What to know about Delhi section of Dwarka Expressway, Urban Extension Road-II to be inaugurated by PM Modi today
The Prime Minister's Office said on Saturday that the projects, the Delhi section of the Dwarka Expressway and the Urban Extension Road-II (UER-II), have been developed under the comprehensive plan to decongest the capital.
The new stretches are expected to vastly improve connectivity, cut travel time, and reduce traffic in Delhi and its surrounding areas.
Here's what we know so far:
The Delhi section of Dwarka Expressway is 10.1 km long and has been developed at a cost of around Rs. 5,360 crore.
The section will provide Multi-modal connectivity to Yashobhoomi, DMRC Blue line and Orange line, upcoming Bijwasan railway station and Dwarka cluster Bus Depot.
> Package I: 5.9 km from Shiv Murti intersection to the Road Under Bridge (RUB) at Dwarka Sector-21.
> Package II: 4.2 km from Dwarka Sector-21 RUB to the Delhi-Haryana Border, providing direct connectivity to Urban Extension Road-II.
The 19-km long Haryana section of the Dwarka Expressway was earlier inaugurated by PM Modi in March 2024.
PM Modi will inaugurate the Alipur to Dichaon Kalan stretch of Urban Extension Road-II (UER-II) along with new links to Bahadurgarh and Sonipat.
It's built at a cost of ₹ 5,580 crore.
The PMO office said the road will ease traffic on Delhi's Inner and Outer Ring Roads and busy points like Mukarba Chowk, Dhaula Kuan, and NH-09.
"The new spurs will give direct access to Bahadurgarh and Sonipat, improve industrial connectivity, cut city traffic, and speed up goods movement in the NCR," the PMO said in a press release.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
4 minutes ago
- India.com
Indias Rs 62,000 Crore Indigenous Fighter Jet Push: Govt Clears Deal To Buy 97 LCA Tejas Mark 1A Combat Jets
In a major boost to indigenous defence manufacturing, the Government of India on Tuesday approved the purchase of 97 more LCA Tejas Mark 1A fighter jets for the Indian Air Force. This decision comes at a time when the Air Force is phasing out its ageing MiG-21 fleet and playing a key role in large-scale military exercises like Operation Sindoor. The clearance was given during a high-level government meeting and will now allow Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) to begin production, defence officials told ANI. Second Big Order for Tejas Jets This is the second major order for Tejas Mark 1A aircraft. The first order for 83 jets was placed a few years ago at a cost of around Rs 48,000 crore. Together, these jets will form a crucial part of the Air Force's future fleet as the MiG-21s are finally being retired in the coming weeks. Also Read: '6 Pak Aircraft Were Downed During Operation Sindoor': Air Force Chief Praises S-400 System Boost for 'Make in India' The Tejas programme has strong backing from both the Ministry of Defence and Air Force Headquarters. It's seen as not just a military upgrade, but also a big push under the Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat initiatives. The project will benefit hundreds of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) involved in manufacturing defence components across India. PM Modi's Personal Support Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been a key supporter of HAL and India's defence manufacturing capabilities. He even flew in a trainer version of the Tejas — becoming the first Indian Prime Minister ever to fly in a combat aircraft. The idea of acquiring 97 more jets was first shared by former Air Force Chief, Air Chief Marshal VR Chaudhari, during his visit to Spain. Also Read: 'Political Will And Coordination…': Air Force Chief Lists Reasons For Operation Sindoor's Success More Advanced Technology The Tejas Mark 1A jets have improved radars, avionics and a higher indigenous content — over 65 percent — compared to the earlier batch of 40 jets. The aircraft is considered a symbol of India's growing self-reliance in aerospace and defence technology. What's Next? HAL is also expected to receive additional orders in the near future — including over 200 Tejas Mark 2 jets and a large order for India's upcoming fifth-generation Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA).
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Chinese Foreign Minister strikes a conciliatory tone, says recent ‘setbacks' did not help India and China
Striking a note of reconciliation, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Tuesday that the bilateral relationship between India and China now faces an 'important opportunity'. Speaking at the 24th meeting between Special Representatives on the India-China boundary question, Wang indirectly referred to the negative impact of the 2020 Galwan clashes, and said the 'setbacks' of the recent past did not advance the interests of both countries. Responding to the positive sentiment from the Chinese side, National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval said Prime Minister Narendra Modi would visit China to participate in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin. 'The setbacks we experienced in the past few years were not in the interest of our two countries, and in October last year, President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Modi held an important meeting in Kazan (Russia). That meeting pointed direction for our bilateral relations and provided impetus for proper settlement of the boundary question,' Wang said in his remarks, recollecting the meeting between the two leaders during the BRICS summit in Kazan. Doval described the previous Special Representative-level talks in China as 'wonderful', and said that there had been an 'upward trend' in India-China ties in recent months. 'I am very hopeful that like the last one, this 24th Special Representative-level talks will be equally successful. Our Prime Minister will be visiting for the SCO summit shortly, and therefore, this Special Representative-level talk assumes a very special importance,' Doval said, announcing Modi's first visit to China since the Galwan clashes. Foreign Minister Wang arrived in New Delhi on a two-day visit on Monday, and held a meeting with External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, who emphasised that the process of withdrawal of troops from the Line of Actual Control (LAC) needs to 'move forward'. Sources said that Wang assured Jaishankar that China would address India's needs for fertilisers, rare earths, and tunnel boring machines. Referring to the differing perceptions regarding the LAC, Wang recounted the 23rd round of Special Representatives' meeting that was held on December 18, 2024, in China. 'At that meeting, we reached new and important consensus on the management of disagreements, stabilising the borders, and moving toward a settlement. We identified specific goals and formed a new working framework. We are heartened to see the stability that is now restored in the borders,' he said. Wang's visit has come at a time when India-U.S. relations face trade-related uncertainties, which are being balanced with increased conversations between Russia, India, and China. This Russia-India-China angle will find reflection in Moscow as Jaishankar is expected to reach Moscow later this week. The leaders of the three countries are also expected to connect on the sidelines of the SCO summit in Tianjin. Wang referred to the SCO Heads of State Council meeting in Tianjin, for which China had earlier extended an invitation to the Modi. 'The Chinese side attaches great importance to the Prime Minister's visit to China to attend the SCO summit at our invitation. We believe the Indian side will also make contribution to a successful summit in Tianjin. History and reality proved once again that a healthy and stable China-India relationship serves the fundamental long-term interests of both of our countries. It is also what all developing countries wanted to see,' the Chinese Foreign Minister said. Presidential Reference Bench says Supreme Court stepped in to resolve an 'egregious situation' in Tamil Nadu Governor case A Presidential Reference Bench of five judges headed by Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai observed on Tuesday that the Supreme Court's move to grant deemed assent to 10 crucial Tamil Nadu State Bills may have been a way to resolve an 'egregious situation' created by the Tamil Nadu Governor who had been sitting over them since 2020. The five-judge Bench found the facts of the Tamil Nadu case 'glaring' to say the least. 'Were the Bills pending since 2020?' Justice Surya Kant asked Attorney General R. Venkataramani. The Attorney General replied that the facts in the Tamil Nadu case may be correct, but there were reasons the Governor had kept the Bills pending. He said he did not want to get into the facts. 'Is it because the facts are so glaring that you do not want to get into them?' Chief Justice Gavai asked. Justice P.S. Narasimha said the facts of the Tamil Nadu case did not consist of any 'pudding' and were stark in themselves. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Union government, seconded Venkataramani's submission that a Reference Bench need not get into the facts of the Tamil Nadu case, but merely answer the questions raised by the President. The role of the Reference Bench was to maintain the balance envisioned by the Constitution, Mehta submitted. But Justice Kant persisted to ask what a Constitutional court was expected to do if the facts were as obvious as those found in the Tamil Nadu case. 'It seems such an egregious situation came into existence in the Tamil Nadu case, that the Supreme Court was compelled to handle the situation and resolve the issue. The conclusion was not meant to act as a precedent,' Justice Narasimha referred to the circumstances which had led to the April 8 judgment. The oral remarks from the Bench came on the first day of hearing the Presidential Reference which has questioned the power of the apex court to impose three-month deadlines on the President and Governors to deal with State Bills which come to them for assent. 'We will only be expressing our view on the questions of law raised in the Reference, and not pronounce a judgment in the Tamil Nadu case,' Chief Justice Gavai addressed the Centre and Attorney General R. Venkataramani, who are supporting the Reference. Tamil Nadu, represented by senior advocates A.M. Singhvi and P. Wilson, and senior advocate K.K. Venugopal and advocate C.K. Sasi, for Kerala, raised preliminary objections to the very maintainability of the Presidential Reference, arguing that the Tamil Nadu Governor case judgment was binding on all under Article 141 of the Constitution. The two States submitted that an 'opinion' given by a Presidential Reference Bench in its advisory jurisdiction under Article 143 cannot set aside the 'binding' judgment in the Tamil Nadu case. They argued that the Reference cannot be a substitute for a review or a curative petition against the Tamil Nadu judgment. 'Presidential References like this could make serious inroads into judicial independence. It could be used as an indirect endeavour to overturn Supreme Court judgments without going through constitutional proceedings like the review and curative,' Singhvi contended. Venugopal submitted that questions raised in the Reference have been comprehensively answered in the April 8 judgment in the Tamil Nadu case. To this, Attorney General R. Venkataramani countered that there was no inflexible rule that President cannot make a Presidential Reference if there was a judgment of the Supreme Court. Justice Surya Kant assured the two States that the five-judge Bench was sitting in its advisory jurisdiction, and not as an Appellate Bench over a Supreme Court judgment. 'We can give an opinion about a judgment, but we cannot overrule it,' Justice Kant made a fine point. Sudershan Reddy, former Supreme Court judge, is Opposition's pick for Vice-President election INDIA bloc has decided to commonly field retired Supreme Court judge B. Sudershan Reddy as the candidate for the upcoming Vice-President elections. The decision was taken unanimously, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said in a press conference on Tuesday. Leaders belonging to INDIA bloc too took part in the press conference held in New Delhi. This vice-presidential contest is an ideological battle, and all the opposition parties agreed on this, and this is the reason we have nominated B Sudershan Reddy as the joint candidate...,' Kharge said. The AAP, which is not part of INDIA Bloc, has also reportedly supported his candidature. Calling Justice (Retd.) Reddy as one of India's most distinguished and progressive jurists, Kharge added: 'He has been a consistent and courageous champion of social, economic and political justice. He is a poor man, and many judgments if you read, will know that how he favoured the poor people and also protected the Constitution and fundamental rights.' Justice (Retd.) Reddy served as a Supreme Court judge between 2007 and 2011, for four-and-a-half years. He had rendered several landmark judgments on various branches of law, in particular on issues of criminal jurisprudence, Constitution, taxation, service law and human rights. He served as Goa's first Lokayukta, but subsequently resigned within seven months. He had also served as the Chief Justice of Gauhati High Court until he became a Supreme Court judge. Born in a village in erstwhile Andhra Pradesh, Justice (Retd.) Reddy graduated in law from Osmania University. He became an additional judge in Andhra Pradesh High Court in 1993. INDIA's bloc decision comes two days after the ruling NDA fielded Maharashtra Governor C.P. Radhakrishnan for the elections. The Vice-President election is scheduled to be held on September 9 and the last date to file nomination is on August 21. Journalists' bodies condemn sedition charges against Siddharth Varadarajan, Karan Thapar of The Wire The Press Club of India (PCI), the Indian Women Press Corps and the Editors Guild have expressed dismay at the FIR against senior journalists Siddharth Varadarajan and Karan Thapar of The Wire by the Assam Police's Crime Branch, which invoked sedition charges under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The PCI and the IWPC said in a joint statement that this was the second such FIR against the news platform in two months. They alleged that the Assam Police unleashed vindictive actions against the journalists through the Crime Branch in Guwahati. 'It is noteworthy that the summons were issued on August 12, 2025, even as the Supreme Court bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi had granted Varadarajan and all journalists at The Wire protection from any coercive action in an FIR (0181/2025) filed by the Assam Police in Morigaon on July 11, 2025 under Section 152 and other provisions of the BNS. Now, the Assam Police have filed another FIR without mentioning any reason and have asked Varadarajan and Thapar to appear before the investigating officer at the Crime Branch in Guwahati on August 22 — on pain of arrest in the event of non-compliance,' the statement added. The organisations said that in May 2022, the Supreme Court had ordered the suspension of proceedings and criminal prosecutions for sedition under Section 124A of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. 'Section 152 of [the] BNS is a repackaged version of Section 124A. In its writ petition last week, The Wire has also challenged the vires of Section 152, [the] BNS, and the apex court issued notice to the Assam government and others,' the journalists' bodies said. 'While we welcome the relief given by Supreme Court to The Wire and Varadarajan last week, the registration of a new case against him and Thapar makes it apparent that Section 152 has become a tool with which to target the media in India,' they said, demanding immediate withdrawal of these cases against the senior journalists, as well as the withdrawal of the 'draconian' Section 152 of the BNS, which 'threatens freedom of expression as enshrined in Article 19(1)a of Indian Constitution'. 'As can be seen from the actions of the Assam Police, Section 152 of the BNS has been weaponised to chill the press into silence,' they said. In a separate statement, the Editors Guild said that it is extremely disturbed by this continuing trend of law enforcement agencies across States registering FIRs against journalists by invoking multiple provisions of the criminal code. 'This practice effectively muzzles independent journalism, as the very process of responding to notices, summons, and prolonged judicial proceedings becomes a form of punishment. The invocation of Section 152 of the BNS is particularly troubling, since it is widely regarded as a repackaged version of the draconian sedition law (Section 124A of the IPC), which the Supreme Court ordered to be kept in abeyance in May 2022 in response to petitions filed by the Guild and others challenging its constitutionality. 'Rather than meaningfully engage with the concerns raised by the Court, the government reintroduced the provision in broader form under the new law. Section 152 of the BNS now extends beyond speech acts (written or oral) to also include the alleged use of financial means to pursue certain objectives,' the Guild said. While laws must always be respected and upheld, they must not be misused to suppress journalism, the Guild added, urging the Assam Police to refrain from actions that could cast even the slightest doubt on their true intent. 'The Guild also takes the opportunity to remind fellow journalists about the importance of pursuing their profession without fear or favour. Honest journalism can never be a crime,' the statement said. The FIR is based on a complaint filed by a BJP leader over a story published in The Wire on June 28, based on a presentation by India's defence attache to Indonesia, Captain (Indian Navy) Shiv Kumar. Eight dead, crops on 14 Lakh acres damaged as rains pound Maharashtra for the second day Maharashtra was pounded by rains for the second day in a row on Tuesday, leading to the death of eight persons and damage to crops on 14 Lakh acres of land. Mumbai witnessed 350 mm rain in 24 hours. 350 people were rescued and moved to safe locations after Mithi river breached the danger mark for a few hours. Five teams of NDRF remained stationed in the city. As local train services on the western line and central line were disrupted, stranded passengers were seen waiting for hours at key junctions like Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus, Dadar station, Kalyan station, and Thane station. Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde visited the flood affected areas of Mumbai and Thane, and held a review meeting with officials at the BMC headquarters. 'Nanded witnessed a cloudburst-like situation. Eight people have died there. But the situation in the State is under control. NDRF and SDRF are kept on an alert. Several rivers are nearing the danger mark. Mumbai witnessed severe rainfall. But with respect to the flooding due to the Mithi river, the BMC is taking a look into the Mithi river cleaning afresh,' Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said, alluding to a scam in Mithi river silting during the previous government, Meanwhile, Deputy Chief Minister Ekanth Shinde, who reviewed the rain preparedness in Mumbai, said that the Government had asked the administration to install more pumps for pumping out rain water. '525 pumps were operational throughout Mumbai. There are six main pumping stations and 10 mini pumping stations in Mumbai. They were all working non-stop. What happened in Mumbai on Tuesday was almost a cloudburst-like situation. The city witnessed 350 mm rain in 24 hours and 200 mm rain in just six hours,' he said. Mithi river, which passes through Dharavi, which is one of the most densely populated areas in the world, almost reached the danger mark for some time on Tuesday. The water level started receding after reaching 3.9 metres. But by that time, several houses were flooded, prompting a rescue operation from Kurla Krantinagar by the NDRF. 350 people were moved to safety, the BMC said A Monorail train with at least 200 passengers on board came to a halt due to an apparent power failure between Mysore Colony and Bhakti Park stations in Mumbai. The passengers who were rescued said panic prevailed inside the train, which runs on an elevated track, with several people complaining of suffocation as the AC system shut down. The fire brigade was rescuing passengers using three snorkel cranes. Follow the Mumbai rain live. In Brief: Parliament on Tuesday passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025 that aims to further liberalise, modernise and make India's mineral sector more dynamic, especially with a focus on critical and strategic minerals. The Bill, which seeks to amend the original Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, was passed in Lok Sabha on August 12. Rajya Sabha passed it with a voice vote. About 19 members participated in the debate and shared some constructive suggestions. Replying to the debate on the Bill, Union Minister of Coal and Mines G Kishan Reddy said the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government has taken revolutionary reforms in the coal and mine sector in the last ten years. Evening Wrap will return tomorrow.
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bombay HC quashes notice issued by magistrate to HDFC Bank CEO in criminal defamation complaint
The Bombay High Court earlier this month quashed a notice issued to HDFC Bank and its Managing Director and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan by the magistrate court in a criminal defamation complaint filed by Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust (LKMM Trust), which oversees the Lilavati Hospital in Bandra (West). The HC held that the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Girgaon had issued notice to Jagdishan in contravention of procedure laid down under the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). The magistrate on the same day issued notice to the Bank, Jagdishan and others. The Trust, in its criminal complaint had alleged that the Bank and Jagdishan had made 'malicious and derogatory' statements against the Trust and its permanent trustee Prashant Mehta. Aggrieved by the notice issued in criminal defamation complaint, Jagdishan approached the HC. Senior advocates Ravi Kadam and Sudeep Pasbola for Jagdishan argued that the magistrate had issued the notice on the same day the complaint was filed and order to issue notice was made without recording complainant's sworn verification, which was mandated as per the law. On the other hand, senior advocate Aabad Ponda for the Trust argued that the magistrate was entitled to issue notice before taking cognisance of the case. The Trust argued that section 223 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) provided that the court has to hear the accused before taking cognisance of the complaint, which the court rejected and said the same was incorrect if the main provision and the proviso of the section were considered together. Justice Shriram M Modak emphasised that verification of complainant and witnesses after filing of private complaint was necessary and the proposed accused was required to be heard. 'If we consider the chronology, it shows that after filing of complaint there has to be verification of the complainant and witnesses and when prior to decision on taking cognizance is taken, the accused needs to be heard. Hearing the accused cannot be interpreted prior to recording the verification and the statement of witnesses if any,' Justice Modak observed. 'There is a purpose of recording the verification. It gives an opportunity to the Magistrate to ascertain whether to proceed further or not, the judge added and quashed and set aside the order of issuance of notice to proposed accused Jagdishan. The court clarified that the magistrate was at liberty to proceed with the matter by recording the verification of the Complainant and all witnesses, if any and then pass the appropriate order. The Trust has also filed a defamation suit in Bombay HC against the HDFC Bank and Jagdishan seeking damages of Rs. 1,000 crore and the same is pending before the court. Meanwhile, Jagdishan had filed a criminal writ petition challenging FIR registered against him on a complaint filed by the Trust, accusing him of accepting a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore to help a group consisting of one Chetan Mehta and other erstwhile trustees to retain alleged illegal control over the trust. The next hearing on Jagdishan's writ plea is scheduled on August 20.
