After Liam Neeson Said He's 'Madly In Love' With Pamela Anderson, Here's What You Need To Know About Their Off-Screen Relationship
If your social media timeline is anything like mine, you've probably seen tons of footage of Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson having a good time together while promoting their raunchy new comedy, The Naked Gun.
Related: "What An Ass": 19 Brutally Honest Stories From People Who Ran Into A Celebrity In Public
Most recently, the costars cozied up on the red carpet for the movie's premiere in London, sharing a kiss as they posed together for photos.
So... Pamela, 58, and Liam, 73, are both iconic, brilliant actors. And they're also both single, which means only one thing: Fans are wondering if they might be Hollywood's next cute couple.
Related: 21 Times Celebrities Were So, Soooooo Shady
For some context, Liam said in October last year that he fell 'madly in love' with Pamela while they were shooting The Naked Gun together.
At the time, fans thought this was amazing and that they'd make a sweet couple. And so, with their recent red carpet outing, there's plenty of renewed speculation about the pairing, and whether they might be the 'new late-life love story.'
Related: Sarah Michelle Gellar Explained Why She Reacted So Awkwardly When Asked A Question About Jennifer Love Hewitt On A Red Carpet, And It Makes Total Sense
However — and I hate to be the bearer of bad news — it sounds like Liam and Pam are strictly platonic. Speaking to Entertainment Weekly in May, Pamela said that she and Liam kept their relationship 'professionally romantic,' although that didn't mean they didn't have a lot of fun.
More recently, the pair did a joint cover interview for EW, in which Pamela said that she has found 'a friend forever in Liam,' adding that they have a connection that is 'very sincere' and 'very loving.'
Related: 17 Celebrities Who Dropped The Most Fascinating Truth Bombs About Menopause That'll Make You Go "Whoaaaa, I Did Not Know That"
And, for what it's worth, Liam has previously said he's done with dating in his 70s, telling People: 'No... I'm past all that.'
So, it sounds like romance isn't on the cards between these two, but can you blame Liam for being a little Taken by Pamela? Get it?
The Naked Gun hits theaters on Aug. 1.
More on thisAfter Describing Him As The Love Of Her Life, Pamela Anderson Gave An Update On Her Relationship With Her Ex-Husband Tommy LeeEllen Durney · Jan. 10, 2025Pamela Anderson Explained Why She Thinks She Had Depression For "A Couple Of Decades"Larry Fitzmaurice · Oct. 8, 2024Liam Neeson Has Dragged 'The View' After Joy Behar Thirsted Over Him During An 'Embarrassing' And 'Uncomfortable' Interview Last WeekStephanie Soteriou · Feb. 22, 2023
Also in Celebrity: "I Can't Emphasize Enough How Filthy Some Of These People Are": 39 Hollywood Secrets People Have Learned From Working With Celebs
Also in Celebrity: 34 Cringey Celeb Moments That I Feel Like Everyone Collectively Forgot
Also in Celebrity: 18 Times Celebs Called Out Other Celebs Over Wealth And Greed
Read it on BuzzFeed.com
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry denies new book's claim that he punched Prince Andrew
Prince Harry says he never punched his problematic uncle Prince Andrew, nor did the latter make insulting remarks about Meghan Markle, despite claims being made in a new book. Author Andrew Lownie's soon-to-be released biography, 'Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York,' details some of the more intimate elements of Prince Andrew's life, including his marriage and divorce from Sarah Ferguson, his relationships with his family and the immense scrutiny he's faced due to his connection to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Among the many claims made in the book are allegations that Andrew was left with a bloody nose after a 'heated argument' with Harry broke out during a 2013 family gathering. According to a newly published excerpt, 'punches were thrown' when anger escalated over 'something Andrew said behind Harry's back.' The book also accuses Andrew of having expressed skepticism and concern about Harry's marriage to Meghan, allegedly calling her an 'opportunist.' But according to a representative for the 40-year-old prince, 'neither of those things are true.' 'Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make those comments about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry,' a spokesperson said in a statement to People. Harry has long had to deny rumors about himself and his family, especially amid the tensions that grew after he and Meghan left their senior royal duties in 2020 and decamped to her native California. Despite reports that his relationship with the royal family is as strained as ever — thanks in no small part to all the dirty laundry he aired in his 2023 bestselling memoir 'Spare' — Harry insisted to the BBC in May that he 'would love reconciliation.' Prince Andrew, meanwhile, has remained largely ousted from the royals' good graces after his disastrous Epstein-focused interview with the BBC in 2019. He was allegedly cut off financially by his brother King Charles, according to another controversial biography. _____
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The Proof That Former Disney CEO Michael Eisner Hasn't Lost His Magic Touch
Media companies don't come much more historic than Disney. The eponymous studio was founded by Walt Disney and his brother Roy 101 years ago and, to this day, only two other executives have been as synonymous with the company as they were. Disney's current chief executive Bob Iger will forever be associated with the Mouse thanks to his acquisitions of Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm and 21st Century Fox. They turned Disney into a titan which consistently ranks as the highest-grossing studio in the movie industry. However, neither Iger nor even Walt himself laid the modern-day foundations that Disney is built on. Iger's predecessor Michael Eisner can take the credit for that and his track record at Disney really is the fairest of them all. Few executives have cast as powerful a spell on the entertainment industry as Eisner. When he became Disney's chief executive on September 22, 1984 its stock price was just $1.24 and the studio was in the doldrums. However, by the time he handed over the hot seat to Iger 21 years later, each share was worth $23.80 and Disney was the world's biggest media company. Impressive as this is, it isn't the clearest evidence that Eisner really does have a magic touch. The New York native joined Disney after an eight-year stint as chief executive of Paramount where he launched ground-breaking movies like Saturday Night Fever, Beverly Hills Cop and Raiders of the Lost Ark. At the time, Disney was a shadow of what it is today. Construction costs at Walt Disney World in Orlando had spiralled and attempts to make more modern movies had led to forgettable live-action films such as sci-fi flop The Black Hole and Condorman, starring Michael Crawford. Combined with a failure to focus on new animation, repeated re-releases of its back catalogue and declining quality standards at its theme parks, Disney was at risk. "They lost the company basically by overspending on Walt Disney World," explained Eisner in an interview with this author. "People don't remember that but Walt, and particularly his brother, coming out of the Depression, were afraid of debt, so instead of using debt to build a pretty much over budget theme park in Florida, they used their equity. They sold. They lost control. They also way overspent and they didn't have the attendance so between losing control, not having the attendance, not doing new animation, having very few live-action pictures, re-releasing the old library theatrically prior to home video, the company was at risk." He added that "it was being torn apart. It could have been over in six weeks. When we walked down Main Street the second day in Disneyland I realised what a valuable asset it was." Eisner knew what was needed. "[George]With a wave of his magic wand, Eisner brought Disney back to its roots of hand-drawn animation yielding beloved favourites like Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin and The Lion King. "We concentrated on reinvigorating animation, particularly musical animation," he explained. "We obviously made an early deal with Lucas for Star Tours and Raiders of the Lost Ark because we had no recent movies for which to put in the parks. We then had a lot of recent movies, whether it was the Roger Rabbits, or the Aladdins, or Beauty and the Beast or The Lion King or whatever." Eisner then commissioned rides based on them as well as merchandise to sell in the theme parks so the films acted as promotion for Disney's resorts which in turn drove the sale of toys that would fuel kids' interest in the movies. Eisner doubled down on this spellbinding cycle by building two new theme parks in Florida as well as others in California, Paris and Hong Kong. The 1990s were a golden era for the theme park industry and Disney was at the vanguard of it. So much so in fact that it was referred to as the Disney Decade. As Eisner explained, "we went to Europe. We went to Japan. We started negotiating in Hong Kong. We opened in Hong Kong. All that before I left." In turn, Hong Kong Disneyland paved the way for the opening of the Shanghai Disney Resort in 2016 which, until recently, was the studio's latest park. That only changed in May when it announced that one of its outposts is coming to Abu Dhabi's Yas Island after Iger signed a deal with Mohamed Al Zaabi, the trailblazing chief executive of Miral, the world's leading theme park operator outside Disney and Universal Studios. The impact of Eisner's expansion was magnified by his emphasis on quality and details. He describes his legacy as "the strategy of excellence. The strategy of whatever you do, do it really well." It is no exaggeration. When Disneyland Paris (Euro Disney as it was then known) was being developed, Eisner amassed a team of the world's best designers to make it the most immersive theme park ever built. They included Eddie Sotto, who meticulously created the park's turn-of-the-century themed Main Street, and Tom Morris, the architect of its majestic castle. The clearest evidence they succeeded is the fact that the Disneyland Paris is still Europe's most-visited theme park even though a new attraction hasn't been built there for several decades. As this report revealed, launching Disneyland Paris may actually be the studio's best-ever deal. Eisner's effect didn't just extend to expansion. "We improved the food at Walt Disney World which was terrible in 1984. We built 30,000 hotel rooms, high-quality hotels, which they didn't have - they had two." He added that 'we did that in architecture. We built 80 buildings around the world at Disney. They had never done this before at Disney, they had always done it internally. We went with the best architects around the world.' Eisner's expansion helped Disney to become the world's most-visited theme park operator with 142.1 million guests streaming through its turnstiles in 2023 according to the latest data from the Themed Entertainment Association. That's just the start. In order to ensure that the studio didn't get left behind by the rise of computer-animated movies, Eisner signed a pioneering deal in 1991 to distribute Pixar's modern-day fairytales. Its films like Finding Nemo and Toy Story grossed a total of $3.4 billion during Eisner's tenure paving the way for Disney's $7.4 billion acquisition of Pixar in 2006. Ten years after he took over the top job at Disney, Eisner created a new category of entertainment when he gave the green light to a Broadway show based on Beauty and the Beast. It opened at the Palace Theatre in New York in 1994 and was such a success that it set the stage for other shows based on The Lion King, Aladdin, and Frozen. Since then, Disney Theatrical Group's 10 titles have been seen by around 230 million theatergoers in 38 countries with The Lion King alone becoming the most successful show in theatre history playing to more than 115 million people in 100 cities. Instead of resting on his laurels, Eisner pushed the boat out and in 1998 launched Disney Cruise Line which now generates more than $2 billion of annual revenue as I revealed in British newspaper City A.M. Eisner declines to comment on the future of Disney and who should replace Iger. However, he is happy to look back and says that his turnaround of the company was driven by 'new content, invigorated management, diverse management, which we didn't have when I got there, great assets that Walt created that you had to build upon. No one big thing to put the company at risk. Motion pictures that were less than the industry average. All of those things together were a result of what turned Disney around. Going to Broadway, which has been a giant success. And I think the businesses that we put together in those 21 years are still the businesses that Disney is [today].' As the chart below and data here shows, by the time that Eisner stepped down on September 30, 2005, Disney's stock price was $23.80 which was a staggering 19.2 times higher than when he joined the company. It comfortably makes him the most successful boss in Disney's history as its stock price only rose 5.4 times during Iger's initial term which ran until February 25, 2020 when each share was worth $128.19. Former theme parks chief Bob Chapek took over the driving seat and although the stock price hit an all-time high of $201.91 under him, by the time he handed the reins back to Iger on November 20, 2022, it had slumped to just $97.58 which was lower than when he became Disney's boss. When Eisner stepped down he could have retired thanks to his sizeable pile of Disney stock which has soared even higher in value under Iger, closing at $119.35 today. Instead, he built up a boutique media company called Tornante after seeing signs showing the word on a cycling trip through Italy. Meaning 'hairpin turn', the name was fitting as Tornante headed in a completely different direction to Disney by producing hit adult animation series on Netflix such as Bojack Horseman and Tuca and Bertie. Despite his close ties to streaming, Eisner is still a big believer in movie theaters as this reporter revealed in the Daily Mail in 2023. He has also recently written a book called Camp, about the lessons he learned at summer camp, and has diversified outside media. Tornante has made investments in prize-draw company Omaze and trading card business Topps, which was sold to Fanatics in 2022 for an estimated $500 million. However, they were just trailers for the main event. Soon after Eisner turned 75 in 2017 he took perhaps his biggest swing yet when he acquired British soccer club Portsmouth FC. The team was founded in 1898 and was experiencing one of the toughest times in its history. In 2012 the historic team had fallen two tiers below the top flight Premier League after collapsing into administration – the British equivalent of Chapter 11 bankruptcy – for the second time in two years. Its plight was so serious that it had to be rescued by its fans before its real life prince charming came along. Eisner had some experience in sports as under his leadership Disney bought the Los Angeles Angels baseball team and founded the Anaheim Ducks NHL squad which went on to win the World Series and the Stanley Cup respectively. Accordingly, making a success of a soccer team may sound like a cinch, especially for someone who built up the world's biggest media company. However, Eisner wasn't willing to buy his way to the top and burn up blockbuster losses. There is good reason for this. Eisner was one of the first of a string of American celebrities to invest in British soccer teams. He was followed by Ryan Reynolds, Michael B Jordan and Will Ferrell who invested in Wrexham FC, AFC Bournemouth and Leeds United respectively. Eisner wasn't jumping on a bandwagon and instead bought Portmouth FC, or Pompey as it is affectionately known, because he is a devoted soccer fan himself. He even invited Ferrell to matches leading to his investment in Leeds. Eisner's goal is getting Portsmouth back into the prestigious Premier League by building it up organically. What's more, he wanted it to be the springboard for a behind the scenes show along the lines of the hit Ryan Reynolds Disney+ docuseries Welcome to Wrexham. Eisner revealed the rationale behind it in a 2019 interview with this author for the Daily Mail at his office in Beverly Hills. When asked why a media boss would want to own a soccer team he replied 'football is the most direct [investment of my] media strategy. It is the most obvious and the clearest as opposed to the least obvious.' He explained that 'content, in my opinion, is still the essential ingredient in the media and having content is still the most important thing in platform that is appealing to an audience has to have something that lights up the Christmas Tree. And what lights up the Sky Christmas Tree or the ESPN Christmas Tree is live sports.' Known as appointment viewing because fans have to tune in at a specific time to watch it live, sport commands premium prices by broadcasters. "The only thing that demands viewing when it happens is sports. Yes, you have replays and you have all sorts of analysis of sports but if you know the score at the end of the game, the rest is really just icing on the cake." The drama of live sport also yields immensely passionate fans who crave content about their heroes. It explains why Welcome to Wrexham has been so popular but it wasn't the first mover in the streaming space. That accolade goes to Sunderland Til I Die, a 2018 Netflix series about the disputes and dilemmas behind the scenes at Sunderland AFC which had just been relegated from the English Football League Championship to League One. As Eisner explained, "all you have to do is watch Sunderland Til I Die on Netflix to understand the emotion of a team going into dissent." In fact, it was this show that convinced the actor Rob McElhenney to buy a soccer team leading to his investment in Wrexham with Reynolds. At the end of last season Wrexham was promoted to the Championship, one step below the Premier League. The odds seemed stacked against Eisner getting Portsmouth back to the top as English soccer is full of team owners who are prepared to pour billions into their squads in a bid to win on the pitch and earn international acclaim. However, afer seven calendar years in charge, his happy ending is within striking distance. Portsmouth won the League One title in the 2023-2024 season and was promoted to the Championship after a 12-year absence. Since then, the team has retained its place there and will make a renewed charge for promotion to the Premier League when the upcoming season gets underway on Friday. Perhaps indicating Eisner's confidence in its chances, he recently announced that Portsmouth is planning to film behind-the-scenes content over the coming year. It is a momentous milestone as it will give him the content he envisaged back in 2019. Most impressively, Eisner has managed to get this far without burning up blockbuster losses and putting the team in jeopardy. Quite the opposite actually as analysis of its latest financial statements reveals that the team now has the strongest capital structure in its 127-year history with no debt and net assets of $33.5 million (£26.5 million) as of June 30, 2024. Its net asset value has increased more than five fold since the supporters took over the club in 2013 which shows how strong the business has become. The metric is calculated by deducting a company's liabilities from the value of its assets so the higher the value, the lower the level of risk. The net result can be a sign of impending peril and, testimony to this, Portsmouth had net liabilities of $93.8 million (£47.5 million) in 2008 before it collapsed less than two years later. Since Eisner bought the team its cash reserves have risen 16.3% to $3.9 million (£3.1 million) which also gives strong confidence in the business. Its success has been shared amongst its staff as their pay has almost doubled to $13.4 million (£10.6 million) since Eisner took control even though employee numbers have decreased by 26.1% to 275. Staff and players were paid bonuses after the team was promoted and this partly fueled a $7.1 million (£5.6 million) net loss last year which pales in comparison to the red ink burned up by its counterparts in the Premier League. Everton FC for example reported a $67.3 million (£53.2 million) net loss last year whilst Tottenham Hotspur lost $33.1 million (£26.2 million). Both clubs have hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue as they share in the proceeds of the league's broadcast deals which are amongst the biggest in world soccer. It explains why Portsmouth's revenue is far lower though it rose 8.9% last year to $17.2 million (£13.6 million), the highest level since Eisner bought the team. Last year alone, matchday takings increased 6.3% to $8.7 million (£6.9 million) whilst broadcasting revenue rose by almost double that percentage to $3.2 million (£2.5 million). The increased broadcast exposure gave a 21.4% boost to the team's commercial and sponsorship revenue with partners including Nike and Uber Eats paying a total of $2.3 million (£1.8 million) in 2024. It was a family effort as the team is run by Eisner's dynamic entrepreneur sons Anders, founder of zero-sugar brand Activate Drinks, producer Eric and director Breck who made 2005 adventure film Sahara starring Matthew McConaughey and Penélope Cruz. They are accompanied by talented managers including chief executive Andrew Cullen, chief marketing officer Matthew Barker, chief commercial officer Mark Judges and the coach John Mousinho. Although Eisner's spending on Portsmouth hasn't been unchained, he hasn't left the club wanting. Its 2018 financial statements revealed that "the purchase of the club by Tornante resulted in an injection of £10 million [$13.2 million] new working capital which bolstered the balance sheet to a new positive total of £12.6 million [$16.6 million] net assets." It didn't stop there. As of June last year the Eisner family had invested $46.8 million (£37 million) in the club including $24 million (£19 million) alone on the redevelopment of its Fratton Park stadium. This began in June 2021, well ahead of the club's 125th anniversary, and was handled by Robert Stern who Eisner knew through his work at Disney. Stern designed Disney's Feature Animation Building in Burbank, California, with its soaring blue replica of Mickey Mouse's pointy sorcerer's hat. Stern was also behind Walt Disney World's lavish Yacht and Beach Club Resorts, which look like sprawling New England mansions, and their counterpart at Disneyland Paris, the Newport Bay Club. His work on Fratton Park had a magic touch as average attendance increased by around 1,000 to 18,952 in the year to June 30, 2024 and on February 17 last year Portsmouth had its first crowd of more than 20,000 spectators in 13 years. Its latest financial statements add that "in the second half of the season, we capped our season tickets to 15,000 and introduced a season ticket waiting list at Fratton Park for the first time in many years." In turn, the surge in spectators led to record hospitality kiosk and merchandising sales which is perhaps as significant a home run as the team's success on the pitch. "It is a game about winning. It is a game about progressing upwards. It is a game about strategy. It is a game about intelligent management," says Eisner. "Just like in the entertainment business."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jessica Biel Sparks Huge Debate About Moms Giving Their Kids Fast Food: ‘I'd Rather Pay More'
Did Jessica Biel know what she was getting into when she casually told a magazine that she doesn't take her kids to McDonald's? In an interview with Parade, the actress, 43, said that when it comes to feeding Silas, 10, and Phineas, 4 — the two boys she shares with husband Justin Timberlake — the global fast food giant is her big dealbreaker. And, unsurprisingly, it has sparked a big debate. 'I'm like, 'Sorry, guys, I'm not doing it',' she said. 'They don't get McDonald's. I just feel like I don't know what's going on with [the] quality of that food. It's stuff like that that I'm like, 'No, we're not.' Let's go have a great burger and fries at a fancy place. I'd rather pay more for you to have something fancy than something like that.' Biel added: 'I guess I'm not crazy, rigid and strict, but that would be something that, if they asked me for, I would just be like, 'Next! Next place. Next down the line!'' Famous or not, in 2025, it feels like airing any views at all on kids and food is a surefire way of causing controversy. Because, from the moment a baby is conceived — in fact, sometimes even before, since women are even told what to eat when merely trying to get pregnant — moms are judged for their dietary choices. Jessica Biel and Justin Timberlake's Cutest Family Moments It reaches a crescendo when it comes to breast-feeding versus formula feeding and baby-led versus traditional weaning — but that doesn't mean it's over by the time the baby turns 2. In these days of extreme wellness, letting your kids eat fast food can be pretty controversial. While some families see a trip beneath the golden arches as a rite of passage and warmly recall their own childhood memories of Ronald McDonald birthday parties, others make it sound like they would rather hand their kids a cigarette. Biel, for her part, is under a bit of fire for bringing money into it. She's not saying she doesn't let her boys have burgers and fries; she's saying she only lets them have expensive burgers and fries. And to add to the awkwardness, there's the fact that some of Biel's family wealth is actually thanks to McDonald's: Timberlake was paid $6 million in 2003 for singing the 'I'm Lovin' It' jingle (although he did later say he regretted it). So, while some commenters on social media chimed in with Biel's view, writing 'It's so unhealthy, I agree,' others pulled her up for speaking from a place of obvious privilege: 'So here's the thing, Jessica, some of us are poor.' By implying McDonald's isn't good enough for her kids, Biel was inadvertently shaming the millions of families who happily eat there — whether every week, or once in a while. But, in turn, she's now being shamed for judging them. Yet again, moms can't win: if we do what we think is best for our kids, it feels like we're judging other people. And if we succumb to the lure of junk food, we're making bad choices. Ultimately it's better to keep quiet about your personal parenting choices — but it gets problematic if your kids are invited to McDonald's by another family, just like it can get problematic if they go for a playdate with different rules around screens, or have some friends who are allowed sleepovers or pierced ears before others. Navigating this stuff is a freaking minefield for moms, and even celebrities aren't immune to it. Solve the daily Crossword
