
Apple's developers conference left Wall Street analysts underwhelmed. Here's what they said
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 Top Dividend Stocks Duke It Out. Which Is Better?
Key Points On top of its regular dividend, Costco also occasionally pays out a much bigger special dividend. Both companies increased their dividend this year. Valuation is ultimately what makes one stock a better buy than the other. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › When investors think about dividend stocks, they usually start with high-yielding names. Utilities, telecoms, and big consumer staples often dominate the conversation. But sometimes the best dividend opportunities come from companies with low payouts. That's where membership-based wholesale retailer Costco (NASDAQ: COST) and Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL) come in. Both yield less than 1%, making them easy to dismiss for income. Yet, both are outstanding businesses with excellent dividend growth prospects. Costco, specifically, delivers incredible stability and even pays occasional special dividends on top of its regular dividend. Meanwhile, Alphabet has a brand-new payout and is one of the cheapest valuations among big tech. But which one of these two dividend growth stocks edges out the other when compared head-to-head? Costco: Dependable income at a high price Costco has a reputation for consistency, and its dividend reflects that. The company's payout is below 30%, leaving plenty of room for business reinvestment and steady dividend increases over time. Additionally, Costco has increased its dividend every year for more than two decades, with an annual growth rate of around 13% in recent years. The latest raise came this spring, when management boosted the quarterly dividend to $1.30. That puts the annual payout at $5.20 and the dividend yield at roughly 0.5%. Notably, Costco offers more than just its regular dividend. From time to time, the company pays special dividends, too. In early 2024, for instance, shareholders received a $15 special dividend. These extra payouts can make a big difference for long-term holders, even though they come only occasionally. The issue with Costco, however, is the stock's valuation. Shares trade at more than 50 times earnings, a very high multiple for a stock that grew its sales and earnings per share 8% and 13%, respectively, in its most recent quarter. That premium reflects both the quality of the business and investors' willingness to pay up for its reliability. But such a lofty valuation leaves little margin for error. Even though sales and earnings continue to grow at a healthy pace, today's stock price already bakes in years of strong performance. Investors buying now should expect modest returns from here unless Costco delivers upside surprises. Alphabet: Small yield, big upside Alphabet only started paying a dividend in 2024, so it doesn't have Costco's long track record. The payout is small, with an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and a yield of around 0.4%. But the payout ratio is less than 10%. That leaves huge room for growth if management decides to raise the dividend in future years. The company is also aggressively investing in its business (perhaps explaining why management increased its dividend by only 5% this year). Capital expenditures are surging as Alphabet builds out its artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud infrastructure. Sure, this has weighed on free cash flow in the short term. But investors should remember that these investments are aimed at capturing long-term growth opportunities. Making the case for Alphabet stock even stronger, the internet search and cloud computing company's growth story benefits from a diversified set of key revenue sources -- and they're all doing well. Alphabet's advertising business remains strong, YouTube continues to expand, and Google Cloud is gaining ground. Unlike Costco, valuation is a bright spot for Alphabet. Shares trade at about 21 times forward earnings -- a much lower multiple than tech peers like Microsoft and Meta and far below Costco. That's unusual for a company still posting strong double-digit growth in both revenue and profits. Revenue and operating income both increased 14% year over year in the company's second quarter of 2025. With earnings growth like this, Alphabet could ramp up its dividend in a big way down the road (though it might have to get through a period of high capital expenditures first as it invests aggressively in growth). A clear winner Costco and Alphabet may both look like low-yield stocks, but they represent two very different kinds of dividend investments. Costco is the steady option. It offers a safe payout, regular increases, and the occasional special dividend. But investors pay a steep price for that safety, which limits future returns. Alphabet, by contrast, has only just begun rewarding shareholders with dividends. The yield is tiny but could grow substantially over time. More importantly, the tech stock's valuation is much cheaper than Costco's. For investors willing to accept a small payout today in exchange for better long-term potential, Alphabet is the clear winner. Should you invest $1,000 in Alphabet right now? Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Daniel Sparks and his clients do not have positions in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Costco Wholesale, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Top Dividend Stocks Duke It Out. Which Is Better? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
iPhone 17 Air tipped to make 3 big compromises vs iPhone 17 Pro — here's what you're giving up
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Like Samsung and its Galaxy S25 Edge, Apple will reportedly chase a thinner phone design when it releases the much-rumored iPhone 17 Air later this fall. A likely replacement for the iPhone 16 Plus, the Air could deliver a thinner phone to the iPhone 17 lineup, but not without making a few key compromises. That's what regular leaker Fixed Focus Digital claims in a Weibo post, anyway. The leaker says that the iPhone 17 Air will be very similar to the upcoming iPhone 17 Pro, but with three big sacrifices in the name of a thinner phone. 'It has almost all the configurations of the Pro, but it cuts one core in the GPU part, and the screen and battery are not as good as the Pro,' Fixed Focus Digital wrote in the machine-translated post, adding that they were 'quite optimistic' about the iPhone 17 Air. What this means is that the iPhone 17 Air will still feature an A19 Pro chipset, as we expect to see in the Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, but that it will have five GPU cores instead of the six found in the Pro models' chipset. The Air would still be more powerful than the standard iPhone 17, which is supposed to have a standard A19 processor. Battery & screen sacrifices Fixed Focus doesn't specify, but they also mentioned that the screen and battery are supposed to be steps back from what the iPhone 16 Plus offers.. Current rumors have the iPhone 17 Air featuring a 6.6-inch OLED display, a skosh smaller than the iPhone 16 Plus' 6.7-inch panel. The same leaker previously claimed that the Air would have a 120Hz screen but not a ProMotion display, so it won't have a variable refresh rate. A thinner phone usually means a smaller capacity battery — that's one of the compromises Samsung had to make with the Galaxy S25 Edge. But Apple may go even smaller with the iPhone 17 Air's power pack as reports claim the phone will either feature a 2,800 mAh battery or a 2,900 mAh cell. Either outcome would be smaller than the 3,900 mAh battery in the S25 Edge. The iPhone 16 Pro was able to fit a larger 3,582 mAh battery in the phone. We haven't seen many rumors on battery size for the iPhone 17 Pro, but it could rely on better power efficiency to get more life out of the battery. That's not all Even compared to the standard iPhone 17, the Air model is expected to have a more limited camera setup. Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo believes the Air will only feature a single 48MP rear lens, and leaked renders of the iPhone 17 Air seem to bear that rumor out In contrast, the standard iPhone 17 should have the same 48MP primary lens and a 12MP ultrawide as the iPhone 16. Meanwhile, the Pro models could feature an upgraded 48MP telephoto lens in their rear camera array. Add it all up and it feels like the iPhone 17 Air is making a lot of major compromises to reach a very specific aesthetic over actual performance. Even so, Fixed Focus Digital believes the phone will be a hit, so it will be interesting to see how people respond to iPhone 17 Air when it arrives. That could be very soon as the iPhone 17 series is likely to launch in September — just a few weeks from now. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide Meet the iPhone of 2035 — it's the 'mainframe on your body' Apple Watch 11 — here's the 5 biggest rumored upgrades Apple just revealed what the 'all-glass' iPhone of the future could look like — and it's something to behold
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
iPhone 17 Air — here's where Apple can succeed where Samsung failed
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Samsung intended to start a revolution when it launched the Galaxy S25 Edge not long ago, but the reality is that the phone turned out to be underwhelming. I've been using it for more than two months now, and given my experience with the ultra-thin phone, Apple certainly has the opportunity to steal its thunder with the iPhone 17 Air. It's one of the many new iPhones tipped for reveal at an upcoming rumored Apple September event. The iPhone 17 Air could end up being the most compelling model the company introduces in years. I've been keeping tabs on all the rumors and leaks, so while it's unlikely we'll see dramatic changes between now and its reveal, there are still ways Apple could make it a more compelling thin phone. I know there are areas where we could see compromises, but I'll explain how the iPhone 17 Air could still succeed where the Galaxy S25 Edge failed. Here's how. A single rear camera that just works Since I'm a camera guy, I'm most interested in the cameras rumored to accompany the iPhone 17 Air — or should I say, camera? While I'm a bit forgiving about Apple's decision to give the iPhone 16e a single rear camera, it feels wrong to do it with the iPhone 17 Air. So far, the rumors suggest that it will have a single 48MP camera on the back, which isn't appetizing when you're used to a triple camera setup. This might be an area where I could say the Galaxy S25 Edge is better than the iPhone 17 Air, but Apple can still surprise us. That's because I need to just look back at my 200 photo shootout between the iPhone 16e and Pixel 9a, like the side-by-side shot above. Even though the iPhone 16e narrowly lost, it did impress me for its strong telephoto and dynamic range performances. It's proof of Apple's excellent image processing with its iPhones, so it could do the same for the iPhone 17 Air. Another thing worth pointing out is all the leaked images and renders of the iPhone 17 Air. The back of the phone shows a prominent camera bar that spans one side to the other, which could lead me to suspect that there could be a larger sensor in there — perhaps the same one for the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max. If so, that would give it more leverage. The only thing it would lack is an ultrawide, but I wouldn't mind keeping it to just a single camera if its field of view ends up being a smidge wider. Thin phone doesn't have to mean shorter battery life There's no denying that the iPhone 17 Air is going to be a remarkable feat of engineering for a modern device. So far, it looks like it's going to be thinner than the Galaxy S25 Edge with rumors of it being as thin as 5.5mm. In comparison, the S25 Edge measures in at 5.8mm. As I've noted in my Galaxy S25 Edge review, the biggest compromise to designing a thin phone is that battery life is dramatically impacted. A thinner phone means less room for a battery, subsequently resulting in a much shorter battery life. However, Apple could squash any battery drain concerns with the iPhone 17 Air — by looking at what the current iOS 26 beta offers. Apple's latest iPhone software has a ton of features, but one that's overlooked is the new adaptive power mode. I suspect this could be the answer to addressing any anxiety about its battery endurance, by dynamically adjusting the phone's performance to get more juice out of the battery. Plus, I think the A19 Pro chip rumored to power the iPhone 17 Air would be power efficient enough to hopefully make it last longer than the standard iPhone 17. Higher price point doesn't mean paying more I'm hoping that the iPhone 17 Air ends up taking the same $899 price point that the current iPhone 16 Plus holds in Apple's lineup. However, I'm not as optimistic about that given the price of the Galaxy S25 Edge and Galaxy Z Fold 7. There are rumors that the iPhone 17 Air could end up being even more costly than the iPhone 17 Pro Max. Hopefully, that's not true because it would have an even tougher time convincing people (myself included). Realistically, Apple could fit the Air in between the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max — which would put it at $1,099, assuming Apple maintains its pricing structure from before. This would put it in direct competition with the Galaxy S25 Edge, but a higher price point still wouldn't make it a dealbreaker. Even though I'm all about the best cheap phones, I would be shocked if there aren't deals for the iPhone 17 Air at launch to bring down its price. Nearly every major carrier will offer some kind of deal because that's been their standard procedure with every major phone release. Take the iPhone 16 Pro Max last year when it dropped down in price to a penny less than a month after its launch. Sure, you'll have to sign off on some sort of phone plan, but the end result was getting a new iPhone on the cheap. This could happen for the iPhone 17 Air, so I'm not too worried about a higher price point. It would only really affect those buying the phone outright. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide iOS 26 public beta 3 has already arrived — here's what's new Right now is the worst time to buy a new iPhone — here's why I've been using apps on the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7's cover screen with this download — but I'm not totally in love with it