logo
Paula Hynes: Do you have a beef with the cost of living?

Paula Hynes: Do you have a beef with the cost of living?

Irish Examiner2 days ago
The cost of living, along with food inflation, is making the headlines — one politician even said 'a litre of milk is now more expensive than a litre of petrol'.
There is some bit of truth in that statement, but in reality it is a headline grabber — if the same politician shopped own brand in a supermarket, they would get their litre of milk cheaper than petrol, and if the cost of diesel came down, the price of food may do the same, as there is a lot of transport involved in collecting milk from farms, delivering food to distribution centres and then onwards to supermarkets. And let's not forget contractor charges, which have risen dramatically due to the cost of diesel.
I might remind the same politician that while petrol may be cheaper than milk, oil companies make far greater profits than dairy farms. In fact, thank God the price of milk is high. Irish dairy farmers spent most of 2023 and 2024 operating at break-even as the price of milk was so low.
The price of food will need to remain high in Ireland — there are further taxes being placed on fertiliser next year, there is also a proposed tax of €80 on a tractor tyre, energy prices are far too high in this country, and diesel the same, meaning the cost of producing milk is high and will only go higher going forward.
Ask yourself this: why do politicians start to spout dramatic headlines when the voter and consumer have their backs against the wall?
Politicians need to get in touch with reality and join the real world fast, because milk was always going to get more expensive — if it didn't, then farmers would simply go out of business.
Politicians are still wrangling over regulations which may further impact the price, will the derogation be renewed, and now the mighty EU wants to play with the CAP budget, well if they reduce it, the consumer will pay the price.
There are talks the budget will be reduced by 22% between 2028 and 2034. Remember, the CAP was originally set up to keep the cost of food low, and the EU has already been reducing those payments to farmers for years.
Milk isn't the only food that has risen in cost, the cost of beef for the consumer has risen 22% year-on-year. It seems high, but the price of cattle has risen 48%, according to CSO figures. Beef kill at factories is reducing week on week, with prices climbing, which will further increase the price for consumers.
The writing was on the wall for high beef prices for some time, and yet politicians continued to walk around in La La Land, oblivious to a looming beef shortage. When Pete was in the US in 2023, Angus calves from dairy herds, which were still being fed milk, were costing $450 each. The same calf here was costing between €50 and 100.
Why the price difference? There was a massive shortage of beef cattle in the US. Ground beef has risen by 50% in price over the last five years in the US, beef production is forecast to drop by a further 2.1% this year, which equates to 600,000t, and the US beef herd has fallen to its lowest in 70 years — an 800-pound steer in the US cost about $1,500 in 2024 and now costs $2,400, prices which are forecast to continually rise through 2025.
It is not just a US issue — in Ireland, changes to derogation rules by the EU meant Irish farmers had to reduce dairy cow numbers to the tune of nearly 200,000 cows.
If we assume a 10% non-pregnant rate, then that is 20,000 fewer cows going for slaughter a year, and 180,000 fewer calves born, so the beef kill in Ireland was forecast to drop, and it has.
In fact, the beef kill in Ireland is in free fall at the moment, and not only will have an impact on beef prices in the supermarket, it also has a serious economic impact on our economy, and may potentially lead to job losses.
On an EU level, beef cow numbers are at their lowest since 1961. EU politicians have simply regulated farmers out of business — those farmers who continued have been crippled by the rising cost of farm inputs, and while many farmers continue, climate change is now driving them out of business.
Farmers in Mediterranean countries have now ceased trying to rear young calves due to the challenges of extremely high summer temperatures, and have now switched to sourcing older weanling cattle from Northern Europe, including Ireland, as these older cattle can adapt to high temperatures with fewer health issues.
Export demand for cattle to other EU countries from Ireland has never been higher, and looks to increase. The EU political solution, to simply sign the Mercosur deal, and ensure you will all be eating South American beef, which in turn will further push EU farmers out of business.
In the end, we will be simply paying a high prices to Brazil for beef because other countries across the world will also be looking to source the same beef due to a global beef shortage, which is forecast to increase as global demand continues to soar over the next decade.
The great Texas ranchers would most likely say to politicians, y'all made a mess of it, and they would be right on the money with that statement.
The next time you, the consumer, hears a politician or an MEP saying they have got your back, and they are going to raise the cost-of-living issue, ask them what their stance on EU food security is, and whether they are going to fight to ensure the EU's number one priority is food security?
The same politician who feels a litre of milk is higher than a litre of petrol might also remind her political party MEPs to actually turn up and vote when it comes to EU agricultural parliament voting, because their record of voting is pretty dismal and bordering on non-existent up until now. They simply didn't seem to care about EU agriculture or food production until it became a huge issue for consumers.
On a cheerier note, with no shows since the Great Yorkshire due to a few hospital appointments, we are all set for YMA National Finals in Kilkenny, and with seven heifers travelling, we have two top-class days of showing ahead, so hopefully we might have a little luck.
Read More
Is it the thin end of the wedge for flat rate Vat compensation scheme?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's crystal clear that an unregulated digital world carries far too many risks for the young
It's crystal clear that an unregulated digital world carries far too many risks for the young

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

It's crystal clear that an unregulated digital world carries far too many risks for the young

An EU-wide survey published last month, found that overall, one in three Europeans surveyed were concerned that there were insufficient online protections for children and young people. Digging a little deeper, Irish people were more sanguine than the average European about how digital rights and principles were applied, with almost half of those questioned in Ireland (49%) being satisfied compared to a European average of 42%. And yet, for those who care for and work for and with children, and have seen the harms that can occur, it is crystal clear that the digital world carries far too many risks for children and young people. Regulating tech platforms to produce systems and material that do not harm children is an ongoing topic at both Irish government and regulator level, and at EU level too. Now, in this second half of July, some important advances have been made. After long deliberations, the European Commission issued guidelines on Monday, July 14, to a wide number of tech platforms setting out how they are to apply EU legislation – particularly the Digital Services Act – to better protect children and young people from engaging with illegal and harmful content online. While the Act was there already, these guidelines are more practical, more precise, with clearer emphasis on ensuring children's human rights and equality are respected. They emphasise that platforms must identify how risky their content is to children, and then take practical and workable steps so that children don't access it. They will have to ensure that their recommender systems – which control things like the 'For You' function on apps – is stricter for young people on the company's site. They must have practical, effective age assurance systems to stop children from accessing inappropriate content. In a nutshell, the privacy, safety and security of the child and their best interest is to be central to the platform's consideration. Meanwhile back at home, the second and final section of Coimisiún na Meán's Online Safety Code comes into effect today. This applies to a smaller number of companies but includes some of the largest social media companies, which have their European headquarters in Ireland. Those companies have had obligations under the first part of the Online Safety Code since last November which meant that they were obliged to take steps to protect children and young people from content which could "impair their physical mental or moral development". The second part of the code, going live today, puts specific obligations on companies to effectively prevent children from accessing adult-only content such as pornography and to have good parental control and flagging systems. While we would want to see the regulators playing a much stronger role in enforcing uniform, high safety standards, rather than each platform setting its own rules, these requirements will mean that there will be better protections for children and young people using these online platforms/services. At the end of the day, that is progress. While tech companies, for the most part, will say that they welcome fair regulation, there is some restiveness. Coimisiún na Meán, the Irish regulator, has had to issue a formal notice to X – formerly Twitter - to say that it's not satisfied with the information X has submitted about the protection of young people on its platform. And the same company is challenging the regulator about whether the entire code should apply to it at all. A step forward These regulatory changes come with few fireworks and clashing cymbals, but they need to be acknowledged. They are a step forward. They also need to be widely known. They will have to be monitored and implemented by Coimisiún na Meán but the rest of us – caregivers, educators, child rights organisations and advocates - will also need to know what's there to highlight discrepancies, to complain about breaches, to require the tech platforms to be a bit more responsible for children's safety. We will also have to continue to highlight that while technology is with us and brings great benefits to everyone including children and young people, tech platforms and those who are in the business of making sometimes extraordinary profits from selling their digital products and advertising to us, must do it in a way that is decent and fair. We will need to be a lot less complacent than the recent survey shows we have been about the welfare and rights of our children. And we will need to continue to insist that our government and our regulators continue to scrutinise the tech industry to ensure the safety and rights of children and young people in Ireland in this, our digital world. Noeline Blackwell is the Online Safety Co-Ordinator with the Children's Rights Alliance

Return to office: a power grab masquerading as policy
Return to office: a power grab masquerading as policy

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Return to office: a power grab masquerading as policy

Let's stop pretending return-to-office mandates are about collaboration. They're not about team culture or innovation. They're about control. Executives who built their power on parking passes, proximity, and title inflation are demanding a return to rituals that reinforce their relevance. The corner office means little when the top-performing team member is working from Kerry or Kraków. What we're witnessing isn't a strategy, it's a cultural counterattack from a generation that feels left behind. Productivity was never the issue. Microsoft, Meta, and other high-output firms have reported better retention and performance under hybrid models, while companies like Amazon and Google slashed thousands of jobs even as they pushed people back into buildings. In January 2025, Amazon targeted 14,000 managerial positions for elimination shortly after its RTO policy rollout. Meanwhile, leaders cited 'culture restoration' while morale tanked and attrition soared. When the people still getting results from home are the same ones being told to 'show commitment', the message becomes clear: it's not about performance. It's about presence and who gets to enforce it. Returning to the office is costly and the bill isn't paid by the executives. Workers who moved to affordable areas during lockdowns now face long commutes, higher fuel costs, and childcare disruptions just to sit in open-plan silence and take Zoom calls they could've done from home. Dublin rents are among the highest in Europe, with some counties reporting fewer than 50 affordable HAP units in total. The Simon Community's 2025 housing snapshot showed systemic undersupply across key Irish cities. For workers, the message is: subsidise the real estate contracts your employer signed in 2017 or risk being labeled 'non-collaborative.' That's not strategy. That's displacement policy in corporate packaging. At the same time, surveillance is spreading under the guise of productivity. From keystroke tracking to badge swipe audits, companies now monitor everything from meeting engagement to emotional tone. Axios and AI Now have detailed how AI-driven oversight tools are reshaping the workplace into a lab experiment with dashboards. Employees are told to bring their 'authentic selves' to work—but only if that self is camera-ready, always-on, and smiling for the engagement score. Trust has been replaced by telemetry. And the ones most exhausted by it are the ones being asked to prove themselves daily just by showing up. This isn't just about friction. It's about legacy leadership colliding with a workforce raised on outcomes, not optics. Gen Z and millennial workers don't equate facetime with effectiveness. They've grown up building in distributed environments where deliverables not desk hours are what matter. And while IT departments are designing global infrastructure for asynchronous, cross-time-zone work, executives are still measuring productivity by who's in the lift before 9am. That's not a policy gap, it's a values gap. People aren't quitting because they're disengaged. They're leaving because they've been gaslit into believing their best work only counts if it's performed under fluorescent lighting. The smartest workers are already spreadsheeting their exits, scanning visa options like Canada's Express Entry, Portugal's D7, or the Netherlands' highly skilled migrant programs. They're not running: they're reallocating. Because they've realised something leadership hasn't: proximity is not proof of commitment. And no one's commuting two hours a day to prove they can be trusted to do what they've already done for years. If your ability to manage depends on watching people sit at desks, you're not managing. You're supervising. And supervision is no longer worth the petrol. Not when real work happens in GitHub commits, Airtable dashboards, async feedback loops, and global collaboration channels that never needed a badge scan to begin with. The office didn't die. It just lost its monopoly. And workers aren't coming back to rebuild what's already been replaced. This isn't culture. It's regression. It's a last-ditch attempt to recentralize power in a workforce that's already outgrown it. And as teams quietly update their LinkedIn profiles and explore contracts in cities they've never visited, it's clear who's adapting and who's clinging to an era that no longer fits the work. Trust is the new currency. And those who don't invest in it are about to find out just how expensive nostalgia really is.

Irish prison overcrowding is now at 'crisis' level
Irish prison overcrowding is now at 'crisis' level

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Irish prison overcrowding is now at 'crisis' level

Irish prisons are entering 'unthinkable territory' and may have to use recreation halls and even classrooms to house inmates. The Prison Officers Association (POA) and senior prison sources have told the Irish Examiner that there may be 'no option' given that all physical spaces have been used up with bunk beds and mattresses on floors. The only alternatives are seen as politically toxic, such as expanding temporary release rules to include sex offenders or the 'mass discounting' of sentences. The other possibility would mean reintroducing 'inhumane and degrading' conditions in jails by reopening the condemned old Cork Prison or using E Block in Portlaoise Prison, where there are no toilets in cells, and have inmates use buckets. 860 more inmates than prisons can hold The latest Irish Prison Service (IPS) figures show there are 5,528 inmates in custody, almost 860 more than the maximum prisons can hold. Over 500 more prisoners are in jail today than at the start of this year. In January, the Department of Justice warned justice minister Jim O'Callaghan that prison numbers, at that stage, created 'very great risks' for both staff and prisoners. Some prison sources estimate that if the rate of increase in the first half of 2025 continues, numbers could approach 6,000 by year's end. Dóchas women's prison and Cork Prison are seeing the biggest rise in custody numbers this year. Cork Prison: Every cell doubled up Every cell in Cork is doubled up but it still has almost 90 inmates sleeping on mattresses on the floor, accounting for almost a quarter of all prisoners in the jail. Cork Prison is, by some distance, the most dependent on mattresses of all the Irish jails. 'We said 4,300 was the maximum number that could be housed in our prisons, and passing 5,000 was a tipping point,' POA deputy general secretary Gabriel Keaveny said. 'But we have gone way over that and have increased by a further 500 already this year. We are now getting into unthinkable territory. Are we going to have to open recreation halls and schools to house prisoners as there is, physically, nowhere else?' A senior source said there is 'no option' but to consider changing prison regulations to certify recreation halls as suitable for accommodation. 'Every committal prison is absolutely at saturation point. There is no more space for bunk beds or mattresses,' the source said. The final week of the courts this week, before the summer break, is expected to be busy and prison bosses are said to be concerned about where to house committals and remands. An analysis of IPS figures on July 17, compared to January 10, shows: Total number in custody is now 119% above bed capacity, compared to 111%; The most overcrowded prisons are Limerick female (154%), Dóchas (138%), and Cork (133%); The rate of increase this year is greatest in Dóchas (+19%), Cork (+17%), Portlaoise (+16%), Castlerea (+15%), and Mountjoy (+11%); There are 201 inmates in Dóchas, which has a capacity of 146, and 393 prisoners in Cork, with a capacity of 296; Some 457 inmates are sleeping on mattresses on floors, up 38%, from 356 on April 28 (when IPS started publishing mattress figures); Since then, mattress use has more than doubled in Cork (42 to 87) and Cloverhill Remand Prison (33 to 70), and almost doubled in Midlands (46 to 82) and Castlerea (27 to 50). Dóchas 'in a shocking state' 'Dóchas is in a shocking state,' Mr Keaveny said. 'Cloverhill is so packed they are sending remand prisoners to Wheatfield, in Cork Prison every cell is doubled up and you still have 90 on mattresses, in Mountjoy the single cells are small and only suitable for one person but you have two people crammed in.' He said warm weather is the worst scenario, with the heat in cells and the 'shocking ventilation' with little fresh air getting in. 'Where overcrowding prevails, drug abuse increases and you have more rows and debts and when we intervene we are assaulted,' he said. 'The fact that something really serious in prisons hasn't happened is pure chance.' He added: 'We need 1,200 spaces rapid but we are five years away from the bulk of the promised spaces.' He repeated POA requests to open the old military prison in the Curragh, which he said could take 100 prisoners and open, with refurbishment, the E block in Portlaoise, which could take 200 prisoners. The original IPS capital plan was expected to create 1,100 extra spaces by 2030/31 but Mr O'Callaghan said last week the renewed plan had the potential to deliver 1,595 spaces, including through the redevelopment of the old Cork Prison and a prison at Thorton Hall. The justice minister recently secured Cabinet agreement to accelerate the delivery of 960 of the additional spaces in Castlerea, Midlands, Wheatfield, and Mountjoy. He said that 'subject to the necessary funding' in the National Development Plan, this should speed up delivery by 12 to 18 months.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store