BBC Says 'Unprecedented Funding Challenge' Lies Ahead As Content Spend Set To Fall By $200M
As we have reported in depth so far this year, the BBC flagged 'co-production partnerships with global streamers and media companies [that] have reduced across the sector' as contributing to the major challenge.
More from Deadline
BBC Veteran Journalist Shares He Asked Bill Clinton Sexual Questions "For A Bet"
Emma Laird To Star In 'Mint'; Cameras Roll On 'Scrapper' Director Charlotte Regan's Family Crime Drama For The BBC
BBC & ZDF Strike High-End Drama Partnership
'Without intervention, it will be difficult to maintain the current ambition and volume of UK content,' said the plan.
The much-publicized drop-off in the American co-pro market has left numerous BBC shows stuck in funding limbo, although today's Annual Plan didn't go into further detail around these shows, which we know includes the likes of its Shuggie Bain adaptation.
The BBC did, however, reveal that its content spend for the coming 12 months will slide by £150M ($200M) to £2.5B. This figure does tend to fluctuate and is often dependent on whether there is a big sporting event coming up in the summer, which there isn't in the next 12 months.
Having forecast a surplus for this year after an enormous £492M deficit last year as part of a 'transformational budget,' the BBC in fact posted another deficit – although a far lower £33M 'due to some delayed transformation costs,' the report said. The BBC's group income will be just over £6B and license fee income is set to rise by around £100M to £3.9B, which is helped by an increase in the annual fee but 'partly offset by a 1% decline in the number of licence fee payers,' according to the plan.
The BBC unsurprisingly raised concerns about future funding challenges but used the plan to passionately argue that it is the premier maker of British content. It cited research that found 16% of UK adults agree that Netflix shows the lives of people in the UK, compared with 64% for the BBC. This comes with Netflix's Adolescence dominating headlines worldwide, with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer saying in the past few minutes that the show about teenage masculinity and the damaging impact of social media 'hit home hard.'
'As viewing shifts to international platforms, consumption of British content is at risk,' said the BBC plan. 'The BBC invests more in original British creativity than anyone else, keeping the UK's creative economy strong and supporting new talent across the sector.'
The BBC said viewing across its TV channels and iPlayer is more than Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ combined, and ahead of YouTube and TikTok combined. Adolescence has topped the UK ratings charts for the past couple of weeks.
The document revealed plans to 'move more creative spend, programming and journalism outside of London to better represent and reflect audiences,' citing upcoming examples like Baby Reindeer creator Richard Gadd's new show Half Man, which is made with HBO.
BBC Commercial, meanwhile, which incorporates BBC Studios, will 'continue to invest in infrastructure, services and content.'
BBC Director General Tim Davie said: 'We are focused on our mission to deliver value for all, through our journalism, our storytelling and our unique ability to bring people together. The UK's creative industry continues to change rapidly, as does the world around us. This plan sets out how the BBC continues to evolve for audiences, both on and off air, but also how we will support and invest in the wider industry.'
Best of Deadline
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
'1923' Season 2 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out?
2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
Fake Labubu dolls knows as 'Lafufus' are serious choking hazards that could kill kids, government warns
The government is urging people to be wary of fake Labubu dolls as the knock-off versions "pose a serious risk of choking and death to young children." The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission sent out an alert warning against "Lafufus," which is what the internet has dubbed the fake version of the popular plush toys sold by PopMart. It warns that the knockoffs "break apart easily, releasing small pieces that can become choking hazards." Investigators with the agency identified shipments of the fakes and requested the seizure of thousands of units due to violation of federal regulations. Peter A. Feldman, the acting commission chairman, said that the fake dolls "have no place in American homes." "No parent should have to wonder if a toy will stop their child from breathing," Feldman said. "Protect your children and buy only from reputable sellers." Labubus are monster-like characters in the form of a plush doll, frequently keychains, that soared in popularity over the summer. The toys often come in a random assortment inside blind boxes, meaning consumers don't know which variation of the toy they have until they open it. People began posting unboxing videos on social media and Labubus were increasingly difficult to get as the little monsters became all the rage. And as authentic Labubu prices went up on the reseller market, fakes also became more widely available. Social media users noted that their "Lafufus" often broke, some with heads or eyes coming off the dolls entirely. The CPSC offered some tips on how to distinguish a fake from a genuine Labubu toy. One obvious feature is that a real Labubu has a holographic Pop Mart sticker and newer versions of the plushies have a UV stamp on one foot.
CNBC
a minute ago
- CNBC
How retail accounting could distort profitability as tariffs take effect
As more tariffs take effect on goods imported into the U.S., a specific accounting method could have major implications for how American retailers calculate the impact. A tariff adds to the cost of an imported item when it's received and paid for when it crosses a border. While there's debate over who pays that tariff — the manufacturer, the retailer, the consumer or some combination — the hit will likely show up in retailers' bottom lines. But a specific accounting practice, called retail inventory method accounting, or RIM, can make profitability appear stronger than it is in the short term. "Retail inventory method accounting (RIM) is less responsive to initial product cost changes compared to cost accounting, and can initially overstate profitability," said Ali Furman, PwC U.S. consumer markets industry leader. "This would normalize once tariffs stabilize, depending on how much of the cost retailers absorb." Because RIM uses an average cost-to-retail price ratio across a broad group of items, rather than the actual cost of every item, like in cost accounting, RIM does not entirely capture the immediate impact of rising costs. Nearly a quarter of U.S. retailers use the retail inventory method of accounting, according to PwC. Walmart, Target and Home Depot are among them. All three retailers report quarterly earnings this week, and their results may not fully show how tariffs have cut into their profitability so far. Take Walmart, the largest U.S. retailer, which will post fiscal second-quarter earnings Thursday. TD Cowen analyst Oliver Chen estimated about half of Walmart's quarter will include the impact of levies, as the company brought in inventory at different cost levels before and after new tariff rates took effect. That could temporarily distort gross margin profitability, Chen said. Walmart's accounting has in part informed its strategy in recent months as it navigates President Donald Trump's unpredictable tariff policy. A week after Trump's April 2 announcement of so-called "reciprocal tariffs" on a wide swath of trade partners, Walmart withdrew its guidance for operating income in its first fiscal quarter. However, the company maintained its annual forecast, citing in part the influence of RIM accounting. Then when it reported its fiscal first-quarter earnings in May, Walmart said it would mitigate higher costs as much as possible, but would likely have to increase some prices at the current tariff rates. In response, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that Walmart should "just eat" the tariffs. Doing so could actually benefit a retailer's bottom line, at least initially, according to Furman. "The more costs retailers absorb in retail accounting, the greater the risk of overstating profitability during periods of increasing costs, such as tariff increases," she said. Walmart management briefed Trump this spring about the impact its accounting method may have on results in a high-tariff environment, according to a person familiar with the discussion, who asked to remain unnamed while speaking about private conversations. Still, James Bowie, managing director in EY's technical accounting advisory group, warned "all of the inventory costing methodologies will be affected in some ways." It typically takes a large, non-fast fashion retailer using RIM roughly two to four quarters for cost volatility to settle and profitability to get closer to its true level, according to PwC. The method could make profitability look higher initially, then lower in a subsequent quarter, before it has time to stabilize. "It's kind of like you've got a speed boat on the price," he said. "I can turn pretty quickly, but I've got a cruise liner that is carrying all my average of my inventory. It takes a little longer for it to turn and so even though they might ultimately be able to go the same speed, it takes a little bit of time for that one turn to take place." While RIM is more likely to lead to a temporary overstating of profitability, it can also wind up understanding profits if tariffs are negotiated lower. Bowie said if a retailer responds to lower tariff rates by cutting retail prices, under RIM accounting, "it looks like my margin has eroded, but it's only because I now am waiting for the cost relationship to catch back up, so [it] might look like there's margin compression even in a period of decreasing tariffs." Furman added that PwC is seeing "a clear disconnect" for companies that use RIM accounting. "Companies might be doing all the right things: navigating sourcing challenges, managing suppliers, and even mitigating tariffs," she said. "But, those efforts often aren't reflected in the financials. That misalignment between operational execution and reporting for those using RIM is exacerbating the challenges retailers face." The retail inventory method of accounting is an older method that was most useful for retailers when they had many items from a range of categories without an easy, or technological, way to track inventory. "Inventory accounting methods existed before this thing called Excel," said Bowie. "[A retailer] had an abacus and a dream trying to figure out what you're going to do." Over time, technology made it easy to use actual costs rather than averages, so cost accounting became more common. As retailers grow and accounting methods become ingrained, it's difficult, though not impossible, to switch tactics. Macy's and Nordstrom recently made the change to cost accounting. PwC said it takes an average of two to three years to make the transition from one accounting method to another and can require millions of dollars and a restatement of previous years' financials to provide apples-to-apples comparisons. Still, the accounting firm said about half of retailers that use RIM have considered switching. CNBC worked with PwC's Furman and Suni Shamapande, the firm's U.S. retail customer experience and operations leader, to develop a simplified example demonstrating the difference between RIM and weighted average cost accounting in how they affect gross profit margins. The example demonstrates how RIM accounting can "overstate" true profitability at a moment in time when costs increase quickly. For the purposes of this example, PwC and CNBC used weighted average cost accounting, which takes a SKU-level weight average and blends all costs together, regardless of purchase date. A SKU is a stock-keeping unit, which retailers use to track inventory of specific items. Base case: No tariffs The base case, which does not include tariffs, uses three different T-shirts types from three different countries. Each type of T-shirt, or individual SKU, has a different cost and is sold to consumers at a different retail price. The retailer bought each type of T-shirt in different quantities, as did consumers. Here's how the math differs to start. The gross profit margin for the items calculated using weighted average cost accounting is 46%. Using RIM, it's 53%. Tariff case 1: Retailer's costs increase, all else remains the same If the retailer's cost for each T-shirt goes up as a result of tariffs, but everything else — units bought, units sold and retail price — remains the same, gross margin falls if calculated using cost accounting and RIM. But it would still be higher under RIM than if the company used cost accounting. Here's the math for our simplified example: Tariff case 2: Retailer raises prices to offset higher costs If the retailer passes on the full dollar value of the tariff cost to the customer, and units bought and sold stay the same, gross margin improves under both accounting methods. In our example, it goes to 36% in cost accounting and 47% with RIM. Both gross margin percentages are lower than the base case, which assumes no tariffs, but the percentage change is smaller under RIM than under cost accounting. Tariff case 3: Retailer raises prices and units bought and sold both fall Here's where it gets interesting, and likely more realistic, to reflect supply and demand choices a retailer and consumer would likely make as costs rise. If the retailer passes on the full dollar value of tariffs to the customer and also sells fewer items to consumers at the higher retail price, RIM makes profit margins look temporarily rosier. Gross margin in our example falls to 27% under cost accounting, but holds steady under RIM at 47% even though units sold have changed. Here's where you see how the ratio of cost of goods sold to selling price hasn't had time to adjust.
Business Insider
a minute ago
- Business Insider
I tried the viral Elroel foundation stick — it takes a minute to blend, but it turns from clown white into my skin tone
Every so often, a beauty product goes viral for all the right reasons — and recently, the Elroel Blanc Cover Cream Stick, an innovative color-changing foundation from Korea, has been making the rounds on TikTok and Instagram. Almost magically, its stark-white pigment blends away to match the wearer's skin tone virtually perfectly. While it may seem that the white, almost chalk-like consistency would be too thick or caky for everyday wear, the result seems to be ultra-glowy skin with beautiful, non-patchy coverage and a scarily accurate color match. In other words: the internet's glam-loving girls are going positively feral. Here, I set out to see if the unique foundation stick is worth the hype (or if it's instead a gimmick that's simply too good to be true). It costs $27 on Amazon and comes in six adaptable shades Olivia Rose Rushing/Business Insider The buzzy foundation stick comes in six adaptable shades, from their lightest "200 Fair" to the darkest "205 Deep." As is true with many Korean cosmetic brands, the shade range doesn't encompass as many hues as American ones (think Fenty Beauty's industry-shifting fifty foundation hues). Because of this, I'm unsure if this will work for those with the deepest complexions. I ordered shade "201 Fair." When I first opened the box, I loved how simple and sleek the packaging was. What's more, the ultra-soft built-in brush actually felt like something I would use — especially when traveling with makeup. Upon my first application, the product felt a lot creamier on my skin than expected. I immediately disliked its powdery floral scent — which thankfully doesn't come from any added perfume — it's more likely due to the jasmine and evening primrose oils. Still, the heavy fragrance is my least favorite aspect of the formula. Before and after blending out the color-changing foundation Just like the viral TikTok videos, I couldn't believe how intensely stark white the color was swatched against my complexion (and I'm quite fair to begin with). That being said, it started to blend away relatively effortlessly, slowly but surely revealing an impressive color match that's hard to find in a foundation. While I initially thought that the built-in brush would be a major win, I did find that it took much longer than I prefer to spend blending my base makeup. Because of that, I probably wouldn't use it again, unless I was traveling or in a pinch as it did a good enough job. It matched my skin tone beautifully, but I just can't get past the scent It goes without saying that the color match is almost exact, and with a surprising amount of coverage that doesn't require you to layer more swipes of foundation. And as many have noted online, the final result is a soft-matte finish with a pretty glow that appears healthy and nourished thanks to efficacious ingredients like niacinamide. In that regard: I totally understand the hype. I also loved how this foundation worked well with my current product lineup, like my go-to cream-to-powder blush that's coloring my cheeks. Though honestly, despite its light finish, it was weighed down by the lingering powdery jasmine aroma. The bottom line The Elroel foundation stick does exactly what it promises: it swipes on white, blends into skin for a wow-worthy color match, and leaves you looking youthfully dewy. It never made my skin look too textured or caky, and overall, the formula is lightweight and wears well throughout the day. That said, my main gripes are the limited shade range — especially for those with darker skin tones — and the scent, which is a personal preference but important to note. Because of that, it hasn't replaced my current foundation, though it might just end up being someone else's new holy grail.
