
AI agents are an opportunity to rethink creativity: Adobe's Govind Balakrishnan
The versatile Adobe Express platform is adding significant new functionality too, as it competes with the likes of Canva as well as a number of AI-based tools that have become proficient at replicating some of Express' functionality. The new additions add video generation, enhancing speech to remove background noise, animation for objects in static designs and an AI clip maker that creates shorter duration clips from a larger video, optimised for social media sharing. Adobe is taking forward steps with AI Agents, across Photoshop and Premiere Pro.
Also Read:Agentic AI: Next big leap in workplace automation
On the sidelines, Govind Balakrishnan, senior vice president for Express Product Group & Digital Media Services at Adobe, spoke with HT from London, and detailed India's importance as a market for Adobe Express, how important it is to leverage Firefly amidst stiffer competition, if Adobe Express' perceived value proposition has changed with time and the excitement around AI Agents (Adobe has detailed plans to bring agentic AI to Express). Edited excerpts.
Adobe Express has come a long way since the big revamp in 2021. Did Adobe, at that time, envision such a thick AI layer to envelope Express over time, and is Adobe Express today exactly as you'd thought of it then?
The benefit of starting with a complete free platform is that we have an ability to think holistically about where we think the product should go, and we obviously have the advantage that we were beginning to see what was happening in the industry around us, including advancements that were happening in AI and more. Importantly, even the advancements happening in generative AI. One of the key tenets that we wanted to hold true to was that we would provide recommendations, that is we would not put the burden entirely on users to figure out what to do and when to do it. From the beginning, we architected the product in a way that we could provide font recommendations. We give our users access to more than 30, 000 fonts now, but that doesn't help if you can't figure out how to pick the right one. Look at the content, context, and we make some recommendations. Similarly, we are also making colour, stock assets and other recommendations. Users don't have to go searching for these pieces of content.
Then along came generative AI. We were still in the middle of building the product when generative AI started taking off as much as it did. Adobe has deep experience in generative AI base, and how we got Firefly to where it is today. But since we were building the product, we didn't have to bolt it all as an afterthought. We have actually seamlessly and contextually integrated it with the workflows in the journey. While you're creating, just add something as simple as video generation, that we just did. Now, it's not something you start with. You actually start with your intent. You can start with video generation if you choose to, but the more natural way is, you're now creating a Instagram reel for instance and as part of that, you're putting some clips together. Now, you need a five second clip that is a filler potentially? So, in that workflow, in that context, we give you the ability to generate video. It's that integration seamless integration as part of your workplace that has been a big advantage for us.
Also Read: Video Gen AI battles begin, as Adobe releases Firefly Video model into the world
Did we expect the product to be what it is today? I would say, not necessarily. I take pride in is the fact that the product has evolved based on what we are seeing and how we're seeing our customers use the product. So, rather than us sort of saying, you know, this is exactly what the product should be, and this is how all the workflows and experiences should be, we have chosen to morph, adjust and build the product based on what we hear from our community and our users
How pivotal has Firefly been to Express, as it has been to the likes of Photoshop and Premiere Pro for instance, and does that need to be Adobe's AI trump card considering the AI ecosystem is creating focused alternative after alternative at a rapid pace?
I would say yes, and for a few reasons. We have essentially created the creative category, and we have more experience and expertise in the creative space than any other company in the world. Our researchers have been hard at work for many years, making sure they build the models that are best in class. There will be pointed solutions that will come and obviously challenge us, which is great. But if you look at it holistically, I would say that our ability to deliver the best results is real and is something that we are investing in and stay ahead of everyone else.
What then differentiates our Firefly models is that what we have built is safe for commercial use. We have trained these models with data that we have access to and essentially what we have done is, regardless of whether you're a student, a solo planner or someone in a business, we have given you the ability to leverage generative AI capabilities and use it for your creative work without being concerned about your IP infringement of any kind. That's the other one that we have held through to.
Also Read: We aren't building AI models for the sake of it: Adobe's Deepa Subramaniam
The third piece to this is that because we have built the tools that work on content. We have been able to bridge those solutions together and make those available through these seamless, contextually relevant touch points. The integration works better unlike a point solution that can be used to generate a stunning image. The questions, what do you do with that image? The image is not an end to itself, and you generally have to do something with the image. Perhaps put it into a poster, into a birthday card, or a social media campaign. We can now make all of that available to one single tool that gets you to start from an intent, use generative AI wherever your design, and then take it out with the flexibility across social media to banners to flyers. Users now have an end-to-end solution that only Adobe can provide right now. It's a matter of plugging these pieces together and obviously continuing to make sure we deliver the highest quality delivered safely.
Do the contours of perceived value proposition for Adobe Express change with time, and surely that ties in with what the consumer and business audiences are looking for?
For consumers, in general, their primary goal is to get started with an intent as soon as possible. We give them the ability to either start with a template, their own content, or generate their own images or videos. You can essentially enter a prompt to generate a design, modify it and get to desired outcomes. As part of that journey, users are able to use our generative AI in a meaningful way. When I say generated, it relates to image generation, video generation, text effects and an ability to create captions for social content.
With Enterprises, we are seeing a significant traction, and adoption, for generative AI in particular. That is given the quality of what's created or generated, but more interestingly, also because whatever we generate for commercial use is proving to be something that a large number of enterprises care about and value. The fact that it's safe for commercial use, and it's the confidence that there is no IP infringement. Those are the two things that go hand in hand as it plays to the value proposition that we are offering with generative AI to enterprise customers.
Also Read: Our AI innovation undergoes careful evaluation and diligence: Adobe's Grace Yee
AI agents are now very much part of the conversation for businesses, and perhaps in due course, for consumers too. What is Adobe's vision for agentic AI in Adobe Express and what shall form the core of this evolution?
This is an area once again that I get very excited about and often tell my team in the context of the advancements that we are seeing, and the tools that we have in our toolbox, are AI agents, now really a path to, or a way to interact with these applications. The opportunity that we have is to essentially reimagine and rethink creativity. This next wave, with the capabilities that are available and with the direction that we are headed in, we're seeing just the tip of where we want to go. As we deliver on that vision, we think a user will now have the ability to essentially interact with the application, purely using prompt based interaction models. It can be conversational or input text based and a user will no longer have to take the time and energy to essentially learn a tool like Adobe Express to get work done.
Think of it as the ability to bring what's in your mind's eye, to a digital service. No need to learn a tool to do that. What makes us even more magical though is that even as a user goes through that process, is the granular control to get to your desired outcome. The tools that we have in a product like Adobe Express are still available and a user can very seamlessly go from interacting using prompts to actually going into the tool and making the tweaks and adjustments manually. Users are not giving up on control by adopting, but enhancing an ability to start using these interfaces and capabilities to then get to the desired outcome as well as possible.
Also Read: Video Gen AI battles begin, as Adobe releases Firefly Video model into the world
Please tell us about India as a market for Adobe Express. What are users here demanding, and does that feedback and research help build for the rest of the world?
India is one of the most unique markets in the world, through diversity and its dynamic nature. I strongly believe that it is one of our biggest growth areas as we look ahead, not just for Adobe Express, but more holistically for Adobe. Given how creative the Indian population is, India presents a huge opportunity. One of our biggest challenges previously was that we did not have the tools and applications that could lower the barrier to entry. To address the broad base of users in India, Adobe Express is bringing all these capabilities together and we believe we have lowered the barrier to entry sufficiently enough for us to have lots of viable and exciting offerings for India.
We are going to invest heavily, and even based on investments and the advancements we have made, we are seeing a 3x increase in the number of Adobe Express users in India over the past 12 months. We expect that number to continue to grow. Our focus is on investing in making sure that we have the right content for the Indian market, be it templates, stock images, or forms. We are doing everything we can to increase the breadth of content that we have available for users in India.
In parallel, we are also trying to build solutions such as an AI assistant and agent solutions that don't necessarily rely on templates and content — a user simply explains what they want to do, and generate the right content. We will also add support for additional languages. We recently added a few additional languages in terms of localisation of the UI itself, but beyond that, we are making it so that users can translate content into as many as 15 Indian languages.
Adobe is also partnering with educational institutions and the education industry at large, the Ministry of Education and we have a number of compelling partnerships in the works. There is a big opportunity in education for kids and students in schools and educational institutions to use Express for their learning and creative work. If we put it all together, it is a big opportunity for us in India. It is a priority and we intend to stay focused.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
Who Is Aravind Srinivas? Meet Perplexity CEO Behind $34.5 Billion Bid For Google Chrome
He co-founded Perplexity AI in 2022 alongside Denis Yarats, Johnny Ho, and Andy Konwinski. An Indian-origin tech entrepreneur is making waves across the tech world after making an audacious offer to acquire Google Chrome. Aravind Srinivas, CEO of the AI startup Perplexity, recently sent a letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai on August 12, proposing an all-cash acquisition of the popular web browser, as reported by Reuters. In a bold and unexpected move, Srinivas' company has offered a staggering $34.5 billion to purchase Google Chrome, despite Perplexity AI reportedly being valued at around $18 billion. The unsolicited bid, which significantly overshoots the company's own valuation, has sparked surprise and curiosity across the global tech landscape. Srinivas, 31, was born and raised in Chennai, India. A graduate of IIT Madras, he later pursued higher education at the University of California, Berkeley. He co-founded Perplexity AI in 2022 alongside Denis Yarats, Johnny Ho, and Andy Konwinski. The company's core product is an AI-powered search engine designed to deliver direct, conversational answers using real-time information, positioning itself as a potential challenger to traditional search engines like Google. Before launching Perplexity, Srinivas accumulated valuable experience in the AI and tech ecosystem, having previously worked at Google, and collaborated with influential AI researcher Yoshua Bengio. These formative roles helped shape his expertise in search and information retrieval technologies, which are now at the heart of his company's mission. The timing of the bid is noteworthy. Google is currently facing legal challenges following a major antitrust ruling in the United States. A US District Judge recently ruled that Google had maintained its search monopoly through illegal practices, including paying billions to remain the default search option on devices and browsers. Google has announced plans to appeal, but the litigation process could take years. So far, Google has not issued a public response to Srinivas' acquisition offer. While Perplexity has only raised around $1 billion to date, it claims that multiple investment firms have offered to fully fund the proposed deal. However, the company has not disclosed the names of these potential financiers. Whether Google will entertain the proposal remains unclear, but the bid has already placed Aravind Srinivas and Perplexity AI firmly in the global spotlight. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Is Sam Altman gearing up to take on Musk's Neuralink? Report says...
Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is working to co-found a brain-to-computer interface startup called Merge Labs. If Merge Labs moves forward, it would mark Altman's bid to stake a claim in a field Musk has championed Musk, who left OpenAI after his failed attempt to take over the company in 2018, has long been critical of the firm. Image Credit: Reuters Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is working to co-found a brain-to-computer interface startup called Merge Labs, according to the Financial Times. The venture is said to be seeking funding at a potential $850 million valuation, with some capital possibly coming from OpenAI's own ventures arm. Sources told TechCrunch that talks remain early and OpenAI has not committed to participating, meaning the terms could still change. Merge Labs is reportedly collaborating with Alex Blania, head of Tools for Humanity, the company behind Altman's iris-scanning digital ID project. The new company would compete directly with Elon Musk's Neuralink, which is developing brain implants to help people with severe paralysis control devices using thought alone. Neuralink, founded in 2016 and valued at $9 billion after a June fundraising round, is currently running human trials. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The concept of 'the merge'— humans integrating with technology— has long fascinated both Musk and Altman. In a 2017 blog post, Altman wrote that the merge 'has already begun' and predicted humans would become 'the first species ever to design our own descendants.' The idea predates Silicon Valley's current fixation on artificial general intelligence and ties back to earlier visions of 'the singularity.' The two tech leaders, once OpenAI co-founders, have since become open rivals. Musk left the organisation in 2018, and the relationship has soured, with the pair trading public barbs on X this week. If Merge Labs moves forward, it would mark Altman's bid to stake a claim in a field Musk has championed, and a new front in their escalating competition. Elon Musk vs Sam Altman Elon Musk and Sam Altman were once co-founders of OpenAI, but their relationship broke down after Musk left in 2018. Since then, they have become rivals, running competing AI companies: Musk's xAI and Altman's OpenAI. The feud has played out both in business and in public spats. Musk has criticised OpenAI's direction and tried to buy it back, while Altman has pushed ahead with commercial growth. This week, tensions escalated when Musk accused Apple of favouring OpenAI's ChatGPT in the App Store. Altman responded by accusing Musk of manipulating X to benefit his own ventures. Their rivalry now spans technology, influence, and personal reputation, with both positioning themselves as leaders in the race to shape the future of AI. With inputs from agencies


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Apple denies favouring ChatGPT after partnership claims, rejects Elon Musk's allegation that App Store hinders rivals
Apple has rejected allegations from Elon Musk that its App Store discriminates against competitors, insisting the platform is free and fair of bias, according to a BBC report. The remarks come after the Tesla and X chief threatened legal action, accusing Apple of making it 'impossible' for apps to rival ChatGPT-maker OpenAI in the store. Musk's criticism followed his renewed clash with OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, whom he labelled a 'liar' after Altman accused him of using X to 'benefit himself and his own companies'. The dispute marks the latest escalation in a long-running feud between the two tech leaders, who co-founded OpenAI before Musk's departure from the firm. In a statement to the BBC, Apple said: 'We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria.' Apple entered into a partnership with ChatGPT in June 2024 but has denied any preferential treatment. The company noted that other AI tools, including DeepSeek and Perplexity, have reached top positions in App Store rankings since then. Musk, however, continued to criticise the company online, questioning why neither X nor its AI chatbot Grok featured in the App Store's 'Must Have' section. He pointed out that X ranked as the number one news app globally and Grok was fifth among all apps, while ChatGPT topped the UK's free app chart. Official rankings show Grok in third place and X absent from the top 40. Meanwhile, tensions between the xAI chief and Sam Altman escalated further, as the public spat unfolded against the backdrop of legal proceedings in the United States. This week, District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers allowed OpenAI's claims against Musk to proceed to trial, including accusations of a 'years-long harassment campaign' involving public remarks, social media activity, court filings, and what the company describes as a 'sham bid' for its assets. The trial is expected to intensify tensions in a rivalry that has persisted for over a decade, stemming from Musk's belief that OpenAI abandoned its original founding principles.