Pregnant Rihanna Outfits Her Growing Baby Bump in a Pastel Pink Confection of a Dress
Rihanna wore a pastel pink gown that showed off her baby bump
The singer accessorized with sneakers and statement jewelry
Rihanna announced her pregnancy in May at the 2025 Met GalaRihanna continues to raise the bar when it comes to maternity fashion.
On Tuesday, Aug. 5, the 37-year-old Fenty founder stepped out in Los Angeles wearing a floor-length pastel-colored dress with a structured neckline. The sleeveless ensemble features a pink and yellow pattern with subtle baby blue and neon yellow accents.
Rihanna teamed the dress with oversize earrings and a rose ring and, for a casual twist, some lime green sneakers.
The star's hair was partially pulled back and she sported a soft, pink-toned makeup look.
The soon-to-be mother of three, who is expecting her third baby with partner A$AP Rocky, has been showing off her stellar maternity style throughout her pregnancy. On July 20, she was photographed in Santa Monica, Calif., after having dinner at Giorgio Baldi wearing a navy blue ERL suit jacket left open to reveal her bare baby bump and a Savage x Fenty sheer bralette.
Related: https://people-app.onelink.me/HNIa/kz7l4cuf
The singer accessorized with a polka-dot ERL necktie and a pair of gold necklaces featuring the names of her two sons, Riot, 23 months, and RZA, 3.
While stepping out for dinner at Giorgio Baldi following the L.A. premiere of Smurfs on July 13, Rihanna donned a white two-piece look by Alaïa's Pieter Mulier that showcased her bump.
The top included a hood that draped down into a high neckline, while the floor-length skirt featured a sculptural roll of padding around the waistband, creating a flared look at her hips. Rihanna completed the look with black rectangular shades and a stack of diamond bracelets.
For the world premiere of Smurfs in Brussels on June 28, the nine-time Grammy winner stepped out with Rocky wearing a flowy look with a sheer center section that revealed her bump.
The custom Chanel ensemble, which featured a celadon green silk chiffon top and skirt, took 840 hours to make, according to the fashion house. The set was embellished with sequins, crystals and feathers. Per Chanel, the look was inspired by the brand's haute couture spring 2003 collection and came complete with a tone-on-tone organza and feather camelia, as well as jeweled buttons.
Rihanna and Rocky revealed that they were expecting their third child at the Met Gala in May.
A source told PEOPLE in July that the couple are "thrilled" to become parents to a third child, adding that they've "really embraced this chapter and their bond has only deepened since becoming parents."
According to the insider, Rocky "has been incredibly attentive and nurturing throughout this pregnancy." That means "changing diapers, doing bedtime routines, and keeping" his sons "entertained."
"He's completely tuned into [Rihanna's] needs," the source said of the rapper.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI Legal Developments Affecting Hollywood In 2025
AI legal developments are occurring at breakneck speed, so this article provides a brief update on AI legal developments so far in 2025. Right of Publicity California. Effective as of January 1, 2025, California prohibits contracts that purport to permit the creation of digital replicas of a person unless a number of easy-to-meet exceptions apply, such as if the person is represented by a lawyer or use of the digital replica does not replace work that the person would otherwise do. Another exception is if the person is a member of SAG-AFTRA, because the SAG-AFTRA Basic Agreement provides much better protection. California law provides the heirs of 'deceased personalities' (persons who are widely known at the time of, or because of, their death) with right of publicity protection for seventy years after death. However, there was a large statutory loophole that permitted use of the deceased personality's voice or likeness in connection with 'entertainment, or a dramatic, literary, or musical work,' and this exception was repealed as of January 1, 2025 with respect to digital replicas. New York. In June, New York passed legislation requiring any advertisement that includes an image of a human created by AI ('synthetic performer') to conspicuously disclose that fact unless (a) the image 'is recognizable as any identifiable natural performer' (in which case that person presumably gave consent or has a right of publicity claim) or (b) the advertisement is for an expressive work (like a film) in which the synthetic performer appears. Federal Laws. Given the wildly inconsistent rulings on the right of publicity at the state level, there is a desperate need for uniform federal legislation on this issue, as there is for copyright and trademark. The very first federal legislation directly addressing content created by AI was enacted in May, called the TAKE IT DOWN Act. The good news is that the Act creates criminal and civil penalties for using AI to create a look-alike version of someone without their consent, but the bad news is that it only applies if the person is shown as nude. This Act would have been the perfect opportunity to include all AI created look-alikes without consent, but alas, the federal bill that would do that, the NO FAKES Act, is still languishing in Congress and does not look likely to pass anytime soon. Copyright Uploading. There has been an avalanche of litigation by everyone that owns any copyrighted content (e.g., text, photos, films, and music) against AI companies for copyright infringement for uploading that content. The outcome of these cases will depend on the fair use defense, and in February the case of Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence held that the fair use defense didn't apply to uploading to train AI, at least when the uploading was done to compete with the uploaded content. The court relied in part on the 2023 Supreme Court case in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, which essentially held that it is not fair use if the owner of the copyright would reasonably expect to be paid for the copying. However, in June, two other courts (in Bartz v. Anthropic and Kadrey v. Meta) held that uploading books was fair use, at least as long as the output (a) did not infringe on the uploaded content and (b) did not hurt the market for the uploaded content, looking only to the prior market of sales of the books to consumers and not the market of licensing the books to AI companies. The courts predictably relied on Authors Guild v. Google, a 2015 Second Circuit case that permitted Google to copy the full text of books for purposes of permitting searches that resulted in showing just snippets from the books. And in July, Trump gave his verdict, which is that uploading is always fair use, and this might have an impact on how the Supreme Court rules on this issue. Copyright Protection. In March, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit held that AI generated content does not qualify for copyright protection, following the position taken by other courts and the Copyright Office. Copyright Office Report. In May, the Copyright Office released a 'pre-publication' report on AI that concluded that (a) the mere fact of uploading by AI could be copyright infringement of the uploaded works and (b) AI output could be copyright infringement of the uploaded works even if the output were modified versions of the uploaded works. However, the very next day the head of the Copyright Office was fired, throwing into doubt whether this 'pre-publication' report will ever become final. Disney and Universal v. Midjourney. In June, Disney and Universal sued Midjourney for both uploading and downloading, since there was rampant and flagrant use of their characters by Midjourney users, which was encouraged by Midjourney's website by hosting multiple examples of the characters being used in various settings. My bet is on Disney and Universal prevailing on this one under a Napster theory, since if they don't, copyright protection is gone. Defamation. Given AI's tendency to 'hallucinate,' it is not surprising that AI has reported nasty untrue facts regarding real people, which has led to defamation claims against AI companies. An interesting aspect of this issue is that if the matter involves a public figure or a matter of public interest, a defense to a defamation claim is that the person making the statement actually believed it to be true (so no 'actual malice'). In May, the case of Walters vs. OpenAI held that false derogatory content about the plaintiff produced by ChatGPT did not constitute defamation because the plaintiff was a public figure and ChatGPT was incapable of 'believing' anything it produced. The court held that even if the plaintiff were not a public figure, no reasonable person should believe ChatGPT derogatory content given that it provides warnings that it hallucinates. Unhappy SAG-AFTRA. In May, SAG-AFTRA filed an unfair business practice claim with the NLRB against the producer of the videogame Fortnite for alleged failure to bargain in good faith prior to using AI to recreate Darth Vader's voice with the consent of the actor's estate. The matter was settled when the parent company entered into a new agreement with SAG-AFTRA in July. Really? Almost exactly two years ago, a lawyer was sanctioned for filing a brief written by AI that was full of hallucinated case citations, and I was sure this would be a one-time event given the publicity. Well, such sanctions started occurring monthly, then weekly, and now daily! So there are a lot of lawyers out there that put a tad too much trust in AI.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift describes the art of the easter egg: ‘If you know you know then you know'
One thing Taylor Swift does very well is to tease her fans with easter eggs. Throughout her career, the Grammy winner has dropped hints about her future albums, whether that be the color that will be associated with the album, or taking advantage of her favorite number, 13. On Wednesday, August 13, the pop superstar was a guest on New Heights, the podcast her boyfriend Travis Kelce co-hosts with his brother, Jason, as she revealed that her 12th studio album, The Life of a Showgirl, will be released on October 3. Throughout the episode, she also touched on why she drops so-called easter eggs for her fans, including the orange door that she exited through during her last performance of her Eras Tour. 'I exited through a door, through an orange door to be specific, and that was an easter egg,' she said. 'I kind of wanted to give a little subliminal hint to the fans that I may be leaving the Eras Tour era, but I was also entering a new era.' When she does drop an easter egg, there are a few rules that she tries to follow. 'The art of the easter egg is, there's, do's and don'ts, right? Like, I'm never gonna plant an easter egg that ties back to my personal life. It's always gonna be towards music or a musical something,' Swift said. The 'Karma' singer also mentioned which of her easter eggs was the most exciting for her to release. 'I think my favorite one of those was when I was given an honorary doctorate from NYU, and I made the commencement speech, and I put so many lyrical easter eggs in that speech that when the Midnights album came out after that, the fans were like, the whole speech was an easter egg,' the 'Lavender Haze' singer said. 'I want easter eggs to be a certain thing where if you are a part of the fandom and you want to experience music in a normal way, you don't even see these. You don't even care what that thing is above that doorway in, under that dimly lit, flickering light over there that's upside down backwards in Braille. You don't need to know what that is.' In addition to the easter eggs she dropped about the new album, it also featured a special guest. One of the songs, 'The Life of a Showgirl,' will include Sabrina Carpenter. The 'Nonsense' singer and Swift have previously worked together, as Carpenter was an opener for one part of Swift's Eras Tour, which ended in December 2024. Speaking on New Heights about her inspiration behind the songs, Swift said the 12 songs were influenced by her experiences during her record-breaking Eras Tour, saying: 'This album is about what was going on behind the scenes in my inner life during this tour, which was so exuberant and electric and vibrant. It just comes from like the most infectiously joyful, wild, dramatic place I was in in my life.'
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dubs Talk: Breaking down Jonathan Kuminga's potential future, fit with Warriors
On 'Dubs Talk,' Bonta Hill and Monte Poole discuss Jonathan Kuminga's NBA free-agency saga and his possible return to the Golden State Warriors. Dubs Talk: Breaking down Jonathan Kuminga's potential future, fit with Warriors originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area
