&w=3840&q=100)
Trump's tariffs push Brics closer, but India wants to retain strategic autonomy
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Global South has been in a diplomatic huddle led by China, India, and Brazil. Russia, the 'expelled' Global North member, is a key pillar of the Brics. Trump has been making vocal attacks on the bloc. Expanded Brics has five new member nations and is forging a stronger alliance that has the economic and political muscle to push back against Trump's daily tariff offensives. Adding to the economic tensions is Trump's changed stance and aggressive push for cryptocurrency and to make the US the world's crypto capital. This is perceived as a counter to the Brics currency aimed at challenging the petrodollar's dominance, as well as an attempt to capitalise on the lucrative digital asset market.
In the wake of Trump's threats, PM Modi reaffirmed India's commitment to deepen the strategic partnership with Putin's Russia. India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval just met Putin in Moscow. Putin is all set to visit India in a few months.
Brics
The Brics is a forum for cooperation among a group of leading emerging economies. Begun by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, the initials of which formed the acronym, it has added Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates to make a group of ten, making it Brics-Plus. The Brics mechanism aims to promote peace, security, development and cooperation. It evolved as a combination of the two forums RIC (Russia, India, and China) and IBSA (India, Brazil, and South Africa). The first summit took place in 2009. Some in the West consider Brics the alternative to the G7. Others describe the grouping with increasing anti-Western and anti-American objectives.
The grouping has implemented competing initiatives such as the New Development Bank, the Brics Contingent Reserve Arrangement, Brics Pay, the Joint Statistical Publication and the basket reserve currency. Brics has established almost 60 intra-group institutions and think tanks to dialogue and cover agendas in 34 subjects. All the original five members and Indonesia are also part of the G20.
Brics has received both praise and criticism from numerous commentators and world leaders. The economic bloc has actively sought to reduce its reliance on the US dollar. China has even pushed for 'de-dollarisation' by promoting its currency, the Yuan, and forming currency swap agreements with other countries.
Trump's erratic approach to tariffs and global agreements has revived doubts about the US' reliability on the world stage and raised long-term concerns about the stability of the dollar. Emerging powers such as China and India have expanded their global influence, and alternative financial systems, including the rise of cryptocurrencies, have gained traction.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Table by the author
De-Dollarisation
The US dollar is the world's primary reserve currency, and it is also the most widely used currency for trade and other international transactions. As per a JP Morgan report, the US' share in global exports and output has declined, and China's has increased, yet the dollar's transactional dominance is still evident in areas including foreign exchange (FX) volumes and trade invoicing. However, its hegemony has come into question in recent times due to geopolitical and geostrategic shifts. As a result, de-dollarisation has increasingly become a substantive topic of discussion.
Some form of de-dollarisation is unfolding in most central bank FX reserves, where the share of US$ has slid to a two-decade low. The share of foreign ownership in the US Treasury market has fallen over the last 15 years, pointing to reduced reliance on the dollar. De-dollarisation is most visible in commodity markets, where a large and growing proportion of energy is being priced in non-dollar-denominated contracts. The concept of de-dollarisation relates to changes in the structural demand for the dollar that would relate to its status as a reserve currency.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
There are two main factors that could erode the dollar's status. The first is the perceived safety and stability of the currency and the US's overall standing as the world's leading economic, political and military power. The ongoing US tariff policy could also cause investors to lose confidence in American assets.
The second is the positive developments outside the US that boost the credibility of alternative currencies, such as that of rising and stable China. De-dollarisation could shift the balance of power among countries, and this could, in turn, reshape the global economy and markets. The impact would be most acutely felt in the US, where de-dollarisation would likely lead to a broad depreciation and underperformance of US financial assets versus the rest of the world.
Trump's tax legislation, which he recently signed into law, is expected to add $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit. This is fuelling fears about long-term US economic stability, potentially raising borrowing costs that could impact global investors, central banks and everyday consumers.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Yet, in finance, the foreign exchange market is the biggest and most liquid financial market, with volumes of over $7.5 trillion daily. Among the top currencies remain the US dollar (44 per cent of all forex transactions), the euro (16.5 per cent), the Japanese yen (JPY) (8.4 per cent), the British pound sterling (6.4 per cent), and the Chinese yuan renminbi (CNY) (4.7 per cent).Clearly the USD and EUR have held a steady share over the past two decades. While the share of CNY is increasing in China's global transactions as it moves to conduct bilateral trade in its own currency, it is still relatively low. The main de-dollarisation trend in FX reserves pertains to the growing demand for gold. China, Russia and Turkey have been the largest buyers in the last decade.
Due to Western sanctions, Russian oil products exported to some major countries are being sold in the local currencies of buyers or in the currencies of countries Russia perceives as friendly. Among buyers, India, China and Turkey are all either using or seeking alternatives to the dollar. Saudi Arabia is also considering adding yuan-denominated futures contracts in the pricing model of Saudi Arabian oil. Yuan is gaining ground outside of oil too. Some Indian companies have started paying for Russian coal imports in yuan, even without the involvement of Chinese intermediaries. Bangladesh also recently decided to pay Russia for its 1.4 GW nuclear power plant in Yuan. The de-dollarisation trend in the commodity trade is a boon for countries like India, China, Brazil, Thailand and Indonesia, which can now not only buy oil at a discount but also pay for it with their own local currencies. But de-dollarisation is still far off, and work is in slow progress.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Brics Approach to Trump Tariffs
Trump tariffs have hit the group badly. Trump has escalated trade tensions by doubling tariffs on Indian goods to 50 per cent, citing India's continued imports of Russian oil, which account for 36 per cent of India's oil imports. Brazil faced a similar 50 per cent tariff increase, linked to Trump's allegations of political persecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Brazil's Lula rejected Trump's offer for direct trade talks. Russia is under sanctions. After the US revoked Russia's Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status, many Russian goods are subject to around 20 per cent tariffs. In April, when the tariff war between the world's largest trading nations was at its peak, Trump had cranked up blanket tariffs on Chinese imports to 145 per cent, and China had retaliated with 125 per cent duties on US goods. China and South Africa currently face a 30 per cent tariff. Trump has now extended the China tariff deadline by 90 days.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump's rhetoric has been blunt and nasty. He called India and Russia 'dead economies' and accused New Delhi of profiting from reselling refined Russian oil. He further warned that Brics nations aligning against US interests would face an additional 10 per cent tariff. India's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India's ties with Russia are 'steady and time-tested' and urged the US not to view these relations through a third-country lens.
Trump's flip, from dismissing Bitcoin as a 'scam' to positioning the US as the global cryptocurrency capital, shows the move might also be aimed at mitigating adverse effects of the potential Brics currency. He has even backed his family's crypto venture, World Liberty Financial (WLF), which has engaged with Pakistan on cryptocurrency.
The large and powerful block is strategising against Trump tariffs. There is talk of increased tariff-free bilateral trade. This would be a significant part of discussions on the sidelines of the SCO meeting in China. Meanwhile, India's RBI has allowed Category-1 banks to open special rupee-vostro accounts for Russian oil companies to invest surplus funds in Indian government securities.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Capacity to Take on US
Individually, each Brics member wants access to the US market. China has reacted with counter-sanctions, but it has some capacity to push the US for concessions. The leverage with other members to call 'Trump Bluff' is relatively less. The US has held negotiations with many foreign trading partners and managed significant deals with two-thirds of them. Notwithstanding Lula's strong statements, no collective official statement has come out yet from Brics.
India has walked a calibrated path. It has chosen the 'blow hot, blow cold' approach and back-channel diplomacy to find some middle ground. It has made it clear that its relations with Russia remain very important. It has also made clear that India will trade with any country based on bilateral understandings and India's economic interests.
The Chinese ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, issued a tweet on X that stated. 'Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile.' The Chinese envoy also attached a statement from his country's Foreign Minister Wang Yi: 'Using tariffs as a weapon to suppress other countries violates the UN Charter, undermines WTO rules, and is both unpopular and unsustainable.'
PM Modi had said at the Kazan Brics summit that economic cooperation could be strengthened through local currencies rather than relying on the dollar. The Unified Payments Interface (UPI) developed by India is a huge success story and has been adopted in many countries. We can also cooperate with other BRICS countries in this area.
While the dollar continues to dominate international trade, nearly 20 per cent of oil trading is now in non-dollar currencies. This is mainly as India and China are buying significant Russian oil in non-dollar currencies. While India has relied on the dirham for payments, China has opted for the yuan. The US felt threatened and decided on additional tariffs unless they committed to never creating 'a new Brics currency nor backing any other currency to replace the mighty US dollar'. While Trump truly intended to weaken the Brics, his policies are having the opposite effect. The US president is uniting the group at a moment when they were facing significant challenges.
Yet the Brics have never been a completely harmonious group in terms of their international interests and positioning. India and China have a long-standing rivalry in Asia. India has long viewed China's proximity to Pakistan, its primary foe, with suspicion. Brazil, India, and South Africa have consistently sought to maintain a non-aligned stance, refusing to be entirely aligned with Russia in its tensions with the West. The challenges for consensus have increased with Iran joining the group and its views on Palestine and Yemen. Egypt and Ethiopia also have some regional rivalries. Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and the UAE won't let pass anything against the US. There are issues about support for Brics currency.
China is India's second-largest commercial partner, surpassed only by the US. With the new US tariffs, China will gain even more economic influence over India. India has become very conscious of US flip-flops, and it is bound to affect India's purchases and engagement with the US. Will India pause Russian oil purchases as global prices are low and consider offering concessions on agricultural and dairy products to arrive at a deal? Remains a moot question.
Brics Catching Up on G7, but Challenges Remain
The G7 comprises Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. They want to maintain global policy leadership, maintain the existing international order, and lead global policy on security, climate change, and global finance.
Brics' priority is to push multi-polarity, challenge the existing Western-dominated global order, and reform the international financial architecture. While historically smaller than the G7 in nominal GDP, Brics has now caught up with the G7 in GDP and is much ahead when measured by purchasing power parity (PPP). Brics is expected to be a major driver of future global economic growth, particularly with the continued expansion of the Brics-plus grouping, while the G7's growth is projected to be slower. More than 40 countries have expressed an interest in Brics membership, including Nato member Turkey.
But Brics faces challenges related to internal conflicts and diverging foreign policies, while the G7 generally maintains greater unity, though US-Canada and US-EU frictions are now more visible. Russia, China and Iran are keen to compete with the dollar as a reserve currency, to circumvent sanctions and to present a counter-model to the West, which is perceived as too dominant.
Countries such as South Africa and Egypt, on the other hand, attach importance to economic diversification and strengthening the voice of the global South without burning all other bridges. China is attempting to dominate the Brics alliance politically.
However, India is growing into another major regional power that is competing with China's ambitions, especially as India is pushing its own model of 'Strategic Autonomy'.
For India, Brics membership is increasingly becoming a balancing act. It is the only country in the group to find itself in open conflict with heavyweight China. India is not in favour of the anti-Western course that China, Russia and Iran would like to see for the Brics. It is a wait-and-watch time for international politics and global order.
The writer is former Director General, Centre for Air Power Studies. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Hell hath no fury like Donald Trump scorned
Trump has not threatened China and Turkey, the largest and third largest importers of Russian oil. Nor Hungary and Slovakia, two European and Nato countries that import Russian oil. And he's ignored the fact that Japan has started to do so from June this year Has Donald Trump got it in for India? He's slapped 50% tariffs, he's suspended trade talks till the tariff dispute is resolved, he says he doesn't care if India's 'dead economy' sinks and Peter Navarro, his trade advisor, has said India is threatening America's national security by buying Russian oil. Worst of all, Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, has revealed that secondary tariffs on India could increase if Trump's talks with Putin fail. He also wants Europe to impose its own secondary tariffs. Does all of this suggest India has fallen out of America's favour? There is a view that Trump is using India to send a message to China and Russia. It's not a comforting one. It means we're collateral damage and he doesn't really care what happens to us. On the other hand — and this is equally galling — Trump seems to have fallen in love with Pakistan. He's only imposed 19% tariffs, his government considers Islamabad a 'phenomenal partner' in the fight against counter-terrorism — last week it lauded Pakistan's 'continued successes in containing terrorist entities' — he invited Field Marshal Asim Munir for lunch and wants to help Pakistan prospect for oil. In fact, Trump has taunted India with the tease that Pakistan could one day sell oil to Delhi. So, is Pakistan the new belle of the ball? Let's focus on the issue of Russian oil, both because it rankles with Delhi but also because Trump has made it clear that until it's resolved there'll be no trade negotiations. In fact, Bessent has threatened further penalties. The truth is the Biden Administration encouraged India to buy Russian oil. In May 2024, this is what Eric Garcetti, the American ambassador in Delhi, said: 'Actually, they (India) bought Russian oil because we (the US) wanted somebody to buy Russian oil at a price cap … because as a commodity we didn't want oil prices going up and they fulfilled that.' Today Trump is deliberately ignoring his predecessor's policy and blaming India instead. Secondly, Trump is also being hypocritical. America continues to import palladium, uranium hexafluoride, fertilisers and chemicals from Russia and reports indicate that in the last six months the amount imported has increased substantially compared to last year. So, if America can import from Russia, why can't India? Thirdly — and this hints at Trump's real intentions — there's another double standard. He has not threatened China and Turkey, the largest and third largest importers of Russian oil. Nor Hungary and Slovakia, two European and Nato countries that import Russian oil. And he's ignored the fact that Japan has started to do so from June this year. In fact, he's just extended the trade truce with China for another 90 days. Clearly his wrath is single-mindedly directed at Delhi. There is, however, another equally worrying aspect of the problem. Does Trump's attitude and behaviour suggest Quad has lost its utility in his eyes? If it has, where does America's Indo-Pacific strategy stand? It brought great comfort to India vis-à-vis our problems with China. If Trump is no longer committed to it, that will create worrying concerns for us. Whether Trump reaches an economic deal with China is hard to predict but probably likely because he's already talking of a summit with Xi Jinping. The question is, will the deal also presage a better political understanding of China? More space for Beijing's regional ambitions? In that event, will India continue to have US support over our border dispute with China? The biggest problem is what can we do about this? The truthful answer is very little. There's nothing we export to America that America can't do without. China has rare earth minerals and metals. We don't. Our leverage is very limited. Our only hope is a Putin-Trump deal on Ukraine which could lead to the secondary sanctions being lifted. Scott Bessent's comments suggest the White House has India in its sights if they aren't. Hell, it seems, hath no fury like a Trump scorned! Karan Thapar is the author of Devil's Advocate: The Untold Story. The views expressed are personal.


Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Vladimir Putin willing to end the Ukraine war, but has one condition: Report
Russian President Vladimir Putin put forward a demand that Ukraine needs to withdraw from the eastern Donetsk region as a condition for ending Moscow's war with Kyiv during the Alaska Summit with US President Donald Trump on Friday. Russian President Vladimir Putin meets US President Donald Trump, in Alaska on Saturday. (X/@WhiteHouse ) However, Putin also told Trump that if his core demands were met, he would be open to freezing the rest of the frontline, the Financial Times reported. According to the report, Trump called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders on Saturday to communicate Putin's demand. He also urged Ukraine and Europe to drop efforts to secure a ceasefire from Moscow. Russia has been in partial control of the Donetsk region for more than a decade. If Putin's demand is met, he will get control of the territory where his forces have made the most gains in the war since November last year. What is Vladimir Putin willing to let go in exchange for full control over Donetsk? According to the FT report, Vladimir Putin has said that in exchange for the Donetsk region, he would freeze the frontline in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where his forces occupy large swaths of land, and not launch new attacks to take more territory. Putin made it clear to Donald Trump that his core demand of addressing 'the root causes' of the conflict still stands. He wants NATO's eastward expansion to end, meaning Ukraine would not be allowed to join the alliance. But he is reportedly prepared to compromise on other issues, including territory, if he is satisfied that the 'root causes' are addressed. The Russian control over Donetsk Russian forces control about 70 percent of the Donetsk region. Ukraine still has control over the region's westernmost chain of cities, which are said to be critical to Kyiv's military operation and defences along the eastern front. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said that he would not swap territory with Russia and would not allow a second partition of the country. He is meeting Trump on Monday in Washington, where this topic will certainly come up.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
A non-NATO pact for Ukraine? US floats Western alliance-style security guarantees for Kyiv
The US has proposed security guarantees for Ukraine similar to – but separate from – the collective defence agreement between NATO member countries. US President Donald Trump gives a thumbs up after landing at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, on August 15, 2025. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin made no breakthrough on Ukraine at their high-stakes summit on August 15, 2025, pointing to areas of agreement and rekindling a friendship but offering no news on a ceasefire. Photo- AFP The United States has proposed offering Ukraine a set of NATO-style security guarantees that stop short of full alliance membership, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and diplomatic sources confirmed AFP on Saturday. The proposal, raised by President Donald Trump during calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders following his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, would create a 'non-NATO Article 5' clause to assure Kyiv of collective support without extending NATO membership, a key Russian red line. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'As one of the security guarantees for Ukraine, the American side proposed a non-NATO Article 5 type guarantee, supposedly agreed with Putin,' the diplomatic source told AFP on condition they not be identified in any way. NATO's collective security is based on its Article 5 principle: if one member is attacked, the entire alliance comes to its defence. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who was on the call with Trump, confirmed the US president had raised the idea of security guarantee 'inspired' by Article 5, which she has been pushing for several months. The starting point for the proposal was defining a collective security clause 'that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the US, (which would be) ready to act in case it is attacked again', Meloni said in a statement. In March, Meloni told Italian senators that any such response would not necessarily involve going to war. She noted that, while NATO's Article 5 has the use of force as an option, 'it is not the only possible option'. Kyiv has long aspired to join NATO – but Russia has given that as one of its reasons for its war in Ukraine, and some Western circles have expressed resistance to the idea. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has repeatedly ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance. Before his joint call with Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump spoke just with the Ukrainian president about Friday's Alaska summit. 'The American side voiced this (joint security proposal) during a conversation with the president (Zelensky) and then repeated it during a joint conversation with the Europeans,' the diplomatic source said. Another source with knowledge of the matter confirmed the NATO-like guarantees had been discussed. But that source added: 'No-one knows how this could work and why Putin would agree to it if he is categorically against NATO and obviously against really effective guarantees of Ukraine's sovereignty." European Leaders Reaffirm Support for Ukraine Several European leaders jointly pledged to continue support for Ukraine and maintain pressure on Russia until the war in Ukraine ends, after a summit in Alaska between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The joint statement from leaders including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni was issued after Trump briefed them on his talks with Putin. It said the next step must be talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and that they were ready to work with Trump and Zelenskiy towards a three-way summit with European support. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump said after his talks with Putin that Ukraine should agree a deal to end the war with Russia. He said he had agreed with the Russian leader that the best way to do this was to go straight to a peace settlement rather than via a ceasefire, something hitherto opposed by Kyiv and its European allies. The European statement - also signed by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and European Council President Antonio Costa - said Ukraine must have 'ironclad' security guarantees to defend its territorial integrity. 'It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force. 'Our support to Ukraine will continue. We are determined to do more to keep Ukraine strong in order to achieve an end to the fighting and a just and lasting peace,' the statement said. 'As long as the killing in Ukraine continues, we stand ready to uphold the pressure on Russia. We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace." STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies