Driver dead following single-vehicle crash on Highway 54 in Haldimand County
OPP Sgt. Ed Sanchuk said the crash happened just after midnight Tuesday between Onondaga Townline Road and Harrison Road and claimed the life of the driver.
According to Sanchuk, Haldimand County OPP, Haldimand County Fire Department, and Haldimand County EMS responded to the crash.
"I'm sad to say that the driver of the vehicle suffered serious life-threatening injuries and was pronounced deceased on scene," Sanchuk said.
He said Haldimand Road 54 will be closed between Onondaga Townline Road and Harrison Road until around 12 p.m. because of the investigation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
33 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
Son sought for murdering parents found dead inside Bracebridge home
An OPP shoulder badge. Photo by Derek Baldwin / Postmedia Network The OPP says the man wanted in connection with an ongoing death and arson probe in Bracebridge has been confirmed dead. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Cops say on Friday around 8 p.m. they responded to a report of gunfire at a Beatrice Town Line Road residence and found a man's body and the home in flames. Police say that the dead man was identified as Paul Gray, 60, of Bracebridge, and a gunshot wound caused his death. A suspect search was initiated and police issued a shelter-in-place order that was lifted by around 1:45 a.m. on Saturday. Following further investigation, two additional bodies were located in the residence: One was identified as Mitchell Gray, 29, of Bracebridge, who was wanted for murder. His cause of death was determined to be smoke inhalation. The identity of the other individual was confirmed as Anita Gray, 59, of Bracebridge, and her cause of death was determined to be a gunshot wound. Police confirmed Mitchell was the son of Paul and Anita Gray. Editorial Cartoons World Canada Celebrity Columnists
Globe and Mail
33 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Judge sides with Mobilicity investors, orders Ottawa to repay hundreds of millions of dollars
An Ontario judge has sided with the original investors of a former independent mobile provider in a court battle that has lasted for more than a decade, ordering the federal government to repay hundreds of millions of dollars for unexpectedly altering its spectrum policy and causing them losses. Justice Peter Osborne of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled Wednesday that Ottawa committed negligence and negligent misrepresentation when it induced Quadrangle Group LLC and Obelysk Media Inc. to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in Mobilicity in 2008, only to change the rules for the resale of the startup's wireless licences in 2013. Justice Osborne also ruled that the government wrongfully interfered with the sale of Mobilicity's spectrum assets, the invisible radio waves that carry wireless signals, when it extended what was supposed to be a five-year moratorium on new entrant spectrum transfers to incumbents. In doing so, the judge said, the then-Harper government quashed proposed purchase offers by Telus Corp. T-T when Mobilicity was operating under court protection from its creditors. (Mobilicity was eventually sold to Rogers Communications Inc. for a lower price.) Rita Trichur: Wheels of justice grind slowly for Mobilicity's initial investors The lengthy and complex trial, which relied on 10 fact witnesses and five expert witnesses, underlines the question of investors' rights in the face of changing policy frameworks. The case also reinforces governments' 'duty of care' to ensure that their regulatory actions do not lead to unreasonable harm business interests. The decision contributes to continuing debates over the effectiveness of Canada's telecom competition policy and the degree to which the government should put its finger on the scale when it comes to commercial matters. 'At its core, this action is about the transferability of spectrum licenses. But significantly, it is also about the extraordinary and unusual conduct of Government officials with respect to the Mobilicity spectrum licenses in particular,' Justice Osborne said in his decision. Obelysk welcomed the decision in a statement, saying the plaintiffs are reviewing the details and will continue to pursue all appropriate remedies to recover their losses. While the judge did not specify the total damages, Jonathan Lisus, the lead lawyer for the investors, said the parties had calculated the amount at more than $500-million. The case represents a rare instance of a government being found in breach of private law duty of care, Mr. Lisus said. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada spokesperson Andréa Daigle said in an e-mail that the government has taken note of the court's decision and will review its finding carefully. 'As the decision remains subject to appeal, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time,' she said. David Berman: The question now facing telecom investors: Why bother? The origins of the dispute date back to 2006, when the government approached Canadian businessman John Bitove about investing in a new wireless venture, according to the lawsuit filed in 2014. In order to increase competition, the government decided to set aside a portion of wireless licences in a forthcoming auction for new market entrants. Mr. Bitove, who ultimately became the majority owner of Obelysk, and New York-based private equity firm Quadrangle Group LLC eventually did invest. They purchased spectrum licences worth $243-million in the 2008 auction. Notably, they alleged that they did so under the understanding that, if Mobilicity were to fail, they could sell the licences – typically a telecom's most valuable asset – to an incumbent to recoup their investment after a five-year period, mitigating their risk. But in 2013, the government retroactively altered the rules governing spectrum transfers, arguing that new entrant spectrum was never meant to fall into the hands of incumbent carriers. By taking away the company's ability to sell to incumbents including Telus, Justice Osborne said that the government caused a material and immediate devaluation of the value of Mobilicity's licences. Industry Canada, which regulates spectrum auctions, maintained during legal proceedings that it did nothing unlawful, and provided the investors no assurances that spectrum transfers would be approved in their favour after the five-year moratorium. But Justice Obsborne said there was overwhelming evidence that the plaintiffs understood the opposite, and said that if this was not the case, that the government had a duty to correct their understanding but did not do so. The judge rejected the government's view that it could alter the transferability attributes 'at any time it saw fit' and avoid liability to the plaintiffs. 'The actions of the Government were capricious, and they were inconsistent with the expectations which were in turn based on the representations made,' he said. 'Those representations were relied on by the investors who, as noted, did spend billions of dollars under the assumption that the rules would be respected.' Canadian telecoms boost wireless prices, giving lift to sagging stocks Furthermore, Justice Osborne found that Industry Canada later interfered in a bidding war for Mobilicity, which was struggling financially, disrupting Telus's efforts to acquire the company's spectrum. Telus and Mobilicity had been engaged in talks for the sale of the company before the policy change, so the companies decided to go forward and seek approval, despite concerns that the regulator would not allow it. Justice Osborne said the regulator interfered by threatening in 2014 that Telus would be excluded from future spectrum actions if it continued to pursue Mobilicity licences, and by 'unnecessarily, but intentionally, inappropriately, and for tactical purposes,' withholding the release of a response on a proposed licence transfer to Telus, 'at the specific request and with the direct involvement of the Minister's political staff,' the judge found. The regulator eventually made an exception to its policy to allow Rogers Communications Inc. RCI-B-T to purchase Mobilicity and its wireless licences as part of a spectrum swap in 2015. Rogers paid $465-million, which was $82-million less than Telus's highest bid at the time. By effectively removing Telus as one of the two bidders, the government prematurely and 'surreptitiously' terminated what was otherwise a competitive bidding process, and ultimately reduced the value of the licences, Justice Osborne ruled. The government will be required to repay the shareholders for their initial investments in Mobilicity after the sale in 2015, plus prejudgment interest.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Tip from concerned citizen leads to impaired driving charge for Brantford man
Vehicle outside the headquarters of the Brantford Police Service on May 12, 2025. (Hannah Schmidt/CTV News) A Brantford man is facing an impaired driving charge after police were tipped off about an erratic driver. The Brantford Police Service said they received a call from a concerned citizen on Tuesday around 2:30 p.m. They were told a driver had been spotted swerving and driving erratically in the McMurray Street and Brant Avenue area. The caller gave police a description of the vehicle and the licence plate, allowing officers to quickly track down the driver. Officers pulled the driver over on Brant Avenue near Bedford Street. While speaking with the driver, officers said they noticed signs of impairment, and the driver was asked to provide a breath sample. The results suggested he was three times over the legal limit. A 45-year-old Brantford man has been charged with operation while impaired. His vehicle was impounded and his driver's licence was suspended.
