a writer who has been putting products – including phones, gaming devices and wearables – through their paces for more than a decade. He is constantly tripping over product boxes