Mixed Signals: New York Times editor Joe Kahn, podcaster Megyn Kelly and more on the collapse of trust
Today, we have a special bonus episode: Ben and Max break down the most interesting moments from the Innovating to Restore Trust in News summit held last week in Washington, D.C.
They discuss Gallup's findings on the worsening trust in news media, New York Times executive editor Joe Kahn's acknowledgment that Donald Trump is good for business, and FCC chair Brendan Carr's plans to go after liberal media.
Plus, Ben responds to Megyn Kelly's take on what she called a 'tense interview.' Is this the start of a heated podcast feud? Maybe, if it helps our ratings.
Find us on X: @semaforben, @maxwelltani
If you have a tip or a comment, please email us mixedsignals@semafor.com
Sign up for Semafor Media's Sunday newsletter: https://www.semafor.com/newsletters/media
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The FCC's Dangerous EchoStar Mistake
The complexities of telecom regulation can bewilder even seasoned professionals. Thus, a headline like 'FCC to Investigate EchoStar's 5G' may seem too boring and technical to look into. This would be a mistake: this action by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has the potential to be seriously market-disruptive, and even to impair American national security. Among the major national carriers, EchoStar is a technological leader in areas most relevant to competition with China and to national priorities in trade and advanced manufacturing. That makes it a national strategic asset. As a true fourth national network, it protects consumer choice and lower consumer prices. The FCC threatens such severe sanctions that they put EchoStar's financial viability in question and threaten to kill the company. This places every holder of a spectrum license in a riskier position and will raise consumer prices by forcing every licensee, not just EchoStar, to charge higher risk premiums. Here's how we got here. On May 9th, the FCC was directed to open two proceedings on EchoStar: one on 5G buildout compliance, the other on the use of EchoStar's 2 GHz spectrum licenses. On May 10th, the FCC opened an additional proceeding into sharing 2 GHz between EchoStar's terrestrial uses and satellite services, something the FCC has repeatedly found to be impossible in prior proceedings have the cumulative effect of threatening EchoStar with numerous spectrum license revocations, which has severely affected EchoStar's ability to raise capital. EchoStar faces the heavy lift of building a capital-intensive national network, which will ultimately cost tens of billions. That makes these threats existential to the company. Every holder of a spectrum license is taking note: threatening license revocations is the ultimate sanction because without licenses, you don't have a wireless business. This sanction is very rare in the cell phone business. The last time it happened was when NextWave lost licenses for non-payment after its 1998 bankruptcy, and those revocations were overturned at the Supreme Court in 2003. EchoStar committed to build its network, and to spend the billions of dollars required to do so, as part of the U.S. Government's commitment to four national networks when T-Mobile acquired Sprint in 2020. EchoStar claims to have met its commitments, so moving to threaten its licenses seems extremely market-disruptive out of proportion to any claimed offense. But the concerns with these threats go farther. For years, we've heard that China is beating us in 5G. It's important to look under the hood and ask what this means in order to appreciate what's going on with EchoStar. For consumers, 5G was supposed to deliver fast streaming and new applications. But the more interesting part of 5G were always its applications to manufacturing, logistics, and public safety—all areas where China is realizing far greater gains than we are. China has about 16,000 '5G private networks' while we have less than 400. These are the networks supporting advanced Chinese factories and ports. And China has about 77% of its population on '5G Stand-Alone,' versus only about 37% in the USA—meaning that Chinese cell phone networks are more capable than ours of supporting advanced security and performance features for public safety. The conclusion is inescapable: American 5G technology needs more radios, more advanced network cores, and more capital to keep pace with China. American 5G deployments risk checking the 5G box without delivering the innovation, under the hood, that would enable 5G's promise to be realized. T-Mobile and EchoStar's Boost brand are the only American cell carriers that are 100% 5G Stand-Alone. What's more, in building its Boost network—one of only four national networks, now that US Cellular is winding down—EchoStar has built the only American OpenRAN network. OpenRAN, which offers cheaper equipment and software-based management at the expense of the tight integration that a single stack vendor can provide. The jury is out on whether OpenRAN will predominate in 5G, but it's a significant factor overseas, with Japan's Rakuten as one notable success. In industrial and public safety deployments, OpenRAN may prove more suitable to non-consumer deployments than traditional consumer-facing systems. And perhaps most significantly, OpenRAN as used by EchoStar excludes Chinese suppliers accused of threatening national security. Put it all together, and there's only one conclusion. One of the most innovative companies in American telecommunications is at risk of suffering an unprecedented and unpredictable punishment. We're all going to pay a price for it as the effects ramify through the markets, and it's going to hurt our international competitiveness. The FCC should reverse course. If not, China won't have to beat us—we'll have beaten ourselves. Nathan Simington was nominated to serve as a Commissioner of the FCC by President Donald J. Trump. He was confirmed by the United States Senate in 2020 and served in his position until June 6, 2025.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Steve Bannon says Trump should launch an investigation into Musk for alleged drug use
Former White House advisor Steve Bannon is urging President Donald Trump's administration to launch a special counsel investigation into Elon Musk – including looking at his alleged drug use. 'I think the best way to do it is as a special counsel that can kind of oversee everything. Pull the security clearance for the drugs, temporarily, investigate the whole drug situation,' Bannon told former Meet The Press host Chuck Todd on his new streaming show, 'Sunday Night With Chuck Todd.' Bannon, referencing a New York Times report that detailed the billionaire CEO's alleged drug use leading up to the 2024 election. Musk allegedly was using ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms, Adderall and so much ketamine that it caused him bladder issues. He denied the report when asked about it during his final day as a 'special government employee' under Trump. Todd noted that Musk, 'never would have passed a security clearance as just a mid-level staffer,' to which Bannon agreed, saying, 'Zero.' 'Given what the drug use that was on the record,' Todd added. Bannon and Todd went on to discuss Musk's alleged altercation with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the White House, which Bannon told the Washington Post before the story made international headlines. During the conversation, Bannon claimed that Musk was rumored to be 'micro-dosing' before the fight, according to Mediaite. The apparent fight included Bessent repeatedly shouting 'F*** you!' at Musk within earshot of Trump in the Oval Office. Bannon, a longtime critic of Musk, argued before the fiery fallout between Trump and Musk last week that the billionaire tech mogul does not have the president's best interests in mind. The friendship between two of the world's most powerful men came to a crashing halt last week as Musk disagreed with Trump about his spending bill and the two shared a very public Internet feud. Meanwhile, Trump claimed Elon was 'wearing thin' and he asked him to leave. Musk, for his part, brought bombshell claims to X that Trump is in the 'Epstein files.'
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bob Costas: Trump's attacks on the media are unlike anything in my lifetime
'The free press is under attack,' Bob Costas said at an awards ceremon y Monday evening. 'Democracy as we know it is under attack.' The famed sports broadcaster was at the Edison Ballroom podium in New York, accepting a lifetime achievement Mirror Award for his 'distinct, consistent and unique contributions to the public's understanding of the media.' What began as a speech reflecting upon a 50-year career in sports journalism quickly became a scorching sermon about the state of sports media and the threats to the free press coming from President Donald Trump. 'What's happening now are not matters of small degree,' Costas, 73, said of the Trump administration's attacks on journalism, including personal lawsuits, FCC investigations, and crackdowns on press access. 'They're different in kind to anything certainly in my lifetime and maybe in the history of the American presidency.' The president 'intimidated ABC into reviewing George Stephanopoulos,' Costas said of the network settling Trump's 2024 defamation lawsuit brought against it after the star anchor repeatedly said on-air that Trump had been 'found liable for rape' in the E. Jean Carroll case when a jury had found him liable for sexual abuse. 'All they should have said was George misspoke,' the sportscaster said. 'They didn't have to pay a $15 million ransom.' Costas then turned his attention to CBS News. 'Did Shari Redstone — because she wants to effect a merger that Trump's FCC could stand in the way of — did she have to besmirch and undercut the gold standard in our lifetime of broadcast journalism, '60 Minutes?'' Redstone, 71, currently controls Paramount Global, the global media company that owns CBS News. She is seeking to sell her stake in the company as part of a merger with Skydance Media, but the deal needs approval from the Trump administration. As a result, Redstone has reportedly sought to settle the president's lawsuit against CBS over a '60 Minutes' segment — a lawsuit that legal experts have repeatedly deemed bogus — sparking outcry from the network's journalists. 'Paying $20 million in ransom to Trump is just the cost of doing business when there's billions of dollars at stake,' Costas remarked. (ABC and CBS did not immediately respond to requests for comment.) 'These are ongoing assaults on the basic idea of a free press,' he said. 'It does not mean that we are without fault,' Costas said. 'It does not mean that the legacy or mainstream media doesn't screw up from time to time or have blind spots or misplaced narratives.' However, he added, 'if the answer to that is MAGA media, if the answer to that is Donald Trump's view of the world, which is only through a prism of what benefits him… I'll stay where we are.' 'I used to love Bob Costas, but then he turned political,' Costas said he's often heard from sports fans. 'You know what, if that's what you think and that's how you think and you think it in defense of that guy, I wear that as a badge of honor.' Costas has often drawn criticism from fellow sports broadcasters for using his perch to bring attention to political issues. In one particularly famous instance in December 2012, he devoted his 'Sunday Night Football' segment to make a plea for gun control after a Kansas City Chiefs linebacker shot and killed his girlfriend and then himself outside the team's practice facility. Costas, who left NBC Sports in 2019 after 40 years there, also lamented the current state of sports broadcasting, which he said 'tragically' lacks in-depth coverage of the political and social issues intimately connected to the games themselves. Such issues, he said, 'need to be covered, not during the game, not in between pitches, or in between free throws, but at some point need to be covered.' Costas suggested that broadcasters have become deferential to the sports leagues, avoiding interrogative questions or controversial topics altogether. 'With all the hundreds and hundreds of hours of coverage, let's say, of the NFL, can't there be a 'Meet the Press'-style interview of (commissioner) Roger Goodell somewhere?' He quipped: 'Sports isn't brain surgery, but it doesn't have to be brain dead either.'
