Kaleshwaram project: KCR to appear before Ghose Commission on June 11
KCR, as Chandrasekhar Rao is popularly known, was asked to appear on June 5, but on his request, the Commission changed the date.
The Commission on May 20 had issued notices to KCR, former minister T. Harish Rao and BJP MP Eatala Rajender. BRS leader Harish Rao has been summoned on June 6. Rajender has been directed to appear before the Commission on June 9.
When KCR was the Chief Minister, Harish Rao was the Irrigation Minister, while Rajender was the Finance Minister.
The Commission, headed by retired Supreme Court judge Pinaki Chandra Ghose, is probing the alleged irregularities in planning, design, construction, quality control, operation and maintenance of Medigadda, Annaram, and Sundilla Barrages of the Kaleshwaram project.
The one-man Commission was constituted in March 2024, a few months after some piers of the Medigadda Barrage caved in.
The term of the Commission has been extended repeatedly for seven times so far after its initial term ended on June 30, 2024. Notices to KCR, Harish Rao and Rajender were issued a day after the state government extended the Commission's term for two more months, till July 31, to enable it to complete the examination of all those involved.
The Commission has so far examined over 100 engineers, retired and serving officials associated with the barrages and others. Most of the engineers who were examined by the Commission either admitted to lapses in the procedures or expressed ignorance about decision-making.
The Commission examined various documents, including the final report of the National Dam Safety Authority, the Vigilance report and other files.
The panel was expected to submit its report to the government on May 21 or 22. However, the Commission decided to examine KCR, Harish Rao and Rajender as most of the engineers and officials who deposed before it stated that the decisions were taken in the presence of the then Chief Minister and that they acted on the Chief Minister's and ministers' orders.
The BRS alleged that the notice to KCR is an attempt by the Congress government to cover up its corruption and failures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Will not publish or circulate D'Cunha Commission report on Bengaluru stampede, Karnataka govt assures HC
The Karnataka High Court Wednesday directed the state government to ensure that the Justice (Retd) Michael D'Cunha Commission report on the June 4 stampede outside Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru is not published or circulated until the next date of hearing and the government assured the court of the same. The division bench of Justice Jayant Banerji and Justice Umesh M Adiga recorded the submission by Advocate General K Shashikiran Shetty and adjourned the hearing of the petition filed by DNA Entertainment Networks Private Limited to September 4, allowing the Karnataka government time to file its objections. Eleven people were killed in the stampede, which occurred during a celebration to mark the Indian Premier League (IPL) victory of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) cricket team. The Commission's findings held the event organisers and senior police officers responsible for the tragedy. As a result, the government decided to file criminal charges against officials from RCB, DNA Entertainment, and the Karnataka State Cricket Association. DNA, the event management partner of Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited, which owns RCB, filed the plea arguing the Commission violated the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, in the procedure adopted in conducting the inquiry. Senior advocate B K Sampath Kumar argued that DNA had not been granted the opportunity to cross-examine those witnesses who had deposed against them. Kumar alleged that DNA had not been given a copy of the report, when extracts from it had been circulated in the media, adding that the reputation of DNA was being tarnished 'every second'. The AG Wednesday stated that the Commission is a fact-finding body, and there is no question of damage to anyone's reputation. Kumar had previously stated before the court that the time provided for the inquiry was one month and the report was ready only by July 11, which was beyond the period. 'Nowhere is the power for the one-man Commission to say such-and-such action should be taken against any individuals. It is only to point out who is responsible, what were the lapses, etc,' he had said. At the time, AG Shetty had expressed doubts regarding the legal maintainability of the petition by DNA. The high court had then directed the judicial report to be placed before it in a sealed cover.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Duration of the CSE exam cannot be curtailed, the UPSC says
The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) has informed a parliamentary panel that the duration of the one-year long Civil Services Examination (CSE) cannot be curtailed. The time cycle for the CSE had been optimised to the extent possible, despite an increase in the number of candidates, centres and venues over the years, following a detailed analysis of the time taken in the pre-examination and post examination activities, the Commission said. 'One of the most vital factors that go into the determination of the time schedule of an examination is the need to maintain the utmost confidentiality and integrity of the examination process. Various checks and balances have been integrated in the examination system, which have been gained through years of experience to eliminate the risk to confidentiality and integrity,' the UPSC said in its reply to the the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice. The reply is mentioned in the 154th Report on Action Taken on the 131st Report on 'Review of Functioning of Recruitment Organisations of Government of India' pertaining to the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, tabled in the Rajya Sabha on August 8. The CSE is conducted in three stages — the Preliminary Examination (objective type), the Civil Services (Mains) Examination (descriptive type), and Personality Test/Interview. The exams are held to recruit officers for 19 civil services, including the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), the Indian Police Service (IPS), and the Indian Foreign Service (IFS). In accordance with the current trend, the number of applications for the Preliminary Examination was over one million every year, the UPSC said. The 2023 Examination was held at 79 centres across the country, with 2,538 venues to accommodate 10.27 lakh candidates. The gap between the three phases of the exam had been within a range of around two-and-a-half to three months, the UPSC said, adding that there was hardly any scope to further compress the time between the date of advertisement or notification of the CSE, and the date of holding it. Evaluation of nine descriptive-type answer scripts took more time, that is, over two months, as nearly 1.20 lakh answer sheets in different subjects were evaluated by different teams of experts, the UPSC said. The parliamentary panel had recommended a comprehensive re-examination of the civil services recruitment framework, stressing that the process be rationalised and streamlined. 'At present, the examination cycle stretches across almost an entire year,' the panel said. The Parliamentary Standing Committee had asked the Department of Personnel and Training to establish a clear timeline for the implementation of the Baswan Committee's reforms. In 2015, an expert committee, chaired by B.S. Baswan, former Secretary, Ministry of Education, was constituted to comprehensively examine the various issues regarding the CSE, including a high rate of absenteeism among the applicants to the exam. The panel said that UPSC should explore the feasibility of declaring the answer key to the Preliminary exam after the exam was over, instead of publishing it after the declaration of the final results. 'Candidates should be allowed to raise objections at this stage only, and on that basis, any discrepancies related to the answer key of the Preliminary examination should be resolved. This should be taken into account before publishing the results of candidates qualifying for the next stage, i.e., the Civil Services Mains examination,' the panel said. The UPSC said it had an online Question Paper Representation Portal (QPRep) on its website, where candidates could submit their views on any aspect of a question. The Commission released the answer key after the completion of the entire process, a policy it followed in all examinations, which had been working smoothly. 'As the above system of disclosing keys after the final result of the Examination is working fine since inception and serving the larger public interest very well, no requirement is felt to change the same,' the UPSC said. The matter is sub judice in the Supreme Court, the UPSC told the parliamentary panel.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
BRS flays hike in life tax on vehicles, says it's heavy burden on middle-class, poor
The recent increase in life tax on vehicles effected by the State Government is nothing short of a ruthless blow to the poor and middle-class families of Telangana, former minister and Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader T. Harish Rao has said. Condemning the government decision, Mr. Rao accused the government of exploiting people through oppressive taxation policies. He said Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy had proved his deputy M. Bhatti Vikramarka's words right that the Congress had immense experience in collecting revenue by turning this experience into a burden on the common man. Without any justification, the Congress Government had issued GOs 53 and 54 increasing life tax on new vehicles and squeezing the poor and middle class under additional financial pressure. Purchasing even a two-wheeler costs over ₹1 lakh in the present day. Farmers, small traders and daily wage workers depend on these vehicles for livelihood and raising the life tax from 12% to 15% on two-wheelers above ₹1 lakh is nothing but extortion, the BRS leader said. For instance, if a two-wheeler's showroom price is ₹1.10 lakh, the previous tax was ₹13,200 and with the hike it would become ₹16,500 – an additional burden of ₹3,200 per two-wheelerke. Across Telangana, this life tax hike would extract over ₹1,000 crore from the people. Owning a car is an aspiration for many families and most middle-class buyers rely on loans to fulfil this dream. But the Congress Government had shattered those hopes as cars priced between ₹10-₹20 lakh would not attract 18% life tax, up from 17%. resulting in an extra burden of nearly ₹20,000 per vehicle. For vehicles priced above ₹20 lakh and ₹50 lakh, the life tax was been raised by 2% and 3%, respectively, burdening more households. The government didn't stop there and increased taxes on commercial vehicles too from 20% to 22% for vehicles costing above ₹20 lakh and up to 25% for those over ₹50 lakh. Ultimately, this tax burden would be passed on to the market and affect the general public through increased prices of goods and services. In addition, the Congress government is handing over road management under the HAM (Hybrid Annuity Model) to private companies for 15–20 years. To fund this model through loans, the government is quietly increasing taxes as a backdoor way to loot people under the pretext of development, Mr. Rao added.
