How a Fed tour sparked unexpected Trump praise for Powell
Instead, the meeting appeared to signal at least a temporary pause in one of the most contentious periods for the Fed, which has faced near-daily criticism from Trump and his advisers.
Trump has attacked Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell for not lowering interest rates and more recently for cost overruns on the $2.5 billion project. On Thursday, Trump took the unusual step of visiting the Fed in-person, something a sitting president hadn't done in nearly 20 years.
Instead of fireworks, what unfolded was a surprisingly cordial, if sometimes awkward, meeting amid an active construction site, featuring scaffolding, dumpsters and plywood-covered walls and stairs. Trump, wearing a white hard hat alongside Powell, refrained from criticizing the Fed chair, telling reporters he didn't want to make the meeting personal. He later said he wouldn't fire the Fed chair and signaled he wanted the project to proceed.
The visit did not produce the kind of dramatic confrontation seen in the Oval Office when Trump has sparred with foreign leaders, such as South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Trump also departed without any commitments from Powell on lowering interest rates, although Trump tried. And, in a moment that has been widely shared across social media platforms, Powell even publicly corrected Trump on his claims about the project's rising cost.
'I don't think it was as successful as the White House hoped it would be,' said Anne Marie Malecha, chief executive of Dezenhall Resources, a public relations and crisis management firm. 'Powell came off friendly and factual. That doesn't play into the intended narrative of him being the villain.'
By Friday, Trump's tone toward Powell had shifted even further. The president — who has previously derided Powell as a 'moron,' 'numbskull' and 'a stiff' — was complimentary. Speaking to reporters before his trip to Scotland, Trump referred to Powell as a 'very good man.'
'We had a very good meeting,' Trump said. 'He said to me very strongly, the country is doing well. He said, 'Congratulations. The country is doing really well.''
Trump went on to suggest he took Powell's comments as a sign he might soon recommend that the Fed lower interest rates, which trickle through the financial sector to influence what millions of consumers and businesses pay for mortgage, autos and other types of loans.
Thursday's meeting between Powell and Trump came together abruptly. After White House officials declined a Fed offer to allow Trump's aides to tour the building site last Friday, the Fed offered an alternative Thursday. The Fed only learned that Trump himself planned to participate when the White House updated Trump's public schedule shortly after 10 p.m. Wednesday, according to a person familiar with the matter.
While the Fed is not expected to lower rates at its meeting next week, Powell and other top officials have said further cuts are possible later this year, potentially beginning in September — a move that Trump may view as an olive branch.
'The president is still going to be unhappy when the Fed doesn't cut interest rates next week,' said David Wessel, director of the Hutchins Center at the Brookings Institution. 'But in the PR battle, the Fed has fought Trump at least to a draw and may actually have won this round.'
At one point, the tour nearly turned confrontational, with Powell fact-checking the president's assertion that renovation costs had ballooned to $3.1 billion — far above the figure the central bank has cited. Powell shook his head and questioned the source of the figure. Trump pulled out a summary of costs that included another building, which reopened in 2021. He and Powell then pored over the document together.
'You just added in a third building, is what that is,' Powell told Trump. 'It was built five years ago.'
Trump responded that he was referring to 'overall work,' but quickly lightened the exchange when a reporter asked how Powell could stanch the torrent of criticism from the White House.
'Well, I'd love him to lower interest rates,' Trump said, after slapping the Fed chair on the back. 'Other than that, what can I tell you?'
The Fed, for its part, took the opportunity to praise Trump's visit, saying in a statement Friday that it appreciated 'the President's encouragement to complete this important project,' and emphasized its commitment to be 'careful stewards of these resources' as the work continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why nuclear is the center of the stock market's energy trade in 2025
Nuclear energy stocks have been on a tear in 2025. Shares in the space are far outpacing peers in the broader energy sector. AI and support from the Trump White House are big tailwinds for nuclear. Nuclear energy stocks got a big boost this week after US Transportation Secretary and interim NASA administrator Sean Duffy announced plans to expedite a nuclear reactor on the moon. The comments sent stocks such as Oklo, Nucor and Nano Nuclear Energy jumping, with the gains extending into Wednesday's session. But it's more than seemingly one-off comments that's boosting nuclear stocks this year, and the alternative power source has become the hottest energy trade out there in 2025. Nuclear power has come sharply into focus in recent years, with advocates including Tesla CEO Elon Musk and, more recently, the Trump White House. A quick look at the energy sector reveals that nuclear energy is outpacing its peers. The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) is up almost 50% year-to-date, compared to the Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU), which is up 13%, and the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE), which is down about 1% this year. Nuclear energy is riding the AI wave It's hard to examine the growth of nuclear energy stocks in 2025 without talking about the role of nuclear in the AI boom. AI demand has continued to skyrocket as companies have doubled down on capex plans in the space. Dizzying demand for data centers has created an equally enormous need for power. Goldman Sachs predicts that data center power demand will increase 165% by 2030. That's sparked a search for alternative power sources to support the continued growth of data centers and AI. "It was easy and fast to reactivate nuclear reactors to meet the growing demand for clean energy from data centers," said Alexander Lis, chief investment officer at Social Discovery Ventures. "Other energy sources were either less clean, like coal, or longer to build, like wind or solar." Lis added that his firm considers this demand to be sustainable, as "many big tech companies have already announced their plans to use nuclear energy for their data centers." Last September, Constellation Energy said it would reopen Three Mile Island, with Microsoft set to purchase the power power generated by the site. Eric Schiffer, chairman and CEO of The Patriarch Organization and a nuclear energy investor, echoed this sentiment, highlighting the role that it may play in helping the US achieve AI dominance. "China [is] far more equipped right now from an energy platform perspective," he stated. "Nuclear is a critical piece to ensure we're staying at pace. You can't lose this race over an energy constraint." An under-the-radar Trump trade Schiffer and others believe that Trump's focus on AI will benefit nuclear energy stocks in the near term. "The Trump administration's policy priorities to support AI advancement and the unleashing of American innovation has been centered around a deregulation focus and a markets-driven all-of-the-above energy strategy," said Jeff Le, managing principal at consulting firm 100 Mile Strategies. "It includes an audacious goal of quadrupling US nuclear energy capacity to 500 gigawatts by 2050." Le added that Trump's recent executive orders put "nuclear reactor licensing, fuel reprocessing, and domestic production, at the top of its 'Energy Dominance' agenda." The cumulative effect of already soaring demand for power from AI and Trump's turn away from renewables in the search for alternative power sources means nuclear has been a big winner this year. Importantly for investors, Schiffer thinks this bullish period will continue for another 18 months or so. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bank of America juniors will be reassigned — but not fired — if they accept PE jobs
Bank of America joined other firms in asking junior bankers to disclose future job offers. This follows similar policies by JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Citi, and Morgan Stanley. BofA's approach seeks to balance conflict-of-interest concerns with young bankers' ambitions. Bank of America's junior bankers are the latest young cohort on Wall Street to receive new guidance on accepting hush-hush private equity jobs while employed by the bank. The Brian Moynihan-led bank will ask its analysts to disclose whether they have offers for future-dated jobs, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter. The policy was first reported by Bloomberg. It follows similar rules rolled out by JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Citi, and Morgan Stanley in recent weeks, with one big exception: BofA juniors who accept these future-dated job offers will not be terminated but rather reassigned to another area within the bank. A Bank of America spokesperson declined to comment. By contrast, JPMorgan has told juniors that their "employment with the firm will end" if they take offers. Other banks weren't as specific about what would happen if the bankers attest that they indeed have future jobs lined up, which the banks have criticized as a potential conflict of interest. Citi's memo said that anyone with a future-dated job would be assessed on "a case-by-case basis," and Morgan Stanely juniors were told they could face disciplinary action. BofA's approach comes as banks struggle to balance their staffing needs with the career ambitions of young bankers who want to jump to the buy side after their investment banking analyst stints end, usually after two years. The PE industry's habit of filling future analyst classes with junior investment bankers two years in advance has become a major thorn in the side of many investment banks. In the last few years, the recruiting timeline has been pushed up to the point that college grads were secretly interviewing for future-dated PE jobs before they had even officially started their current banking jobs. Many banks have buyout firms as clients, which could lead to conflicts of interest for the bankers working on deals with future employers. "I think that's unethical. I don't like it, and I may eliminate it regardless of what the private-equity guys say," Dimon told college students at Georgetown University last year, adding: "You are already working for somewhere else, and you are dealing with highly confidential information for JPMorgan." This year, JPMorgan's stance seemed to cause a fall of the dominoes. In June, CEO Jamie Dimon blasted the practice. Days later, buyout shops Apollo Global Management, General Atlantic, and later TPG announced they'd hold off on recruiting for 2027 analysts until next year — an unprecedented step. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's July exports top forecasts amid rush to meet Trump tariff deadline
BEIJING (Reuters) -China's exports beat forecasts in July, as manufacturers made the most of a fragile tariff truce between Beijing and Washington to ship goods ahead of a looming deadline later this month. Outbound shipments from the world's second-largest economy rose 7.2% year-on-year in July, customs data showed on Thursday, beating a forecast 5.4% increase in a Reuters poll and June's 4.8% growth. Imports grew 4.1%, following a 1.1% rise in June. Economists had predicted a 1.0% fall. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with the U.S. administration, after Beijing and Washington reached framework agreements in May and June to reduce non-tariff barriers such as rare earth minerals and technology to avoid further escalating their trade war. Without a deal, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. Trump said on Tuesday the U.S. was close to a trade deal with China and that he would meet his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the end of the year if the world's two largest economies could come to an agreement. China's July trade surplus narrowed to $98.24 billion from $114.77 billion in June. Separate data from the U.S. Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis on Tuesday showed the U.S. trade gap with China shrank to its lowest in more than 21 years in June. Chinese government advisers are stepping up calls to make the household sector's contribution to broader economic growth a top priority at Beijing's upcoming five-year policy plan, as trade tensions and deflation threaten the outlook. And top leaders have vowed to step up regulation of aggressive price-cutting by Chinese companies that is pushing prices ever lower. But economists warn that reversing the current deflationary slump will be far more difficult than during the last round of supply-side reforms a decade ago, as the downturn now poses a broader threat to employment, which Chinese leaders have emphasised is a core component of social stability. Reaching an agreement with the United States — and with the European Union, which has accused China of producing and selling goods too cheaply — would give Chinese officials more room to advance their reform agenda. However, analysts expect little relief from Western trade pressures. Export growth is projected to slow sharply in the second half of the year, hurt by persistently high tariffs, President Trump's renewed crackdown on the rerouting of Chinese shipments and deteriorating relations with the EU.
