It could be that some New Hampshire Republicans just need to do a little more reading
I don't spend a lot of time thinking about why Democratic politicians struggle so much to connect with working-class voters. That's for the party leaders and candidates to figure out. But it's entirely possible that Fyodor Dostoyevsky partially diagnosed the problem almost 150 years ago, when he wrote in 'The Brothers Karamazov': 'The more I love humanity in general, the less I love man in particular.'
Recent Republican success winning over the working class is a little easier to understand considering America's Puritan roots. The right has long made political hay by convincing millions of voters that the degradation of society is most evident not in corrupt fiscal policies but in expressions of human sexuality. Every legislative session has its examples, and this year one of them is a book banning bill now headed to the governor's desk.
House Bill 324 is touted by conservatives as 'parental rights' legislation meant to keep certain books out of the hands of impressionable young people. It reads: 'This bill prohibits material that is obscene or harmful to minors in schools and creates a procedure for removal and cause of action.'
'Obscene,' of course, always refers to sexuality and not the cherished Americana of extreme violence. And, importantly, it does not encompass the most glaring national obscenity: economic inequality.
Whether or not you buy the Republican argument that HB 324 targets only 'flat-out pornography' in schools — which seems unlikely because that's already covered under New Hampshire's existing obscenity laws — author Jodi Picoult is correct in her assessment of the bill's true intent and the price we all pay for censorship: 'These parents will tell you that the books are exposing kids to topics that are salacious or revolutionary. What kids are really being exposed to are lives and mindsets different from their own, which creates compassion and empathy.'
The bottom line is that what Republican New Hampshire lawmakers — and many conservative parents — don't like is LGBTQ themes in literature. Why? Because they are convinced that the four horsemen of the American apocalypse will ride into town dressed in drag. But the riders they should worry about have always been with us, gulping the rarefied air of Pullman palace cars and private jet cabins.
The American right's fixation on sexuality is bad enough on its own, but it is downright confounding when coupled with Republican-backed efforts that exacerbate economic inequality. Only one of those things is an existential threat to the American experiment, and I promise you it's not Picoult's 'Nineteen Minutes.'
HB 324 is an unnecessary bill that exists only to scratch the Republican itch to crush content it deems symbolic of Western decline. But the real threats to society are found elsewhere.
For example, consider New Hampshire Republicans' myopic repeal of the Interest and Dividends Tax, an action undertaken in service to the state's economic elite. That move should be constantly discussed and dissected in this state, especially now as lawmakers work at cutting hundreds of millions from the next state budget. But conservatives would rather fish in libraries for words and themes to be offended by. Meanwhile, those with the least in New Hampshire are on the threshold of fresh harm from the right's cold budget priorities.
If you want more evidence of this dynamic, consider the 'big beautiful bill' now in the works in Washington, D.C. Once again, a few will win and the struggling many will lose. But the trick to sneaking garbage like that through is to make people look for threats in the wrong places. Immigrants, diversity programs, books with titles like 'Gender Queer.' Republican voters are made to believe that those are the issues pulling at America's seams and not the obvious culprit: the 1 percent's scorched-earth pursuit of limitless wealth.
Riding shotgun with all of this is the rot of hypocrisy. The far right now dominating the American Republican Party is selling an idea of liberty that in practice amounts to unfettered freedom but only for the like-minded. That is why the party so consistently defends bigots and punches down on the vulnerable. You can see evidence of this in the always-uneven Republican application of 'local control.' How is HB 324 in alignment with local control? How are any of the laws targeting transgender rights in alignment?
Well, they're not, because 'local control' isn't a Republican principle. It's a label applied or removed as a matter of philosophical convenience.
The New Hampshire Legislature's latest go at book banning is unsurprising, considering the puritanical forces as old as the nation itself that continue to influence conservative ideology. But if they're as concerned about the degradation of society as they say, one can only hope that they'll realize before it's too late that the call is coming from inside their house.
Because sexual content in a novel isn't going to be America's undoing, but the continuation of policies that increase the nation's already obscene levels of economic inequality almost certainly will.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Labor secretary hails Trump move to fire BLS chief
Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer praised President Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) after the Friday release of the July jobs report. In a statement on social media, Chavez-DeRemer hailed Trump's decision to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the agency, which is housed in the Labor Department, released a stunningly bad jobs report earlier Friday. 'I agree wholeheartedly with @POTUS that our jobs numbers must be fair, accurate, and never manipulated for political purposes,' wrote Chavez-DeRemer, without offering any evidence to support Trump's claim. 'A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner,' she continued. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS.' While McEntarfer was appointed by former President Biden to lead BLS, she had previously served for more than 20 years in the federal government in administrations led by both Democrats and Republicans. Former BLS Commissioner William Beech, who was appointed by Trump and served from 2019-2023, strongly condemned the firing of his successor. 'The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, my successor as Commissioner of Labor Statistics at BLS, sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau,' Beech wrote, sharing a statement of concern from other BLS veterans. Trump's move to fire McEntarfer triggered outrage among economists and analysts across the ideological spectrum. 'Erika McEntarfer has devoted her career to public service. She has conducted herself as BLS Commissioner with great integrity. There is no evidence whatsoever that BLS data are politically biased,' wrote Michael R. Strain, director of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Insitute, on social media. 'By incorrectly asserting that the data are biased, President Trump is undermining the integrity of the information that policymakers, businesses, households, and investors use to make important decisions that affect the welfare of the nation,' he continued. 'It is imperative that decisionmakers understand that government statistics are unbiased and of the highest quality. By casting doubt on that, the President is damaging the United States,' Strain wrote.


Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
Top White House economist: I believe jobs numbers, but agency needs fixes
Top White House economist Stephen Miran tells Axios a key economic statistics agency needs "fresh eyes," but he stopped short of repeating President Trump's claim that Friday's jobs data was politically manipulated. Why it matters: President Trump ordered the the firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner on Friday after alleging — without evidence — that disappointing jobs numbers were "rigged." The bureau later confirmed commissioner Erika McEntarfer was terminated, with her deputy William Wiatrowski stepping in as acting commissioner. Catch up quick: The July jobs report, released earlier on Friday, showed just 73,000 jobs added last month. The BLS also announced massive revisions that showed employment was a combined 258,000 lower than previously thought. It was the second-largest two-month downward revision on record, behind only the pandemic. What they're saying: "There's been very little attempt to actually fix this problem and come up with creative solutions to make the data more reliable," says Miran. "It is absolutely time for fresh eyes on this to try and come up with solutions to improve the reliability of the data and get those revision levels down." Miran said the agency should try to incentivize faster responses or delay the data publications by a week or two, if it means smaller revisions down the line. Catch up quick: "In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad," Trump posted on Truth Social. Trump accused the agency of boosting jobs figures to support his opponent's presidential candidacy. Reality check: The BLS, a nonpolitical agency housed within the Labor Department, has faced plummeting response rates to the surveys that comprise the report. It has scaled back some of its data collection — the Consumer Price Index report, for instance — due in part to proposed budget cuts. "Economic data are always noisy and this has always been a problem that has plagued economic research and economists — it's one that we make the best of," Miran said. Asked if he believes the numbers released by the BLS, Miran said "I think if the BLS tells me that there were 14,000 jobs created [in June], I don't have a competing survey that tells me otherwise." Between the lines: Miran said that revisions were largely a result of statistical artifacts — namely adjustments to account for seasonal quirks. He said that Trump's immigration policies would "inevitably show up in one way or another in the labor market data. I think that some of what we saw is also due to that." "If we're swapping out foreign-born job holders for American-born job holders, I think that's a win," Miran said. What to watch: Mainstream economists say the economy and labor market will likely slow further this year.


Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
Giuffre family blasts Trump for Maxwell's prison move: "Smacks of a cover up"
The family of Virginia Giuffre and other accusers of Jeffrey Epstein expressed "outrage" over Ghislaine Maxwell 's move to a minimum security prison in Texas Friday, calling it "a cover up." The big picture: The Giuffre family has been speaking out recently against Maxwell as she has returned to the spotlight amid President Trump's handling of the Epstein documents. The late Giuffre, who died by suicide at age 41 in April, previously alleged Maxwell recruited her from Mar-a-Lago for Epstein. Driving the news: Maxwell, who was serving a 20-year prison sentence in Florida, has been moved to Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, her attorney confirmed to Axios Friday. The minimum-security facility has hosted notable public figures such as Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes and reality TV star Jen Shah. The move came as Maxwell has been appealing her conviction. She spoke with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for nine hours over two days last week. What they're saying: "President Trump has sent a clear message today: Pedophiles deserve preferential treatment and their victims do not matter," the Giuffre family and Epstein's accusers said in a statement to Axios. " This move smacks of a cover up. The victims deserve better." The statement is attributed to Epstein accusers Annie Farmer and Maria Farmer, as well as Giuffre family members Sky and Amanda Roberts, and Lanette and Danny Wilson. The family and the accusers said they felt "horror and outrage" over the "preferential treatment" that Maxwell received by the transfer. "This is the justice system failing victims right before our eyes," the statement reads. "The American public should be enraged by the preferential treatment being given to a pedophile and a criminally charged child sex offender." Flashback: The Giuffre family has recently criticized Trump for saying earlier this week that Epstein "stole" Giuffre from her job at his Mar-a-Lago resort. "She's not an object, she's a person," said Sky Roberts, Giuffre's brother, in an interview with NBC News that was published Thursday. "She wasn't stolen." Roberts told CNN in an interview Thursday evening: "She was preyed upon ... That's a predator that came and took her and did absolutely horrible things to her and so many other women." Worth noting: The family also released a media statement Wednesday calling on Trump not to pardon Maxwell as some have suggested. "Ghislaine Maxwell is a monster who deserves to rot in prison for the rest of her life," the family said.