logo
An alliance and poll arithmetic

An alliance and poll arithmetic

The Hindu10-05-2025

The revival of the ties between the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has brought back to the political discourse how tie-ups are critical to the success of the main Dravidian parties, including the ruling DMK. Though their combined vote share was close to 66% of the votes polled in the seven Assembly elections since 1991, the two main Dravidian parties had always faced the electorate in the company of one or more parties. An exception to this rule was former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa putting up the AIADMK nominees in 227 constituencies during the 2016 election and allotting one constituency each to seven parties that contested on the AIADMK symbol. This gamble paid off. But 2016 is a distant past and neither the DMK nor its main adversary, AIADMK, would like to take any such risk in 2026. Moreover, the principal Opposition party learnt a lesson the hard way in the 2024 Lok Sabha election; it went to the polls in the company of smaller parties such as the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam (DMDK), the Puthiya Tamizhagam, and the Social Democratic Party of India to take on the DMK, which joined hands with the Congress, two Left parties, the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi, the Indian Union Muslim League, and the Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam.
Drawing a blank
Given this backdrop, the AIADMK's performance was predictably disastrous: it did not win a single seat and forfeited deposit in seven constituencies. It suffered such a debacle for the first time since it was formed in October 1972. The BJP-led National Democratic Alliance's vote share was around 18.2%, with the BJP alone accounting for 11.4%. It was evident that had the AIADMK-led coalition, with a vote share of around 23.3%, and the NDA, which had the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK), the Tamil Maanila Congress (Moopanar), the Amma Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam (AMMK) and groups headed by O. Panneerselvam, A.C. Shanmugam, John Pandian, and T. Dhevanathan Yadav, been on the same side, the outcome would have been different. At least now, proponents of the coming-together of these two alliances say such a combine could have prevented the DMK-led front's landslide. It is against these circumstances that the renewal of ties between the AIADMK and the BJP has assumed importance. Stitching the alliance last month, Union Minister for Home Affairs and senior BJP leader Amit Shah said in Chennai, 'We will fight the election under the leadership of Edappadiji [AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami].'
One more factor that led to the revival of the relationship is the perception that the BJP, led by a firebrand K. Annamalai for over three years till recently, had made inroads in the Kongu or western region, a traditional stronghold of the AIADMK. Take the instance of Thondamuthur, now represented by former Local Administration Minister and AIADMK's face in Coimbatore S.P. Velumani. In 2021, Mr. Velumani polled about 1.24 lakh votes, whereas, three years later, his colleague could poll barely 58,000 votes in the segment that comes under the Pollachi Lok Sabha constituency. The BJP's Vasantharajan took away around 56,800 votes. Had they remained together, they might have easily overtaken the DMK's K. Eswarasamy, who polled 98,355 votes. In terms of the total number of votes polled in Thondamuthur , there was only a marginal decline — 2,30,531 votes in 2021 and 2,28,535 votes (excluding postal votes) in 2024. On its own, the AIADMK was ahead of the DMK-led coalition only in four Assembly constituencies in the western region, two of which (Edappadi and Kumarapalayam) are being represented by Mr. Palaniswami and former Electricity Minister P. Thangamani respectively. According to a study done by this journalist based on the performance of the parties in the 2024 election, had the AIADMK-led front and the NDA been together, the combine would have taken the lead in 34 more constituencies of the region.
Belied hopes
While parting ways with the BJP in September 2023, the AIADMK thought that it would 'get back' a part of the votes of the minority communities which, according to the party, had been lost because of its alliance with the national party. In fact, immediately after the 2021 election results were out, former Law Minister C. Ve. Shanmugam, who was defeated in Villupuram, had blamed the BJP for his party losing the support of the minority communities in his constituency, including 18,000 in Villupuram town. Mr. Shanmugam, now a Rajya Sabha Member, had polled 87,403 votes against 1,02,271 votes garnered by R. Lakshmanan of the DMK. Likewise, the party's long-time spokesperson and former Fisheries Minister, D. Jayakumar, referred to his defeat in Royapuram (that he had represented since 1991, except during 1996-2001) and said that after netting 36,645 votes, he would not have lost by about 25,000 votes (the actual margin was 27,779), had the AIADMK gone to the polls without the BJP. However, in 2024, their party's performance was poorer than in 2021. In Royapuram and Villupuram, it polled 24,247 votes and 62,825 votes respectively. 'They [the minority communities] do not want us to be with the BJP. But they would not vote for us in elections. Under such circumstances, what else can we do?' wonders an AIADMK veteran in the western region.
The biggest weak spot for the AIADMK is the region of Kancheepuram, Tiruvallur, Chengalpattu, and Chennai (KTCC), where it could win only one (Madurantakam) out of 37 constituencies in 2021. There has not been much change in the situation since then. Had the formations led by the AIADMK and the BJP contested together, they would have got one more — T. Nagar, where the AIADMK lost to the DMK four years ago by 137 votes. Another problematic region for the AIADMK is the Cauvery delta, where the party bagged only four of the 41 constituencies. They were won by former Ministers R. Vaithilingam (Orathanadu), O.S. Manian (Vedaranyam), R. Kamaraj (Nannilam), and C. Vijayabaskar (Viralimalai). If the 2024 voting pattern is any indication, the party needs the support of the national party and its partners to win even in Viralimalai and Vedaranyam.
One more ally needed
Assuming that all the allies of the BJP and the AIADMK, including the PMK and the DMDK which are yet to decide on the alliance, remain in the NDA, such a combine, based on the 2024 performance, would not be able to defeat the DMK and its allies next year. It requires one more party, which can either be the Naam Tamilar Katchi, which grabbed 8.24% of the votes polled last year, or the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam. As the TVK is an untested force, it is too early to assess its strength. However, if one is to go by what the DMDK, founded by Vijayakant, polled in the 2006 Assembly and 2009 Lok Sabha elections when it contested alone, one can assume that the TVK's vote share can be 8% to 10%. As of now, NTK leader Seeman has been maintaining that his party will go it alone, while TVK founder Vijay says his party will head a coalition. If the AIADMK-BJP combine brings the NTK to its side, it can win 48 more constituencies, of which 19 are in the KTCC and Cauvery delta regions.
Though the circumstances under which the people are going to vote next year will be different from what they were last year, the possibility of the revamped NDA (comprising parties that include the AIADMK, the BJP, the PMK, and the NTK) giving a tough fight to the DMK-led front is real. At the same time, even the DMK's critics would acknowledge that the biggest strength of the party and its allies is their vote-transferring capacity. It was not by coincidence but by design that the DMK-led front could have a vote share of 47% in 2024. Also, all its constituents had a vote share, ranging from 42% to 51%, in their contested seats. Individually, the DMK, by getting about 5.34 lakh votes in every contested Lok Sabha constituency last year, had demonstrated that its vote base in every Assembly seat was, on an average, 89,000 votes, as six Assembly segments constitute one Lok Sabha constituency. This would be formidable, given that a prospective winner in the Assembly election would require around 90,000 votes. Between the 2016 Assembly election and the 2024 Lok Sabha election, around 4.41 crore voters had exercised their franchise. This meant that roughly 1.88 lakh votes were cast in every Assembly constituency. The DMK's score of 89,000-odd should be viewed only against this context. Predictably, the AIADMK is in no position to better its arch rival; hence, it needs more allies. This requirement has been realised by Mr. Palaniswami, who has been saying that more parties will come over to his side. It remains to be seen whether the Leader of the Opposition is able to beat Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, who appears to have an edge over others.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Action taken against those visibly responsible': Siddaramaiah defends government's response in Bengaluru stampede case
'Action taken against those visibly responsible': Siddaramaiah defends government's response in Bengaluru stampede case

Hindustan Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Action taken against those visibly responsible': Siddaramaiah defends government's response in Bengaluru stampede case

Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Friday hit out at the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for politicising the stampede at Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium, which claimed 11 lives and left dozens injured. The incident occurred during RCB's IPL victory celebrations on June 4. Responding to allegations from the BJP that the Congress-led state government was scapegoating the police, Siddaramaiah told ANI that action had been taken against officials found 'visibly responsible' and 'negligent in their duty.' 'They [BJP] are doing this for politics. I don't do politics. We have taken action against those who were found visibly responsible,' the Chief Minister said. (Also Read: 'Doesn't listen to anyone': Nikhil Kamath recalls what a politician said about suspended Bengaluru top cop B Dayananda) Meanwhile, Karnataka BJP President BY Vijayendra accused the government of acting under pressure, pointing out that key decisions, including the suspension of senior police officers and the registration of FIRs — only came after public outrage. 'The government acted only when pressure mounted. The real accused are Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, Deputy CM DK Shivakumar, and Home Minister G Parameshwara. They should be investigated,' Vijayendra said. Following the tragedy, the government suspended multiple senior police officials, including Bengaluru Police Commissioner B Dayananda. He was replaced by senior IPS officer Seemant Kumar Singh, who officially took charge on Friday. The list of suspended officers includes Additional Commissioner of Police Vikash Kumar Vikash, DCP (Central) Shekhar HT, ACP Balakrishna, and Cubbon Park Police Inspector Girish AK. In parallel, Karnataka Police registered an FIR against the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), event organisers DNA Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), alleging 'irresponsibility' and 'carelessness' in crowd management. In response, the KSCA board, including President Raghuram Bhat, Secretary A. Shankar, and Treasurer E.S. Jairam, filed a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court seeking to quash the FIRs. The plea will be heard later on Friday by a bench led by Justice Krishna Kumar. (Also Read: Bengaluru stampede: KSCA officials move High Court, seek quashing of FIR)

Delhi: Satyendar Jain appears before ACB for questioning in classroom construction case
Delhi: Satyendar Jain appears before ACB for questioning in classroom construction case

The Print

time22 minutes ago

  • The Print

Delhi: Satyendar Jain appears before ACB for questioning in classroom construction case

Before leaving for the ACB office, Jain had asserted that the previous AAP government in the national capital worked towards improving the city's education, while the current BJP government was only doing politics. New Delhi, Jun 6 (PTI) Former Delhi minister Satyendar Jain on Friday appeared before the Anti-Corruption Branch for questioning in connection with an alleged graft case in the construction of classrooms in government schools. Speaking to PTI Videos ahead of his questioning, Jain said the BJP was trying to divert attention from key issues. 'First, tell me, where did the word scam come from? They (BJP) do not want to work and are aiding private schools in increasing fees,' Jain said. 'Manish Sisodia (former education minister) did excellent work in schools. He has been summoned. I have been summoned. These are all tactics to divert attention. 'They (BJP) used to say that dogs are roaming in the streets, but we will clean the roads. Now they should get these things done, but they are only indulging in politics,' he charged. The ACB summoned AAP leaders Sisodia and Jain over alleged graft in the construction of classrooms in government schools. While Jain was asked to appear on Friday, Sisodia has been summoned on June 9. The summons come after an FIR was registered by the ACB on April 30 based on allegations of financial irregularities to the tune of Rs 2,000 crore in the construction of over 12,000 classrooms or semi-permanent structures in Delhi government schools. PTI SLB BM RHL This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Bengaluru stampede: Former city police chief Bhaskar Rao slams Karnataka government for Dayananda's suspension
Bengaluru stampede: Former city police chief Bhaskar Rao slams Karnataka government for Dayananda's suspension

The Hindu

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Bengaluru stampede: Former city police chief Bhaskar Rao slams Karnataka government for Dayananda's suspension

Calling it the 'darkest day in history of Karnataka police,' former IPS officer Bhaskar Rao slammed the Karnataka government for suspending Bengaluru City Police Commissioner B. Dayananda following the deadly stampede during the revelry to celebrate Royal Challengers Bengaluru's (RCB) IPL victory in the city on June 4, 2025. A day after the tragic incident at the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium, which claimed the lives of 11 people, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had on June 5, 2025, suspended Mr. Dayananda and all police officials responsible for the jurisdiction where the stadium is, pending inquiry. The government later named Seemanth Kumar Singh, a 1996 batch IPS officer, presently posted as Additional Director-General of Police, Bengaluru Metropolitan Task Force, as the new city Police Commissioner. Mr Siddaramiah has gone into Panic mode. The suspension of Bengaluru City Police Commissioner is the darkest day in the History of Karnataka Police. The prize for telling the Truth and he and his Team slogged the whole night to keep Bengaluru Safe. Everyone in Karnataka knows… — Bhaskar Rao (@Nimmabhaskar22) June 5, 2025 Mr. Rao, who himself served as the city police chief from August 2019 to August 2020, criticised the move in a post on X. While lashing out at CM Siddaramaiah for going into 'panic mode', he also accused Deputy CM D.K. Shivakumar of being 'the main culprit' who 'orchestrated the death march.' 'The Government has Blood on its Hands and Now has lost its Mind too. The Government is now in Disaster (sic),' wrote Mr. Rao who joined the BJP on March 1, 2023, after being the face of the Aam Aadmi Party in Karnataka for 11 months. He contested the 2023 Assembly elections as the BJP's candidate from Chamrajpet constituency in the city.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store