&w=3840&q=100)
‘How to Train Your Dragon' beats ‘Lilo & Stitch' in its box office debut with $83.7 million
The reboot easily outpaced 2019's 'How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World,' which opened with $55 million. The latest film earned more than $114.1 million internationally, bringing the global total to $197.8 million. read more
'_How to Train Your Drago_n' took flight at the box office this weekend, proving that some remakes still have teeth.
The Universal live-action adaptation of the beloved animated franchise soared to a strong $83.7 million debut in North American theaters, according to Comscore estimates Sunday. The film, directed by franchise veteran Dean DeBlois, follows the unlikely friendship between a young Viking named Hiccup (Mason Thames) and a dragon called Toothless.
The reboot easily outpaced 2019's 'How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World,' which opened with $55 million. The latest film earned more than $114.1 million internationally, bringing the global total to $197.8 million.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'This is yet another example of a live-action remake really delivering on the promise of the marketing,' said Paul Dergarabedian, the senior media analyst for Comscore. 'I think the longevity and playability of some of these films particularly in the summer has been nothing short of miraculous.'
'How to Train' also claimed the No. 1 spot ahead of Disney's 'Lilo & Stitch,' which slipped to second place after topping the charts for three weekends. That hybrid live-action remake added another $15 million, pushing its domestic total past $386.3 million.
'Materialists,' a modern-day New York love story starring Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal, and Chris Evans, rounded out the top three films of the week with a $12 million debut. The romantic dramedy features Johnson as a savvy matchmaker caught between two suitors: a broke, struggling actor who happens to be her ex, and a wealthy 'unicorn' who seems too good to be true.
'Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning' slid to fourth place, taking in $10.3 million and avoiding a dip into single-digit territory.
The John Wick spinoff 'Ballerina' fell to fifth place with $9.4 million, despite strong reviews from both critics and audiences. Directed by Len Wiseman, the action film stars Ana de Armas and features Keanu Reeves reprising his role in a supporting turn.
Dergarabedian said 'Ballerina' could have a surge later down the line similar to 2014's 'John Wick.'
'It took a while for that franchise to really catch on,' he said. 'You saw a huge outpouring of interest for the first 'John Wick' when it hit home video or streaming, I should say, and I think the same will happen here.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In sixth place, 'Karate Kid: Legends' earned $5 million followed by 'Final Destination: Bloodlines' at seventh with $3.9 million. Wes Anderson's latest 'The Phoenician Scheme' brought in $3 million eighth place. 'The Life of Chuck,' based on a Stephen King story, placed ninth with $2.1 million.
Rounding out the top 10 was 'Sinners.' The Ryan Coogler film starring Michael B. Jordan, drew $1.4 million - which is impressive since the movie is available to watch at home through online and digital platforms after being released two months ago.
Overall, the box office is up 23% from this point in 2024.
Dergarabedian said he's looking forward to films in the coming weeks that could have a positive presence at the box office, such as 'Eilo,' 'F1,' 'Superman' and '28 Days Later.'
Top 10 movies by domestic box office
With final domestic figures being released Monday, this list factors in the estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Comscore:
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
1. 'How to Train Your Dragon,' $83.7 million
2. 'Lilo and Stitch,' $15.5 million.
3. 'Materialists,' $12 million.
4. 'Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning,' $10.3 million.
5. 'From the World of John Wick: Ballerina,' $9.4 million.
6. 'Karate Kid: Legends,' $5 million.
7. 'Final Destination: Bloodlines,' $3.9 million.
8. 'The Phoenician Scheme,' $3 million.
9. 'The Life of Chuck,' $2.1 million.
10. 'Sinners,' $1.4 million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Rahul Matthan: AI models aren't copycats but learners just like us
On 11 June 2025, Disney and Universal filed a lawsuit against Midjourney, claiming that the AI image-generation platform was creating 'recognisable" images of characters over which they held exclusive rights. This is the latest in a series of complaints lodged against AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic, alleging that this revolutionary new technology conflicts with the way intellectual property law has operated for centuries. At the heart of all these cases lies the prohibition under copyright law against the reproduction of literary and artistic works without the owner's permission. AI companies admittedly 'train' their models on text, audio and video material scraped from the internet. Given that much of the output they generate contains similar content, there is a presumption that they have somehow 'copied' these works without the permission of copyright holders. Also Read: ChatGPT plays Ghibli well: Will genuine originality suffer? Copyright law was established in response to the very first innovation of the information age—the printing press. When publishers realized that the works they had commissioned were being sold in the market at a fraction of the price they charged, they asked for legal protection—not only for the physical books they had printed, but also for the ideas contained within them. This necessitated a new form of legal protection, one that broadened the concept of ownership beyond just the tangible forms in which content is sold (like books, paintings and vinyl records) to include the intangible ideas they hold. As new technologies emerged, these protections evolved to encompass them; this is how we prevent pirates from selling bootleg DVDs, counterfeiters from duplicating merchandise and websites from displaying images without permission. Now, with AI, copyright law is also being adapted to accommodate it. Also Read: Pay thy muse: Yes, AI does owe royalties for stolen inspiration AI companies process large volumes of content—text and images—to develop their models. They first break text down into smaller units called tokens and convert images into discrete pixel values. Transformer architectures then process these text tokens to learn the relationships between them, while neural networks learn to remove 'noise' from random particles until they start forming coherent images. As a result, AI models do not store the content they process for retrieval on demand. Instead, they identify statistical patterns within the data so that, when prompted, they can apply that knowledge to generate content that most appropriately responds to the requests made. In the case of large language models (LLMs), this involves predicting the next word, sentence or paragraph. In the case of diffusion models, it entails progressively eliminating noise until an image appears. So, even though Midjourney may have been trained on millions of images, it hasn't 'copied' them into its memory. All it has done is derive statistical patterns from such visual information so that general principles of composition, colour and form can be encoded as mathematical weights that represent that information. Also Read: Parmy Olson: AI chatbots could become advertising vehicles This process is remarkably similar to human learning. When we read, our eyes scan the words in a book, but our brains don't store an exact facsimile of that text; instead, they merely retain the ideas and concepts it embodies. When art students study the Great Masters, they do so not to replicate them perfectly, but to absorb techniques, principles of composition and visual approaches, allowing this enhanced understanding to improve their own artistic skills. This is the essence of human creativity. Exposure to existing works has always been essential for new expression. Shakespeare borrowed his plots. Picasso learnt from African masks. Jazz musicians transformed classical forms. Great artists are also great students, building their own individual styles upon those of masters who came before them. If the fundamental essence of human learning does not violate intellectual property laws, should we not apply the same logic to AI as well? Also Read: Devina Mehra: Yes, AI is coming for our jobs; it's the old story of new tech There is no doubt that this will affect creative industries. But we have been here before. Every wave of technological evolution has been disruptive. The powerloom replaced handloom artists; recorded music rendered live musicians redundant; and the film industry disrupted live theatre performances, just as OTT streaming content has led to fewer people going to theatres. In much the same way, AI is going to disrupt artists of all sorts—graphic designers, musicians, authors, actors and film producers. Incumbents have always resisted change. But early victories have often been pyrrhic. Although the music industry succeeded in shutting down Napster's free file-sharing service, within a decade music had become entirely digital, distributed over online platforms using the very model they had fought so hard to squash. Creative enterprises that succeed in the long run are those that embrace change. The London-based advertising agency group WPP recently created a Super Bowl advertisement entirely with AI—no sets, no actors and no crew. It cost far less than it would otherwise have and was completed in a fraction of the time. The ad agency group also offers an AI platform called WPP Open that can take simple text prompts and turn them into social media ads in a matter of minutes—a service that over 50,000 people are already using. The only way to prevent yourself from being disrupted is to disrupt yourself. The author is a partner at Trilegal and the author of 'The Third Way: India's Revolutionary Approach to Data Governance'. His X handle is @matthan.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Aamir Khan says he's proud to be an Indian and a Muslim: "Islam doesn't teach…"
Khan, who is gearing up for Sitaare Zameen Par, finally addressed the backlash he faced when his picture with Türkiye President Erdogan went viral during Operation Sindoor. read more Aamir Khan has broken silence on being an Indian Muslim in a recent interview and said, 'I am proud to be an Indian and a Muslim. I don't consider these terrorists as Islamic people, I don't even consider them as Muslims. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khan, who is gearing up for Sitaare Zameen Par, finally addressed the backlash he faced when his picture with Türkiye President Erdogan went viral during Operation Sindoor. Speaking on Aap Ki Adaalat, the actor said, 'Turkey did a very wrong thing, and every Indian has been hurt by that. A few years ago, there was an earthquake in Turkey. The Indian government was the first to help them then.' Khan added, 'At that time, even our government didn't know, just like I didn't when I went to meet Erdogan, that they'd do this to us seven years later. We extended our hand in friendship and helped them during a crisis, and this is what they do to us?' The picture that went viral was from 2017 and Aamir Khan clarified saying, 'Our government was also supporting Turkey at that time.' In the same interview, the actor revealed, 'When the film was released, Disney was one of the producers; they presented it. Pakistan's censor had asked them to remove the Indian flag and the Indian national anthem from the scene where Geeta Phogat wins a match.'
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
NYT Connections Hints June 17, puzzle #737: Clues and answers to solve today's breezy brain workout with familiar themes
The New York Times' daily word puzzle challenge, NYT Connections, continues to captivate a global audience with its fresh take on word association. For Tuesday, June 17, 2025, the newspaper released puzzle #737, offering an intriguing mix of categories that tested both travel smarts and pop culture memory. NYT Connections has surged in popularity following the immense success of Wordle. Designed as a grid-based word association game, it presents 16 seemingly unrelated words, asking players to group them into four correct thematic clusters. Each group represents a specific category, progressing from easy (yellow) to very challenging (purple). How NYT Connections Works Accessible via both mobile and desktop platforms, NYT Connections is structured around a 4x4 word grid. Players are tasked with organizing these words into four sets of four, with each group tied to a thematic concept. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Lentes fotossensíveis que escurecem automaticamente de acordo com a luz Óculos Max Saiba Mais Undo The color-coding system helps players gauge difficulty: Yellow – Easiest Green – Moderate Blue – Hard Purple – Most difficult For today's puzzle, the four themes offered a mix of practicality, emotional resilience, technical glitches, and animated nostalgia. Live Events NYT Connections Hints for June 17, 2025 To help players struggling with the day's challenge, the following NYT Connections hints for June 17 were provided to steer them in the right direction, as mentioned in a report by Beebom: Yellow: You'll need these on a trip Green: The ability to cope with hardships Blue: You wish your website didn't do this Purple: All parts of Disney movies These clues, while subtle, offered keen players a way to group the 16 words more confidently. Today's Categories and Answers Revealed If you've reached your limit and are eager for a solution, here are the confirmed NYT Connections answers for June 17: Things to Book for a Vacation – Car, Flight, Hotel, Tour Mettle – Fight, Grit, Resolve, Spirit Bad Things for a Website to Do – Freeze, Glitch, Quit, Timeout Figures in Classic Disney Animated Films – Elephant, Fawn, Marionette, Mouse While the puzzle maintained a relatively mild difficulty level—rated 1 out of 5—some players still found the Purple category to be the trickiest, relying heavily on knowledge of Disney's classic characters. A Game That Balances Challenge and Charm Players remarked that today's NYT Connections hints June 17 were 'refreshingly intuitive,' especially with the vacation-themed yellow group being solved with ease. Those with an ear for technology quickly cracked the blue set, and literary-minded users found comfort in solving the green mettle-related group. With only four terms remaining, even the elusive purple group revealed itself—reminding participants of beloved animated icons like Dumbo (Elephant), Bambi (Fawn), and Pinocchio (Marionette). FAQs What is NYT Connections? NYT Connections is a daily word association puzzle by The New York Times where players group 16 words into four thematic categories. Each category is color-coded by difficulty, ranging from yellow (easiest) to purple (most difficult). Where can I play NYT Connections? The game is accessible on both mobile devices and desktop browsers through the official New York Times Games section.
