‘Miracle' Air India survivor haunted by nightmares and guilt
Ramesh, 40, a British citizen seated in 11A during the ill-fated flight, escaped with cuts to his face and minor chest injuries. Despite the physical recovery, he remains deeply tormented, carrying what relatives describe as an overwhelming sense of survivor's guilt.
Dubbed the 'miracle man' and 'God's child' by Indian media, Ramesh has become a symbol of hope. However, his recovery has been overshadowed by grief. His cousin Krunal Keshave, 24, from Leicester, shared: 'He sleeps but not properly. When he does, he dreams he's on the flight again—he saw everyone die in front of him.'
The crash, which occurred when the Boeing 787 Dreamliner plummeted shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad and burst into flames upon hitting a residential building, killed 241 of the 242 people on board, including 52 British nationals. Ramesh's brother, Ajay, 35, was among the victims.
The brothers had been running a fishing business in Diu, India, returning to the UK during the off-season. Ramesh, still visibly shaken, told The Sun: 'It's a miracle I survived. I'm OK physically, but I feel terrible that I couldn't save Ajay.'
The two had tried booking seats together but were forced to sit separately in row 11. 'If we had sat together, maybe we both would've survived,' Ramesh said. 'But I lost my brother right in front of my eyes. I keep thinking—why couldn't I save him?'
Ramesh was seated near an emergency exit and managed to crawl through a gap in the wrecked fuselage. He even tried to re-enter the burning wreckage to save Ajay. Emergency responder Satinder Singh Sandhu recounted: 'He was disoriented and covered in blood. He kept telling us, 'My brother is in there, burning—I have to save him.''
Ramesh later carried his brother's coffin during the funeral in Gujarat, where he broke down in tears and had to be escorted away.
One relative said, 'He feels guilty for being the only one who lived. That's a lot to carry.'
Evaluation of the crash has since shifted focus to possible human error in the cockpit. A preliminary investigation suggests that Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, may have inadvertently triggered engine failure by switching off two key fuel-related switches, despite his calm demeanor during the incident. First Officer Clive Kunder, 32, who was piloting the aircraft at the time, reportedly panicked as the engines lost power.
According to sources familiar with the U.S. probe, the cockpit voice recorder captured a brief exchange in which one pilot questioned the other's actions regarding the switches, with both denying responsibility. The switches were flipped off a second apart, then reactivated ten seconds later—too late to avert disaster.
Air India, in a statement, said it 'stands in solidarity with the families and those affected by the AI171 accident' and pledged full cooperation with the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) and other authorities involved in the investigation.
As the probe continues, Ramesh remains a living reminder of the human cost of the tragedy—a man burdened not only by survival but by the haunting loss of his brother and the lives of hundreds more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab Times
3 days ago
- Arab Times
‘Miracle' Air India survivor haunted by nightmares and guilt
LONDON, July 20: Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, the only survivor of the devastating Air India Flight AI171 crash, is struggling to cope with the psychological aftermath of the tragedy that claimed 241 lives, including that of his brother. His family says he suffers recurring nightmares in which he relives the moment of impact and sees 'everyone die.' Ramesh, 40, a British citizen seated in 11A during the ill-fated flight, escaped with cuts to his face and minor chest injuries. Despite the physical recovery, he remains deeply tormented, carrying what relatives describe as an overwhelming sense of survivor's guilt. Dubbed the 'miracle man' and 'God's child' by Indian media, Ramesh has become a symbol of hope. However, his recovery has been overshadowed by grief. His cousin Krunal Keshave, 24, from Leicester, shared: 'He sleeps but not properly. When he does, he dreams he's on the flight again—he saw everyone die in front of him.' The crash, which occurred when the Boeing 787 Dreamliner plummeted shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad and burst into flames upon hitting a residential building, killed 241 of the 242 people on board, including 52 British nationals. Ramesh's brother, Ajay, 35, was among the victims. The brothers had been running a fishing business in Diu, India, returning to the UK during the off-season. Ramesh, still visibly shaken, told The Sun: 'It's a miracle I survived. I'm OK physically, but I feel terrible that I couldn't save Ajay.' The two had tried booking seats together but were forced to sit separately in row 11. 'If we had sat together, maybe we both would've survived,' Ramesh said. 'But I lost my brother right in front of my eyes. I keep thinking—why couldn't I save him?' Ramesh was seated near an emergency exit and managed to crawl through a gap in the wrecked fuselage. He even tried to re-enter the burning wreckage to save Ajay. Emergency responder Satinder Singh Sandhu recounted: 'He was disoriented and covered in blood. He kept telling us, 'My brother is in there, burning—I have to save him.'' Ramesh later carried his brother's coffin during the funeral in Gujarat, where he broke down in tears and had to be escorted away. One relative said, 'He feels guilty for being the only one who lived. That's a lot to carry.' Evaluation of the crash has since shifted focus to possible human error in the cockpit. A preliminary investigation suggests that Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, may have inadvertently triggered engine failure by switching off two key fuel-related switches, despite his calm demeanor during the incident. First Officer Clive Kunder, 32, who was piloting the aircraft at the time, reportedly panicked as the engines lost power. According to sources familiar with the U.S. probe, the cockpit voice recorder captured a brief exchange in which one pilot questioned the other's actions regarding the switches, with both denying responsibility. The switches were flipped off a second apart, then reactivated ten seconds later—too late to avert disaster. Air India, in a statement, said it 'stands in solidarity with the families and those affected by the AI171 accident' and pledged full cooperation with the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) and other authorities involved in the investigation. As the probe continues, Ramesh remains a living reminder of the human cost of the tragedy—a man burdened not only by survival but by the haunting loss of his brother and the lives of hundreds more.
Kuwait Times
4 days ago
- Kuwait Times
UK ‘princes in the tower' murder probe clears Richard III
It is one of history's most intriguing 'murders' -- the mysterious disappearance over five centuries ago of two young princes from the Tower of London. Nearly 200 years after they disappeared, two small skeletons were found in a wooden box at the historic tower and reburied at Westminster Abbey. The remains were believed, but never proved, to be those of the two brothers -- heir to the throne Edward, 12, and Richard, nine, the sons of King Edward IV of England, who were reputedly murdered at the behest of their uncle, Richard Duke of Gloucester. William Shakespeare later immortalized him in Richard III as a scheming hunchback who did away with his royal nephews so he could take the crown himself, sealing his reputation as a child killer. Now British author Philippa Langley, who helped unearth Richard's body from a central England carpark in 2012, has claimed that the princes -- far from being killed -- actually survived. The elder prince, Edward, was heir to the throne at the time of his disappearance and would have ruled as King Edward V of England. Langley decided to delve into the mystery after coming to believe that the conventional narrative in which Richard had the young princes killed smacked of 'history being written by the victors'. She was finally spurred into action after reading an article about Richard's reburial at Leicester Cathedral in 2015 which questioned whether the nation should honor a 'child killer'. 'I think I'd always realized that the story sort of developed during the reign of the Tudors,' she said, adding that it was then 'repeated and repeated over time' until it became 'truth and fact'. An undated handout picture released on February 4, 2013 from the University of Leicester shows the skeleton of king Richard III found at the Grey Friars Church excavation site in Leicester. --AFP photos An Uber boat passes The Tower of London on The River Thames under a cloudy sky in London. Tudor mud The last English king to die in battle, Richard ruled from 1483 until his brutal death at the Battle of Bosworth near Leicester in 1485, aged 32. Bosworth was the last major conflict in the Wars of the Roses and changed the course of English history because the Tudor dynasty of Henry VII captured the crown from Richard's Plantagenets. Langley attributes the accepted story that Richard had the boys murdered to King Henry VII, a 'very, very intelligent individual, but suspicious and highly paranoid'. 'He had a massive spy network working for him. And he was able to completely control the narrative,' she said, adding that Richard ended up 'covered in Tudor mud'. Taking a cold case review approach to the historical 'whodunnit', Langley says she assembled a group of investigative specialists, including police and lawyers, to advise her. 'They said: 'Look, if you haven't got any confirmed, identified bodies, then it has to be a missing persons investigation and you have to follow that methodology'. 'They said: 'You have to actively look for evidence'. That's when it really started to get interesting.' Langley put out an appeal for volunteers to scour archives, only to be inundated with offers of help from people ranging from ordinary citizens to medieval historians. The result was the decade-long Missing Princes Project which she says unearthed a significant amount of information pointing to the survival of both young princes. Survival theory Langley now believes that it is up to Richard's detractors to disprove the survival thesis, which she outlines in the new book 'The Princes in the Tower: Solving History's Greatest Cold Case'. 'The onus is now on them to find the evidence that the boys died. 'They cannot say Richard III murdered the princes in the tower any more because we found numerous proofs of life everywhere,' she said. Key to Langley's conviction that both boys survived are documents discovered supporting a rebellion by 'Edward IV's son'. During the rebellion in 1487, Lambert Simnel, a pretender to the throne who came forward after Richard's death, was crowned in Dublin. According to fresh references found by the project, the boy was 'called' or said to be 'a son of King Edward', which she believes points to Simnel being the elder prince, son of Edward IV. The reaction to Langley's research has been mixed. Michael Dobson, director and a professor of Shakespeare studies at the University of Birmingham's Shakespeare Institute, expressed scepticism. 'Given the ways of dynastic monarchy, I think Richard would have been taking a very big risk in leaving those princes alive,' he said. 'The chances of their having accidentally gone missing while incarcerated on his orders in the Tower of London seem pretty remote.' — AFP
Arab Times
5 days ago
- Arab Times
Fuel Cutoff Mystery: Is the Truth About Air India's Crash Being Covered Up?
MUMBAI, July 18: The captain of Air India Flight 171, which crashed shortly after takeoff in Ahmedabad last month, killing 241 of the 242 people on board, reportedly handed control of the aircraft to his first officer seconds before the disaster, according to information retrieved from the flight's black boxes. Sources familiar with the cockpit voice recordings told Italy's Corriere della Sera that Captain Sumeet Sabharwal told First Officer Clive Kunder, 'The plane is in your hands,' moments before the plane left the runway. While it is not uncommon for a first officer to pilot a flight during takeoff, aviation experts have questioned the timing and circumstances of the handover. Flight data shows the aircraft took off at 1:38pm and remained airborne for just 30 seconds before it lost power and crashed into a residential area, killing 19 people on the ground. The sole survivor on board remains in critical condition. Investigators say the plane's engines lost thrust shortly after takeoff, and that the fuel control switches—critical to maintaining engine power—had been moved from the 'run' position to 'cutoff' within seconds of liftoff. According to India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), both switches were turned off and then switched back on about ten seconds later, but not in time to prevent the crash. The AAIB's preliminary report, released last week, confirmed that no mechanical or maintenance faults were found on the aircraft. However, the cause of the fuel cutoff remains under investigation. The switches are designed with safety locks that require manual lifting to operate, making an accidental flip highly unlikely. Cockpit audio captured in the seconds before the crash suggests rising tension between the two pilots. According to sources briefed on the U.S. assessment of the recordings, First Officer Kunder can be heard repeatedly asking, 'Why did you shut off the engines?' to which the senior pilot vaguely replied, 'I didn't do it.' The exchange, lasting six seconds, has been interpreted by some officials as an indirect admission that the captain may have cut the fuel supply. Flight data further reveals that after the aircraft reached approximately 650 feet, a backup power system—known as the Ram Air Turbine (RAT)—deployed, indicating both engines had lost power. Although the fuel switches were returned to 'run' and the engines attempted to restart, the aircraft lacked the altitude and time to recover. The jet clipped treetops and a chimney before crashing into a nearby medical college, erupting in flames. Aviation experts remain baffled by the switch movement. 'It's absolutely bizarre for the engine cutoff switches to be flipped just after takeoff,' said Terry Tozer, a former airline pilot, speaking to Sky News. 'Unfortunately, the altitude was so low that the engines didn't have time to recover.' The AAIB has yet to identify which pilot flipped the switches, and cockpit audio alone has not definitively clarified the roles each pilot played in the final moments. U.S. officials reviewing the early data believe that as the flying pilot, First Officer Kunder would likely have had both hands on the Dreamliner's controls, suggesting Captain Sabharwal may have been responsible for manipulating the switches. Captain Sabharwal had logged over 15,000 hours of flight time, while Kunder had 3,400. According to colleagues cited in Indian media, Sabharwal had recently taken bereavement leave following his mother's death but had been medically cleared to fly. Some sources have raised questions regarding the mental health history of one of the pilots. Captain Mohan Ranganathan, a prominent Indian aviation safety expert, told The Daily Telegraph that one pilot had previously taken extended medical leave for mental health reasons. However, this has not been confirmed by the authorities, and Air India maintains both pilots were fully certified for duty. India's Civil Aviation Minister, Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu, has urged the public to avoid premature conclusions. 'Let us wait for the final report,' he told reporters. Air India CEO Campbell Wilson echoed that message in an internal memo, stating that while the preliminary report found no mechanical issues, further investigation is required to determine the human factors involved. In response to the crash, Indian aviation authorities have ordered comprehensive checks across Air India's Boeing 787 Dreamliner fleet. The airline operates 33 of the aircraft. The AAIB has not issued any immediate safety recommendations to Boeing or the engine manufacturer, General Electric. The agency criticised elements of the international media for 'selective and unverified reporting,' stating that the investigation remains ongoing and that drawing conclusions at this stage is premature. The final report into the crash is expected within 12 months, in line with international aviation standards.
