Councillor Challenges West Coast Council Over Secrecy
Brett Cummings, who chairs the council's Resource Management Committee, asked the council in March for details of the professional qualifications of Commissioners and a planner engaged by the council to work on the region's new district plan - Te Tai o Poutini Plan (TTPP).
The Greymouth goldminer represents his council on the TTPP working group and has protested regularly over its mounting costs and rules he considers too restrictive.
'It's supposed to be an enabling plan, customised for the Coast but the planners have taken over and I wanted to know to know how qualified they are and in what fields'.
Cr Cummings made his request under the provisions of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act (LGOIMA).
But the council's quarterly summary of LGOIMA requests showed it was rejected on privacy grounds.
Under the Act, councils can withhold information to protect the privacy of 'natural persons'', including the dead.
Cr Cummings says that makes no sense in this case.
'These are professional people and we are paying them and the council should be open about their backgrounds and their qualifications.'
The councillor has since found the information he wanted both online and in the council's public documents.
Principal planner Lois Easton formally recorded her credentials with the TTPP committee at the beginning of the plan project.
Her LinkedIn profile describes her as an environmental scientist with 25 years' experience advising government and not for profit organisations.
And a quick Google search reveals her bio as a member of the Hawke's Bay Conservation Board, with an MSc degree in environmental planning and botany.
The credentials of the five TTPP commissioners are also readily available online.
Cr Cummings says council staff appear confused about the meaning of privacy, as it applies under LGOIMA.
'If the information is publicly available and our council staff are citing privacy – you have to wonder why.'
The LGOIMA report shows the council rejected several other information requests on privacy grounds, and those decisions should be reviewed, Cr Cummings said.
The West Coast Regional Council received 27 LGOIMA requests over the quarter and granted 13 of them in full.
Ten were granted in part, with remaining questions declined.
Privacy grounds were cited in three other cases.
Information requested about the Taylorville Resource Park and its monitoring was partly withheld on grounds of privacy, maintenance of the law, legal privilege and to protect the free and frank exchange of information by or to council officers.
A request about the Te Kinga pest control aerial poison drop was refused in part to 'protect staff and contractors from improper pressure or harassment."
Another, about compliance monitoring, was declined to protect privacy and the integrity of the council's environmental complaints hotline.
Other requests were refused on commercial grounds, or because the information did not exist, or that collating it would require too much work.
The council has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Lockdown Overlords Missing In Action From The Podium Of Truth
'Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Grant Robertson, and Ayesha Verrall's refusal to front up to the COVID inquiry is a big change from invading our living rooms daily. What's changed?' asks ACT Leader David Seymour. 'Hipkins and co loved the limelight at 1pm every day. They wielded extraordinary powers over citizens' lives, dismissing those who questioned them as uncaring. Now they're refusing to even show up, what a contrast. 'The then-Government used emergency powers more dramatically than any other in our country's peacetime history. Those powers included: Separating families at the border and in hospitals even at times of birth, death, and severe illness Letting unused Rapid Antigen Tests expire by the million, while locking down Auckland for over 100 days longer than the rest of the country. Locking down Northland down for 11 days on false information that humiliated three women. Officials apologised, but Hipkins refused to. Being were slow to close the border in early 2020, and even slower to adapt when Omicron made their Delta-era rules obsolete. Sticking to outdated restrictions that hurt people but couldn't stop Omicron, keeping MIQ in place long after the virus was widespread in the community. Putting surgeries, screenings, and medical treatments on hold. Damaging the education of a generation, with school attendance still bounding back from the Government's forced closures. Making strange, inconsistent rules that often hurt small businesses to the benefit of large chains– supermarkets could open, but butchers couldn't. Ignoring Treasury warnings to spend $66 billion, driving inflation over 7%, and sparking a cost-of-living crisis and mortgage crunch households are still paying for. Appointing a Royal Commission of Inquiry that would ignore most of the above costs, by focusing on the effectiveness of the COVID response rather than its costs. 'ACT campaigned to expand the Royal Commission inquiry and opened it to the public. If another pandemic arrives, we literally cannot afford to repeat the mistakes made during COVID, the bond ratings agencies will see to that. Facing another pandemic more successfully requires honest reflection from the decisionmakers of that period. 'Tens of thousands of New Zealanders have already engaged with the inquiry, sharing heart-wrenching experiences of how their lives were upended. They deserve the basic respect of accountability. If Chris Hipkins can't front up for a single day of questioning, he is not fit to act as Opposition leader, let alone return to Government. 'Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Grant Robertson, and Ayesha Verrall must change course and agree to publicly front the Royal Commission. It is a matter of duty and respect.' Note: A Curia poll suggests 69% of New Zealanders believe Ardern, Hipkins, Bloomfield, and other key decision-makers should testify in person at the Covid Inquiry hearings.
NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon condemns Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, says he's ‘lost the plot'
'I think Netanyahu has gone way too far. I think he has lost the plot. What we are seeing overnight, the attack on Gaza City, is utterly, utterly unacceptable,' he said. Luxon said the Israeli Prime Minister is 'not listening to the international community'. He said he had been 'consistent' in his language and said the current military actions was 'driving more human catastrophe across Gaza'. New Zealand had limited trade to Israel and connection there, but 'we have stood up for values'. Luxon reiterated that any attempt by Israel at annexation would likely breach international law. When he was pressed on the gravity of saying another leader had lost the plot, Luxon said: 'I am telling you what my personal view is.' 'As a human being, looking at the situation, that is how I feel about it.' Prime Minister Christopher Luxon was extremely critical of Netanyahu. Photo / Mark Mitchell Act leader David Seymour said it was up to the ICJ to decide about claims of genocide. 'They have said it may be likely, but they haven't said that it is. Unless Chris Hipkins knows something more than the ICJ, I am not sure,' he said. He questioned what you actually do about that. Seymour emphasised the Government was wanting to make a 'sane, sober' decision on the question of Palestinian statehood 'in full knowledge of the facts'. Labour's Hipkins said 'we have an obligation to prevent genocide, and I don't think you can do that if you don't name an unfolding genocide'. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese this week said Netanyahu was 'in denial'. 'I spoke with Prime Minister Netanyahu. He, again, reiterated to me what he has said publicly as well – which is to be in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people," he told the ABC. According to the Times of Israel, Netanyahu on Sunday rejected allegations of a genocide, saying if Israel had wanted to commit genocide, 'it would have taken exactly one afternoon'. Over the weekend, following a meeting between Luxon and Albanese, the Prime Ministers said there was a 'catastrophic humanitarian situation' happening in Gaza. 'Any attempt by Israel to escalate hostilities, including by taking control of Gaza City, would be wrong, risk violating international law and exacerbate the human catastrophe already unfolding inside the Gaza Strip. We urge the Israeli Government to reconsider before it is too late.' On Monday, the Government announced it would formally weigh up New Zealand's position on the recognition of Palestine over the next month. A statement issued by several countries' Foreign Ministers over the weekend, including New Zealand's Winston Peters, rejected Israel's decision to launch a fresh military operation in Gaza. 'It will aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages and further risk the mass displacement of civilians. The plans that the Government of Israel has announced risk violating international humanitarian law. Any attempts at annexation or of settlement extension violate international law.' It said the countries were 'united in our commitment to the implementation of a negotiated two-state solution as the only way to guarantee that both Israelis and Palestinians can live side by side in peace, security, and dignity'. 'A political resolution based on a negotiated two-state solution requires the total demilitarisation of Hamas and its complete exclusion from any form of governance in the Gaza Strip, where the Palestinian Authority must have a central role.' Netanyahu told reporters on Monday that any decision by foreign leaders to recognise Palestine was 'rewarding terror', according to reports. 'It defies imagination or understanding how intelligent people around the world, including seasoned diplomats, government leaders, and respected journalists, fall for this absurdity.' He also said Israel's goal was not to occupy Gaza, but instead to 'free it from Hamas terrorists'. Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
Former press secretary Michael Forbes told to inform PM himself after filming allegations
Michael Forbes. Photo: LinkedIn/Michael Forbes Police immediately escalated allegations about the prime minister's former deputy chief press secretary Michael Forbes to the police executive - including the police commissioner and the assistant commissioner - but Forbes was told the "onus was on him" to inform his employer, documents released under the Official Information Act reveal. Forbes, a former journalist, resigned after it emerged he recorded audio of multiple sessions with Wellington sex workers, and amassed a gallery of women working out at the gym, shopping and being filmed through a window getting ready to go out. Police earlier said they got a complaint from a Wellington brothel last July after images were found on a client's phone, but decided the case did not meet the threshold for prosecution . On Wednesday, a series of documents were released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, including a timeline of key events and executive notifications. The incident at the Wellington brothel happened at 7pm on 11 July. Police Comms was notified the following day at 5.40pm. Ten minutes later the National Command and Coordination Centre was alerted and then the District Command Centre. At 6.15pm on 12 July an email was then sent to a large number of senior police leaders, including former Police Commissioner Andrew Coster, Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming and others. "Police Comms have been called by an informant who works for an escort agency. The informant has found images on a client's phone of naked females, including one very intoxicated female that appear to have been taken with the consent of those photographed/filmed. "The client is allegedly Michael FORBES who is the Senior Press Secretary for the Hon Louise Upston, the Minister for the Community and Voluntary Sector, Minister for Social Development and Employment, and Minister for Child Poverty Reduction. "The alleged offender has left his personal and work cell phones with the informant. The file has been assigned to the Wellington District Crime Squad for attendance." The police media team had been notified, the email said. The email was recalled about 20 minutes later after now Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura said asked for the recall as "the distribution list is too broad for this type of communication". The staffer replied they had. Kura said the case was "one of those ones that is a little more sensitive and didn't need such a wide audience". Police said that as the email, which was sent to nearly 40 senior staff, was recalled "not all the people on the distribution list would have seen the notification email or had any awareness of the details". At 6.26pm Detective Superintendent Darryl Sweeney texted Detective Inspector John van den Heuvel to say the National Command and Coordination Centre had sent the notification "viral". John van den Heuvel. Photo: RNZ / Alexander Robertson At 6.47pm, Wellington District Commander Superintendent Corrie Parnell received a text from a senior sergeant advising him of the allegations. Parnell replied and said he needed them to "ensure we calm the farm and step through things. Already a cast of 1000s in the loop". At 7pm Parnell emailed Sweeney, van den Heuvel and Assistant Commissioner Paul Basham and said Kura had been briefed. "Expressed my frustration that a cast of thousand notified for what is a matter well within the normal investigation capability of our team." He ended the email saying: "suggest some thought is given to a response in the event of media interest". Sweeney replied there needed to be a look at the serious crime notifications in general "as they all go far and wide now". "Maybe District commanders and crime managers local get advised then use normal channels. Creates a bit much excitement." The documents included an investigation summary, which said on 12 July 2024, Wellington Police received a complaint that Forbes had covertly made an audio recording the previous day while engaging the services of a sex worker. "The informant advised police that they had taken two mobile phones from Forbes, one believed to be a personal phone, the other a work device. The informant also reported finding other audio files, images and videos that caused concern." The informant was spoken to by police and both phones were taken. "Once it was established that Forbes was a senior press secretary at Parliament, procedural escalation notifications were made that evening. "The Wellington District Command Centre was advised, as was the duty inspector." On 13 July, a detective obtained search warrants to examine the two cell phones. "The suspected offence was making an intimate visual recording, being an offence against section 216H of the Crimes Act 1961." On 15 July, a detective visited Forbes and advised him of the police investigation. During that visit Forbes provided access codes for the phones. On 18 July, a detective examined the phones. "Located within both phones were numerous videos, screenshots and photos of unidentified females, some in various state of undress, and exposed breasts were visible in multiple videos. "It was apparent to detectives that some images were taken in, and from, public places, including a gym. Some images were also taken through street facing windows of unidentified women, dressing (undressing) themselves, and who were visible from the waist up." Christopher Luxon and Louise Upston. Photo: Marika Khabazi The summary said the examination of the phones did not identify evidence of criminal offending. On 18 July, Forbes met with a detective and the phones were returned to him. "He was also provided copies of the search warrants that had been obtained. "During the meeting it was suggested that Forbes should delete some of the images on his phones, and he began doing so. Police also stressed the onus was on him to inform his employer." On 19 July, police provided an update to the complainant. On 6 August, police also provided an update to another staff member at the brothel. "They expressed frustration and disappointment with the outcome," the summary said. In an earlier statement, van den Heuvel earlier said that as part of the investigation, police obtained a search warrant to seize two of his phones. On examining the phones, police found a number of photos and videos of women in public spaces, and what appeared to be women in private addresses, taken from a distance away, van den Heuvel said. "Police considered the available evidence and concluded it did not meet the requirements for criminality, and therefore charges could not be filed. "The individual concerned voluntarily spoke with police and admitted to taking the images and recordings. He was reminded of the inappropriateness of his behaviour and encouraged to seek help." Forbes also deleted the images in the presence of police. "Police acknowledge this man's behaviour was extremely distressing for the women involved and would like to reassure them that any new information will be thoroughly considered. "Based on the initial report and available evidence to date, police are unable to progress the matter further." Van den Heuvel said that any new information regarding Forbes would be "thoroughly considered". When earlier asked why police did not alert the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) after executing a search warrant on a government-issued phone, the department said: "We are still gathering facts and will look into all of this as part of our deep dive." The DIA said all Ministerial Services staff were subject to standard pre-employment checks when they were first employed. These included reference checks, serious misconduct checks and a criminal conviction check. In addition, security clearances were required for some positions in ministers' offices. The department said these checks were completed when Forbes was first employed by Ministerial Services and were not required for the later temporary assignment to the prime minister's office. "We acknowledge staff may be unsettled or feel their safety may have been compromised. We are committed to supporting our people and ensuring they feel, and are, safe at work." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the incidents that were investigated by police but did not lead to any charges occurred after he was vetted to work for Social Development Minister Louise Upston. "He has an obligation to actually declare those issues or those incidents to us - that didn't happen which is why his employment would have been terminated, obviously," Luxon said in a media conference at Parliament in June. "But there is a good question about making sure, and I have asked specifically for DIA to look at vetting processes." He added that the expectation was on Forbes to have raised the incidents with the prime minister's office "because it impacts the office and the reputation of the office, for obvious reasons, but that did not happen". Forbes moved from Upston's office to the prime minister's in February this year and "had the vetting that he needed to come into the Beehive". "We will look at that to make sure that there is anything else we could have done differently in that vetting." Luxon would not discuss what level of security clearance Forbes had in the Beehive. Luxon also had questions about whether the investigation should have been elevated by police to the Beehive. 'We have to take this incident and understand what has happened here and how it happened, and what more can we do about it. "I think it is a legitimate question to say, what can we look at between the inter-agency processes, between the different agencies, whether it is police, whether it is the SIS or whether it is Ministerial Services." Forbes earlier offered an apology for the harm his actions caused to women. "I want to offer my sincerest apologies to the women I have harmed," he said in a statement. "In the past, I was in a downward spiral due to unresolved trauma and stress, and when confronted with the impacts of my behaviour a year ago, I sought professional help, which is something I wish I had done much earlier. "What I failed to do then was make a genuine attempt to apologise. Instead, I tried to move on without offering those I had harmed the acknowledgement, accountability, or amends they deserved. I recognise how wrong that was." Forbes said he spent the past year "reflecting on how I may have affected these women's sense of safety and ability to go about their lives and work". "No one should ever feel violated, unsafe, or disrespected, especially in spaces where they should feel secure, and I am truly sorry for contributing to an environment where women may have felt otherwise," he said. "The therapy I've received over the past year has helped me to understand the roots of my behaviour and begin addressing the patterns that led to it. This is a long-term commitment to change that I take very seriously. "I understand that my past actions may have undermined the trust people place in me. So, I have resigned from my job to focus on the work I need to do." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
