Odisha govt engineer held on retirement day for amassing assets, disproportionate to income
Bhubaneswar, An Odisha government engineer was arrested on the last day of his service on Saturday for allegedly amassing assets, disproportionate to his income, the state vigilance said.
He was apprehended a day after ₹2.56 crore in cash was recovered and several immovable assets were detected during search operations on the premises linked to the engineer, an official said.
"Vigilance sleuths arrested Baikuntha Nath Sarangi, Chief Engineer, Plan Roads, RW Department," he said.
Sarangi, who was scheduled to retire from 34 years of service in the state government as an engineer on May 31, was booked under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the official said.
The engineer would be produced before the Court of Special Judge, Vigilance, Angul, he said.
The anti-corruption wing of the Odisha Police raided seven places linked to Sarangi on Friday.
When a team of vigilance sleuths reached his residence, he had attempted to dispose of the bundles of ₹500 notes by throwing them out of the window of his flat in Bhubaneswar, the official said.
The engineer was found in possession of assets, including over ₹2.56 crore in cash, two multi-storeyed buildings, two flats, seven high-value plots, bank deposits worth ₹1.5 crore, investment in shares, mutual fund and insurance worth ₹2.7 crore, gold of over 1.141 kilograms, 15 imported wrist watches and others.
"These assets are disproportionate to his known source of income as he could not produce satisfactory documents to prove the source of cash and valuables,' an official said, adding that the investigation is underway.
The cash recovery from Sarangi's places was considered the third biggest seizure by the Odisha Vigilance.
The highest cash seizure of ₹3.41 crore was made from the house of a former assistant engineer of the minor irrigation division in Ganjam district in 2022.
Over ₹3.12 crore was recovered from the house of a former additional sub-collector, Nabarangpur, in 2023, sources in the vigilance said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
Ex-PM Madhav Nepal charged in land misappropriation case
According to the CIAA, the accused were involved in facilitating approval of land ceiling exemptions for a non-profit organisation in 2010, the paper said. The Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA) on Thursday filed a case at a special court against Madhav Nepal and 92 others for their alleged involvement in the land misappropriation case, The Kathmandu Post newspaper reported. Kathmandu, Jun 5 (PTI) Nepal's former prime minister and CPN-Unified Socialist chairman Madhav Kumar Nepal has been charged in a land misappropriation case by the anti-graft agency, media reports said on Thursday. The non-profit in question was involved in acquiring land beyond the legally permitted ceiling in multiple locations across Nepal. The agency has also demanded the recovery of Nepalese Rs 185.85 million from the accused along with prison sentences and fines under the relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act (2002). Madhav Nepal on Thursday denied the corruption allegations against him, saying he has done nothing wrong and is prepared to face the legal process. 'I have not done anything wrong, nor do I wish to encourage any wrongdoing,' he was quoted as saying by My Republica newspaper. 'There is nothing greater than justice and nothing greater than the truth,' said Madhav Nepal, who served as prime minister from May 2009 to February 2011. He alleged that there was a conspiracy against him and that the case was filed with the intent to end his political career. The charge sheet also names former Law Minister Prem Bahadur Singh, late Land Reform Minister Dambar Shrestha and former Chief Secretary Madhav Prasad Ghimire. Madhav Nepal, the sitting member of parliament, lost his parliamentary position automatically after the filing of the chargesheet. As per Nepal's law, all public servants charged with corruption are automatically suspended until the case is fully resolved. PTI RD ZH RD RD This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hindustan Times
14 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Legal battle ends in Hiranandani Gardens case
MUMBAI: The curtain has come down on the legal battle over alleged corruption in the development of Hiranandani Gardens, the landmark township built by Lake View Developers of the Hiranandani Group in Powai. The case revolved around the allegation that the developer had used 233 acres of government land earmarked for affordable housing to build luxury apartments and sold them at a premium. A special court trying cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act on Monday accepted the second closure report submitted by the Maharashtra Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), which stated that there was no criminality involved in the implementation of the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), also called 'Hiranandani Gardens'. The verdict brings relief to developer Niranjan Hiranandani, former urban development department secretary TC Benjamin and others who were named as accused in the case. 'In my opinion, this is not a fit case to proceed against the accused persons and I am inclined to accept the closure report for the reasons mentioned herein above,' said Judge Shashikant Bangar of the special court while accepting the second closure report filed by the ACB. The special court had rejected the ACB's first closure report filed in 2018, and ordered a further investigation. While accepting the second closure report on Monday, the court noted that none of the allegations levelled by the complainant against the developer and others had been proved to be true by the investigation. The First Information Report (FIR) was filed in 2012 on a complaint by activist Santosh Daundkar, who alleged that Hiranandani had colluded with Benjamin and officials of the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) and the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to build luxury housing on government land earmarked for affordable houses. The project, called the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), goes back to 1986, when the state had handed over 233 acres on an 80-year lease at a rate of 40 paise per acre, in return for constructing affordable housing. Daundkar alleged that Hiranandani had violated the agreement by building a posh residential complex. He also alleged that the builder had failed to hand over 15% of the developed flats to the state government, in accordance with the agreement. The ACB filed its second closure report on August 30, 2019, which means the investigation had concluded and no offence was made out against the accused. They had neither engaged in any illegal activities or fraud in PADS, nor had the developer violated the tripartite agreement or gained any illegal profit, nor had the government suffered any loss, the report stated. The court observed that the ACB had twice investigated the case, adding that 'it is clear that the said investigating officers have taken all relevant records, papers, documents from MMRDA and other authorities and they have collected all the relevant witness statements of the officials'. The special court said that based on orders passed by the high court, the developer had built 1,511 flats of 40sq m and 887 flats of 80sq m each, and handed over possession of 256 flats to MMRDA in 2022. 'The investigation has been carried out fairly, and as per the directions of this court,' said Special Judge Shashikant Bangar. After the ACB filed its second closure report, Daundkar had filed a protest petition, alleging that the investigating officer Pramod Bhosale, who was in the process of filing a charge sheet, was transferred midway. This amounted to administrative interference and resulted in suppression of crucial material. He alleged that the officials failed to prevent the misuse of government land and monitor the PADS implementation. However, the special court said, 'The protest petition lacks merit in view of the binding adjudication by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay.' The court, however, said the dispute is purely civil in nature. 'There is no alleged breach of terms of the tripartite agreement, any other irregularities and illegal acts found to be committed by the accused/respondents. The investigating officer found that there are no sufficient and concrete grounds to proceed against the accused/respondent persons to file a charge sheet against the said accused persons,' the court added. The high court in 2016 and 2017 had accepted the reports that of 2,200 flats of 80sq m, 1,337 flats were constructed, 12 were locked, and 887 remained to be completed, as per the plan and timeline. 'In view of the accepted compliance framework and absence of mens rea or criminal intent proven during investigation, the ACB rightly concluded that no prosecutable offence remained.' The court held that there was no material to show abuse of public office or conspiracy by the public authorities or developers.
Hindustan Times
15 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Classroom case: Probe said to focus on Jain; Sisodia's role also under scanner
Former Public Works Department (PWD) minister Satyendar Jain is the primary focus of the investigation being carried out by Delhi government's Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) into the alleged irregularities in the construction of classrooms, while formed deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia is being probed for giving post-facto approval to the project, officials aware of the matter said on Wednesday. Jain has been summoned to appear before the bureau on June 6, and Sisodia on June 9. Both Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders are to be questioned at the ACB's office in central Delhi. Senior ACB officials said the investigation was launched based on statements by contractors and architects, many of whom have pointed to Jain's direct involvement in procedural lapses and financial mismanagement. 'We will be able to make a definitive statement on their roles only after the probe is complete and the charge sheet is filed,' said one official. As for Sisodia, investigators said he granted post-facto approval for the project in 2018-19—nearly three years after the construction was completed. He also allotted deposit work for the project, a move that may not in itself be criminal, but is under scrutiny. 'Post-facto approvals are retroactive decisions often taken without prior sanction. Similarly, in deposit work, one department provides funds to another, and execution is the latter's responsibility. These are procedural acts. But we are probing deeper to determine if his actions were merely procedural or indicative of culpability,' said an investigator, requesting anonymity. According to ACB, the alleged irregularities occurred during the AAP government's drive to expand classroom infrastructure in Delhi's government-run schools. The case concerns the construction of 12,748 semi-permanent classrooms across multiple school campuses. The project was initially valued at ₹860 crore, but subsequent cost escalations—largely carried out without fresh tenders or adherence to procurement norms—brought the total to over ₹2,800 crore. ACB's April 30 FIR names both Jain and Sisodia and invokes Section 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, along with IPC Sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy), following clearance under Section 17-A of the POC Act. Summons issued to the two leaders cite their roles in the decision-making process and ask them to provide written submissions and supporting documents. 'Allegations have been levelled against several then-government functionaries, including you by name... Non-compliance with this notice may attract legal proceedings,' the notice reads. Both Jain and Sisodia have denied wrongdoing in earlier public statements. Officials said a key part of the investigation is focused on how consultants and architects were appointed without following Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) guidelines or the CPWD Works Manual. Cost escalations were allegedly pushed through by these consultants without inviting fresh bids, thereby bypassing competitive tendering. A senior official involved in the probe said, 'Contracts worth ₹860 crore were awarded, and then inflated by up to 90%, eventually reaching nearly ₹2,892 crore. A sum of ₹205 crore from this escalation was for what were termed 'richer specifications'—upgrades that had no financial justification or transparency.' Investigators further allege that although the classrooms were built as semi-permanent structures (SPS)—designed to last about 30 years—the cost per classroom averaged ₹24.86 lakh, nearly five times the market cost of ₹5 lakh per room. 'That figure is comparable to what would be expected for fully reinforced concrete (RCC) buildings with a lifespan of 75 years,' said one official. 'No justification was provided for why SPS was chosen over permanent structures if the cost was almost the same.' Another revelation that has drawn serious concern is the concealment of a report by the Chief Technical Examiner (CTE) of the CVC. The report, issued in February 2020, flagged several procurement violations and showed how amendments made after contracts were awarded contributed to massive financial losses. However, it was allegedly kept under wraps for nearly three years. The investigation was prompted by complaints filed by BJP leaders, who alleged that the AAP government manipulated costs and procedures to favour select contractors.
