logo
Future-Proofing The Chip Supply Chain: Planning For Agility And Growth

Future-Proofing The Chip Supply Chain: Planning For Agility And Growth

Forbes5 days ago
Umesh Kumar Sharma is a Specialist Leader in Global Supply Chain Transformations.
Semiconductor supply chains are among the most complex and globally distributed in the world. These highly specialized networks involve intricate processes, multiple geographies and deep interdependencies between front-end and back-end operations.
Recent disruptions, from pandemic shutdowns to geopolitical tensions, have exposed the structural fragility of these supply chains. For example, the 2021 chip shortage alone cost automakers $210 billion in lost revenue and reduced vehicle production by 7.7 million units. For semiconductor manufacturers, supply chain reliability has escalated from an operational challenge to a boardroom-level priority with strategic implications.
In response, companies are significantly ramping up production capacity, with some semiconductor majors committing $100 billion over three years and others announcing $20 billion U.S. fab expansions. However, throwing capital at the problem isn't enough.
To truly future-proof operations, supply chain leaders must rethink how to plan holistically across both front-end (wafer fabrication) and back-end (assembly, test and packaging) stages. The path forward demands a cohesive strategy that unites long-term capacity planning, digital integration and synchronized execution across global nodes.
Aligning Strategy With Capacity
Strategic planning begins by ensuring that semiconductor capacity decisions are tightly aligned with long-term business objectives. As the global chip market is projected to surpass $1 trillion by 2030—fueled by megatrends such as artificial intelligence, electrification, autonomous vehicles and 5G connectivity—the stakes have never been higher.
To capture this growth and remain competitive, semiconductor companies must go beyond reactive planning. They need to proactively quantify future capacity requirements, model investment timing and scenario-plan for various macroeconomic, regulatory and technological shifts that could impact demand and supply.
This means considering not just how much capacity is needed but where it should be located, what technologies it should support and how flexible it must be to accommodate shifting product mixes. For instance, site expansions in regions like Arizona exemplify efforts to geographically diversify manufacturing footprints and mitigate risks related to geopolitical tensions or concentrated supply chains.
Synchronized Front-End And Back-End Planning
One of the semiconductor industry's greatest challenges is decoupling the long lead times of wafer fabrication (6-8 weeks) from the shorter cycles of back-end packaging (1-2 weeks). Without tight coordination, supply bottlenecks or excess die inventories are inevitable.
To address this, companies must employ synchronized planning practices across both horizons—Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) for front-end operations and Sales and Operations Execution (S&OE) for back-end processes. On the front-end side, S&OP focuses on mid- to long-term planning to establish an optimal wafer start plan that aligns with demand forecasts and strategic capacity goals. This plan serves as the foundation for manufacturing continuity and resource optimization.
In contrast, back-end operations demand a responsive, short-term focus. S&OE enables planners to manage incoming orders, monitor material availability and swiftly respond to demand and supply fluctuations. This near-term agility ensures that packaging and testing operations remain aligned with real-time customer needs and service commitments.
Agile Implementation Through Pilots
As discussed in my previous article, an agile, pilot-based implementation model is critical when introducing new supply chain technologies and planning solutions. Rather than launching end-to-end transformations immediately, organizations benefit from initiating controlled pilots that test tools like AI-driven planning engines within specific products or plants.
These pilots serve as learning grounds, helping validate assumptions, measure impact and refine workflows in a lower-risk environment. Once successful, the solutions can be scaled systematically across the broader supply network. This method reduces disruption, enhances team adoption and aligns planning innovations with real-world operational dynamics.
Empowering Talent And Collaboration
Advanced planning systems are only as effective as the people using them. Semiconductor supply chains demand highly specialized expertise, ranging from yield optimization to test protocols and lead-time management. So, upskilling the planning workforce is essential.
Forward-looking companies are creating hybrid roles like 'supply chain data scientists,' who blend domain expertise with analytics to turn complex data into clear business outcomes. According to Gartner's "Supply Chain Top 25 for 2025" research, organizations that invest in analytics talent and cross-functional alignment consistently achieve higher inventory turns, improved forecast accuracy and faster decision-making.
Embedding Resilience And Sustainability
Future-ready semiconductor supply chains must be designed for both resilience and environmental responsibility. The CHIPS Act is catalyzing a wave of domestic investments, with over $200 billion in new U.S. semiconductor projects already in motion, according to the Semiconductor Industry Association.
To meet the demands of this new landscape, companies are rethinking network design. Geographic diversification and dual sourcing strategies are becoming essential, not only to mitigate geopolitical risks but also to ensure operational continuity during regional disruptions. Organizations are actively building flexibility into their manufacturing footprints by establishing distributed assembly hubs and creating buffer capacity closer to end markets.
The Path Forward
Semiconductor supply chains are at an inflection point. With long lead times, rapid demand shifts and mounting geopolitical risk, companies must move from reactive to proactive planning. By aligning strategy, integrating front-end and back-end processes, embracing digital tools and fostering collaboration, supply chain leaders can build the resilience and agility needed for the decade ahead.
Those that succeed will not only weather future disruptions but lead the next wave of semiconductor innovation and growth. They will set new benchmarks for responsiveness, sustainability and strategic foresight in a world where technological cycles continue to accelerate. As chips become central to everything from AI to green energy, supply chains must evolve from cost centers to enablers of competitive advantage. The organizations that invest today in intelligent, end-to-end planning will define the semiconductor landscape of tomorrow.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Circle stock rises after quarterly revenue beats estimates in first earnings since blockbuster IPO
Circle stock rises after quarterly revenue beats estimates in first earnings since blockbuster IPO

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Circle stock rises after quarterly revenue beats estimates in first earnings since blockbuster IPO

Circle (CRCL) stock jumped 2% in afternoon trading on Tuesday after the stablecoin issuer posted better-than-expected quarterly revenue for the first time since going public. The company reported second quarter total revenue of $658 million, versus the $647 million analysts expected. CEO Jeremy Allaire said the company's stablecoin, USDC (USDC-USD), was the "fastest-growing major stablecoin over the past year." USDC in circulation grew 90% year-over-year to $61.3 billion at quarter end, and has grown an additional 6.4% to $65.2 billion as of Aug 10. "Overall activity globally in the digital asset economy has been growing," Allaire told Yahoo Finance on Tuesday morning. "We're continuing to see growth in the use of dollar digital currencies like USDC as a store of value around the world in cross-border settlements," he added. "Use cases continue to expand, and I think people are finding that this is an incredibly high utility, new form of money." The company also announced ARC, a new blockchain network for stablecoin finance that will launch in the second half of the year. "We wanted to create a way for institutions to pay fees on blockchains in a fast, predictable manner that would be simple from an accounting perspective and could deliver very low-cost and stable fees," CEO Jeremy Allaire said during the company's earnings call on Tuesday morning. The stock is up roughly 480% from its IPO price of $31 per share as crypto-friendly legislation has lifted the sector. Circle has been at the center of optimism over the stablecoin market following the passage of the GENIUS Act, legislation that creates guardrails and a framework for digital tokens backed by assets such as the US dollar. Circle makes much of its money from interest income, specifically from short-term Treasury bills backing its stablecoin, USDC. The company's reserve income increased 50% year over year to $634 million, primarily from an 86% growth in USDC stablecoin circulation. Allaire indicated if the Fed reserve cuts interest rates and yields on short term treasuries decline, the growth of stablecoins will offset decline in rates. "We believe that lower interest rates are going to be accelerative to the business, as money velocity picks up, as invested capital picks up, and as more people are putting money to use in the economy, this very high utility form of money will grow," said Allaire. The company also shares part of its revenue with Coinbase (COIN), a major distribution partner. Last month, Compass Point analyst Ed Engel flagged the risk of rising distribution costs as the company expands its network while continuing to share a portion of its interest income. On Tuesday morning, Engel said Circle's gross profit margin guidance of 36% to 38% for fiscal year 2025 "slightly underwhelmed." Engel said that forecast implies second half margins will come in below the first half of the year's 39%, writing "we would have expected higher gross margins in 2H25." "While CRCL's lower margin guidance could be due to conservatism, CRCL's recent partnerships don't seem to benefiting the near-term margin outlook. As such, we reiterate our Sell rating and $130 PT," he wrote. However, others on Wall Street saw the stock as a way for investors to participate in rising enthusiasm over stablecoins. "CRCL is a global leader in stablecoins and is the purest stablecoin play in the public markets right now, and we anticipate further gains in the shares as the company creates new opportunities for itself and its partners," Seaport Research analyst Jeff Cantwell wrote last month. The analyst has a Buy rating and price target of $280 on the stock. Circle's results come as the overall market hovers near all-time highs and crypto rallies on expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts and President Trump's push to include crypto in 401(k) plans. Prior to the earnings release, Wall Street analysts had nine Buy, five Hold, and four Sell ratings on Circle stock. Ines Ferre is a senior business reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

Better Quantum Computing Stock: IonQ vs. Quantum Computing Inc.
Better Quantum Computing Stock: IonQ vs. Quantum Computing Inc.

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Better Quantum Computing Stock: IonQ vs. Quantum Computing Inc.

Key Points IonQ and Quantum Computing Inc. are racing to develop tech that can overcome the challenges inherent in quantum machines. Quantum Computing Inc. employs photons as a means of building scalable quantum devices, and its sales may be on the verge of taking off. IonQ adopted ions in its approach, and the company saw second quarter revenue rise 82%. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › The field of quantum computing is exciting. Quantum computers use atomic particles to perform complex calculations beyond the abilities of today's supercomputers, positioning them to revolutionize numerous industries. Many businesses are battling to produce technology that overcomes the challenges inherent in quantum machines. Two for investors to consider are IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) and Quantum Computing Inc. (NASDAQ: QUBT), which also refers to itself as QCi. These companies use different techniques to build quantum devices. IonQ employs ions to perform calculations while QCi utilizes photons. Between IonQ and QCi, one proves to be a better quantum computing investment right now. To understand which one and why, let's dive into both businesses in more detail. Where Quantum Computing Inc. is at today Current quantum computers are prone to calculation errors due to the delicate nature of atomic particles, preventing these machines from scaling up, and limiting their widespread use. Many quantum companies try to minimize errors by subjecting particles to freezing temperatures in expensive, bulky cryogenic equipment. Quantum Computing Inc. takes a different approach. It embraces the inherent chaos of harnessing these particles in a technique called entropy quantum computing. This method allows QCi's machines to operate at room temperature, use less power, and integrate with ordinary computer servers. Despite these advantages, its technology hasn't taken off. In the first quarter, QCi produced revenue of just $39,000. However, its Q1 operating expenses totaled $8.3 million. This chasm between income and expenses eventually will become a death knell for the business if sales don't pick up. But perhaps the company is turning a corner. In April, it sold one of its computers to a large automotive manufacturer, and in July, it secured a purchase valued at $332,000 from a major U.S. bank. The bank's sale is significant considering QCi produced revenue of $373,000 in all of 2024. IonQ's financial ups and downs IonQ's technology also operates at room temperature by using lasers to carefully control ions. It's been winning customers and growing revenue, a sign that its approach shows promise in surmounting quantum computing's shortcomings. In 2024, sales reached $43.1 million, up from the prior year's $22 million. But in Q1, the company's revenue of $7.6 million was flat year over year. This underwhelming result was not a good sign for a business with a Q1 operating loss of $75.7 million. Then in Q2, IonQ's sales trajectory changed once again. This time, revenue came in at an impressive $20.7 million, nearly double the prior year's $11.4 million. Part of this massive increase came from the company's recent acquisitions, as it works toward building a quantum computer network akin to the infrastructure underpinning today's internet. However, the acquisitions resulted in additional expenses, which catapulted IonQ's Q2 operating costs to $181.3 million, a huge increase over 2024's $60.3 million. Consequently, its Q2 operating loss ballooned to $160.6 million versus a loss of $48.9 million in the previous year. To bolster its finances, IonQ executed a $1 billion equity offering in July. This adds to the $1.3 billion in total assets the company exited Q2 with, while total liabilities stood at $168.2 million. Choosing between IonQ and Quantum Computing Inc. In deciding between these two quantum computing companies, one factor to weigh is share price valuation. This can be assessed through the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which measures how much investors are willing to pay for every dollar of revenue generated over the trailing 12 months. IonQ's P/S multiple is substantially lower than QCi's, indicating it's a better value. In fact, QCi's P/S ratio is so high, its stock looks overpriced. IonQ's superior sales growth and share price valuation make it a better investment over QCi in the emerging field of quantum computing. That said, buying IonQ stock carries risks, especially in the current macroeconomic climate, which could see inflation rise as a result of the Trump administration's aggressive tariff policies. IonQ's operating expenses are already accelerating, and the economic environment could drive those costs higher. While its balance sheet sports the funds to maintain operations in the short term, the longer-term picture remains murky. Whether IonQ's tech can achieve the quantum computing dominance it seeks is far from certain, and both it and QCi face large competitors with deep pockets, such as Microsoft, which is developing its own quantum computing solution. So only investors with a high risk tolerance should consider IonQ stock. Should you buy stock in IonQ right now? Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 Robert Izquierdo has positions in IonQ and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Quantum Computing Stock: IonQ vs. Quantum Computing Inc. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Cargill's Revenue Falls to 4-Year Low Amid Declining Crop Prices
Cargill's Revenue Falls to 4-Year Low Amid Declining Crop Prices

Bloomberg

time12 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Cargill's Revenue Falls to 4-Year Low Amid Declining Crop Prices

Cargill Inc. 's revenue declined to the lowest in four years as the largest private company in the US continues to restructure in the face of declining crop prices and a shrinking American cattle herd. The Minneapolis-based company posted revenue of $154 billion in the year ended May 31, according to an annual report posted on its website. That's down from about $160 billion a year earlier and the lowest since 2021, when revenue was reported at $134 billion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store