Health Check: Biotechs obey the Three Commandments of life sciences
Heramed falls victim to US healthcare funding cuts
D-Day looms for Mayne Pharma holders – or will there be a twist?
Biotechs are heeding the Three Commandments of Life Sciences, as evidenced by ASX announcements over the last few days.
Why have only three emerged from the Mount?
Inspired by Donald Trump's famed negotiating skills and the supermarkets' shrinkflation practices, we managed to whittle them down from ten – and got adultery removed for good measure.
Anatara cuts the pineapple in other ways
Commandment One: when a clinical trial faileth, do not throweth in the towel prematurely.
In the case of Anatara Lifesciences (ASX:ANR), the company dipped out with a phase II trial testing its drug candidate – Garp – on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients.
Garp, as in Gastrointestinal ReProgramming, contains a form of bromelain, an enzyme found in pineapple stems of all things.
Enlisting 78 volunteers, the study failed to meet the primary endpoint of a meaningful improvement in IBS symptoms, compared to placebo.
This was despite a 40% 'sustained and consistent' improvement, as measured by the IBS symptom scoring system.
The gist is that while there was an 'apparent trend of pain and distension relief', the more subjective measures did not show a clear pattern of improvement and this affected the overall score.
For example, questions included "how dissatisfied are you with your bowel functioning the past 10 days?"
The answers 'appeared to confound the result, presumably because the underlying disease is still present with a level of symptomatology'.
Anatara is continuing its anti-obesity pre-clinical studies, which are expected to take about six months to complete.
The other lesson here is that in devising primary endpoints, one should be-eth bloody careful to picketh the right ones.
Chimeric seizes the day
Commandment Two: Don't wasteth a successful trial result: go-eth to the well.
True to that lore, Chimeric Therapeutics (ASX:CHM) on Friday requested a trading halt 'pending an announcement in relation to a capital raising'.
The shares are frozen until tomorrow, or possibly today if the news come through.
On Thursday Chimeric shares soared 60%, or two-thirds of the cents after the company said two out of three evaluable patients in its phase IIb trial had achieved a complete response.
A complete response means remission or – in layman's terms – a cure.
The third patient had 'achieved stable disease, whereby the cancer is neither increasing nor decreasing in extent or severity'.
The study tested Chimeric's natural killer (NK) cells, agents in the blood stream with heightened cancer busting powers.
Chimeric's candidate, CHM-0201 was administered alongside standard-of-care chemotherapy patients to the for acute myeloid leukemia.
The three patients are the first to be targeted of 20 subjects, with 12 enrolled as of December.
The first patient was dosed in June last year.
The three patients were ineligible for transplantation and had not been previously treated.
Honey – we shrunk the share base
Commandment Three: when one's share price plummeteth, one should seeketh to consolidate one's shares.
Imugene (ASX:IMU) proposes a share consolidation to reduce its circa 7.46 billion shares on issue by a factor of 34, subject to investor approval at an EGM.
Imugene shares have fallen more than 70% over the last two years – and lost close to 10% this morning.
In theory, the shares would be worth 68 cents a share post-consolidation.
Apart from the 'vibe' of a company no longer being in 'penny dreadful' territory, share consolidations don't change anything fundamentally.
Heramed loses US hospital partner
HeraMED (ASX:HMD) has fallen victim to Trumpian public healthcare funding cuts, with hospital partner Broward Health ceasing use of the company's digital foetal monitoring tool Heracare.
Heramed says Broward believed that Heracare worked quite well, including reducing pre-term births significantly.
But the First, Second and Third Commandment of US healthcare is that economic imperatives come before clinical ones.
As a Medicaid 'safety net' hospital, Broward took up Heracare courtesy of a state grant. As of April 1 this year, federal allotments to the states to fund such services have been reduced by US$8 billion annually.
Heramed has appointed a US healthcare commercialisation firm, Aspire Health Innovations, to further its US growth.
The company also is in commercial discussions with potential partners 'in other markets with stable healthcare policy environments.'
Vitura pots another one
Medical cannabis intermediary Vitura Health (ASX:VIT) has added another chain of clinics to its range of outlets, albeit indirectly.
Vitura's 50% joint venture Flora has acquired the digital platform Heyday Medical, 'one of Australia's most respected medicinal cannabis clinics'.
Established in 2020, the chain claims to have services more than more than 5000 patients.
The deal involves Flora paying $350,000 in cash, plus a 15% stake in Flora post-deal, the value of which has not been quantified.
Vitura owns the Canview marketplace, Doctors on Demand telehealth business, CDA Clinics (medical cannabis telehealth) and a the clinic chain Candor Medical.
Last November Flora acquired the Releaf Group, which operates telehealth and physical clinics.
Mayne and Island shares have a rest
Mayne Pharma (ASX:MYX) shares are in trading halt until Wednesday, pending news of a 'material announcement' pertaining to US dermatological group Cosette's $7.40 a share cash takeover offer.
Last Thursday, Mayne issued an independent report opining the offer was 'fair and reasonable', with an assessed value of $6.61 to $7.50 per share.
Barring any surprise, Mayne holders will meet on June 18 to approve the scheme of arrangement.
Meanwhile, Island Pharmaceuticals (ASX:ILA) shares are on trading halt pending a capital raising.
The developer of both a treatment and prophylactic for dengue fever, Island had cash of $4.8 million as of the end of March.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
20 minutes ago
- ABC News
Commonwealth Bank replaces dozens of call centre jobs with AI chatbot
One of Australia's largest employers has axed 45 jobs in its customer call centres after rolling out an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot to deal with customer inquiries. The Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) confirmed to the ABC that the organisation was consulting the dozens of people impacted by the cuts. "To meet the changing needs of our customers, like many organisations, we review the skills we need and how we're organised to deliver the best customer experiences and outcomes. That means some roles and work can change," a CBA spokesperson said. "Our priority is to explore opportunities for redeployment and to support affected employees with care, dignity and respect throughout the process. This includes access to redeployment options, career transition services, and wellbeing resources." The CBA said it hired more than 9,000 people over the past year and had about 670 open roles across Retail Banking Services and frontline teams. The major bank briefed the Finance Sector Union (FSU) on the recent changes last week, marking the first time a bank had informed the union its job cuts were due to AI. FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano said workers affected by the "outrageous move" should be retrained and supported into new roles that leverage AI technology. "Just when we think CBA can't sink any lower, they start cutting jobs because of AI on top of sneakily offshoring work to India," she said. "Workers want a tech-savvy bank, but they expect to be part of the change, not replaced by it." The CBA rejected the allegation that jobs were being sent offshore and suggested redundant staff would be re-skilled. "We're also proactively creating new roles to support career growth and help our people transition into future-fit opportunities," a CBA spokesperson said. "Our investment in technology, including AI, is making it easier and faster for customers to get help, especially in our call centres. By automating simple queries, our teams can focus on more complex customer queries that need empathy and experience. "Recognising that the work context is evolving, and based on individual situations, many of our people have taken up the upskilling and reskilling pathways made available for them to continue their careers at the bank and build capabilities for future opportunities." According to a CSIRO report, 68 per cent of Australian businesses have already implemented AI technologies, with many customer service jobs being replaced with chatbots and virtual assistants. Some economists say AI is also creating jobs at an unprecedented rate, but not always for the people in the firing line. The latest row between the FSU and CBA follows the union taking the major bank to the Fair Work Commission for allegedly breaching a contract by outsourcing hundreds of jobs to India. In response to the CBA denying it is offshoring jobs, Ms Angrisano doubled down on the union's allegations. "The CBA never publicly acknowledged that they are offshoring jobs, even when we've presented clear evidence," she said. "The truth is they are cutting customer specialist roles in Australia while employing people in India doing the same work. This round of redundancies includes customer specialist roles and we have every reason to believe they are sneakily offshoring those jobs." In February, the CBA reported a 6 per cent increase in net profit, with a half-year result of $5.1 billion.
SBS Australia
20 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Are Australians at risk from lifting the restrictions on US beef imports?
"Australia bans — and they're wonderful people, and wonderful everything — but they ban American beef. Yet we imported $3 billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone. They won't take any of our beef. They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and, you know what I don't blame them, but we're doing the same thing.' When United States President Donald Trump singled out Australia's ban on US beef imports, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would never compromise on protecting farmers or biosecurity. "We have made it very clear to the United States that we will not compromise on biosecurity. We will not weaken the measures that protect our farmers and producers from the risks of disease or contamination. Indeed, we've made it a priority to strengthen biosecurity, because one of the things that makes Australian food and fibre the best in the world is a people everywhere, know that it stands for quality. It also stands for safety." Now, ahead of the tariff deadline on August 1, Australia's restrictions on US beef imports have been dropped. But the government says the timing of the decision is a coincidence, and has nothing to do with Donald Trump. Minister for Agriculture, Julie Collins, says a review into the US beef ban began in 2015 under the Coalition Government. "This decision has been purely based on science and a rigorous assessment by my department. Biosecurity risk assessment process is very robust and I have faith in the officials in my department to do this appropriately. These are experts in the field. Australia's biosecurity system is world-renowned for a reason and this assessment has now been completed." In 2019, Australia changed restrictions to allow beef imports from cattle traceably born, raised, and slaughtered in the US. In practice, however, the ongoing biosecurity rules meant that only a small amount of beef, largely shelf-stable products, were imported from the US. "We are assured that the supply chain and traceability and the safety of any food coming into Australia is safe. The US, of course, has been able to bring beef into Australia since 2019. Our farmers, are of course, are exporting already to the United States. We're exporting over four billion dollars' worth of beef to the United States presently and our farmers are a net beneficiary of our two-way trading system." So, why was the ban imposed in the first place? And should Australians be concerned about eating beef imported from the US? In 2003, Australia placed restrictions on the import of US beef in response to an outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, more commonly known as Mad Cow Disease. Humans cannot contract mad cow disease, though in rare cases they can develop a variant which leads to dementia and premature death. However, the Australian food regulator deems US beef is low-risk. Trade Minister Don Farrell says the government would not compromise standards for trade. "We have not made any compromise and we certainly have not compromised Australia's strict biosecurity laws. This has been a process that's been underway for the last 10 years. It's now come to a completion and it's appropriate that we announce the results of that inquiry. But at no stage do we risk our terrific biosecurity standards for any trade arrangement." One key concern remaining after 2019 was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently allow beef from disease-affected regions to enter Australia. However, the government says the review has found that the US Department of Agriculture protocols for beef imported from Canada and Mexico now address Australia's biosecurity concerns. Mark Thomas, the Chair of the Western Beef Association, says it's unclear how effective the US tracking system is. "Well, we implement an NIL system, as they call it, so any animal that's born on your property has a electronic tag, and that same tag is scanned and transferred whenever that animal leaves your property, all the way through to sort of slaughter. So an animal that's been slaughtered, they can go back and work out where that animal has been over its lifetime. I am unsure how quickly America can get up to speed. However, it's taken many, many years for Australia to implement that system and make sure that it works efficiently." Despite government assurances, National Party leader David Littleproud is among critics calling for an independent examination into the matter. "The government has not provided or released the protocols on which the beef from the U.S could be imported into this country. Those are the legal requirements that an importer would have to meet to bring beef from the United States into Australia, that was from Mexico or Canada. The fact they haven't done that raises serious concerns to me around how this decision has been made and the timing of it. If it was well planned, the department would be able to provide me with those details. They have not. I think the prudent way forward is to have an independent scientific panel review the department's decision and the protocols when they came out." Along with concerns about the spread of disease, there are also concerns about differing US regulations around the use of hormones and antibiotics on cattle. While some cattle in the US are given approved natural or synthetic hormones to help them grow, the US Food and Drug Administration regulates these, and experts say they are in extremely low levels. US beef, according to both Australian and US officials, is safe to eat, but is it better than Australian beef? Evangeline Mantzioris is the Program Director of Nutrition and Food Sciences at the University of South Australia. She says the diet of an animal impacts the nutritional value of the meat. "What it comes down to is the type of feed that the animals are given. So in the US they tend to be grain-fed whilst here in Australia, they tend to be grass-fed, and that produces differences in the way that the body of the cow handles it and in the way that they make and lay down fat in their body. The other thing that might make a slight difference is also the genetics of the cows. So assuming it's the same breed of cow, we expect grain-fed to lead to more fat in the meat compared to grass-fed." Studies show that grass-fed beef can be 30 to 75 per cent lower in fat than grain-fed. Grass-fed is also reported to have higher levels of beneficial Omega-3 fats, up to five times more antioxidants, and slightly higher protein, with some studies also indicating lower cholesterol. So, for consumers, choosing between local and imported beef will mostly come down to personal preference rather than health concerns. Dr Mantzioris says while the differences aren't major, grass-fed beef is the best option. "So if we combine all of those different components of the beef that we've looked at, overall grass fed beef, which is what we have in Australia, is the healthier option." But what about Australian farmers? When Australia lifted the ban, Donald Trump wrote on social media that the US was now going to sell 'so much beef' to Australia. Australia is the second largest exporter of beef products in the world. And while Australians are some of the highest per capita consumers of beef products, our relatively small population means we have a lot left to export. Mark Thomas says he isn't too worried about competing with U-S products. "Well, I suppose, from a from a cattle perspective's point of view, our only concern would be if we thought that US beef was going to compete with our own product here in Australia, and I don't believe that that is going to do so based on the price of cattle in the US over a longer period of time and considering their cattle numbers compared to what we have here in Australia." In fact, US cattle stocks have been in decline for two decades. The United States is the second largest importer of beef globally and cattle stocks in the country are the lowest they've been since the 1950's. The US Department of Agriculture says beef prices have increased by 8 per cent since the start of 2025, with one kilogram of beef costing around AU$30.. Mark Thomas says with beef shortages in the United States, it's unlikely the Australian market is going to be flooded with imported US beef. "Well, currently, there's a lot of Australian beef going into the US market, purely because they need it. At the moment, cattle prices in the US are just quoting a heavy steer close to $5 whereas that same animal in Australia is only going for $2.50 so how can they purchase an animal for $5 a kilo? Process it, send it to the other side of the world and expect to compete with the product that we have here?" While beef prices have been increasing in the United States, Australian beef exports broke an all-time monthly record in June. And the biggest buyer was, that's right, the United States. In New York, Stew Leonard Junior is the CEO of a grocery chain. He says he gets grass-fed beef from Australia and plans on splitting the tariff cost with his supplier. "We are a huge meat purchaser, and it's mainly the US. So you know, there could be some, that's one of our trains going by up there, okay, for the kids right there, they love that. But one of the things we don't get a lot from Australia, the only thing we do get is our grass-fed beef. They sell beautiful grass- fed beef in Australia. That's being tariffed a little bit. We're splitting that tariff with our supplier. We don't really buy beef from Canada or Mexico or Argentina."
ABC News
20 minutes ago
- ABC News
More than a million unemployed Australians job ready as 'deeply concerning' data released
One in 10 Australians have been in their current job for more than 20 years, as the national job mobility rate decreased for a second year. Just under 8 per cent of employed people – 1.1 million workers – changed jobs in the past year, according to new data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). At the same time, the annual retrenchment rate – the number of employees dismissed for financial reasons – increased to 1.9 per cent. About 2.2 million people left or lost their jobs for various reasons. The numbers have been labelled "deeply concerning" by social services advocates, who have called for an overhaul in the employment sector. ABS head of statistics Sean Crick said there was a "small decrease" in job mobility to 7.7 per cent. The figure is down from 8 per cent last year, and 9.6 per cent in 2023. "This follows a rise in job mobility over the COVID period, where the job mobility rate increased to 9.6 per cent in February 2023," Mr Crick said. "Of the 1.1 million who changed jobs during the year to February 2025, almost two-thirds (62 per cent) remained in the same occupation." An ABS spokesperson told the ABC the job mobility rate had spiked "leading up to the recession of the early 90s" to almost 20 per cent. "[This was before] declining considerably during the recession, down to around 12 per cent," they said. "Since then, it has declined to under 8 per cent. "Job mobility, underemployment and potential workers have declined a bit over the last few years. "Like unemployment, potential workers and underemployment tend to follow the business cycle, so have had periods of increasing and decreasing.' There were 1.7 million people not working but wanting to work as of February 2025 – labelled "potential workers". Of those potential workers, more than 1 million were available to start work in the previous week before being surveyed. Another 311,300 were available to start within four weeks. "People who were unavailable to work in the short to medium term may not begin looking for work until it is closer to the time when they will be able to work,' the ABS said. "There were 596,100 people who wanted to work, were available to start either immediately or within four weeks, but did not actively look for work." The main reasons those potential workers gave included attending education and needing childcare. Australian Council of Social Services chief executive Cassandra Goldie said there was a "clear mismatch" in the labour market. "There is … a steady decline in entry-level jobs making it harder for people to transition into paid employment, especially those on income support," she told the ABC. "People are struggling to look for work while surviving on woefully low JobSeeker payments that trap them into poverty. "It's hard to look for work if you can't afford rent, transport, internet or even food." There were also 719,300 people permanently unable to work. Dr Goldie said the government needed to "move beyond punitive compliance" and "deliver real solutions" for employment. "We need to overhaul employment services and invest in tailored, quality employment programs that support people to transition into secure, suitable work, lift income support payments to liveable levels and a commitment to ambitious employment targets," she said. "We also need to end harmful payment suspensions and cancellations, which damage people's capacity to find employment." Many jobseekers also reported feeling discouraged when it came to searching for work. They cited concerns about qualifications, age and health conditions as their main barriers to finding employment. This was in line with ACOSS's 2024 Faces of Unemployment report, which found people with a disability or health concerns were also likely to be older, with both factors putting them at higher risk of long-term unemployment. "We know that people with partial work capacity, older people and First Nations people face persistent barriers to paid work, including workplace discrimination, a lack of appropriate roles in their communities, and employment services that are failing to support them," Dr Goldie said. "The decline in job mobility combined with high numbers of job losses is deeply concerning. For people on low incomes or facing disadvantage in the labour market, it often means they are being shut out completely. This month the ABS reported the unemployment rate had risen to 4.3 per cent in June. This meant there were an additional 34,000 unemployed people nationwide. Along with unemployed people, the ABS also released new data relating to "underemployed" workers. This referred to those who had either worked less than their usual hours or those who would prefer to work more than they usually did. As of February 2025, there were 818,900 part-time workers who wanted to work more hours, "with almost half preferring to work full-time". Of the total 1.5 million underemployed people, 321,100 had had their hours reduced.
