BJD asks Centre to issue 'stop-work' order on Polavaram project till tribal concerns are addressed
A delegation of the regional party, which has been strongly opposing the "unilateral" design change of the Polavaram project by the government, had a detailed discussion with Union Jal Shakti Minister CR Paatil and also met the Chairman of the Central Water Commission at New Delhi.
During both meetings, the delegation vehemently raised the serious and unresolved concerns of Odisha, especially relating to the severe submergence impact of the Polavaram project on Malkangiri district, which threatens the lives, lands, and livelihoods of thousands of tribal people, including Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups , BJD senior vice-president Debi Prasad Mishra told PTI over phone.
Mishra said the delegation reminded the Jal Shakti Ministry that they had a previous meeting on the matter in December last year with the CWC, which had resulted in assurances of concrete action to address Odisha's apprehensions. However, despite repeated reminders, no substantial step has been taken to safeguard the interests of Odisha, and the minutes from the meeting held on August 28, 2024 have been the only official communication received so far, he said.
Expressing deep disappointment, the delegation maintained that the Ministry of Jal Shakti and the CWC have "failed" to act in line with the directives of the Supreme Court which had categorically stated that the Ministry and CWC must play a pioneering role in engaging all stakeholders and reviewing technical, environmental, and displacement concerns arising from the Polavaram Project.
Mishra said the recent sanction of ₹17,936 crore by the Centre for the project's completion has further escalated fears of displacement and ecological damage without Odisha's consent or due consultation.
Earlier, on February 28, 2025, the Polavaram Action Committee, comprising the affected tribal communities from Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh, had also unanimously opposed the continued unilateral execution of the project, expressing deep anguish over the lack of empathy and responsiveness from the concerned authorities.
Among the major demands, the BJD delegation sought immediate clarification on the unilateral revision of design flood discharge from 36 lakh to 50 lakh cusecs without stakeholder consultation, fresh studies on backwater impact, especially in light of IIT Roorkee's findings, and a technical review of the proposed embankments at Motu.
The BJD also demanded involvement of neutral and independent agencies to assess backwater impacts, stakeholder consultation including affected tribal communities, as mandated by the Supreme Court, high-level meeting of all stakeholder chief ministers to build consensus and cooperation, stop-work order on the Polavaram Project until Odisha's concerns are addressed, halt to any alterations to the original project design, including the unauthorized Polavaram–Banakacherla Link Project and others.
"The BJD leadership strongly urges the Union Government and the Central Water Commission to act in the spirit of cooperative federalism, uphold constitutional obligations, and ensure justice for the tribal communities of Odisha, who are facing existential threats due to the arbitrary expansion and unregulated implementation of the Polavaram Project," Mishra said.
The BJD leader said that it is not just a regional concern, but a matter of human rights, environmental justice, and federal integrity.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
States raise revenue loss concerns: GoM backs Centre's plan for GST rate rationalisation
The Group of Ministers on Rate Rationalisation gave its in-principle support Thursday to the Centre's proposal to overhaul the Goods and Services Tax (GST) design, even as member states raised concerns about potential revenue loss on account of the rate rationalisation. Six days ago, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his Independence Day address, announced the next big phase of reforms under the GST regime by Diwali, a gift for the common man, small entrepreneurs and MSMEs, in terms of reduced tax burden. The Centre has suggested replacing multiple slabs – 5 per cent, 12 per cent, 18 per cent and 28 per cent – with a broad two-slab structure – 5 per cent and 18 per cent – in addition to a 40 per cent special rate for sin and demerit goods. States said they do not oppose the 'pro-people' proposal, but it may result in revenue losses that will ultimately leave them with less resources to spend on common people in their regions. While Bihar's Deputy Chief Minister and GoM convenor Samrat Choudhary spelt out the panel's support for the GST overhaul proposal, he said observations made by states will be referred to the GST Council. Detailed discussions on items will be taken up in the Council, he said. 'We have deliberated upon the Centre's proposal to remove the two GST slabs, we have given our support and recommendations. Now, the GST Council will decide. All states gave their views, there were some observations by some states. Those will be referred to the GST Council,' Choudhary said. The differing views and observations of states on revenue loss and concerns over profiteering by manufacturers and companies will be part of the note that the GoM will send to the Council along with the Centre's proposal. Some states were also of the view that the work done by the GoM over the last few years will now essentially be wasted as they would be simply handing over the Centre's proposal to the GST Council. 'We have neither approved nor rejected it. Centre cannot give its proposal directly to the Council, so we will be just handing over the Centre's proposal to the Council,' a top state government official told The Indian Express. States are learnt to have sent their suggestions for the GoM's note on a mechanism to compensate states that will address their revenue loss concerns. States are anticipating annual revenue loss of Rs 6,000-10,000 crore, the official said. West Bengal's Finance Minister Chandrima Bhattacharya echoed a similar view and said they are 'okay with the pro-people proposal' but it is not an agreement. The Centre's proposal has not outlined the figure for revenue loss on account of the GST rate rationalisation and the proposal should not move ahead without detailing a mechanism for compensating states for revenue loss. 'It's not an agreement in that way. If it's there, it is okay. If it is pro-people, then it's okay. But it has to be discussed in the Council's meeting also. There is no benefit in discussing it item-by-item in the GoM meeting. It will be discussed item-by-item in the (GST) Council meeting. While presenting a report to the GST Council, they will give a note of what we have said,' she said. Bhattacharya said no state had any issue in accepting the pro-people GST overhaul proposal. 'All states are pro-people. There is no doubt about it. It's nothing to talk about in politics. They are pro-people, let us take it for granted. But when the states lose their revenue, that also ultimately goes back to common people. That has to be looked into. That is what we have said,' she said. 'Because to give relief to common people should not mean that there isn't much left to spend on them after that, we have to think about that. That's why we have said that while you give the presentation, you must quantify it (revenue loss),' she said. She also said that ministers from BJP-ruled states have concurred with the suggestions. 'But we have said we are there, if it benefits people, we are okay. On the one hand it reaches people and on the other hand see what is the loss we (states) are facing. Ultimately if a state suffers any loss, that ultimately boils down to the suffering of the common man,' she said. Uttar Pradesh's Finance Minister Suresh Kumar Khanna said the Centre's proposal was welcomed by all member states saying it is in the interest of the common man. 'States were asking that they should be compensated for revenue loss. The revenue loss will be calculated. Ultra luxury goods and sin goods will attract 40 per cent,' he said. Revenue loss concerns of states stem from the plan to prune the list of items in the 12 per cent slab and shift them to 5 per cent. There is also a concern that most items the existing 28 per cent slab. The Centre plans to introduce a special rate of 40 per cent, which will apply only to 5-7 sin, demerit and luxury items. States revenue loss concerns stem from the plan to prune the list of items in the 12 per cent slab and shift them to 5 per cent. There is also a concern that most items in the existing 28 per cent slab will shift to 18 per cent slab except sin and demerit goods. The Centre plans to introduce a special rate of 40 per cent, which will apply only to 5-7 sin, demerit and luxury items. Some states have suggested amending the GST laws to allow for an additional levy going beyond the current cap of 40 per cent (20 per cent Central GST plus 20 per cent State GST). Some of the items right now attract GST of 60-70 per cent, Bhattacharya said, adding that the law should be amended to ensure that the current tax incidence, especially on sin goods, remains at the current level.
India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Meet Satish Golcha: Delhi's new Police Commissioner tasked with city's safety
The Centre on Thursday appointed senior IPS officer Satish Golcha as the new Commissioner of Delhi Police, replacing SBK Singh, who had been holding the post as additional charge since July-end. Singh will now continue as Director General of Home a 1992-batch officer of the AGMUT cadre, is currently serving as the Director General of Tihar Jail. His appointment comes at a sensitive moment—barely a day after Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta was attacked, and amid rising concern in the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) over a sudden spurt in gun violence and street crimes in the national capital over the past three weeks, sources IN DELHI POLICE AND BEYOND Satish Golcha is no stranger to Delhi Police, having served in key positions including Special Commissioner (Intelligence), Joint CP, and DCP in different districts of the city. He was also Special CP (Law & Order) during the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots. His tenure as DGP of Arunachal Pradesh further added to his administrative as a firm and strategic officer, Golcha is expected to focus on tightening law and order in the capital at a time when the city has been facing repeated questions over public IN MAJOR PROBESDuring his stint with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Golcha led several sensitive probes. He headed the team that exposed the false narrative in the 2009 Shopian case in Kashmir, which had initially been projected as the rape and murder of two women by security forces, as per a report by PTI. The CBI investigation, led by Golcha, found that the deaths were due to drowning and that the charges had been fabricated at the behest of Pakistan's ISI to destabilise the the Shopian case, Golcha also worked on the Ruchika molestation and suicide case, the Rizwanur Rahman death case, and investigations related to the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.- EndsMust Watch
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Punjab slams Centre over GST losses, demands release of Rs 50,000 crore dues
CHANDIGARH: The AAP-led Punjab government on Thursday slammed the BJP-led Centre after the two-day GST GoM meeting, demanding immediate release of pending Rs 50,000 crore dues while accusing the GST regime of causing massive revenue losses to states. Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema said GST has inflicted a Rs 1.11 lakh crore loss on the state and alleged that stopping the compensation cess was aimed at weakening state economies, forcing them to 'beg with folded hands' before the Centre. Cheema stressed that Punjab would not have suffered such massive revenue losses had it not joined the 'One Nation-One Tax' scheme. With the compensation cess now scrapped, he called out the BJP government for deliberately wrecking state economies to make them beg before the Centre. He said, "On August 20–21, the GST Group of Ministers met continuously for two days. On Wednesday, the meeting was on life and health insurance. In the evening, a meeting was held on compensation cess. The Chairman told us that today the meeting was on rate rationalisation, and that all members of the compensation cess would participate. Therefore, we also participated in Thursday's meeting.' He continued, "GST came in 2017. In the past eight years, there have been 27 amendments in GST, with exemptions given to different sectors. Fifteen times the GST rates of various goods were reduced. This practice has been continuing in the GST Council for the last eight years, and for the past three years I have been witnessing it myself.' Highlighting the Prime Minister's announcement, Cheema added, 'The Prime Minister declared that there would be two GST slabs - one at 5 per cent and another at 12 per cent - and everyone would celebrate Diwali. But after GST came, who will compensate for the loss suffered by Punjab and other states? Who will pay for this damage? One Nation, One Tax was the scheme of the central government, and all states, including Punjab gave their consent. Everyone agreed that uniform tax rates should prevail across the country so that no state could impose higher or lower taxes on its citizens. But this formula has inflicted a huge loss on Punjab.'
