Potential Alberta separation referendum question referred to judge for approval
Send this page to someone via email
Share this item on Twitter
Share this item via WhatsApp
Share this item on Facebook
A potential referendum question on Alberta separating from Canada has been referred to a judge for confirmation that the question doesn't violate the Constitution.
The proposed Alberta separatism question seeks a yes or no answer to whether people agree with the province becoming a sovereign country and ceasing to be part of Canada.
Alberta's chief electoral officer says in a news release that provincial laws require potential referendum questions to respect more than 30 sections of the Constitution, including the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Story continues below advertisement
The potential referendum question was submitted to the electoral officer earlier this month by Mitch Sylvestre, an executive with the Alberta Prosperity Project who has been touring the province promoting independence.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
If approved, Sylvestre would need to collect 177,000 signatures in four months to put the question of Alberta separation on a ballot.
In June, Alberta's electoral officer approved a competing question that seeks to have Alberta make it official policy that the province will never separate from Canada.
— More to come…
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
22 minutes ago
- Global News
Trump extends Mexico trade talks another 90 days, keeps tariffs in place
U.S. President Donald Trump said Thursday that there would be a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico after a call with that country's leader, Claudia Sheinbaum, as the 25% tariff rates stay in place. Trump, posting on Truth Social, said his phone conversation with Sheinbaum was 'very successful in that, more and more, we are getting to know and understand each other.' Trump said that goods from Mexico imported into the U.S. would continue to face a 25% tariff that the U.S. president has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. The Republican said that autos would face a 25% tariffs, while copper, aluminum and steel would be taxed at 50%. Trump said that Mexico would end its 'Non Tariff Trade Barriers,' but he didn't provide specifics. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Some goods continue to be protected from the tariffs by the 2020 U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which Trump negotiated during his first term. Story continues below advertisement But Trump appeared to have soured on that deal, which is up for renegotiation next year. One of his first significant moves as president was to tariff goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year. 0:52 Mexico, Canada coordinate as Trump warns of new USMCA tariffs U.S. Census Bureau figures show that the U.S. ran a $171.5 billion trade imbalance with Mexico last year. That means the U.S. bought more goods from Mexico than it sold to the country. The imbalance with Mexico has grown in the aftermath of the USMCA as it was only $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump started his first term in office. Besides addressing fentanyl trafficking, Trump has made it a goal to close the trade gap. Sheinbaum celebrated the tariff pause in a post on X, saying her call with Trump was 'very good' and that Mexico 'avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow.' Story continues below advertisement —With additional files from Reuters
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Alberta transportation minister won't rule out legislation on the future of bike lanes
'It was a good initial meeting to talk about how the province's road network intertwines with municipal road networks and how there has to be a better, more coordinated, measured approach going forward.' That's how Alberta Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen described an hour-long meeting with Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek on Wednesday, during which the future of bike lanes in the city was one of the main topics of discussion. The meeting took place after Dreeshen sent letters to both Calgary and Edmonton earlier this year, asking them to remove bike lanes from some of the city's key transportation corridors. View image in full screen In a video posted to social media earlier this year, Alberta Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen claimed bike lanes are creating gridlock and longer commutes in Calgary and Edmonton. Government of Alberta He's concerned they cause congestion, taking away from needed space for cars, trucks and other vehicles. Story continues below advertisement 'The big major concern was bike lanes that are obviously taking over driving lanes that have been engineered by a civil engineer years ago and some places 100 plus years ago — and then for that road network that's supposed to accommodate vehicle traffic, it being taken over by bike lanes just doesn't make sense,' said Dreeshen. 1:52 Alberta transportation minister, Calgary mayor trade letters over bike lanes Several protesters also gathered outside the closed door meeting, calling for an audit of bike lane use in Calgary. 'I'm not against bike trails, I'm against the building of these trails of bike paths where there's insufficient traffic,' said Roy Beyer of A Better Calgary Party, a conservative-leaning political party that will be running candidates in this fall's municipal election in Calgary. View image in full screen A protestor holding a sign protesting against any more bike lanes in Calgary, gathers outside a closed door meeting Wednesday, between the mayor of Calgary and Alberta's transportation minister, where the future of bike lanes was one of the main topics of discussion. Global News On the opposite side of the debate is Doug Clark of Bike Calgary, who calls bike lanes 'part of the solution' to Calgary's traffic congestion. Story continues below advertisement 'Cycling infrastructure, when implemented properly, generally contributes to less congestion,' said Clark. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Just completely removing cycling infrastructure — I think that's taking a step backwards.' Speaking to reporters following her meeting with the minister, Gondek noted that bike lanes take up just 1 per cent of Calgary's road capacity. 'Minister Dreeshan and I share the perspective that everything we do must be focused on supporting the economy,' said Gondek. 'That means helping people get to work, run their businesses, and take care of their daily tasks — whether it's picking up the kids from school, heading out for groceries, or heading out for entertainment. Every investment and decision has to help Calgarians move efficiently and support continued economic growth,' added Gondek. 'Our extensive regional pathway system supports many of our bicycle commuters, helping to keep them safe and separated from traffic — they are designed for safety and minimal disruption.' However, the mayor also said that bike lanes are not fixed. 'If a bike lane is causing any concerns with congestion or parking, our traffic team is open to reviewing and making any necessary changes,' said Gondek. View image in full screen Speaking to reporters, following her meeting with Alberta's transportation minister, the Mayor of Calgary said the city is open to reviewing and making any neccessary changes to bike lanes that are causing concerns with congestion or parking. Global News Dreeshan's reaction was, 'It was great to hear Mayor Gondek say that bike lanes are temporary.' Story continues below advertisement 'So that's something that we're going to be looking at and working with the City of Calgary to see if there are some bike lanes that need to be removed,' added Dreeshan. The discussion about the future of bike lanes in Alberta's two biggest cities is similar to a debate also taking place in Ontario where, on Wednesday, a court ruled a law passed by Premier Doug Ford's government ordering the removal of three bike lanes in the city of Toronto was unconstitutional. The law, the court said, was a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — because it would put people at an 'increased risk of harm and death.' 2:56 Ford government to appeal court ruling which deemed bike lane removal unconstitutional The Ontario government has promised to appeal — and following his meeting with the Mayor of Calgary, Dreeshen left open the possibility of the Alberta government introducing legislation here on the future of bike lanes. Story continues below advertisement 'As I've said publicly before, we've seen other provinces introduce legislation to be able to make sure that there's more sanity when it comes to bike lanes,' Dreeshen said. 'That's something that we're hoping that these conversations with the mayors of Edmonton and Calgary — that we wouldn't need to have provincial legislation to make sure that driving car lanes are protected, but we'll see where things go.' When she was asked about the possibility of legislation, Gondek replied, 'This was not a combative meeting in any way. It was an idea exchange and an information exchange.' '(The Minister) and I have committed to working together and making sure that we understand each other and that he has a good overview of what the city is doing and how we are accommodating all modes of transportation,' said Gondek. 'Whatever happened in Ontario is the perspective of government and the courts there. Here, we are simply trying to keep people safe no matter how they choose to travel.'
Cision Canada
3 hours ago
- Cision Canada
New Report Warns Collapse of Local News Threatens Canadian Democracy
OTTAWA, ON, July 31, 2025 /CNW/ - A new report from the Public Policy Forum, in partnership with the Rideau Hall Foundation and the Michener Awards Foundation, warns that the collapse of local news is imperiling the underpinnings of Canadian democracy. Released today, Uncovered: How to build back election coverage for a better democracy reveals how millions of voters went to the polls this spring with little or no information about their local candidates. The report documents what happens when an important national election unfolds against the backdrop of a collapse in local news. New Ipsos polling commissioned for the report reveals that: 70 percent of Canadians said more local news would have made them better informed about the election; 63 percent of those in local news-deprived communities were unfamiliar with local candidates' views (vs. 35 percent in areas with local news); moreover, 53 percent of those in local news-deprived communities weren't able to find information about the local candidates in their electoral district through trusted media sources; and 57 percent said they didn't have enough information from media, or could have used more, to make an informed choice. (Polling was conducted by Ipsos in July 2025. Twenty-five percent of the 1,000 respondents — Canadian residents aged 18+ — lived in communities with populations under 10,000, another 25 percent lived in communities of 10,000 to 99,999, while the remaining half lived in communities of 100,000 or more. Results are considered accurate to within +/- 3.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.) "This is much more than a media issue, it goes to the very core of Canada as a 'community of communities,'" said Inez Jabalpurwala, President and CEO of the Public Policy Forum. "We know that vibrant communities create a more prosperous nation. But Canadians are telling us loud and clear: they need trustworthy local news to make informed democratic decisions." The polling also found that only 19 percent of voters chose their MP primarily based on the local candidate, compared to 49 percent who voted for the party and 32 percent for the leader. Three in four (74 percent) of Canadians believe too much attention is placed on party leaders and not enough on local candidates and issues. Fourteen percent of voters cited Facebook as the platform that most contributed to their voting decision, despite Facebook having banned news content in Canada. "This was most likely the most poorly covered federal election in modern Canadian history," the report states. "Millions cast ballots with little or no real knowledge of their local candidates, while wading through the toxic waters of social media." The report, written by Tim Harper, Sara-Christine Gemson and Alison Uncles, profiles five communities — Bonavista (NL), Richmond (BC), Laval (QC), Vaughan (ON) and Yellowknife (NWT) — to show the varying effects of local news presence on civic awareness and voter engagement. It revealed serious democratic gaps, including communities that had little election coverage other than candidate-funded advertisements and Facebook misinformation. In some cases, candidates avoided media scrutiny entirely. Despite these challenges, the report highlights a promising path forward. The Covering Canada: Election 2025 Fund, a non-partisan journalism fund created and led by PPF, and delivered in partnership with the Rideau Hall Foundation and the Michener Awards Foundation, awarded $525,000 in grants to 40 local media outlets during the campaign. The fund was powered by a lead gift from The Rossy Foundation and donations from the Donner, Echo, Gordon and Metcalf Foundations. "Enabling a better-informed citizenry is a non-partisan priority that benefits all Canadians," said Teresa Marques, President and CEO of the Rideau Hall Foundation. "The goal of the Covering Canada Fund was to help cover community stories that otherwise might not have been told, and to ensure funds be dispersed quickly and efficiently to support smaller local newsrooms, public service journalism, and Canadian democracy all at the same time." The report, which feeds into a wider PPF 'Mission Canada' initiative that links a healthy democracy with a stronger, more prosperous country, calls for the creation of a similar permanent, non-partisan election journalism fund to ensure local news outlets have the resources to deliver high-quality coverage in future campaigns. "A devastated local news ecosystem requires additional scaffolding at election time — and will for the foreseeable future," the report says. "Hope is not a strategy. We cannot surrender our most important institutions to it."
