Ensure effective delivery of MITRA funds and initiatives
IN August 2024, Malaysian Indian Transformation Unit MITRA (MITRA) chairman P. Prabakaran requested an increase in the allocation for the India community to RM300 mil in Budget 2025, up from the current RM100 mil.
Prabakaran, who is also the Batu MP, said the RM 100mil allocated annually wasn't enough to effectively fund initiatives aimed at improving the socio-economic status of Malaysian Indians.
He highlighted concerns that the amount would be inadequate to meet the diverse needs of the community and drive meaningful upliftment programmes.
Now given that MITRA has endorsed 45 applications totaling RM40 mil which are awaiting processing at the Prime Minister's Office, why is there a delay in their disbursement?
Prabakaran had emphasised that the government needs to boost the budget to adequately support projects that are genuinely transformational for the Indian community.
Why aren't funding initiatives for the Indian community given higher importance?
As June approaches, it is concerning that the Indian community remains unaware of the actual disbursement status of the RM100 mil allocated to MITRA this year.
It is crucial that these funds are approved and effectively implemented without delay to provide tangible benefits for the Indian community.
MITRA opened applications for the Socioeconomic Development Grant Programme for the Malaysian Indian Community (PPSMI) 2025 from Oct 15 to Nov 14, 2024. That was about seven months ago.
MITRA should undergo a full restructuring.
To fulfill her May 23 PKR election promise to champion the Indian community, Nurul Izzah Anwar faces the critical task of fast-tracking MITRA's initiatives and programmes.
She must guarantee the swift approval and implementation of the RM40 mil allocated for Phase 1 of Budget 2025, as any further delays will hinder tangible progress and risk the return of unutilised funds to the Finance Ministry by the third quarter of 2025.
It's been almost four months since funds amounting to RM40 mil for NGOs and training organisations were approved and agreements were signed.
Yet, the money remains undistributed and there's no clear execution plan in sight. This delay hinders vital community works and training initiatives
The recommendation is for community development professionals and experts to lead the organization. This change is crucial to ensure both transparency and effective management within MITRA. ‒ June 3, 2025
Muniandy Krishna
Kuala Lumpur
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Main image: Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
China imposes temporary anti-dumping duties on Canadian canola imports
BEIJING: China will impose temporary anti-dumping duties on Canadian canola imports starting Thursday. The commerce ministry stated the preliminary investigation found Canadian shipments caused substantial damage to domestic industries. A 75.8 percent duty will apply as deposits while final measures are determined. This follows China's March decision to impose 100 percent surcharges on Canadian rapeseed oil, peas and oil cakes. Beijing linked the move to Canada's matching of US tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles last year. Canada ranks among the world's top canola producers, with most exports going to China and the US. Chinese authorities launched the canola probe in September 2024 after trade tensions escalated. Separately, Beijing announced an anti-dumping investigation into Canadian pea starch imports on Tuesday. Preliminary duties between 13.8 and 40.5 percent will also apply to rubber imports from Canada and Japan. The ministry terminated a similar probe into Indian rubber shipments due to negligible import volumes. Trade analysts note agricultural products frequently become casualties in China-Canada economic disputes. The measures come amid ongoing tariff clashes between Ottawa and its two largest trading partners. - AFP
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Strong state-federal ties crucial for Sabah's progress, says Hajiji
RANAU: A robust partnership between the Sabah state government and the federal administration is essential for sustaining development in the region, according to Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor. Hajiji, who chairs Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS), highlighted that the collaborative governance under the GRS-Pakatan Harapan (PH) alliance has significantly advanced Sabah's progress. He emphasised the importance of stability and unity with the federal government to ensure prosperity for the people. Under the Sabah Maju Jaya (SMJ) development agenda, more than 400 initiatives have been introduced, with 94% successfully executed. Hajiji noted that the GRS-PH government has rolled out unprecedented aid programmes for education and public welfare. This year, nearly 100,000 hardcore poor households in Sabah are receiving monthly assistance of RM300, a scheme set to continue if the coalition retains public support in the upcoming state election. The GRS Supreme Council has agreed to uphold its existing cooperation with PH for the election, reinforcing their shared commitment to Sabah's development. The 16th Sabah State Legislative Assembly will dissolve automatically on 11 November unless an earlier dissolution occurs. Separately, Hajiji announced that the state government, via the Sabah Housing and Town Development Authority (LPPB), remains dedicated to alleviating urban and rural poverty through new township projects. The Paginatan New Township, spanning 200 acres and located 43 km from Ranau, is expected to stimulate the local economy. The project, aligned with SMJ's welfare-focused goals, will feature government offices, shops, affordable housing, health centres, and multipurpose halls, developed in five phases. – Bernama
Focus Malaysia
3 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
MIC at a crossroads: Time to reclaim relevance
AS MALAYSIA edges closer to its 16th General Election (GE16), the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) finds itself at a critical political juncture. Once a dominant voice for the Indian community within Barisan Nasional (BN), MIC now appears increasingly adrift by lacking clear messaging, decisive leadership, and the strategic agility necessary for survival in a rapidly shifting political landscape. Recent developments in Kedah have raised eyebrows. MIC's local leaders have been signalling support for Perikatan Nasional (PN) through indirect channels, relying on non-Muslim wings and secondary-tier representatives to express political positions. While such moves may be attempts to test the waters, they also reveal a worrying absence of national-level coherence. This low-profile political posturing suggests a party unsure of its direction, grappling with identity, and failing to recognise the urgency of its situation. The contrast with the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) is striking. Like MIC, MCA has suffered heavy electoral losses and faces significant questions about its relevance. Yet, unlike MIC, MCA has maintained an active, visible presence in public discourse. Its leadership continues to issue timely statements, engage with community concerns, and assert the party's stance on national issues. While results have been mixed, this strategy has preserved MCA's leverage within BN and positioned it more favourably in ongoing seat negotiations. Visibility matters, especially as coalitions prepare for GE16. Seat allocations are expected to be based on incumbency, perceived electability, and party relevance. MCA's willingness to speak up, even symbolically, grants it political currency. MIC, by contrast, seems content with silence or ambiguous positioning, a dangerous miscalculation at a time when political capital is earned through engagement, not deference. The problem goes deeper than just poor communication. MIC's reliance on indirect proxies to signal political intent shows an organisation out of touch with modern political dynamics. At a time when issues such as education, employment, minority rights, and equality before the law dominate the discourse among Indian Malaysians, MIC has failed to place itself at the forefront of these conversations. Meanwhile, major parties like UMNO, PKR, and DAP have consolidated their narratives around national unity, multiracial platforms, and economic reform. They shape the broader political terrain and influence coalition direction. MIC, with its narrowly ethnic appeal and outdated approach, risks becoming politically irrelevant if it continues to misread the moment. Crucially, MIC lacks a visible strategic brain trust. Rather than positioning itself as a robust voice for Indian Malaysians or a necessary coalition partner, it appears to be hedging its bets by quietly leaning toward PN in hopes of future favour or fallback relevance. This is not strategy; it's drift. Coalitions reward utility, not nostalgia or quiet loyalty. Without a strong electoral base or meaningful public engagement, MIC offers little to entice either its traditional partners or potential new allies. The allure of aligning with PN may seem tactically viable to some within MIC's ranks, especially in states where PN appears to have momentum. However, such a move is fundamentally flawed. The coalition's track record shows limited commitment to minority rights beyond symbolic gestures. Non-Malay support for PN remains low, and MIC's credibility could be seriously damaged if it is seen as abandoning its community's interests for uncertain political gain. Additionally, MIC risks alienating its current coalition allies. Public flirtation with PN, even if unofficial or regionally confined, sends mixed signals and projects weakness, not confidence. It suggests desperation rather than strategic foresight that a damaging perception ahead of high-stakes seat negotiations. GE16 presents a make-or-break moment. MIC cannot afford to continue operating as it has. It must reclaim its space through bold, coherent, and consistent public engagement. National leaders must speak directly to the electorate, articulate a vision for the Indian community, and engage in coalition politics from a position of strength, not subservience. The blueprint is clear. MIC should take a cue from MCA's approach through assertiveness, relevance, and public messaging. Even when symbolic, these efforts help a party remain visible and necessary. MIC must stop issuing endorsements through obscure platforms or relying on backchannels. Instead, it needs a reinvigorated public presence and a strategy that reflects the real concerns of Indian Malaysians. Education, economic empowerment, social justice, and equitable development are key areas where MIC can still make a difference. But this requires more than policy papers and closed-door meetings. It demands direct engagement with communities, strategic alliances, and clear communication from top-tier leadership. The party's historic legacy does not guarantee a future. Relevance must be earned, and time is running out. If MIC fails to recalibrate and if it continues to wait for recognition rather than claim its place, it risks being reduced to a political footnote. GE16 is not just another election cycle for MIC. It is, quite possibly, the final opportunity to prove that it still matters. Politics rewards those who adapt, communicate, and negotiate. For MIC, the silence and ambiguity of the present are not signs of strategy but they are symptoms of decline. It's time to reshape the narrative decisively and take swift, purposeful action. ‒ Aug 12, 2025 R Paneir Selvam is the principal consultant of Arunachala Research & Consultancy Sdn Bhd, a think tank specialising in strategic national and geopolitical matters. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bernama
