Is AI causing mass layoffs at tech companies? Kind of, experts say
The reality is more complicated, with companies trying to signal that they're making themselves more efficient as they prepare for broader changes wrought by AI.
Tech job postings are down 36 per cent from 2020, according to a new report from the job listing site Indeed. But that isn't only because companies want to replace workers with artificial intelligence (AI).
A new report from career website Indeed says tech job postings in July were down 36 per cent from their early 2020 levels, with AI representing only one factor in stalling a rebound.
ChatGPT's debut in 2022, for example, also corresponded with the end of a pandemic-era hiring binge.
'We're kind of in this period where the tech job market is weak, but other areas of the job market have also cooled at a similar pace,' said Brendon Bernard, an economist at the Indeed Hiring Lab.
'Tech job postings have actually evolved pretty similarly to the rest of the economy, including relative to job postings where there really isn't that much exposure to AI".
That nuance is not always clear from the last six months of tech layoff emails, which often include a nod to AI in addition to expressions of sympathy.
Workday CEO Carl Eschenbach, for example, said in an email announcing mass layoffs earlier this year that "companies everywehre are reimagining how work gets done," citing the "increasing demand" for AI at his company as the reason behind the layoffs.
The same rhetoric is being used internationally, for example by India's tech giant Tata Consultancy, which justified the 12,000 cuts to its organisation by saying that it is getting ready to deploy "AI at scale for our clients and ourselves".
AI spending is a more common factor
What's more common than AI replacing jobs, though, is the need for more dollars to implement AI throughout the company, experts said.
Tech companies are trying to justify huge amounts of spending to pay for data centres, chips, and the energy needed to build AI systems.
Bryan Hayes, a strategist at Zacks Investment Research, said there is a "double-edged sword," of restructuring in the AI age. Companies are trying to "find the right balance between maintaining an appropriate headcount but also allowing artificial intelligence to come to the forefront".
Hayes said broader tech layoffs have helped improve profit margins, but what it means for the employment prospects of these workers is hard to gauge.
'Will AI replace some of these jobs? Absolutely,' said Hayes. 'But it's also going to create a lot of jobs".
Those tech employees that are able to show that they can "leverage artificial intelligence and help the companies innovate and create new products and services, are going to be the ones that are in high demand," he added.
Hayes pointed to Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, which is on a spree of offering lucrative packages to recruit elite AI scientists from competitors such as OpenAI.
The Indeed report shows that AI specialists are faring better than software engineers, but postings for those jobs have also gone down.
Bernard said that is because of the "cyclical ups and downs of the sector".
Entry-level jobs most affected
The Indeed report found that AI is having the deepest impact on entry-level jobs across sectors, including marketing, administrative assistance, and human resources.
That's because those jobs have tasks that overlap with generative AI tools.
Postings for workers with at least five years of experience fared better, the report found.
'The plunge in tech hiring started before the new AI age, but the shifting experience requirements is something that happened a bit more recently,' Bernard said.
On the other end of the spectrum, some types of jobs appeared more immune to AI changes. That included health workers who draw blood, followed by nursing assistants, workers who remove hazardous materials, painters, and embalmers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Google AI summary feature deals blow to website traffic
Google's algorithm changes last year led to a plummet in search engine traffic for news websites and publishers, and even resulted in the bankruptcy of some independent publishers, including Turkey's Gazete Duvar. The technology giant is now dealing another blow to online publishers through its artificial intelligence summaries. Google's Artificial Intelligence Overview feature is a service offered by the internet giant to compete with artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT. The feature offers short summaries generated by Gemini that appear at the top of search results. Below the summary, there are details such as links to the source and a "Show more" option. In other words, when a user types a query into the Google search engine, they can get the answer in a summary without clicking on the links below. But this presents a serious risk, especially for websites that rely on Google Ads revenue and traditional search engine optimisation (SEO) efforts. Traffic of popular websites dropped The introduction of the AI Overview has particularly affected traffic to sites that feature content such as holiday guides, health tips and product reviews. According to Similarweb, search traffic to websites decreased by 55% between April 2022 and April 2025. A report published by the Wall Street Journal indicates that traffic to many well-known news sites around the world is declining. Traffic from organic search to HuffPost's desktop and mobile sites has more than halved in the last three years, while the Washington Post has seen a nearly identical decline. Business Insider CEO Barbara Peng laid off about 21% of her staff in May, citing "extreme traffic declines beyond our control" as the reason for the layoffs. The share of traffic from organic search to the New York Times' desktop and mobile sites also fell to 36.5% in April 2025. Nicholas Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic, predicts that traffic from Google will drop towards zero and says the company needs to improve its business model. "Google is changing from a search engine to an answer engine," Thompson said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. In an interview with the WSJ, Thompson and other industry leaders said they are trying to develop new strategies and are most concerned with building reader relationships. Users don't click on links Google executives argue that the company is committed to sending traffic to the web and that people who click on links after seeing the AI Overview tend to spend more time on these sites. However, survey studies show a different picture. According to a new study by the Pew Research Centre, only % of the 900 Google users in the US click on the source page specified as a result of a search that includes the Artificial Intelligence Overview summary. The rest are content with the short information provided by Google. Moreover, according to the study, the most frequently cited sources in both AI summaries and traditional search results are Wikipedia, YouTube (also a Google subsidiary) and Reddit. 15% of the sources in AI summaries come from these three sites. Referrals to government sites (e.g. with the 'gov' extension) are more common in AI summaries than in traditional search results. On the other hand, both AI summaries and traditional search results are equally likely to refer to news sites, at 5%. Worse still, 404 Media, a website known for specialised technology news, noticed that a story about AI-assisted music production was not showing up in Google searches. This was because Artificial Intelligence Overview summarised the content of the story, but did not link to the actual story. The site summarises the situation with the following statement: "The AI Overview ensures that information is presented in such a way that the source itself is never clicked on." SEO loses its impact The effects of the AI Overview on SEO (search engine optimisation) are also remarkable. According to the Register, the latest data showed that the click-through rate of the top-ranked site in searches with an AI summary fell by an average of 34.5%. Being on the first page is no longer as meaningful as it used to be. AI often provides false information Moreover, there is another risk: the reliability of artificial intelligence. 404 Media published a news article showing that one of the responses given by the feature in question was actually generated from another AI summary, which in turn was based on an AI source. The margin of error increases as the information moves away from the main source. This situation is described by experts as "the vicious circle of information that leads to the collapse of artificial intelligence models themselves". When there are not enough sources of quality information, users are left with inaccurate and superficial content produced by artificial intelligence. The advertising industry continues to work for Google The revenues of websites and Google are based on the following advertising cycle: Websites allow people who use search engines such as Google free access to their content. Google redirects users to websites where they see adverts as well as content. Most websites make money from these adverts. According to the BBC, an estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines, and around 90% of searches take place on Google. This means that websites rely heavily on Google to make money. It is stated that the Artificial Intelligence Overview mode could therefore destroy the business model that has existed for 23 years. However, Google experience no loss in this change, at least for now. Alphabet, the Google's parent company, increased its revenues to a record level in the last quarter of 2024. According to data released by the company, Google's total revenue increased by 14% compared to last year, reaching $96.4 billion. According to the Register, the bulk of the revenue still comes from advertising: exactly $54.2 billion. That's because Google now places adverts directly in or around AI Overview summaries. According to a study by SparkToro, by 2024, only 360 out of every 1,000 Google searches in the US led to sites that are not owned or advertised by Google. These rates are predicted to worsen with the rise of artificial intelligence summaries. 'Desperation not demand' While Google still dominates the market, rival AI-powered search engines such as Perplexity are slowly entering the competition. According to Bank of America executive Muhammad Rasulnejat, Google's spending of $14 billion on infrastructure investment in the last quarter alone points to "desperation in the face of competition", not growing demand. In addition to all this, the fact that the US Department of Justice still accuses Google of monopolisation creates a separate pressure. The Ministry is even demanding that Google divest its Chrome browser. The company's recent advertising and artificial intelligence moves may further inflame these debates.
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
Google AI summary feature deals blow link clicks and website traffic
Google's algorithm changes last year led to a plummet in search engine traffic for news websites and publishers, and even resulted in the bankruptcy of some independent publishers, including Turkey's Gazete Duvar. The technology giant is now dealing another blow to online publishers through its artificial intelligence summaries. Google's Artificial Intelligence Overview feature is a service offered by the internet giant to compete with artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT. The feature offers short summaries generated by Gemini that appear at the top of search results. Below the summary, there are details such as links to the source and a "Show more" option. In other words, when a user types a query into the Google search engine, they can get the answer in a summary without clicking on the links below. But this presents a serious risk, especially for websites that rely on Google Ads revenue and traditional search engine optimisation (SEO) efforts. Traffic of popular websites dropped The introduction of the AI Overview has particularly affected traffic to sites that feature content such as holiday guides, health tips and product reviews. According to Similarweb, search traffic to websites decreased by 55% between April 2022 and April 2025. A report published by the Wall Street Journal indicates that traffic to many well-known news sites around the world is declining. Traffic from organic search to HuffPost's desktop and mobile sites has more than halved in the last three years, while the Washington Post has seen a nearly identical decline. Business Insider CEO Barbara Peng laid off about 21% of her staff in May, citing "extreme traffic declines beyond our control" as the reason for the layoffs. The share of traffic from organic search to the New York Times' desktop and mobile sites also fell to 36.5% in April 2025. Nicholas Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic, predicts that traffic from Google will drop towards zero and says the company needs to improve its business model. "Google is changing from a search engine to an answer engine," Thompson said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. In an interview with the WSJ, Thompson and other industry leaders said they are trying to develop new strategies and are most concerned with building reader relationships. Users don't click on links Google executives argue that the company is committed to sending traffic to the web and that people who click on links after seeing the AI Overview tend to spend more time on these sites. However, survey studies show a different picture. According to a new study by the Pew Research Centre, only % of the 900 Google users in the US click on the source page specified as a result of a search that includes the Artificial Intelligence Overview summary. The rest are content with the short information provided by Google. Moreover, according to the study, the most frequently cited sources in both AI summaries and traditional search results are Wikipedia, YouTube (also a Google subsidiary) and Reddit. 15% of the sources in AI summaries come from these three sites. Referrals to government sites (e.g. with the 'gov' extension) are more common in AI summaries than in traditional search results. On the other hand, both AI summaries and traditional search results are equally likely to refer to news sites, at 5%. Worse still, 404 Media, a website known for specialised technology news, noticed that a story about AI-assisted music production was not showing up in Google searches. This was because Artificial Intelligence Overview summarised the content of the story, but did not link to the actual story. The site summarises the situation with the following statement: "The AI Overview ensures that information is presented in such a way that the source itself is never clicked on." SEO loses its impact The effects of the AI Overview on SEO (search engine optimisation) are also remarkable. According to the Register, the latest data showed that the click-through rate of the top-ranked site in searches with an AI summary fell by an average of 34.5%. Being on the first page is no longer as meaningful as it used to be. AI often provides false information Moreover, there is another risk: the reliability of artificial intelligence. 404 Media published a news article showing that one of the responses given by the feature in question was actually generated from another AI summary, which in turn was based on an AI source. The margin of error increases as the information moves away from the main source. This situation is described by experts as "the vicious circle of information that leads to the collapse of artificial intelligence models themselves". When there are not enough sources of quality information, users are left with inaccurate and superficial content produced by artificial intelligence. The advertising industry continues to work for Google The revenues of websites and Google are based on the following advertising cycle: Websites allow people who use search engines such as Google free access to their content. Google redirects users to websites where they see adverts as well as content. Most websites make money from these adverts. According to the BBC, an estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines, and around 90% of searches take place on Google. This means that websites rely heavily on Google to make money. It is stated that the Artificial Intelligence Overview mode could therefore destroy the business model that has existed for 23 years. However, Google experience no loss in this change, at least for now. Alphabet, the Google's parent company, increased its revenues to a record level in the last quarter of 2024. According to data released by the company, Google's total revenue increased by 14% compared to last year, reaching $96.4 billion. According to the Register, the bulk of the revenue still comes from advertising: exactly $54.2 billion. That's because Google now places adverts directly in or around AI Overview summaries. According to a study by SparkToro, by 2024, only 360 out of every 1,000 Google searches in the US led to sites that are not owned or advertised by Google. These rates are predicted to worsen with the rise of artificial intelligence summaries. 'Desperation not demand' While Google still dominates the market, rival AI-powered search engines such as Perplexity are slowly entering the competition. According to Bank of America executive Muhammad Rasulnejat, Google's spending of $14 billion on infrastructure investment in the last quarter alone points to "desperation in the face of competition", not growing demand. In addition to all this, the fact that the US Department of Justice still accuses Google of monopolisation creates a separate pressure. The Ministry is even demanding that Google divest its Chrome browser. The company's recent advertising and artificial intelligence moves may further inflame these debates.
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
EU AI Act doesn't do enough to protect artists' copyright, groups say
As the European Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act)comes into force, groups representing artists say there are still many loopholes that need to be fixed for them to thrive in a creative world increasingly dominated by AI. The AI Act, celebrated for being the first comprehensive legislation to regulate AI globally, is riddled with problems, these organisations say. Groups like the European Composer and Songwriter Alliance (ECSA) and the European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (GESAC) argue that it fails to protect creators whose works are used to train generative AI models. Without a clear way to opt out or get paid when tech companies use their music, books, movies, and other art to train their AI models, experts say that their work is continually at risk. 'The work of our members should not be used without transparency, consent, and remuneration, and we see that the implementation of the AI Act does not give us,' Marc du Moulin, ECSA's secretary general, told Euronews Next. 'Putting the cart before the horse' The purpose of the AI Act is to make sure AI stays 'safe, transparent, traceable, non-discriminatory and environmentally friendly,' the European Commission, the European Union's executive body, says in an explainer on the law. The law rates AI companies based on four levels of risk: minimal, limited, high, or unacceptable. Those in the unacceptable range are already banned, for example AIs that are manipulative or that conduct social scoring, where they rank individuals based on behaviour or economic status. Most generative AI falls into a minimal risk category, the Commission says. The owners of those technologies still have some requirements, like publishing summaries of the copyrighted data that companies used to train their AIs. Under the EU's copyright laws, companies are allowed to use copyrighted materials for text and data mining, like they do in AI training, unless a creator has 'reserved their rights,' Du Moulin said. Du Moulin said it's unclear how an artist can go about opting out of their work being shared with AI companies. 'This whole conversation is putting the cart before the horse. You don't know how to opt out, but your work is already being used,' he said. The EU's AI Code of Practice on General-Purpose (GPAI), a voluntary agreement for AI companies, asks providers to commit to a copyright policy, put in place safeguards to avoid any infringements of rights, and designate a place to receive and process complaints. Signatories so far include major tech and AI companies such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. AI providers have to respect copyright laws, the Commission says The additional transparency requirements under the AI Act give artists clarity on who has already used their material and when, du Moulin added, making it difficult to claim any payment for work that's already been scraped to train AI models. 'Even if the AI Act has some good legal implications, it only works for the future – it will not be retroactive,' Du Moulin said. 'So everything which has been scraped already … it's a free lunch for generative AI providers who did not pay anything'. Adriana Moscono, GESAC's general manager, said some of her members tried opting out by sending letters and emails to individual AI companies to get a license for their content, but were not successful. 'There was no answer,' Moscono told Euronews Next. 'There was absolute denial of the recognition of … the need to respect copyright and to get a license. So please, European Commission, encourage licensing'. Thomas Regnier, a Commission spokesperson, said in a statement to Euronews Next that AI providers have to respect the rights holders when they carry out text and data mining, and if there have been infringements, they can settle it privately. The AI Act 'in no way affects existing EU copyright laws,' Regnier continued. Mandate licence negotiations, groups ask Du Moulin and Moscono are asking the Commission to urgently clarify the rules around opting out and copyright protection in the law. 'The code of practice, the template and the guidelines, they don't provide us any capacity to improve our situation,' Moscono said. 'They're not guaranteeing … a proper application of the AI Act'. The advocates said the Commission could also mandate that AI companies negotiate blanket or collective licenses with the respective artist groups. Germany's Society for Musical Performing and Mechanical Reproduction Rights (GEMA) filed two copyright lawsuits against AI companies OpenAI, the parent of ChatGPT, and Suno AI, an AI music generation app. While not directly related to the AI Act, Du Moulin says the verdict could determine to what extent AI companies could be bound to copyright laws. The Commission and the European Court of Justice, the EU's high court, have also signalled that they will review the text and data mining exemption in the copyright legislation issued in 2019, Du Moulin said. New AI companies have to make sure they are compliant with the AI Act's regulations by 2026. That deadline extends to 2027 to companies already operating in the EU.
