CM invites Shah to launch Raj's cooperation conference
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The United Nations General Assembly declared the year 2025 as the International Year of Cooperatives. During his meeting with the home minister on Thursday, Sharma provided detailed information to Shah about the progress and innovations in the cooperative sector in Rajasthan.
He discussed topics related to the computerisation of PACS, Mhaaro Khata Mhaaro Bank, Gopal Credit Card Scheme, and the Prosperity through Cooperation campaign.
Additionally, the CM expressed gratitude to Shah for the successful implementation of 54 initiatives started under the Prosperity through Cooperation campaign.
Sharma also met union housing and urban affairs and power minister Manohar Lal Khattar on Thursday. Sharma had a detailed discussion on drainage development, water availability, metro expansion, easy transport facilities, and various means of power generation and supply in Rajasthan.
The CM discussed with the union minister the expansion of urban transport services and the provision of easy transport facilities in various districts of the state.
He also had an extensive conversation about approving the Jaipur Metro Project - Phase II under the joint venture model and the prompt release of central assistance.
Sharma requested Khattar to approve the DPR of Rs 1,368 crore under the RDSS project for the management of electricity supply to agricultural consumers during the day by Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The CM requested the minister to instruct CTUIL, CEA, MNRE, and other related organisations to take necessary actions on a priority basis for the rapid implementation of 115 gigawatt projects in Rajasthan and to develop a transmission system for the evacuation of an additional 50 gigawatts of renewable energy.
Sharma also met union railway, information and broadcasting, and electronics and information technology minister Ashwini Vaishnaw.
During this meeting, they discussed the expansion of the railway network for the convenience of citizens and industrial development. Various topics related to strengthening digital connectivity and promoting innovation in the information and broadcasting sector were also discussed.
Additionally, Sharma met union coal and mines minister G. Kishan Reddy. They discussed the sustainable development of mineral resources, investment opportunities, strengthening infrastructure related to the mining sector, and coal supply for power plants.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Congress divided the nation': Amit Shah on Partition Horrors Remembrance Day
Union home minister Amit Shah on Thursday said the partition of India was a 'tragedy' that caused violence, exploitation, and mass displacement, accusing the Congress of 'dividing the nation into pieces' and 'hurting the pride of Mother India.' Union Home Minister Amit Shah calls India's partition a 'tragedy,' blames Congress for division and violence.(HT File) '#PartitionHorrorsRemembranceDay is a day to express condolences by remembering the pain of those who suffered due to the partition of the country and its tragedy. On this day, the Congress party divided the nation into pieces, hurting the pride of Mother India,' Shah wrote on X. He paid tribute to those who suffered, were displaced, or lost their lives during the partition, calling it a time of violence, exploitation, and enduring pain. 'The partition led to violence, exploitation, and atrocities, and millions of people endured displacement. I offer my heartfelt tribute to all those people. The country will never forget this history and pain of the partition. I offer my tribute to those who lost their lives in this horror of the partition,' he added. Meanwhile, the BJP's X handle posted a video with the caption: 'The deceit of Congress, Nehru's greed, The divisive tactics of the Muslim League... These were the reasons for the partition catastrophe.' Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2021 had declared August 14 to be observed annually as Vibhajan Vibhishika Divas or Partition Horrors Remembrance Day, to commemorate the sacrifices made on August 14 during the partition. He had said that observing this day on August 14 would serve as a reminder to present and future generations of the pain and suffering endured by people during the partition.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
India's first war to Operation Sindoor: 5 shifts transforming its military power
This is the story of how decades of challenges, wars, and innovation have shaped one of the world's most capable defence forces — from building indigenous weapons to developing nuclear deterrence, from reforming strategy after every conflict to creating a modern, integrated force ready for the future In November 1947, just weeks after Independence, Kashmir was under siege. Pakistan-backed tribal raiders had advanced rapidly, reaching the very outskirts of Srinagar. Their final objective was the airfield—the fragile lifeline linking the Valley to the rest of India. Losing it would have meant losing Kashmir altogether. At Badgam, Major Somnath Sharma and fewer than 90 of his men faced an onslaught of nearly 500 heavily armed attackers. They were outnumbered, outgunned and surrounded. Major Sharma, fighting with a broken arm strapped in a sling, refused to retreat. His final words still echo in India's military history: 'I shall not withdraw an inch but will fight to the last man and the last round.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The stand at Badgam saved the Srinagar airfield and, with it, Kashmir. But it also revealed the stark reality of India's early military—a force with no high-tech sensors, no integrated command structure and barely enough men or weapons to hold the line. It was a moment of courage that secured territory but also underlined the fragility of India's defences in those formative years. Today, the picture could not be more different. India's military is now one of the largest in the world, nuclear-capable, technologically integrated and capable of complex joint operations. This transformation did not happen overnight—it took decades, multiple wars, setback, and strategic decisions. Here are the five shifts that have redefined India's defence power. From imports to self-reliance For decades, India depended heavily on foreign arms. The iconic MiG fighter jets came from Russia, howitzers from Sweden and even basic items like rifles and boots were imported. This dependency made the military vulnerable to supply chain delays, diplomatic pressures and operational uncertainty. Even today, India remains the world's largest importer of weapons. But since 2021, that dependence has been steadily shrinking. The government announced an import ban on over 3,000 military items—ranging from small helicopters and army vehicles to drones, radars and surveillance systems—because they could now be manufactured domestically. This shift is not just the result of government policy. Private defence companies, startups and state-run agencies are working together in an unprecedented push for indigenisation. In Tamil Nadu, drone startups like Zuppa and Garuda are producing advanced surveillance UAVs for military use. India is also becoming an exporter. Defence exports have grown from Rs700 crore a decade ago to more than Rs23,000 crore last year—a 34-fold increase. Countries such as Armenia, the Philippines and Vietnam have purchased Indian weapon systems. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Operation Sindoor in 2025 showcased the results of this self-reliance. Indigenous systems like the BrahMos missile and the Akash air defence platform were deployed alongside foreign acquisitions like the Rafale jets, which ran on Indian-developed software overlays. It was a clear demonstration that home-grown capabilities are no longer just supplementary—they are central to India's military strategy. The nuclear reset India's nuclear journey is more than a tale of bombs—it is the story of a strategic transformation. Until 1998, India maintained what was known as 'nuclear ambiguity.' The world suspected it had the capability but had no proof. That changed in May 1998, when India conducted five nuclear tests under Operation Shakti at Pokhran in Rajasthan. These tests were not just a technological feat—they were a military pivot. India formalised a nuclear doctrine built on three pillars: No First Use, credible minimum deterrence and civilian control of nuclear weapons. This last point is crucial—the authority to use nuclear weapons lies with elected leaders, not the military reinforcing democratic oversight in matters of existential security. The Pokhran tests themselves were a masterclass in deception. Under the watchful eyes of US spy satellites scanning the desert daily, Indian scientists and engineers disguised preparations as routine activity. They played cricket in the open during the day, dug shafts at night and even piped away groundwater from blast chambers to avoid detection. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dr APJ Abdul Kalam, later President of India, travelled incognito as part of the mission. The operation remains one of India's most successful covert achievements. The real transformation came after the tests. India developed a full nuclear triad—land-based Agni missiles, air-delivered weapons from fighter jets and sea-based platforms for second-strike capability. This provided a full-spectrum deterrent and reshaped India's global image as a nation capable of wielding nuclear power responsibly. Wars that reshaped the military India's wars have been more than territorial disputes—they have been lessons in transformation. In 1949, the appointment of General KM Cariappa as the first Indian Army Chief ended the colonial structure where units were divided by caste and rank often followed race. Cariappa created the Brigade of the Guards, India's first all-India, all-class regiment and enshrined the principle that the military answers to the Constitution, not to political leaders. His personal integrity was legendary. When Pakistan's President Ayub Khan—once a subordinate of Cariappa—offered to release his captured son during the 1965 war, the general refused, insisting all soldiers deserved equal treatment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 1962 war with China was a wake-up call. Ill-equipped for high-altitude warfare and lacking intelligence capabilities, India suffered defeat. But the setback led to structural reforms under defence minister YB Chavan, including daily briefings between military and civilian leaders, increased defence budgets and expansion of the armed forces. These changes bore fruit in 1971, when India liberated Bangladesh in just 13 days, forcing the surrender of over 90,000 Pakistani troops—the largest such capitulation since World War II. But the 1999 Kargil War revealed new vulnerabilities. Pakistani troops had infiltrated and fortified positions inside Indian territory without detection. The lack of a central military intelligence agency, real-time coordination between services and a mountain warfare doctrine were glaring weaknesses. Post-Kargil reforms included the creation of high-altitude warfare schools, modernisation of glacier combat training and the induction of advanced artillery like the K9 Vajra and M777 howitzers. Most importantly, it shifted India's mindset—never again assuming peace as the default and preparing for multi-front, multi-domain conflict. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Operation Sindoor and the joint force era The lessons from Kargil underscored the need for integrated operations. The creation of the Defence Intelligence Agency and Integrated Defence Staff aimed to synchronise planning, logistics and procurement across services. But true integration took time. In 2019, India appointed its first Chief of Defence Staff, General Bipin Rawat, with the mandate to build theatre commands where the army, navy and air force would operate as a single fighting unit. That vision was tested in 2025 during Operation Sindoor. Indian forces launched precision strikes deep inside Pakistan-controlled territory using a mix of indigenous and imported systems: BrahMos cruise missiles, loitering munitions, Israeli Harop drones and Rafale jets. Every branch operated in perfect coordination through an integrated command structure. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh later emphasised that logistics—ensuring men, machines, and supplies moved seamlessly—was as decisive as firepower. Operation Sindoor proved India could conduct high-tech, joint-force warfare and emerge victorious. It was the culmination of decades of reform aimed at turning three separate services into one cohesive warfighting machine. A force that reflects the nation The Indian military has long been seen as traditional, male-dominated and hierarchical. That image is changing. The National Defence Academy now admits women cadets, and since 2021, over 500 women officers have received permanent commissions. In Operation Sindoor, women officers not only served but led operations, symbolising a broader transformation. The modern Indian military collaborates with startups, works alongside civilian experts and draws strength from scientists, AI developers, drone engineers and cybersecurity specialists. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD National security today is about more than missiles or deterrence. It is about resilience, adaptability and self-reliance—not just in hardware but in mindset. It is about learning from failures, knowing when to act and when restraint is the smarter weapon. From Major Somnath Sharma's stand at Badgam to the synchronised strikes of Operation Sindoor, India's military journey has been defined by courage, adaptation and a constant push for self-reliance. These five shifts—indigenisation, nuclear strategy, lessons from war, joint-force integration and inclusive modernisation—have not just strengthened India's defences. They have redefined what it means to be a military power in the 21st century.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
How can SC/ST scholarships be expanded?
The story so far: Ahead of the upcoming financial cycle spanning FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31, the Union government is considering revising the parental income limit for eligibility in availing post and pre-matric scholarships administered to students from marginalised castes and tribes. What will be the new limit? These scholarships require eligible candidates to have parental annual income below ₹2.5 lakh. The Ministry of Tribal Affairs is looking to raise parental income limit to ₹4.5 lakh for post and pre-matric ST scholarships, and the Social Justice Ministry is discussing revising the limits for post and pre-matric scholarships for Scheduled Castes (SCs), Other Backward Castes (OBCs), and Denotified Tribes (DNTs). In addition, discussions are also on to raise the parental income limit of college and school scholarships for OBCs, and DNTs. What are these scholarships? The post and pre-matric scholarships for SCs, Scheduled Tribes (STs), and OBCs, are run as central sponsored schemes by the government. This means that it is funded by both the Union and State governments on a 60:40 ratio (Union:States), except for in northeast States where the ratio is 90:10. The post-matric scholarships for SCs, STs, and OBCs, require the student to be an Indian national, studying at the post-matric stage, that is, after 10th grade. Pre-matric scholarships are mostly available to students of grades IX and X, but for SCs pre-matric scholarships are available from grades 1 to X, if their parent or guardian is involved in a 'unclean or hazardous' occupation. Both post and pre-matric scholarships require students' annual parental income to be below ₹2.5 lakh to become eligible. In the ongoing fiscal year's budget estimates, centrally sponsored scholarship schemes for SCs, OBCs, Extremely Backward Classes (EBCs), and DNTs accounted for 66.7% of the Social Justice Department's ₹13,611 crore allocation. In the Tribal Affairs Ministry, centrally sponsored scholarship schemes for ST students accounted for about 18.6% of the department's ₹14,925.81 crore allocation for FY 2025-26. How many avail of the scholarships? According to available government data, tabled in Parliament and submitted before House panels, the number of beneficiaries for post and pre-matric scholarships across socio-economic groups has been falling. This showed that from 2020-21 to 2024-25, there was a 30.63% drop in the number of beneficiaries for pre-matric scholarships for SCs. In the same time period, beneficiaries for SC post-matric scholarships dropped by 4.22%, according to data tabled in Parliament this week. Data from earlier this year further showed that for pre-matric scholarships for OBCs, EBCs, and DNTs, the beneficiaries dropped from 58.62 lakh in 2021-22 to a little over 20.25 lakh in 2023-24. A similar drop was seen in post-matric scholarships for these sections in the same time period, reducing from 43.34 lakh beneficiaries to 38.42 lakh. For STs, there was a drop of 4.63 lakh beneficiaries in this time period for pre matric scholarships, and a drop of 3.52 lakh beneficiaries for post-matric scholarships. What have House panels said about these scholarships as well as eligibility criteria? In a report on schemes for OBCs run by the Social Justice Ministry, the Parliamentary Committee on Welfare of OBCs earlier this year recommended a 'suitable rise' in the income limit from ₹2.5 lakh that is currently set for scholarships for OBC students. While the panel asked the government to double the income limit for beneficiaries of pre and post-matric scholarships for OBCs, it has asked for 'suitable rise' in the income limits for beneficiaries of top-class scholarships for school and college education. The panel also said it was puzzling why the pre-matric scholarship for OBCs was only being offered for Class IX and X, recommending that the scholarship start covering students from Class V onwards. A separate House panel, which was set up to oversee the working of the Tribal Affairs and Social Justice ministries this March, noted the same about post and pre-matric scholarships for ST students, recommending that the parental income limits be revised for these schemes. These House panels have stressed the importance of these scholarships, and observed that the existing parental income limit was too low, adding that this was preventing many families who need the scholarships from getting access to it. They have suggested that the parental income limit be raised for these scholarships so that the coverage can be extended to as many beneficiaries that need it.
