logo
Iraq moves to give PMF greater role in state security

Iraq moves to give PMF greater role in state security

The National25-03-2025

Iraq's parliament is considering a bill to cement the role of the paramilitary Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF), a coalition of militias dominated by groups with ties to Iran, as a fully fledged arm of the state's security forces. According to a draft seen by The National, the bill proposes giving the PMF chairman the rank of minister and a seat on the ministerial committee for national security. Other high-ranking PMF figures will take the rank of deputy minister. It says the task of the PMF would be to 'contribute to the protection of the constitutional and democratic system in Iraq', and to the 'defence of the country, protecting the unity and integrity of its territories, and combating terrorism in all its forms'. The PMF was formed after ISIS had seized large parts of northern and western Iraq in mid-2014, as the US-trained security forces collapsed and thousands of Iraqis answered the call to arms by influential Shiite cleric Ali Al Sistani. Several powerful Iraqi Shiite militias, backed by Iran, joined its ranks shortly after, some of which had been fighting alongside former president Bashar Al Assad's forces in Syria's civil war. The PMF fought in parallel with the Iraqi military, which was assisted by the US-led coalition against ISIS. Many of its factions were accused of human rights abuse of civilians, which the government and the PMF have acknowledged as 'individual acts'. To address domestic and international concerns, the Iraqi parliament passed a law in 2016 to regulate the PMF and bring it under the control of the prime minister, who is also commander-in-chief of the national armed forces. However, the legislation had minimal detail on the force's terms of employment and administrative structure. After ISIS was declared defeated in Iraq in late 2017, Tehran-aligned Iraqi militias within and outside the PMF have emerged as a powerful military and political force that has defied the government and opposed the presence of US coalition troops in the country. The situation has prompted calls from within Iraq and from allies such as the US to integrate the PMF into the regular security forces. The chairman of the PMF is Falih Al Fayyadh, who was sanctioned by the US for his role in quelling Iraqi pro-democracy protests in 2019 with the support of Iran's Quds Force. Parliament completed the first reading of the new PMF bill, containing 18 articles, on Monday. The second reading will begin the process of debate and amendments, before the proposal is put to a vote at the third reading. The bill proposes keeping the PMF under the command of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani, but as a parallel military force. It would allow for regular army officers to be appointed to several high and mid-ranking posts but, at the same time, give the group greater strength in other aspects. The proposed law is aimed at 'building and organising a fully integrated military apparatus in terms of arming, training, readiness and ongoing development'. It calls for providing the PMF with 'state-of-the-art technological equipment' and for its fighters to establish their own academy. The PMF's budget and personnel have risen sharply since the defeat of ISIS. Its numbers have nearly doubled, from 122,000 to 238,000, according to the 2023 budget, and the size of its budget allocation has increased steadily, from $2.16 billion in 2022 to $2.8 billion in 2023 and $3.4 billion the following year. It also runs its own trading company. Iraq's government is backed by the Co-ordination Framework, the largest political group in parliament, made up of representatives of pro-Tehran militias and political parties.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US notified Turkey before Israel began attacking Iran, sources say
US notified Turkey before Israel began attacking Iran, sources say

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US notified Turkey before Israel began attacking Iran, sources say

The United States notified Turkey of Israel's plans to strike Iran on Friday, a few hours before the strikes took place, two sources familiar with the matter told Middle East Eye. The American notification late on Thursday may have helped prevent potential tensions between Turkey and Israel, who have recently found themselves at loggerheads in Syria over Ankara's increased presence in the country. Israeli jets are believed to have used Syrian and Iraqi airspace to target sites across the Islamic Republic. Since December, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government has destroyed every aerial defence system in Syria, effectively leaving the country defenceless. On Friday, Iraq's Foreign Ministry filed a complaint with the UN Security Council over Israeli aircraft using the country's airspace to strike Iran. The Reuters news agency reported on Friday that the State Department sent a diplomatic note to several regional allies in the Middle East, including Qatar, informing them of the looming Israeli strikes on Iran. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters MEE reached out to the Turkish foreign ministry and the US State Department for comment but did not receive a response by time of publication. Tensions between Turkey and Israel have escalated as Ankara and Damascus have begun talks to establish several military bases in Syria to help train the country's fractured military. Along with Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan, Turkey aims to help Damascus combat the remnants of the so-called Islamic State (IS) group and seeks control of the Tiyas air base, also known as T4, in eastern Syria. Although Ankara began operations at the base in April, activities have progressed gradually due to Turkish-Israeli deconfliction talks held in Baku, according to the sources familiar with the issue. By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump is pushing Tehran to go nuclear Read More » One of Israel's main concerns is the possibility of Turkey gaining control of Syrian airspace and potentially deploying Russian-made S-400 air defence systems there. An Israeli official told MEE last month that Israel did not want Ankara to closely track Israeli aerial movements, especially in the event of an attack on Iran. A Turkish source told MEE that Ankara was unlikely to deploy S-400s to Syria, as Washington opposes the plan. Instead Turkey is expected to deploy air defence systems targeting immediate threats such as drones and low-altitude attacks. Since Israel launched its assault on Iran, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has held several phone calls with regional leaders, including the presidents of the Islamic Republic, the US and Russia, advocating for diplomacy as the only way to resolve the dispute. Over the weekend, Erdogan told US President Donald Trump that negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme were the only peaceful solution to end the conflict, and offered Turkey as a facilitator for peace. According to Ankara insiders, the Turkish Air Force was placed on high alert as the government convened a series of security meetings to study potential emergency scenarios and spillover risks following the start of the Israeli military campaign. In his phone call to Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa over the weekend, Erdogan advised Syria not to become involved in the escalation between Iran and Israel, and to remain alert to further risks and attacks by terrorist groups. A MEE correspondent, who has requested anonymity, contributed to this report.

Middle East conflict only resolved through diplomacy
Middle East conflict only resolved through diplomacy

Al Etihad

time19 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

Middle East conflict only resolved through diplomacy

16 June 2025 00:33 By Dr. Mohammed Abdullah Al-Ali* The Middle East is a region that rarely finds calm before slipping back into tension. Over the past two years, the intensity of the escalation has increased sharply, with no clear path to sustainable proliferation of conflicts, the emergence of competing actors and contradictory objectives, along with mounting human suffering and economic strain, have created a growing sense of uncertainty. This uncertainty hit a new high on June 13, 2025, when Israel launched strikes on Iran, ushering in a dangerous new chapter in a region already divided and though there had been indications of a potential confrontation between Israel and Iran, especially with the ongoing war in Gaza since October 7, 2023, the weakening of Iran's regional proxies, advances in Iran's nuclear programme (according to both Tel Aviv and the International Atomic Energy Agency), and tense US-Iran nuclear negotiations risking the threat of war, the scale of the Israeli escalation, targeting nuclear and military facilities, and Iran's response following the killing of top commanders came as a predictions are that the war will be brief, as its continuation means it would spread, perhaps to other fronts in the longer the war drags on and expands geographically, the more likely it is that the sound of drones and fighter jets will eclipse diplomacy and political dialogue. The possibility of the conflict engulfing the entire region increases if containment efforts fail. As a result, growth forecasts have dimmed, and states have turned to policies aimed at shielding their economies from shocks in the hope of maintaining stability. Trade and tourism have been affected. Furthermore, the political and economic fallout will not be limited only to combat zones and neighbouring nations, but it will also threaten the entire region and perhaps the world if the situation spirals out of control - a possibility that cannot be ruled and financial markets cannot remain stable in a constantly volatile environment, especially when warfare is no longer bound by borders. Some may have found solace in the fact that in the last two years, the wars in Gaza and Lebanon, or US strikes in Yemen, did not cause major disruptions. But if the current pace of escalation continues, the region may soon face severe turmoil in the energy markets, not to mention further human and material future of the Middle East now hinges on political settlements to its many conflicts, as well as on the regional and international arrangements that will region's long-term stability depends on its ability to develop a model of security and economic cooperation that promotes prosperity, not destruction, and that preserves the wealth of nations rather than squandering it on endless is no shortage of crises in the Middle East. The priority for countries should be to focus on economic development and the wellbeing of their people, not on wars that resolve no crisis and settle no force alone will not resolve long-standing issues. Many countries in the region face deep political, economic and security challenges that will take years of sustained effort to overcome. Yet there are also ambitious states working for the progress of their people and the wider region. These countries are determined not to let instability derail their aspirations for progress in all tensions continue to paralyse the region and obstruct cross-border development powers have shown only limited commitment to promoting peace and stability in the Middle East. As a result, there is a significant risk that the conflict will spread from one country to is spared today may not be spared tomorrow, especially if the same international standards continue to govern responses to crises in the the competing agendas of global powers often reflect broader rivalries, further complicating the path to current conflict points to significant shifts in the regional balance of power, especially if the confrontation between Israel and Iran escalates further, resulting in a nuclear incident, or Iran does battle on multiple regional makes the situation even more dangerous is that neither a decisive victory nor a surrender appears likely. It won't be the last round, even if this one does of the justifications offered by either side, being drawn into a full-scale regional war or tipping the regional balance of power too far in favour of a certain side will only harm the Middle East as a whole.A prolonged war could worsen economic instability in the region and globally, fuel uncertainty, and undermine development by contrast, offers a path to prosperity for the people of the region. But real stability requires more than just halting wars. It demands a new approach to resolving conflicts, an approach that is based on negotiation and diplomacy. *The writer is the CEO of think tank TRENDS Research & Advisory

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store