&w=3840&q=100)
Trump's tax law squeezes poor, boosts income for wealthy, says CBO
The poorest 10 per cent of households will lose an average of about $1,200 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.1 per cent cut in their income, according to the analysis released Monday of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Households in the highest 10 per cent of incomes will see about a $13,600 boost in resources on average, amounting to a 2.7 per cent increase in their incomes.
Earners in the middle of the distribution will see their annual resources grow by about $800 to $1,200 on average, according to the analysis.
The hit to poorer families will largely result from the loss of benefits from social spending programs, while much of the benefit to the wealthy will come from tax benefits and cash transfers, according to the CBO.
Trump and his allies have in recent weeks blasted independent agencies for releasing numbers with which the administration disagrees. The nonpartisan CBO, led by Phillip Swagel — who served in Republican President George W. Bush's administration — has repeatedly come under fire over its growth forecasts.
The tax and spending bill, enacted last month, includes much of Trump's economic agenda. It extends his 2017 income tax cuts while implementing a number of new and expanded breaks, including a higher cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes, an enhanced child tax credit and no taxes on tips and overtime pay. To offset some of the cost, the law includes a number of cuts for clean energy initiatives and social spending programs, including Medicaid and food stamps.
Deficit Impact
The CBO last month said the bill would add $3.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects such as the potential growth impact.
Democrats and other critics have denounced the legislation as benefiting wealthier individuals at the cost of low-income families. The scaling back of the social safety net comes alongside an economic slowdown and weakening in the job market that would enhance the importance of those benefits.
Economists have warned price increases due to tariffs would disproportionately impact lower-income Americans who spend a larger share of their income on necessities, such as food.
Recent polls show a majority of voters disapprove of the tax law, with 55 per cent of voters against it in a Quinnipiac University poll and 61 per cent of voters in opposition in a CNN/SSRS poll.
The loss of resources for lower-income families will likely be delayed because Republicans wrote the law so that many of the cuts to social spending programs don't take effect until after the 2026 midterm elections, while the tax cuts will be noticeable early next year.
The law imposes new work requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients, limits states' ability to tax healthcare providers to help fund the program and creates new cost-sharing rules for beneficiaries who are covered under the Affordable Care Act expansion. CBO estimates that 10 million people will be left without health insurance by 2034 due to the law's changes to Medicaid.
The legislation also creates new work requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps, with exceptions for Alaska and Hawaii. The CBO estimates that those requirements will reduce participation in the program by about 2.4 million people in an average month over the next decade. An additional 300,000 people in an average month will lose benefits due to a separate provision, the analysis found.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Russia Has High Hopes for Trump-Putin Summit. Peace Isn't One of Them.
Moscow sees an opening to reset relations with Washington, with Kremlin officials hinting at the potential for deals with the U.S. on infrastructure and energy in the Arctic and beyond, as Russia's state media plays up what it bills as a looming entente between two equal great powers. 'Neocons and other warmongers won't be smiling' when the two leaders meet, said senior Putin aide Kirill Dmitriev. 'The Putin-Trump dialogue will bring hope, peace and global security.' Though the 'Ukrainian question' has been declared to be the main item of the agenda, 'much more important global issues' would be raised in Alaska, including ambitious plans for economic and infrastructure cooperation in the Arctic, senior Russian lawmaker Sergey Gavrilov said. Alexander Yakovenko, a former ambassador who headed Russia's foreign-service academy until last year, wrote in an op-ed for the state RIA news agency that 'settling the war in Ukraine, which has been lost by the West a long time ago, has become a secondary issue in relations between the United States and Russia—nothing more than an obstacle to normalization that we must overcome together.' Ever since the summit was announced, Russian media has been replete with stories about special U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Dmitriev sharing fried dumplings at a restaurant in the Russian capital, and about the site of a future Moscow hotel, described as a possible Trump Tower Moscow, that the two men visited last week. But when it comes to Ukraine, where Europe's bloodiest war in generations has raged for more than three years, there has been little indication that Putin intends to make a meaningful compromise. The Russian president's offer, as relayed by Witkoff, is a cease-fire if Kyiv agrees to give up territory—including major urban areas that Russian forces have been unable to capture. Western diplomats and Russian analysts say that Putin thinks he is winning on the battlefield and that his original goal of replacing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with a puppet regime in Kyiv might finally be within reach now that Washington has stopped paying for Ukrainian weapons. 'To avoid having a clash with Trump, he may agree to secondary concessions—but he won't end the war,' predicts Russian political analyst Abbas Gallyamov, a former Putin speechwriter who now lives abroad and is a critic of the Kremlin. 'The ideal scenario for Putin would be to divorce the issue of relations with America from the issue of Ukraine, hoping that other political and economic matters would make Ukraine of little relevance to Trump,' Gallyamov said. The very fact of the summit with Trump—and in the U.S., no less—is already a win for Putin, helping restore the international standing of a man treated as a pariah in much of the West and facing an arrest warrant on war-crimes charges from the International Criminal Court in The Hague. 'He can say: 'Look, you have tried to isolate me, but I am meeting with the American president while you Europeans have to crawl on your knees and call him 'Daddy,'' said Sergey Radchenko, a Cold War historian at Johns Hopkins University. Residents carry their belongings out a damaged building following a Russian drone strike Sunday in Bilozerske, in Ukraine's Donetsk region. 'The image of standing tall and proud on equal terms with the United States,' Radchenko said, 'that's what Russia has always wanted, and that's what is really important to Putin.' Trump has let his self-imposed deadline on sanctions against Russia lapse ahead of the summit, a move European diplomats fear signals to Russia that no serious additional U.S. pressure will be placed on the Kremlin whatever happens with Ukraine. 'Putin is absolutely convinced, as the General Staff continues to tell him, that with a little more pushing, the Ukrainian front will collapse,' said Alexandra Prokopenko, a fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center and a former adviser to Russia's central bank. That doesn't mean that Russia will oppose a pause on its own terms, such as a stop to weapons supplies for Ukraine, that would make its next round of offensives easier, she said. One possible concession in Alaska, some Moscow-based analysts indicated, would be for Putin to offer a limited cease-fire in the air, ending missile attacks that have killed hundreds of civilians in Ukrainian cities in recent months. Such a move would be in Russia's interest because Ukraine's long-range drone attacks have caused significant damage to Russian oil refineries and military industries, while also disrupting Russian civil aviation. Air attacks could resume once Russia stockpiled enough missiles and drones and repaired the damage. Russian troops this summer have stepped up a ground offensive in eastern Ukraine's Donetsk region, aiming to encircle the towns of Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad. Meanwhile, protests against attempts to curb Ukrainian anticorruption authorities have also shown widespread discontent with Zelensky. Still, total Russian advances over the past two years account for less than 1% of Ukrainian territory. No strategic breakthroughs have been achieved, and the much-heralded Russian offensive earlier this year on the northern region of Sumy has collapsed with high losses. The Russian proposal ahead of the Alaska summit, as relayed by Witkoff to European leaders and Ukraine, calls for Kyiv to surrender to Russia the heavily fortified northern part of the Donetsk region in exchange for a cease-fire. That is an area larger than the entire West Bank, with big industrial cities. Zelensky has rejected the demand, saying he won't give away Ukrainian land and pointing to Russia's long history of violating cease-fires and diplomatic agreements. European leaders backed Kyiv, saying any territorial concessions must be reciprocal and accompanied by security guarantees. Trump said Monday that his meeting with Putin is meant to 'feel out' whether a peace deal was possible. Trump threatened to abandon the negotiations if he sensed no agreement could be made. 'I'm going to go and see the parameters now,' he said. 'I may leave and say, 'Good luck,' and that'll be the end. I may say this is not going to be settled.' He added that he will seek a Russian withdrawal from some occupied parts of Ukraine. They have occupied some 'very prime territory,' he said. 'We're going to try to get some of that territory back for Ukraine.' What the Russian public has been told to expect is a Ukrainian surrender rather than a cease-fire, let alone a Russian withdrawal. Alexander Sladkov, a top war propagandist on Russian state TV, wrote on Telegram that any cease-fire with Kyiv would last six months at most. 'After that, there will be more war, with a stronger and rearmed enemy,' he said. 'A victory of Russia in the special military operation is inevitable.' Such declarations seem to reflect the dominant message on Russian TV screens. 'We need to win. To win. A horrible war is under way, and it won't end with the meeting in Alaska,' Vladimir Solovyov, one of Russia's top TV personalities, said in a recent broadcast. Kirill Fedorov, a Russian military analyst, agreed. 'The special military operation is a zero-sum game, and it can only be concluded with total victory,' he wrote on Telegram. 'Both the Zelensky folks and the Kremlin understand that—while Trump is a 1990s businessman in a president's chair, so he just keeps imagining deals.' Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's Munir outreach, India tariffs aren't strategy — it's about a Nobel: Ex-NSA John Bolton
In an exclusive conversation with Firstpost's Bhagyasree Sengupta, former US National Security Adviser John Bolton refused to see Trump's Munir outreach or India tariffs as strategic rethinking by the US. Here's what he said read more Much against the ongoing speculation that US President Donald Trump is rethinking the US's strategic position on India and Pakistan, his former National Security Adviser Ambassador John Bolton does not see it as a long-term review of America's policy. In an exclusive conversation with Firstpost's Bhagyasree Sengupta, Bolton said Trump's sudden courting of Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir, and his tariff tirade against India have nothing to do with 'strategic rethinking'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bolton asserts that the apparent change in the US's ties with India and Pakistan is just about his ambition to win a Nobel Peace Prize. In just a few days, India-US ties deteriorated significantly thanks sudden high tariffs imposed by Trump on Indian goods. On July 30, Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, effective from August 7. He argued that India is engaging in unfair trade practices by imposing barriers to market access, particularly in agriculture and dairy. However, a day before the August 7 deadline, Trump signed an executive order, announcing an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports. This is explicitly linked to India's continued purchase of crude oil from Russia amid the war in Ukraine. US President Donald Trump has jeopardised decades of American efforts to bring India away from Russia and China, his former aide John Bolton. File image/AFP This shocked many in India. Not only because India had strong ties with the US for decades, but also because the issue of India buying Russian oil was never brought up during the first six months of Trump 2.0. New Delhi soon called out the double standards, emphasising that it is China which buys more oil from Russia than India, and highlighting how the US still engage in trade with Russia without any such tariffs. While all this was happening, New Delhi also started to pay attention to the growing proximity between Trump and Pakistani Army chief Asim Munir. The Pakistani field marshal has been to the US twice in the past two months. What was concerning was the fact that these visits came soon after the four-day military escalation between India and Pakistan. Munir eventually went on to use American soil to make nuclear threats to India. Firstpost spoke to Ambassador Bolton, remains the longest-serving NSA in the Trump administration having served in the office from April 2018 to September 2019, understand what goes in Trump's mind when he takes such disruptive foreign policy deicisons. Bolton has also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations. Here's what he has to say on the matter: STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Imposing tariffs on India, holding summit with Russia When asked if he was surprised by the sudden surge in tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on Indian goods, Ambassador Bolton called out the duplicity of standards in that regard. 'Well, I think there are a lot of things that are very difficult to explain about what Trump's been doing. First, by all the reporting, which of course comes from leaks from both the US side and the Indian side, the two countries were very close to an agreement on tariffs. When Trump, sort of on his own, decided to go ahead and put the figure at 25 per cent, which is relatively high compared to some other agreements, higher than Pakistan, higher than Bangladesh, no explanation for that,' He said. 'Coming on very quickly was another 25 per cent imposed on Indian exports to the US because of the purchase of Russian oil and gas. Yet at the same time, within days, Trump was agreeing to a summit meeting with Putin in Alaska this coming Friday and not proceeding with his threat to impose tariffs on Russia or put further sanctions on Russia.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'During all this time, no sanctions were imposed on China for its even larger purchases of Russian oil and gas. So I think it's just typical of the confusion in the way Trump does business. But it's going to cause, I think, severe difficulties between the US and India at a time when we should be doing exactly the opposite,' he told Firstpost. Trump tariffs India: Why now? It has been over six months since Trump returned to the White House, and not once has the issue of India purchasing oil from Russia been brought up. When asked about the timing of the call, Bolton noted that the move had something to do with Trump's inability to reach a ceasefire in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. 'Well, for most of the first six months, what Trump was trying to do was use what he thought was his friendship with Vladimir Putin to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine. Now I'll just tell you from my own experience,' Ambassador Bolton explained. US President Donald Trump announced his tariffs on 'Liberation Day' on April 2. Reuters 'Putin doesn't see Trump as his friend. He sees them as somebody that he thinks he can manipulate in true, true fashion of a former KGB agent. And I think he's been pretty successful with it. But at some point toward the end of the first six months, whether intentionally or unintentionally, I think Putin pushed Trump a little too far, and Trump concluded that Putin wasn't interested in a ceasefire.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'That's what angered him. He threatened tariffs on Russian exports to the US and secondary sanctions or tariffs on countries that were buying Russian oil and gas. So all of these issues with the secondary sanctions have arisen within the past 30 or 45 days,' he explained. Was a pressure mounting on Trump in the US Congress? While speaking to Firstpost, Bolton noted that there was a legislation that was floating in the US Congress that proposed as high as 500 per cent tariffs and even greater secondary sanctions on countries that buy oil and gas from Russia. 'That [the legislation] was being pushed in Congress. But Trump never went forward with that. So I think the sanctions against India, the secondary tariffs, were really in part in an effort by Trump to keep control of the situation and not allow what Congress was doing to interfere,' Bolton said. However, the former American NSA pointed out that even Trump could not keep control of conflicting priorities he was facing, i.e. how to stop the war in Ukraine and how to develop better trade ties and overall relationship with India. 'He couldn't make a decision between his priorities, and I think that's why India was being in effect singled out, not even Russia or China being sanctioned, just India. I just think it's typical of Trump's decision-making capabilities,' Bolton told Firstpost. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Is Trump holding grudges against India? For over 27 times, Trump has taken credit for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan following the 4-day military escalation between the two nuclear-powered nations. However, India has maintained that the ceasefire between India and Pakistan was a bilateral decision and the US was not involved. When asked if Trump is holding grudges because of India's denial on the matter, Bolton said he might not care that much about it. 'Well, it could be. I'm not sure he cares that much about what anybody's saying about the escalation after the terrorist attack in Kashmir, because it is part of Trump's campaign to get the Nobel Peace Prize.' 'I mean, he cites stopping a war between Serbia and Kosovo, which nobody in Serbia or Kosovo knew was starting or had happened, and several other things like that. I don't think it's so much a grudge against India in that regard.' Students of an art school and their teacher carry a hand-drawn portrait of the US President Donald Trump as they celebrate the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, in Mumbai, May 10, 2025. AP 'I think he just loses sight of what he's doing, and he focuses on one thing at a time. He makes one decision at a time and doesn't consider the consequences,' he added. Bolton admitted that even he was shocked by the Trump tariffs on India, given Trump's good relationship with the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I thought Trump had a good relationship with Modi. So it just goes to show even in Trump's world, he views international relations through the prism of personal relations, and even a good personal relationship with Trump doesn't stop the chaos,' Bolton averred. Handed China a gift Soon after Trump announced the tariffs on India, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval met Russian President Vladimir Putin. It was announced that President . Apart from this, PM Modi is reportedly going to visit China by the end of this month, his first visit since 2018. When asked if Trump just pushed India toward China and Russia, Bolton maintained that while ties with Moscow have been historical, Trump just handed a gift to China. Bolton said, 'In terms of border disputes and China's general hegemonic ambitions, India would have been well within its rights to consider China the principal adversary. But when it comes to dealing with the US on trade, this [Trump tariffs] has given China a gift to say, 'look, you're in as much danger as we are. Why don't we get together?'' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enter a hall for the family photo before a plenary session of the BRICS 2024 Summit in Kazan, Russia, 23 October 2024. File Photo/Reuters 'I'm sure that's what Xi Jinping is going to be proposing. Russia is somewhat different, given the history. I think in India, there was a developing understanding that Russia grew closer to China. India was facing a problem with that Axis.' 'All of that has been reversed, or at least severely called into question. It's an example of how Trump thinks of one thing at a time and doesn't think of the consequences. So the one thing he was thinking of was a ceasefire in Ukraine, which he wasn't getting from Russia. He took steps that had probably even greater negative implications for the United States elsewhere, particularly with India,' the former US NSA explained. The Asim Munir question Soon after the India-Pakistan military confrontation, Munir met President Trump in the White House. He is currently in the US attending the farewell ceremony of the Centcom chief. Munir eventually used American soil to deliver nuclear threats to India. During Trump's first term, we saw events like "Howdy Modi" and "Namaste Trump". So what changed? Bolton said it is all about a Nobel Peace Prize nomination. Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir (L) and US President Donald Trump (R). PTI / AP Not a strategic rethinking but a Nobel dream While speaking to Firstpost, Bolton said Trump's affinity with Pakistan had nothing to do with 'strategic rethinking'. He said, 'I don't think this is any strategic rethinking by Trump because he doesn't do strategic rethinking. One thing Munir did was to offer to nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize, which has become an obsession with Trump.' 'It's part of a strategy of flattery, which often works with Trump as well. So my suggestion to Prime Minister Modi is that when he talks to Trump next, he should offer to nominate him twice for a Nobel Peace Prize and to keep nominating him until he gets it. Maybe that'll help,' he exclaimed. Trump doesn't understand Pakistan: Bolton When asked about Munir's recent nuclear threat against India during his second visit to the US, Bolton noted that while the US does not censor foreign leaders, it would be in the interest of everyone to see Pakistan retain a democratic government. 'I wouldn't conclude a closer Pakistani-US relationship, although frankly I think it's in the interest of everybody to see Pakistan retain a democratic government and not be under the military,' he said. In recent months, the US under Donald Trump is cosying up to Pakistan. Representational image/Reuters 'But Trump doesn't understand Pakistan at all. He's been speaking in the past few weeks about the significant development of Pakistan's oil reserves, which comes as a complete surprise to people in Pakistan. It's just typical of Trump. He lives in many senses in a world of his own, a world he has created. I'm afraid because he does not think very much about what happens outside his world, he doesn't see the ramifications sometimes of what he says.' Tariff helps no one When asked about the anti-American sentiments brewing in India, Ambassador Bolton said, 'I don't think he [Trump] understands any of that. He sees these tariffs as a way of encouraging domestic US manufacturers of many products, which we buy largely from overseas for a variety of reasons, and that theory isn't going to work.' 'I think it's a difficult populist term to explain that tariffs hurt everybody and that in a trade war, there's never a winner,' Bolton remarked, insisting that ultimately American consumers are paying tariffs. 'It's a tax on Americans. Tariffs were understood in the 19th century in America as taxes because it was the principal revenue source for the Federal government. Nobody had any illusions about it,' Bolton asserted. Demonstrators take part in a protest against US President Donald Trump's announcement of 50 per cent tariffs on Brazilian products, in Sao Paulo, Brazil, July 10, 2025. File Image/Reuters 'Trump thinks trade surpluses are like profits and trade deficits are like losses on a corporate balance sheet. Trade surpluses and deficits are not profits and losses,.' Bolton said. 'When you have a trade deficit, it means that you've been buying more products from another country than they've been buying from the United States. But that doesn't mean Americans are left worse off if they buy a widget from Pakistan that costs $100. They've indeed given $100 to a Pakistani company, but they have a widget. Trump doesn't seem to understand this.' Secondary tariffs are not hurting Russia When asked about Trump's reluctance to hold trade talks with India until it stops purchasing oil from Russia, Bolton emphasised that the whole thing is 'self-defeating'. He said, 'It is indicative of Trump's inability to prioritise among competing objectives.' 'It's a reality, especially for a country like the US, which has so many interests in so many places around the world that sometimes you have to decide what your priorities are. And Trump can't make up his mind on that. He's now fixed that he wants to show some toughness to Russia,' Bolton said. 'He hoped that this [secondary sanctions] would affect the negotiations that will take place in Alaska this Friday. But the fact is, it hasn't hurt Russia at all. India still buys oil from Russia. So tariffs hurt India, but don't hurt Russia.' 'The secondary tariff is not as effective as dealing with Russia directly, but I'm not sure anybody in the White House has explained that to Trump,' he added. Undisciplined decision making When asked if the overall modified tariffs were Trump's bid to divert people's attention from the Epstein Files, Ambassador Bolton simply said that these tariffs indicate Trump's poor decision-making capabilities. 'These tariffs are harmful not just in the existence of the tariffs themselves, but the uncertainty that they've created for decision makers in business and other governments who don't know what the tariff rate is going to be and therefore cannot plan effectively,' he said. Mexicans protest after Donald Trump imposed tariffs on Mexico. File image/Reuters 'That's what Trump likes. He likes to be the centre of attention. So a couple of weeks ago, out of nowhere on a Sunday evening, he imposed a 17 per cent tariff on importing Mexican tomatoes. Nobody knew why. Somehow, somebody had gotten to him about Mexican tomatoes. This is the sort of undisciplined, poorly thought-out decision-making that unfortunately really constitutes a lot of the way Trump reacts,' he said. Trump-Putin meeting: Alaska summit When asked about his thoughts on the US-Russia summit in Alaska, where Trump will be holding talks with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, Ambassador Bolton thinks Putin will be very strategic. 'Well, I think Putin has seen the playbook, so it wouldn't surprise me if he came with a big plaque that said 'Here's my letter of nomination for you.' I think what Putin really wants to do is use his KGB training and try to get Trump back under his influence,' Bolton said. 'I do think he recognises he pushed Trump too far. Maybe he did it intentionally, maybe unintentionally. I don't know. It is a big win for Putin to come to the United States. He's a pariah leader of a rogue state that committed unprovoked aggression against Ukraine.' US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Russian leader Vladimir Putin before their closed-door meeting on July 16, 2018, in Helsinki, Finland. (Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP) 'On Friday, he's going to get to stand next to the President of the United States and get his picture taken on territory that used to be Russian. Nobody in Russia has missed the fact that we bought Alaska from Russia in 1867. So it's what Trump can do. I think a lot of people are going to be watching. But the main thing is to see if Putin emerges with Trump thinking that they're friends again,' Ambassador Bolton concluded.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Zelenskyy could cede some of Ukraine's territory in peace deal: Report
Even as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has rejected any deal between Donald Trump and Donald Trump, he could be willing to cede some territory to Russia in a peace deal. But there will one key condition. read more Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy sings the national anthem during his visit in Kherson, Ukraine, November 14, 2022. (Photo: Reuters) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could be ready to cede some of his country's territory in a peace deal, according to a report. The development comes after Zelenskyy rejected any deal between US President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin about his country in their upcoming summit on Friday without Ukraine's presence and approval. The Telegraph has reported that Zelenskyy could agree to cede territory that Russia already controls at the moment. However, Zelenskyy has ruled out ceding any territory that is still under Ukrainian control. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As of July-end, Russia was in control of around 19 per cent Ukrainian territory, including the province of Crimea that it had invaded and occupied in 2014. Will Zelenskyy's concession be good enough for Putin? Zelenskyy's concession, which would essentially mean freezing battlelines as they exit now, would cede Putin large parts of eastern Ukraine and solidify the control over Crimea that has bene under Russian rule since 2014. However, Zelenskyy's concession may not placate Putin as his maximalist demands do not just include the territory currently under Russian occupation but all four provinces that he declared to be a part of Russia in 2022 — Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia. Even though Russia controls a large chunk of the Donbas region comprising Donetsk and Luhansk, Ukraine controls a sizable part of these provinces and battles continue to range along the frontlines. Moreover, Zelenskyy will only agree to a peace settlement that offers robust security guarantees in the form of weapons deliveries and a path to Nato membership, according to The Telegraph. The report said that the plan has been backed by Ukraine's European partners, such as the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy. 'Europeans now understand their role as supportive of Ukraine in terms of the diplomatic negotiations. It's a boost for morale, it's also strengthening the diplomatic positions of Ukraine so that it doesn't feel alone,' a Western official told the newspaper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD