Ex-RBI Governor Calls For Reforms In UPSC Exam, Proposes Age, Attempt Limits
In his opinion piece in The Times of India, Dr Subbarao highlighted what he described as a "colossal waste of human potential" under the current system, where aspirants spend years preparing for a highly competitive exam with limited chances of success.
"For every successful candidate, there are at least 10 others who too have invested years in preparation but have failed to make the grade. They are back at square one. An abysmal waste of productive years?" he wrote.
Dr Subbarao proposed two key reforms. First, he advocated a reduction in both the maximum number of attempts and the upper age limit. Currently, aspirants can take the exam up to six times between the ages of 21 and 32. He suggested this should be limited to three attempts and the age cap reduced to 27.
"Lakhs compete for a thousand-odd positions, making the chance of success extremely small. Yet candidates keep at it till they exhaust all their allowed attempts, even as the odds are stacked against them. This is a colossal waste of human potential. It also pushes many candidates into deep financial and psychological turmoil," he said.
He warned that the current framework leads aspirants to fall prey to the 'sunk cost fallacy'. "After all, they are susceptible to the 'sunk cost fallacy'-'I've invested so much time, money and effort. All that will go waste if I give up now. Maybe I will succeed this time round.'"
Reflecting on his own experience in the 1970s, when the exam allowed only two attempts within the 21-24 age band, Subbarao said the system has now "gone too far" in the other direction. He also cautioned that too many attempts favour those who master exam techniques over those with genuine aptitude. "Any examination that allows as many as six chances is likely to privilege mastery of exam technique over inherent merit," he wrote.
His second proposal is the introduction of a structured, annual Tier-2 recruitment channel for experienced professionals aged 40-42. Unlike current lateral entries, this route would function as a permanent part of the UPSC system.
"They can pursue other careers and take another shot at the exam mid-career," he wrote, adding that such candidates would bring valuable external perspectives to governance. "Tier-2 recruits will make up for these lacunae and make the civil service collectively more relevant and useful, and maybe even more caring."
Dr Subbarao emphasised that his proposals are not aimed at dismantling the existing entry route for younger candidates. "There is a lot to be said for continuing to recruit young people into the IAS. They bring in youthful spirit, raw enthusiasm, and unspoilt enterprise into administration."
While acknowledging that the civil services examination has evolved significantly over the decades, the former RBI Governor said, "The civil service exam has vastly improved from the time I took it over 50 years ago. But there is still a need to push the envelope."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
US tariffs could knock 50 bps off India's growth, deepen jobless recovery: Former RBI Governor Subbarao
Former Reserve Bank of India Governor DUVVURI SUBBARAO says high tariffs proposed by US President Donald Trump on labour-intensive exports such as textiles and gems will deepen the jobless growth problem since a 50 per cent US tariff threatens exports worth around 2 per cent of GDP. In a conversation with The Indian Express, he says the potential growth hit could be 20-50 basis points in a year, after the extent of diversion and adjustment. Subbarao, who also served as the Finance Secretary of India, warns that for India, 'being labelled a 'dead' economy by a US president carries reputational costs.' Subbarao says Donald Trump may yet find his tariff strategy politically and economically costly, adding that rising geopolitical tension and protectionism increase risk premia, tighten global liquidity and raise the cost of foreign borrowing. Excerpts: Expert estimates suggest that tens of billions of dollars' worth of Indian exports to the US are at risk, so the immediate impact will be sharp. Labour-intensive sectors where we compete on price and scale such as textiles, footwear, gems & jewellery will see margins eroded, orders diverted, jobs lost, and plants downsized. The distributional impact will be regressive, widening income inequality. We must also reckon with China's industrial overcapacity and the possibility of their dumping in our markets to compensate for their own loss of US market share. Further, tariff escalation will impair our China+1 ambition; we were already struggling to break into global value chains because of domestic trade barriers and high costs. Facing higher US tariffs than ASEAN or South Asian competitors will make that integration even harder. What should be the strategy of Indian exporters, especially in the fields of textiles, gems & jewellery, electronics, pharma, etc, if the US continues with the 50 per cent import duty? There are no easy fixes. In the short run, exporters must absorb part of the shock through price renegotiation, market diversification to other markets and make full use of duty-drawback and export credit schemes. In some areas such as solar modules, shrimp, and linen, where the US is the sole or dominant market, such diversion will be much harder. Over the medium to long term, exporters must move up the value chain, produce branded and design-rich goods, tighten compliance and traceability, cut lead times, and deepen domestic linkages to reduce input costs. Investments in automation, skills, and productivity will be critical. On the policy side, we need to accelerate FTAs and market access deals to secure preferential entry into major economies. It's difficult but possible to turn Trump tariffs into an opportunity to make our exports more competitive and robust. Donald Trump recently said that the Indian economy is heading towards being 'dead like Russia's.' What do such comments mean for global investor confidence and how might they impact emerging markets like India? The world has learnt to discount Trump's impulsive, off-the-cuff comments. Even so, for India, being labelled a 'dead' economy by a US president carries reputational costs. It can be read as a signal of our eroding geopolitical and economic leverage. The US remains the pre-eminent economic power and issuer of the reserve currency; its political tone influences global capital flows. Such comments can raise India's risk premium, dent investor sentiment, and prompt portfolio reallocation even absent accompanying policy actions. Do you think India has the flexibility and necessity to open up agriculture and dairy segments to imports from the US and other countries? Agriculture and dairy are protected for compelling reasons: rural livelihoods and food security. A blanket opening is politically untenable and economically risky, and America recognises our red lines here. That said, some selective, calibrated openings could help break deadlocks in trade talks — through targeted tariff cuts, sanitary-phytosanitary alignment, and mutually beneficial supply agreements. Any liberalisation should be phased, product-specific, and paired with farmer safety nets, productivity enhancement, and investments in storage and cold-chain infrastructure. While many economists warned of US inflation due to tariffs, Trump is seen as winning with deals from the EU, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Your view? We are far from the endgame. The stated aim of Trump's tariffs — reshoring manufacturing and creating jobs — is difficult to achieve given the US' loss of competitiveness in labour-intensive industries. Higher import costs will feed into domestic prices; costlier goods will depress consumption, and with weaker demand, job creation will falter. The trade deals mask these tensions. The strain is likely to become visible during the Christmas shopping season, potentially shaping voter sentiment ahead of the mid-terms. Trump may yet find his tariff strategy politically and economically costly. India's GDP growth remains among the fastest globally, but critics argue the growth is uneven and jobless. How do you see the quality of India's current economic growth? Will GDP growth come down due to trade issues? India's headline GDP growth is robust, but employment growth, especially in the formal sector, lags behind. Job creation barely matches labour-force expansion, and informal work remains dominant. Independent economists argue that official unemployment data understate reality. Low employment elasticity means GDP growth is not translating proportionately into jobs. High tariffs on labour-intensive exports like textiles and gems will deepen the jobless growth problem. A 50 per cent US tariff threatens exports worth around 2 per cent of GDP; depending on the extent of diversion and adjustment, the growth hit could be 20-50 basis points in a year. Global risks and uncertainties have increased of late. Will it impact capital flows and funding plans of corporates? Yes. Rising geopolitical tension and protectionism increase risk premia, tighten global liquidity, and raise the cost of foreign borrowing. Corporates dependent on external finance or dollar-linked supply chains will face delayed projects, repriced deals, and higher hurdles for capex. India's deep domestic financial system and growing rupee-denominated bond markets can cushion some of this impact, especially if banks actively finance strategic investments. India is targeting to become a $5 trillion economy. In your view, what are the three biggest obstacles standing in the way — and how can they realistically be tackled? (The) First (obstacle) is education & health deficits: Weak human capital undermines productivity; we need sustained, outcome-driven investment in early education, nutrition, and healthcare. Second is productivity stagnation: Slow reforms, skill gaps, and fragmented supply chains hold back growth; the remedy lies in building industrial clusters, integrating MSMEs, improving logistics, and boosting research and development. The third (obstacle) is rising inequality and weak mass demand: Growth skewed to the top limits consumption. Strengthening lower-income households via formal jobs and social protection can trigger a virtuous cycle of demand, production, and employment. Do you think the trade tariff issues will impact the fiscal and monetary policies? Where are interest rates headed? Likely yes. India's credible path of fiscal consolidation could be disrupted if tariff-hit sectors require short-term support. After last week's policy review, the governor acknowledged that the RBI is watching the impact of tariffs on growth, inflation, and the rupee. If tariffs fuel inflation and pressure the currency, rates may stay high; if growth weakens sharply, there is room to ease. Policy will remain data-dependent and cautious. With global capital becoming more expensive and foreign investors turning cautious, how vulnerable is India's growth story to a potential global slowdown? India's past growth surges have coincided with strong export performance suggesting that exports matter more to our GDP than often acknowledged. A global slowdown and tighter financing will hit exports, FDI, and portfolio flows. Domestic consumption, public capex, and resilience in some sectors offer partial buffers, but export-heavy states and firms reliant on foreign borrowing will be more vulnerable.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
UPSC to begin year-long centenary celebrations from October 1, 2025
The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) will mark its 100th anniversary with a year-long programme of events and initiatives, starting on October 1, 2025, and continuing until October 1, 2026. The decision was finalised in a recent meeting chaired by UPSC Chairman Ajay Kumar, according to an official statement issued on the commission's journey since its inception, Kumar described the UPSC as a pillar of 'transparency, fairness, and meritocracy,' responsible for selecting the most capable candidates for senior government roles through a rigorous and impartial part of the centenary celebrations, the UPSC plans to unveil a commemorative logo and tagline that reflect its service to the nation. Several new initiatives and reforms are also set to be introduced during the year. Kumar noted that employees were invited to contribute suggestions for the celebration, with many valuable ideas received to help shape the programme. 'The centenary is not only a moment to honour our legacy but also a chance to assess our progress, plan for improvement, and commit to serving the nation by selecting the finest talent for its governance,' he said, adding that it is also an opportunity to chart the commission's path for the next UPSC traces its roots to October 1, 1926, when it was established as the Public Service Commission under the provisions of the Government of India Act, 1919, and based on the recommendations of the Lee Commission (1924). It was renamed the Federal Public Service Commission in 1937, and later became the Union Public Service Commission with the adoption of the Constitution on January 26, the UPSC conducts numerous recruitment examinations for central government services, including the prestigious Civil Services Examination, which selects officers for the IAS, IFS, IPS, and other key positions.(With PTI inputs)- Ends
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Raghuram Rajan flags a 'bigger issue' if India stops buying Russian oil
President Donald Trump has been cranking up the pressure on India, a country the US has courted as a strategic counterweight against China. Trump has announced a 50 per cent tariff on the country, a higher rate than many other major economies in Asia. His message to India is clear: Stop buying Russian oil . This raises a crucial question: Can India afford to stop buying Russian oil? As per former Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Raghuram Rajan , 'It wouldn't be a disaster for India', but he pointed to a 'bigger issue' that might be of concern. 'Stopping purchases of Russian oil wouldn't be a disaster for India, since current prices aren't much higher than for Russian crude.' If Russian oil were cut off entirely, prices would rise, but India could handle that, he stated in an interview with International Valor. The bigger issue is 'political: an overt public decision to stop buying from Russia would be seen domestically as bowing to U.S. pressure, which plays badly in any democracy.' If Washington had quietly asked India to phase out Russian oil, it might have been acceptable, the former RBI Governor said. 'Making it public, and tying it to a tariff threat makes it much harder politically.' On trade, there are many areas where liberalisation would be good for India, he stated adding that lowering tariffs can help our economy. 'But, it's hard to negotiate with a gun to your head. I hope that tempers cool and talks resume, because a 50 per cent tariff is unsustainable—not just for India, but also for the U.S., which risks alienating a country it hopes will be a strategic partner. People remember these things for a long time, and turning them away is rarely smart geopolitics.' Although a deal is still possible to avoid the higher rate, Trump's recent barrage against India has quickly damaged ties with a nation that successive administrations have sought to court as a counterweight to China. He's called India's economy 'dead,' its tariff barriers 'obnoxious' and its people indifferent to the plight of Ukrainians — adding to tensions after Trump angered India by claiming to have brokered peace with Pakistan earlier this year. The Indian government has fired back at Trump's tariff threats, saying the purchases are necessary for the nation's energy security and has blasted Trump for singling out India when other countries are also buying Russian oil. 'We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' a spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement. 'India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests.' If implemented, the higher rates would be a further hit to India's economy. Bloomberg Economics estimated that a 50 per cent tariff may cut US-bound exports by 60%, putting 0.9 per cent of gross domestic product at risk. It would particularly hit labor-intensive industries such as gems and jewelry, textiles, footwear, carpets and agricultural goods. While India is still open to talks, Trump's tariff threats are eroding goodwill and risk prompting India to shift closer to Russia and China. Prime Minister Modi is planning to visit China later this month for the first time in more than seven years.
