Netflix Is at Risk of Earnings Letdown After $250 Billion Rally
Expectations have been building around a second-half slate of blockbuster sequels, including the highly anticipated Stranger Things. The stock price has nearly doubled over the past year, adding about $250 billion in market value and lifting its price-to-estimated earnings ratio to 43 times, well above the Nasdaq 100 at 27 times. The firm is due to report second-quarter results Thursday after US markets close.
'Netflix shares are priced for perfection, there isn't a lot of room for error,' said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust Co. 'Everybody is expecting the second half to be really strong.'
In recent years, Netflix has refined its business model after subscriber additions stalled as stay-at-home measures eased following the pandemic. It now has multiple levers to pull, including advertising sales, subscription price increases and the addition of live events like sports and concerts.
The streaming giant has stopped reporting quarterly subscriber numbers this fiscal year, a key metric that had long been the primary way Wall Street evaluated the company's performance. In its absence investors are more focused on revenue and profit forecasts.
Wall Street is anticipating third-quarter earnings per share of $6.70 on revenue of $11.3 billion, according to the average of analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg. That would be an increase of 24% and 15%, respectively, from the same period a year ago.
There may be disappointment if the company fails to raise its full-year sales forecast of $43.5 billion to $44.5 billion, after not doing so following strong first-quarter results in April, according to Rosenblatt Securities Inc. analyst Barton Crockett. He also cited the risk that Netflix could fall prey to changing viewership habits, with 'a rising narrative' of the firm potentially losing leadership in US streaming to Alphabet Inc.'s YouTube.
'While Netflix is dismissive of YouTube as a feeder ground for content talent Netflix can poach, we see a generational change in consumer preferences that could over time prove a headwind,' Crockett wrote.
Analysts acknowledge that a lot of the stock's multiple bakes in the buzz surrounding its highly-anticipated content — which also includes a new Wednesday series and Adam Sandler starring in Happy Gilmore 2.
'We believe that plenty of the long-term opportunity set is factored into the shares at this price,' wrote Seaport Research Partners analyst David Joyce in a note cutting the rating on Netflix to neutral from buy this month. 'The company needs time to execute against the expectations in advertising, aggregating, launching experiences, and expanding share again.'
Options data indicate that the stock is set to rise or fall by about 6.5% the day after results, less than the 9.3% average move following earnings. That would be the smallest swing in at least three years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Still, there is plenty of optimism ahead of the release. BofA Securities Inc. analysts led by Jessica Reif Ehrlich said that Netflix is well-positioned given its 'unmatched scale in streaming, further runway for subscriber growth, significant opportunities in advertising and sports/live and continued earnings and FCF (free cash flow) growth.'
More than two-thirds of analysts covering the streaming platform have a buy-equivalent rating on the stock, while revenue growth is expected range from 14% to 16% for the next three quarters, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
With no direct exposure to tariff uncertainty or China-related risks, the stock is 'incredibly positioned, even compared to many of the Magnificent Seven,' Kenneth Leon, director at CFRA Research, said in an interview.
--With assistance from Christian Dass.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Crazy Vacancies' Force Boston Landlords to Fight Valuations
(Bloomberg) -- Kambiz Shahbazi says the value of his four Boston office buildings has tumbled because of the damage inflicted on the market by Covid-19 and the resulting exodus by tenants. Boston has already lowered the assessed value of the collected properties over the past two years by about 12%, but Shahbazi says that doesn't come close to reflecting the true declines. So he's filed challenges to the city's assessments in the hope he can ultimately lower his tax bills on the properties. For at least one, he says the value should be discounted by about 50%. He's far from alone as Boston landlords struggle with empty offices and high financing costs that make it difficult to upgrade or convert buildings to residential. Owners have challenged assessed values for 388 commercial buildings in the district that includes downtown Boston this year, according to city data obtained through a public records request. That's an 83% jump from 2024 and the highest number of requests since at least 2020. It's a worrying sign for the city, which is already struggling with strained finances and relies on property taxes for almost three-quarters of its $4.8 billion budget. 'The values have been decimated,' Shahbazi, founder of KS Partners said of the city's buildings, describing 'crazy vacancies' for so-called Class B and C buildings. 'It might take a long time, and the city might just have no option other than to fight their way and stall, but at some point they're going to have to reckon with this debacle,' he said. Boston is more reliant than most US cities on commercial property taxes. In the years leading up to Covid, its finances flourished thanks to rising property values and booming real estate development, but those values have tumbled as office vacancies still exceed 20% and workers have been slow to return to the downtown. Boston's office buildings stand to lose almost 50% of their value over the next half-decade, according to an analysis by Tufts University's Center for State Policy Analysis and the nonprofit Boston Policy Institute. That decline could cost as much as $1.7 billion in tax revenue over that span. The city's assessing officials seek to minimize year-to-year swings during both booms and busts in order to stabilize the budget, said Evan Horowitz, the Tufts state policy center's executive director. But with real-world office values sinking so rapidly, landlords have run out of patience and are now trying to 'speed things up' through the challenges to the city, he said. Officials lowered commercial property values by just 3% citywide in the fiscal year that ended in June, the first time they had decreased since 2020. As of mid-July, officials had granted only 11 of the 388 abatement applications in the downtown area, mostly for small properties, records show. A Shahbazi property is one of the few to win an abatement: The city agreed to take nearly $2 million off its initial $14.2 million assessment for an 11-story Court Square office building that Shahbazi says is about two-thirds empty. Landlords can appeal the city's decision to the state Appellate Tax Board. The owners of a handful of Boston's largest office buildings are awaiting rulings based on appeals made in prior years. Those decisions could set a precedent for similar properties post-pandemic. Business groups have clashed with Mayor Michelle Wu over her handling of property taxes. The Pioneer New England Legal Foundation, a law firm that counts some of Boston's best-known corporate lawyers as board members, has accused her administration of illegally increasing the property assessments of owners with appeals before the state board, forcing them to pay more in taxes. The foundation petitioned the Massachusetts Department of Revenue to launch an investigation, but the agency's leader responded last week that his staff was 'unable to substantiate' the claims. Frank Bailey, a former federal judge who leads the foundation, said in an interview that the organization is considering a lawsuit to challenge the practice. A spokesperson for the Wu administration called the claims 'baseless and full of misinformation,' saying that the process is guided by state law and that the city has used it for decades. Josh Kraft, a nonprofit leader who's challenging Wu in this year's mayoral race, called Pioneer's allegations 'serious and credible' at a press conference outside City Hall on Thursday. If property owners bring the city to court and win refunds on hundreds of millions of dollars in overpaid taxes, 'it will be a massive blow to Boston's finances,' Kraft said. 'Right now, it looks like the mayor is using her office to punish property owners for exercising their rights under the law,' said Kraft, the son of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft. Last year, Wu sought to temporarily raise commercial property taxes in order to limit an increase for homeowners, but failed to obtain the approval she needed from state lawmakers before tax bills were mailed to residents. She is making the same push this year. 'I'm at a different neighborhood association or event multiple times a day where this comes up, that people are feeling the pressure of property taxes making it difficult for them to stay in their homes,' Wu said in a recent interview at Bloomberg's Boston office. The mayor has sought to revitalize downtown Boston by giving out grants to retailers to fill vacant storefronts and offering tax incentives to turn empty office buildings into apartments and condos. She also proposed rezoning downtown to allow for more towers in a bid to create more housing in the neighborhood. Josh Kraft has opposed Wu's proposal to shift more of the tax burden onto commercial landlords. He has floated plans to create a cluster of new businesses in the neighborhood and invite Boston's largest universities to invest more in the city center. A revived downtown would help prop up property values and advance the revenue Boston collects from those levies. Amid a budget crunch caused by dwindling pandemic aid and a softer economy, those dollars are even more important after the Trump administration cut research funding to the lifeblood of Boston's economy — health care and higher education. (Updates with Josh Kraft comments in 16th paragraph.) More stories like this are available on
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Junior Bankers Win Up to 30% Pay Hikes in Hong Kong Deals Boom
(Bloomberg) -- Citic Securities Ltd. and other Chinese brokers are raising pay levels again for junior bankers in Hong Kong to boost retention and handle a jump in dealmaking, according to people familiar with the moves. China's biggest broker is raising pay at its Hong Kong CLSA unit, giving 15% to 30% bumps to about HK$75,000 ($9,600) to HK$80,000 a month to select junior associates, the people said, asking not to be identified because they aren't authorized to discuss compensation. The raises don't apply across the board, one of the people said. Pay is now back at 2022 levels, but still below what first- to third-year associates earned in 2021, when deal activity hit multi-decade highs, one of the people said. China Merchants Bank Co.'s Hong Kong arm, CMB International, has also lifted pay to similar levels for juniors, while a number of other firms are considering raises to follow suit amid rising competition for talent, according to people familiar with the matter. The increases and planned bumps mark a stark turnaround after pay was lowered over the past few years and bonuses and perks were gutted, especially on the mainland, amid a political shift to rein in private enterprise. Bankers in particular were singled out by the ruling Communist Party as leading 'hedonistic' lifestyles, leading firms to also take a cautious approach in Hong Kong. Now dealmaking is flourishing in Hong Kong, mainly driven by the listing of mainland Chinese companies, triggering moves between brokers and demand for bankers. Stock markets are also staging a comeback on the Chinese mainland, even as the property market remains in crisis and the economy has struggled to revive. A Hong Kong-based spokeswoman at Citic declined to comment. CMBI wasn't immediately able to comment. Since late 2022, investment banks and brokerages have made multiple rounds of staff cuts as dealmaking dried up, China's economy faltered on deflation and property woes, and Beijing tightened oversight of the private sector. That has turned around over the past 12 months. Hong Kong saw a net increase of some 1,200 licensed financial professionals, driving the total number to almost 42,500 by the end of June, according to Securities and Futures Commission data compiled by Bloomberg. Citic Securities (Hong Kong), along with CLSA, led the growth in licensed financiers versus a year ago with about 300 additions. CMBI and Huatai Financial Holdings (Hong Kong) Ltd. also added about 70 individuals each, according to SFC data. --With assistance from Jinshan Hong. More stories like this are available on
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Are OpenAI, Google, Meta plotting to take down state AI regulations?
US AI regulation 2025 : Tech giants including OpenAI, Meta, and Google are stepping up efforts to block US states from regulating their rapidly growing artificial intelligence businesses, as per a report. Tech Giants Push Back Against State-Level AI Regulations These companies are lobbying both the White House and Republican-led Congress, after five states, including Texas, Colorado, California, Tennessee and New York passed significant AI-related laws, as reported by Bloomberg. Kouri Marshall, director of state government relations with tech trade group Chamber of Progress, pointed out that, 'Lawmakers should be inviting innovation, not driving it away from the state,' as quoted in the Bloomberg report. The group has major players like Andreessen Horowitz, Google, Apple, and Amazon among its members, according to the report. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Replace Your Entire Roof in as Little as 1 Day! Metal Roofing Innovations Learn More Undo ALSO READ: Kamala Harris' '107 Days' book tour: Dates, cities, what to expect and when to get tickets AI Companies Prefer Regulating AI Use Over Development While many of the new state AI regulations have yet to take full effect, industry advocates want to shift the focus away from regulating how AI is developed and instead concentrate on how AI is actually used by consumers and businesses, as per the Bloomberg report. After all, the companies that make early AI breakthroughs stand to gain trillions of dollars in market value, as reported by Bloomberg. Live Events Matt Perault, head of artificial intelligence policy at Andreessen Horowitz, highlighted that, 'My hope is the focus moves away from trying to regulate development to regulating use' by individual customers, as quoted in the report. ALSO READ: Can ChatGPT help you get out of debt? What experts and users say about AI chatbots' financial advice Donald Trump's AI Strategy Signals Opposition to Strict State AI Laws In June, Republicans in Congress unsuccessfully tried to attach a 10-year ban on enforcing state AI regulations to US president Donald Trump's tax legislation, according to the Bloomberg report. Although that effort failed, tech companies successfully influenced White House advisers to version of the federal moratorium on state regulation in Trump's AI plan released in July, as per the report. That plan gives non-binding guidance to federal agencies, which includes a directive that AI-related federal funding should not go to states with 'unduly restrictive' AI regulation, as reported by Bloomberg. While, industry lobbyists say companies are pushing again to attach the 10-year ban on state regulations to upcoming legislation, according to the report. ALSO READ: After billion-dollar hirings, Zuckerberg slams brakes on Meta's AI hiring spree as bubble fears shake Silicon Valley Federal AI Legislation Remains Stalled As AI technology increasingly takes on complex roles, such as screening job applications, identifying criminal suspects, processing medical claims, and creating realistic AI images, state lawmakers want to set some rules of the road, as reported by Bloomberg. However, federal AI legislation remains stalled due to political disagreements and opposition from tech-friendly lawmakers, according to the report. States Propose Audits, Disclosures, and Content Protections Meanwhile, some states are exploring rules that would require firms to conduct audits to prevent consumer harm, disclose when people are interacting with AI and ban the companies from copying artists' creative work, as reported by Bloomberg. ALSO READ: Move over quiet quitting — as AI looms 'quiet cracking' is costing $438 billion and wrecking workers' health Experts Warn of Regulatory Patchwork Slowing AI Progress But the tech companies and venture capital firms which are backing AI startups worry that any regulation could slow their growth in this relatively new sector and navigating 50 different state rules would be a major challenge for the firms, according to the report. Hope Anderson, a privacy and AI lawyer with White & Case, told Bloomberg that the speed of technological change makes it 'tricky' for the law to keep up, and more so if states enact a 'patchwork' of differing regulations, as quoted in the report. FAQs Why are tech companies against state-level AI laws? Because 50 different rules would make it harder for them to scale and innovate quickly. What do the tech companies want instead? They prefer a single federal law focused on how AI is used, not how it's built.
