Rude Hotels by Vir Sanghvi: Room at the top
A few friends joined him and they found a location outside the city to build their villas. But, as construction commenced, they realised that the area lacked the basic infrastructure required to support luxury homes.
So, Zecha decided he would build a small hotel next to their homes that would provide the generators, boilers, laundry, security, etc needed to provide support services to their homes. He called the hotel Amanpuri, and by the time it opened in late 1987, a business model had emerged. Zecha and his friends sold more land around the hotel to other millionaires who built their own luxury homes. Amanpuri managed the properties and, if the millionaires so chose, they could offer their homes up for rent when they were not using them for their own vacations.
Adrian Zecha built Phuket's Amanpuri in 1987 to offer support services to his friends' luxury homes.
The Amanpuri experience had two consequences. The residences-plus-hotel model began to be copied all over the world. It was good for guests because they got to spend holidays by renting the homes of millionaires. It was good for the millionaires because they earned money from their vacation homes when they were not using them. And it was good for hotel developers because they made an immediate return on their investment by selling luxury residences on the hotel site.
But there was also a second consequence. Zecha priced the hotel rooms in Amanpuri at such high rates that most hoteliers thought he was crazy. The hoteliers were wrong. Amanpuri became a rage and guests flocked to Phuket.
Zecha had found a new niche: Super-rich travellers who were willing to pay a fortune for small, luxury hotels. Zecha got back into hoteliering full-time and created the Aman chain of exclusive, expensive hotels. He started out with many Asian locations (he is Indonesian) but expanded to such unlikely destinations as Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
I did a TV show on Aman hotels at the height of Zecha's success and stayed at many of the hotels. I was struck by several things. One: The hotels were all very different and were united only by Zecha's whims, quirks and fancies. Two: Though some of the hotels had great exteriors designed by such brilliant architects as Ed Tuttle, the interiors and rooms could be sparse, boring and impractical for guests. Once you checked in, you didn't always find super-luxury experiences. And three: The food was usually disappointing.
Aman has developed the Japanese restaurant Nama, and the Italian Arva in-house.
Though Aman became a hugely influential chain in concept terms, it struggled financially and many of the quirkier hotels lost money. At one stage, aggressive investors removed Zecha. He returned only to eventually sell the company to India's DLF (which retained his management) before finally losing control completely when DLF sold it to a group of investors led by Vladislav Doronin, a Swedish citizen of Russian extraction who had made a fortune in property and trading, and had dated such glamorous figures as Naomi Campbell.
Though the transition to the new regime was rocky within the old Aman team, Doronin has proved to be good for Aman. He has moved from Zecha's quirkiness to providing a solid luxury experience, stabilised the company's finances, expanded to new locations, attracted corporate investors and turned Aman, which is the preserve of a small number of wealthy guests ('Amanjunkies') into the international hotel group of choice for the global super-rich.
The food is finally worth the prices the hotels charge (Arva and Nama, new, high-quality Italian and Japanese restaurant brands have been developed in-house). The managers are trained professionals, which they weren't always in the Zecha era. The newer hotels offer a consistent luxury experience.
Vladislav Doronin (who once dated Naomi Campbell) now owns the chain and is shaking things up.
Most important, Aman has finally succeeded in moving beyond the resorts category. The old regime screwed up with its first city hotel (now The Lodhi in Delhi; DLF held on to it when it sold Aman) and its Tokyo property was stuck in limbo until it opened, post-takeover, to win fame as one of the world's best hotels. The Aman in New York is the city's most expensive and exclusive hotel. And the Aman Nai Lert, which opened in Bangkok earlier this year, is the region's hottest hotel, winning the loyalty of top-tier guests despite charging nearly double of what The Oriental, previously Bangkok's top hotel, charges.
I stayed there shortly after it opened, and everyone I met in Bangkok (mostly from the hospitality business) asked: 'Wow! Tell us what it's really like!' When a hotel evokes that level of awe, it tells you something about the esteem with which Aman is regarded.
What accounts for Aman's exalted position in the hotel world? It's a hard question to answer.
In the Zecha era, Aman was tapping into a premium market that other hoteliers had not addressed. But now that there is no shortage of luxury hotels with huge villas and massive private pools, wealthy guests have many other options.
Probably the best way to describe why Aman is still at the top nevertheless, is that its hotels manage to create an alternate reality that is peaceful, refined and exclusive. Of course the design is outstanding (the lobby in Bangkok designed by Jean Michel Gathy is breathtaking) and the rooms are super luxurious. But it's more than that: The hotels smell of restrained elegance and good taste. Aman is less in the business of selling hotel rooms and more in the business of creating a sophisticated environment, where every detail is perfect. The super-rich think that they are different from the rest of us. Aman reminds them that they are absolutely right to feel that way.
In keeping with that philosophy, Aman now has several brand extensions. In 2018 a skincare line was successfully launched. In 2020 came Aman fragrances. In 2022 a clothes line became available.
A few years ago, as prices of hotel rooms skyrocketed, Aman created a new hotel brand, Janu, at a lower price point, but with the same sensibility as the flagship.
It's all a long way from the original conception of Amanpuri as a place for Zecha and his friends. The world has changed. But Aman has kept pace with the changes and to its credit, it is now better than it has ever been.
From HT Brunch, Aug 16, 2025
Follow us on www.instagram.com/htbrunch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Delhi airport capacity soars past 100 million, joining elite global club
The Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL)-run hub entered the list in May last year and closed 2024 at 109 million passenger-handling capacity, following the full operationalisation of Terminal 1 Surajeet Das Gupta New Delhi Listen to This Article Delhi airport, with a capacity to handle 109 million passengers annually, has joined a select group of airports worldwide in the '100-million-plus club,' based on data from OAG and airport operators. There are only six airports in this exclusive list. The Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL)-run hub entered the list in May last year and closed 2024 at 109 million passenger-handling capacity, following the full operationalisation of Terminal 1. That makes it the only Asian airport, apart from Tokyo Haneda, in this group. If the government clears plans to rebuild and modernise Terminal 2, the overall capacity could rise further
The Print
35 minutes ago
- The Print
Fewer South Koreans & Israelis, more South Africans now see India favourably—latest Pew survey
The Pew survey was carried out this year from January to April across 24 countries, just before the Pahalgam terror attack and the announcement of tariffs on Indian imports by US President Donald Trump. Its findings were made public on 13 August. Significantly, in South Korea, favourability fell by 16 percentage points from 2024, while in the US opinion was almost evenly divided. New Delhi: Up to 60 percent or more respondents in Kenya, the UK and Israel hold a highly favourable opinion of India, while most respondents in Turkey and Australia held an unfavourable view, according to a new Pew Research Center survey. In roughly half of the surveyed countries, more respondents held a positive view of India than a negative one, the survey report notes. Also, in half of the countries surveyed, men were more likely than women to have a favourable view of India, with differences by gender in double digits in Japan, the Netherlands, Germany, Argentina and France. The report also indicated a gradual change in perception of India in several countries, with 46 percent respondents in South Africa expressing a favourable opinion, marking the highest level since 2008 when the question was first asked, and up 17 percentage points since 2023. The shift can be attributed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi proposing in August 2023 that African nations, including South Africa, be granted permanent membership in the G20. In 2024, both countries also collaborated to establish the India-South Africa Chamber of Commerce. In a few European nations, views of India have gone up favourably, including by double digits in France and Germany, according to the survey. The two nations showed improvements of 11 and 10 percentage points, respectively, since 2023, compared to Italy, which showed a modest rise of 2 percentage points in favourability towards the subcontinent. In the Asia-Pacific region, respondents' views on India have remained relatively stable, with Australia maintaining the same percentage in 2024 and 2025, while Indonesia saw a slight increase in favourable views from 51 percent in 2024 to 57 percent in 2025. Conversely, perceptions in South Korea have declined to 42 percent this year from 58 percent in 2024. The Pew Research Centre conducted this survey following the inauguration of the Indian embassy in North Korea in December 2024. The Japanese hold India in high esteem, with favourable views rising to 58 percent this year from 55 percent last year. Also, while the majority of Israelis continue to maintain a positive perception of India, there has been a decline in favourability by 11 percentage points since 2023. The survey highlighted uncertainty among women from France, Poland, Hungary, Australia, and South Africa regarding their opinions of India. Views also varied by age in six countries, the survey noted. Young individuals from nations such as Brazil, the Netherlands, Japan, and the UK tend to have more favourable views than their older counterparts. For example, adults younger than 35 in the UK were 20 points more likely than adults 50 and above to have a good opinion of India. The survey also indicated that opinion of India varied along ideological lines in five countries. In Australia, Nigeria and South Africa, those on the ideological Right view India more favourably than those on the ideological Left. In the US and Mexico, the reverse is true, according to the survey. Neetu Sharma is an alum of ThePrint School of Journalism, currently interning with ThePrint. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: 'Nones' were 3rd largest group globally after Christians, Muslims in 2010-2020, finds Pew survey
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Fatal blast at US steel's Clairton plant sparks doubts over its future
The fatal explosion last week at US Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the US along with profits, share prices and steel prices have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved US Steel's nearly USD 15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley, David Burritt, US Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time. Will the explosion change anything? The explosion killed two workers and hospitalised 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the US. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong and that it sent technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support. Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay. US Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend USD 100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get US Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two where the explosion occurred were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, US Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odour into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organisation, said US Steel has been forced to pay USD 57 million in fines and settlements since January 1, 2020 for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he found no indication that US Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance programme for the Clairton plant. The Clairton plant, he wrote, is inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design. US Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said US Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. Will Clairton be modernised? It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest USD 11 billion into US Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the USD 2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, US Steel had signalled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that US Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. Relics of steelmaking's past In many ways, US Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, US steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the US has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favour. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the US, there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Centre for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe, Briem said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
