logo
Ryan Reynolds worried he'd go to jail over prank on 'Just Friends' set: 'I got in trouble'

Ryan Reynolds worried he'd go to jail over prank on 'Just Friends' set: 'I got in trouble'

Yahoo13-05-2025

Ryan Reynolds once worried he was going from "just friends" to "just cellmates."
Reynolds shared the comical memory from his time making the 2005 comedy Just Friends during an appearance on the latest episode of SiriusXM's Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend podcast.
The Deadpool star told O'Brien that the film, which also starred Anna Faris and Amy Smart, was filmed in Regina, Saskatchewan.
"It's one of my few times that I've ever been scared of going to jail, because we, just as a joke, me and the art department, we made a sign that would go over, it would snap over the 'Welcome to Regina' sign," he recalled. "And it just said, 'Welcome to Regina, which rhymes with fun.' And I got in trouble, though."
After O'Brien and his podcast team stopped laughing at this story, he asked his guest, "You got in trouble?"
Luckily for Reynolds and the film's art department, the town's officials had a sense of humor about it.
"They thought it was funny because it snapped off," Reynolds replied. "So at first it was vandalism, and then it was class."
Joked O'Brien: "Then it was an art installment that could come down."
Directed by Roger Kumble and written by Adam "Tex" Davis, Just Friends follows Chris Brander (Reynolds), a formerly overweight nerdy high school student who is secretly in love with his popular best friend, Jamie Palamino (Smart), who has put him firmly in the friend zone. As adults, Chris — who's now a successful record producer (and shameless womanizer) — tries to win her over when the two reconnect when he visits his hometown for Christmas.Reynolds is known for his on-set pranks such as this one. Just ask Hugh Jackman, with whom Reynolds has been in a prank war of sorts since at least 2015. A highlight includes the time Reynolds hit Jackman's film The Front Runner with a fake awards season attack ad. In the spirit of the movie, in which Jackman plays 1988 presidential campaign frontrunner Gary Hart as he's swept up in a scandal, Reynolds decided to post the fake hit ad against his longtime X-Men buddy to dissuade "some people" from giving him awards.
He and wife Blake Lively also frequently troll each other publicly on social media, often with dueling embarrassing photos or jokes.
For more with Reynolds and O'Brien, watch the full conversation in the video above.
Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Three celeb-owned Caribbean cribs you can rent for your next vacation
Three celeb-owned Caribbean cribs you can rent for your next vacation

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Three celeb-owned Caribbean cribs you can rent for your next vacation

Leonardo DiCaprio pays property taxes on a 104-acre island off the coast of Belize. Johnny Depp's real estate portfolio includes a 45-acre island in the Bahamas. And not to be outdone, illusionist David Copperfield has his own archipelago called Copperfield Bay. Rihanna has a palatial pad in her native Barbados. Mick Jagger's Mustique retreat has hosted rock royalty for decades, and Oprah Winfrey escapes to her estate in Antigua when she needs a break from Montecito. And those are just a few of the VIPs who own a slice of the Caribbean. Best of all, some of them are up for rent for your next vacation. From a jungle retreat in Jamaica to a supermodel-friendly sanctuary in Turks & Caicos, here are the three coolest celeb-owned vacation homes you can book right now. Diplo's jungle retreat Advertisement 7 The DJ spent seven years developing his private paradise. Getty Images for SiriusXM Grammy-winning DJ and producer Diplo spent seven years building his private paradise, Pompey, in Port Antonio, Jamaica. The result is a jungle hideaway that blends natural elements with high-design aesthetics — plus a professional recording studio that has already birthed over 100 songs. 'Half of your studio time should be taking a break anyway,' Diplo tells the Post, explaining why the space includes a polycade and ping pong table made of reclaimed wood from Mexico. So far, the studio has drawn an eclectic mix of artists — both paying guests and friends of Diplo. His neighbor Grace Jones recently stopped by at 3 a.m. to record what he describes as a 'wild song that will never be heard.' Advertisement As much as he loves his studio, Diplo's favorite room is the library where he likes to watch old movies with his son. It features a full glass wall overlooking the jungle, a massive analog music collection featuring 3,000 records, and several rare art pieces. Pompey opened to the public last year — starting at $100,000 per week — with a perk unlike any other rental in the world: it keeps guests happy with some of the island's finest organically grown ganja, sourced from farmers in Port Antonio. 7 Pompey has its own private music studio. Depasquale Maffini But the focal point of the property is the outdoor dining area. It's the best place to take in the estate's surroundings — including a British cannon sourced from an antique shop in Kingston. Advertisement The only downside of Pompey is it's not entirely private. You'll have to share the property with Diplo's four horses, a donkey, a milking cow, and goats. He says sheep and chickens will be arriving soon. As for Pompey's availability, Diplo says he usually is only there in the fall. That said, February is his favorite time to visit: 'It's not too warm or rainy and the days are still long enough to get everything done.' Branson's eco-escape 7 Forget Necker, Sir Richard Branson has an even more exclusive BVI hideaway. Getty Images Sir Richard Branson may call Necker Island his primary home in the British Virgin Islands. But when the billionaire business magnate wants something even more exclusive, he retreats to the Branson Beach Estate on neighboring Moskito Island. The estate, which accommodates up to 22 guests across three villas, is perched on a dramatic outcrop with sweeping sea views. Each of the villas, connected by treetop walkways, have their own personality. Advertisement 'It's extremely hard to pick a favorite,' Branson said. 'All three are unique, from the interiors to the views.' But Headland House is where he and his wife Joan usually stay when they visit two to three times per year. 'My kids Holly and Sam prefer the other two villas, which are nearer to the beach,' he adds. 7 Get bitten, er, smitten with Moskito Island's villas for $20,000 a night. The Branson Estate 7 The estate offers direct ocean access, rocky as it may be at places. The Branson Estate New in 2025, guests can book individual villas (from $20,000 per night) instead of renting the entire estate (from $51,000 per night), making it more accessible for smaller groups. Branson is also ramping up his efforts to be more eco-conscious. For example, the estate employs a high-efficiency glass recycling machine to turn glass bottles into sand for the island's beaches. The estate offers private pickleball courts, direct ocean access (unlike the other properties on Moskito Island), and personal water sports instructors. Who does Branson hope to share his home with? 'Anyone who loves having fun, doing activities like tennis, kite-surfing, hiking, pickleball, a bit of partying and relaxing too.' Brinkley's sanctuary Advertisement 7 Christie Brinkley soaks in the serenity in Turks and Caicos. Sean T. Smith For nearly two decades, Christie Brinkley has owned Lucky House, a three-bedroom beachfront estate at COMO Parrot Cay, the ultra-exclusive private island resort in Turks and Caicos. The supermodel even celebrated her 70th birthday here last year. Built in 2003 and available to rent since 2004, Lucky House offers a newly upgraded outdoor deck and pool area, blending seamlessly into the surrounding pristine sands. The home is available year-round for $12,000 to $18,000 per night, pending Brinkley's approval. Advertisement 7 Lucky House sports a newly upgraded outdoor deck and pool area. Courtesy COMO Parrot Cay But Brinkley isn't the only A-lister with a rentable retreat at COMO Parrot Cay. Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards is happy to share his three-bedroom Rocky Point Villa, which comes with a private infinity pool and an outdoor gazebo. Fashion mogul Donna Karan's two-story residence, The Sanctuary, rents for $18,000 to $25,000 per night. All rentals at COMO Parrot Cay come with a private butler and access to the resort's world-class spa and private beaches.

Andy Cohen Teases Rachel Zoe's RHOBH Cast Addition: ‘A Perfect Fit'
Andy Cohen Teases Rachel Zoe's RHOBH Cast Addition: ‘A Perfect Fit'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Andy Cohen Teases Rachel Zoe's RHOBH Cast Addition: ‘A Perfect Fit'

After Garcelle Beauvais shockingly announced her exit from Real Housewives of Beverly Hills after Season 14, fans were worried. To some, she was the whole who held the whole group together. Who could she possibly be replaced with? Well, that person was recently announced and it's none other than Rachel Zoe. She got her fame for being a stylist to the Hollywood elite for years. Rachel further made her career known after her successful Bravo series The Rachel Zoe Project. She's made a handful of appearances on Watch What Happens Live in the years since, but this will be her first leading reality TV role in over a decade. And for those who have reservations about her joining an already established group of frenemies, Andy Cohen offers his reassurance. Andy Cohen is excited for Rachel Zoe to be part of the RHOBH cast Andy recently threw his two cents into the network's decision to cast Rachel. And according to him, it's as if she was already a part of the group. Advertisement 'She really fits; She knows Kathy well, she knows Kyle, she knows Boz, she was just on Boz's podcast. She knows Jennifer Tilly, so she really knows,' he explained on SiriusXM's Andy Cohen Live. The WWHL host continued to share that the season will pick up on the heels of Rachel's very public divorce. Specifically, she split with her long-term husband Rodger Berman and is back on the dating scene. 'It's just a perfect fit. And she's at a real transitional moment in her life. I mean, I was really rocked by the news that she and Rog were splitting up.' The rest of the Season 15 cast hasn't been confirmed, so who knows if there's more newbies joining the squad. Advertisement The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills is available to stream on Peacock and Hayu in the UK and Ireland. TELL US – HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT RACHEL JOINING RHOBH? The post Andy Cohen Teases Rachel Zoe's RHOBH Cast Addition: 'A Perfect Fit' appeared first on Reality Tea.

Hollywood Studios' First Lawsuit on AI Sends a Warning to Tech Giants: ‘Piracy Is Piracy'
Hollywood Studios' First Lawsuit on AI Sends a Warning to Tech Giants: ‘Piracy Is Piracy'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hollywood Studios' First Lawsuit on AI Sends a Warning to Tech Giants: ‘Piracy Is Piracy'

It seemed like only a matter of time before Hollywood's studios fired their own legal salvo in the battle over IP protection in a time of technological upheaval, and on Wednesday they did. Disney and Universal sued Midjourney, the company behind one of the most popular generative AI software programs used today, for copyright infringement. The 143-page lawsuit is filled with dozens of pictures comparing screenshots of popular films and TV shows, ranging from 'Frozen' and 'Kung Fu Panda' to 'Deadpool' and 'Star Wars,' to Midjourney-generated AI images of characters from those franchises. 'By helping itself to Plaintiffs' copyrighted works […] Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism,' Disney and NBCU said in the lawsuit. 'Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing. Midjourney's conduct […] threatens to upend the bedrock incentives of U.S. copyright law.' Representatives for Midjourney did not respond to multiple requests for comment from TheWrap. The new lawsuit shows that even as companies like Disney look for ways that it can embrace AI, they share similar concerns about its abuse with the artists who create the work that lies at the foundation of their profits. Legal experts tell TheWrap that Disney and Universal's move signals a new era in the already-uneasy relationship between Hollywood and AI companies, and it will likely set the ground rules for how the two sides work together — if that is possible — moving forward. 'There is a clear path forward through partnerships that both further AI innovation and foster human artistry. Unfortunately, some bad actors – like Midjourney – see only a zero-sum, winner-take-all game,' RIAA chairman/CEO Mitch Glazier said in a statement. Bryn Mooser, the head of Asteria, a generative AI film studio that says it is 'powered by the first clean and ethical AI model,' told TheWrap he sides with Disney and Universal after reading the lawsuit. 'There's no question to me that the studios are right,' the Emmy-winning filmmaker said. 'Disney and Universal are absolutely right to be demanding that AI models have consent.' Midjourney is a San Francisco-based AI company founded in 2021. The company offers a text-to-image tool, similar to other AI companies, that allows users to create images based on what they type into its prompt. Midjourney had $300 million in sales last year, according to the Disney-Universal lawsuit, which is driven by user subscriptions. That makes it relatively small compared to other AI companies like OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT, which hit $10 billion in annual recurring revenue, CNBC reported this week. The lawsuit claims Midjourney has committed 'countless' copyright violations against Disney and Universal. The studios are 'entitled to damages and Midjourney's profits in an amount according to proof,' the lawsuit said, as well as statutory damages up to $150,000 per infringed work. Disney and Universal's filing listed 199 titles that the studios claim had been infringed upon, which would equal $29.9 million in statutory damages. 'Midjourney's large-scale infringement is systemic, ongoing and willful,' the lawsuit claimed. 'And plaintiffs have been, and continue to be, substantially and irreparably harmed by it.' So why target Midjourney in the lawsuit? While it's not as big as ChatGPT, image-generating software like Midjourney is a particular thorn in Hollywood's side. That has been the case even as studios have begun researching ways to use AI to make their production processes and business practices more efficient, as Disney did when it established a new Office of Technology Enablement last November to oversee those efforts. As the lawsuit notes, Midjourney has more than 21 million users that have generated images using the AI software based on copyrighted material. The lawsuit also accuses Midjourney of training its developing image-to-video software on copyrighted material, as well as its upcoming text-to-video model. While not yet capable of producing video at feature-quality 4K resolution, AI experts have told TheWrap that they predict, at its current rate of development, that generative AI software will be capable of creating consistent, 2K-resolution video by the end of the year. If Midjourney is capable of producing mass quantities of artwork of copyrighted characters that are consistent with the art style of the actual films and TV shows they come from, a future where anyone can produce fake clips of 'The Simpsons' or 'Shrek' with a few prompts and clicks is the last thing studios want. Lily Li, a tech-focused attorney for Metaverse Law in Newport Beach, California, said the Disney and Universal lawsuit falls in a legal 'gray area' that will come down to two key factors: How 'transformative' Midjourney's AI-generated content is. In other words, does its text-to-image generator create characters that are too similar in appearance to Disney and Universal characters without consent? The studios, in their lawsuit, argued that is the case, saying Midjourney 'blatantly' ripped off characters like Homer Simpson and Elsa from 'Frozen,' among many others. How was the content that Midjourney used for its model obtained? If Midjourney scraped Disney and Universal content that was behind a paywall and/or without consent from the studios, that could be another major problem for the AI company, Li said. Midjourney, according to the lawsuit, 'never sought any copyright content holders' consent to copy and exploit their works.' Attorney Dustin Taylor, an IP expert with Husch Blackwell, told TheWrap he agreed with Li the 'transformative' nature of the AI-generated content will be a critical point — and he said the pictures Disney and Universal included in their lawsuit to back up that claim are fairly damning: 'The similarity is so strong there.' How will the lawsuit shake out? Both Li and Taylor said that will ultimately come down to what a courtroom decides on the two points above. The 'cutting edge' nature of the case makes it difficult to predict how it will be resolved, Taylor said. But in the near term, Taylor said Disney and Universal's lawsuit has a 'good chance to move past' a likely attempt to dismiss the case from Midjourney, based largely on the strength of its photo examples. And Li said this case will likely spur a wave of similar lawsuits, akin to how The New York Times' copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI in late 2023 has led to copycat lawsuits since. 'Studios are more likely to take action in the future' against AI companies using their content, Li said. Why? Because if their material is used to create AI-generated content that promotes 'harmful conduct,' they could be sued. One example: is being sued in Florida because its model encouraged a 14-year-old boy to kill himself, according to a lawsuit filed by the boy's mother. Studios will not want to see AI-generated characters that were inspired by their content, without consent, being tied to similar tragedies, Li explained. 'If I were an attorney for these studios, I'd go, 'Wait a second, now there is potential liability that we have, because one of our characters is being used by an AI company to create harmful content,'' Li said. News of this lawsuit will be welcomed by Hollywood's artists. The Writers Guild of America openly called on studios to take action this past December, citing a story in The Atlantic that revealed that a data set used by Apple, Meta, Nvidia and other top tech companies to train their AI contained the full scripts of thousands of films and television shows, showing that the spread of copyrighted material in generative AI output was farther than previously confirmed. 'It's time for the studios to come off the sidelines. After this industry has spent decades fighting piracy, it cannot stand idly by while tech companies steal full libraries of content for their own financial gain,' WGA wrote. ChatGPT and other large AI models like Claude and X's Grok were not referenced in Wednesday's lawsuit, though. Disney and Universal said they sued Midjourney because it has been so brazen in its unapproved lifting of their content. The lawsuit included a screenshot of Midjourney's website showcasing how its model created images remarkably similar to Homer Simpson as one clear example of its 'disdain' for copyright laws. As the lawsuit unfolds, the adoption of AI in the entertainment industry is still moving forward. Along with Bryn Mooser's Asteria, there are other independent studios like Toonstar, creator of the YouTube cartoon series 'StEvEn & Parker,' which uses AI throughout its production process. Toonstar uses a bespoke AI engine for each of its productions based on data sets from art created by human artists expressly for the project and with full compensation and consent. 'We've worked with a lot of creatives and storytellers, and we are interested in creating new franchises. That means these shows need to be copyrightable, and that means they can't use copyrighted material,' co-founder and CEO John Attanasio said. A big test of whether their efforts to adhere to copyright were fruitful came when Random House approached Toonstar for a series of graphic novels based on 'StEvEn & Parker,' which required the company's legal team to review the show to make sure it didn't violate any copyrights. 'There's probably no business that cares more about copyright than publishing, so to be able to clear that process shows that what we are doing is compliant,' he said. There's a long history of cases of new technology running afoul of copyright law, and the entertainment industry has turned to the courts for protection time and again. In late 1999, A&M Records sued Napster for pirating its music, which was followed by a larger suit by the industry's trade group RIAA. However the lawsuit turns out, Mooser said this is a legal battle that needed to happen sooner than later, as companies like OpenAI lobby for looser copyright restrictions in order to make it easier to train their models — and stay ahead of foreign adversaries like China. Mooser said the argument for less-strict copyright laws to enable AI growth and keep the U.S. at the forefront of the AI arms race is 'really convoluted' and ignores what should be at the foundation of any relationship between rights holders and AI companies: consent to use copyrighted material. 'I think it's the most important issue of our time in AI,' Mooser added. The post Hollywood Studios' First Lawsuit on AI Sends a Warning to Tech Giants: 'Piracy Is Piracy' appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store