
Bihar Opposition Party RJD Challenges Poll Roll Revision In Supreme Court
Tejashwi Yadav's Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) approached the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission order on revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, a state set to go to polls later this year. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal will appear for the RJD in the case and has requested an early hearing on Monday.
On June 24, the poll body issued instructions to carry out the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar to ensure only eligible citizens can vote. It said the exercise was necessitated by rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths, and inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants. The EC added that it will scrupulously adhere to the constitutional and legal provisions in revising electoral rolls.
The plea by the party's Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Jha is the latest among a chorus of political voices opposing the poll body's order to conduct the exercise that will entail preparation of a draft list containing the names of existing voters whose enumeration forms were received.
Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra alleged that the order for SIR of electoral rolls was intended to deprive the bonafide young electorate from voting in this year's polling, and the panel's next target would be West Bengal. Challenging the order in the Supreme Court, she said the order will disable lakhs of voters born between July 1, 1987 and December 2, 2004 from voting, helping the BJP at the Centre. Her party's chief and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had earlier called the EC order a "diabolical game plan".
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said Bihar's voters of the state would teach the saffron party a lesson for its attack on democracy and the Constitution, claiming that nearly eight crore people will suffer because of the exercise. The INDI alliance has also decided to flag the issue in the state on July 9 as part of a nationwide strike called by Left-leaning trade unions.
Mr Jha's party colleague Tejashwi Jha had earlier questioned why the exercise was being carried out only in Bihar, unlike the previous country-wide revision in 2003.
Several civil society organisations such as PUCL and the Association of Democratic Reforms, and activists like Yogendra Yadav have also approached the Supreme Court against the direction to conduct SIR.
The BJP-led NDA defended the exercise, accusing the opposition of trying to come up with an "excuse ahead of a certain defeat in elections".
The Election Commission on Sunday said the first phase of the exercise had been completed smoothly in Bihar, debunking claims that the process was being manipulated in favour of the ruling dispensation. "It is reiterated that SIR is being conducted as per the SIR instructions dated June 24, 2025, and there is no change in the instructions," it said. The poll body also elaborated upon the process being undertaken as part of the SIR exercise, which includes house-to-house visits, taking live photographs and assisting electors with form submissions.
Electors have been given time till July 25 to submit their documents and the draft electoral rolls will be issued on August 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
16 minutes ago
- The Print
‘Arbitrary, to be replicated in Bengal.' What pleas by ADR, Mahua challenging EC's Bihar exercise say
While Moitra argued this was a violation of the right(s) to equality, freedom of speech and expression and life, Yadav also termed the decision 'manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of electoral laws'. The origins of this case lie in a June 24 decision of the ECI, which directed the state election commission to conduct a special intensive revision of the electoral polls in Bihar. New Delhi: Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra and Bharat Jodo Abhiyan national convener Yogendra Yadav, among others, have moved the Supreme Court against the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, saying that a similar second revision of the voters list can be replicated in the state of West Bengal, in a similar fashion. 'It is submitted that it is for the very first time in the country that such an exercise is being conducted by the ECI, where electors whose names are already there in electoral rolls and who have already voted multiple times in are being asked to prove their eligibility,' Moitra's petition contended. Apart from this, similar petitions have been filed by non-profit organisations Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL). Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) MP Manoj Jha has also filed a similar petition before the top court. ADR's petition, which has been filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan, also mentions alleged lack of due process and an 'unreasonably short timeline' for the revision exercise to take place, while adding that it could result in the removal of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement. 'ECI has issued unreasonable and impractical timeline to conduct SIR in Bihar with close proximity to state elections which are due in November 2025. There are lakhs of citizens who do not possess the documents as required under the SIR order, there are many who may be able to procure the documents but the short timeline mentioned in the directive may preclude them from being able to supply the same within the time period,' it argued. Also Read: 'Worst attack' on Constitution, says Oppn after meeting EC over voter verification drive in Bihar Mahua Moitra's petition In her petition, Moitra also argued that the ECI's move violated provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and Articles 325 and 326 of the Constitution which state that no one can be ineligible for inclusion in a special electoral roll on grounds of religion, race, caste or sex, and mandate universal adult franchise for all. By way of her petition filed through advocate Neha Rathi, Moitra said she has information that the '(SIR) exercise is stated to be replicated in West Bengal from August 2025 for which instructions have already been given'. Saying that such a revision of electoral rolls is a direct threat to democratic rights, Moitra's petition argued that the electoral body was acting at the behest of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and was attempting to disenfranchise millions of voters, especially migrants and the economically disadvantaged. If not set aside, the order can lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters in the country and undermining of democracy and free and fair elections in the country, Moitra said while adding that the ECI must be restrained from issuing similar orders in other states too. Yogendra Yadav's petition By way of his PIL, Yadav challenged the ECI's special exercise in Bihar, saying it violated Section 22 of the RP Act, and Rule 21-A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, since both laws require procedural safeguards before deletion of names. Section 22 of the 1950 Act, outlines the process for correcting, transposing, or deleting entries in electoral rolls. It states that the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) is allowed to make changes to electoral rolls, either on an application or on their own motion, after an inquiry. However, such changes can be made only if an entry is erroneous, or there is a change of residence within the constituency, or requires deletion in case of someone's death. On the other hand, Rule 21-A talks about the process of including names which have inadvertently or erroneously been omitted due to some The ECI order ECI's June 26 order directing that an SIR be conducted requires the inclusion or retention of a voter's name in the electoral roll upon producing citizenship documents, like citizenship proof from either or both parents. If a voter cannot furnish this, they run the risk of exclusion. Moitra said this violates Article 326, which grants universal adult franchise to all persons, and introduces extraneous requirements which are not originally envisaged under the RP Act, 1950. The order arbitrarily excludes commonly accepted identity documents such as Aadhaar and ration cards from the list of accepted documents, which puts a 'huge burden' on the voters who are at a risk of getting disenfranchised, the petition said. It also pointed to current field reports from the state of Bihar that confirm that lakhs of residents across rural and marginalised areas in Bihar are at an imminent risk of disenfranchisement due to these stringent and unreasonable requirements. (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: ECI's voter verification drive in Bihar is tailor-made to keep Dalits, Muslims, EBCs out


The Print
16 minutes ago
- The Print
LJP (RV) chief and Union Minister Chirag Paswan to contest upcoming Bihar polls
Earlier today, Paswan had carried out the 'Nav-Sankalp Mahasabha' from Chhapra to Nav Bihar, starting at the Rajendra Stadium in Chhapra. He said, 'Today, from this sacred land of Saran, I am declaring before all of you that yes, I will contest the election. I will contest the election for the people of Bihar, for my brothers, for my mothers, for my sisters, and we will create a system in Bihar, we will build a Bihar that will truly take the state forward on the path of development.' While hitting out at the Congress and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) over comprising the development of the state, he added, 'In the coming days, regarding the inheritance tax, the way Congress, RJD, and all their allies think about taxing the property that belongs to you generation after generation. The people who talk about development in Bihar today are the same opposition leaders who had ruined Bihar in the 90.' However, the Union Minister, while reacting over the murder of businessman Gopal Khema, expressed worry over the 'rising crime' and the 'collapse of law and order' in the state, and urged for putting pressure on the state government to bring the perpetrators to justice. 'It is a matter of worry the way crime has risen and law and order has collapsed in Bihar. If such an incident has happened in a posh locality of Patna, then we can only imagine what is happening in villages. It is worrying to see such incidents occur under a government that was known for good governance; then the opposition will have a chance to speak up. Strict action needs to be taken to set a precedent so that such a thing is not repeated,' Paswan told mediapersons here. On July 4, businessman Gopal Khemka was allegedly shot dead near his residence in the south area of the Gandhi Maidan in Patna. Following the incident, Bihar Police has formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the murder case. The murder has evoked sharp political reactions from the opposition parties and put the spotlight back on the law and order situation in the state. LJP (Ram Vilas) is part of the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), with Janata Dal (United) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). LJP is expected to keep on allying with the NDA for the upcoming Bihar polls, however Paswan has not yet confirmed his stance on it. (ANI) This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also Read: What Ram Vilas Paswan did to Lalu in 2005 must haunt Nitish in 2025 as Chirag enters poll fray


The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Cong. demands judicial probe into Haryana recruitment of assistant professors by HPSC
Alleging large-scale irregularities in the recruitment process for assistant professors in various subjects in Haryana, Congress Rajya Sabha member Randeep Surjewala on Sunday demanded that the exams be conducted again in a transparent manner and judicial probe initiated into the matter. A delegation of candidates also submitted a memorandum to former Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda at his Delhi residence in this connection. Haryana Chief Minister's media secretary Praveen Attrey denied the allegations as 'baseless', saying that Mr. Surjewala had made similar accusations over half-a-dozen times since the BJP first came to power in 2014 and was 'frustrated' over the people voting the party to power for the third time in a row. Mr. Surjewala, at a press conference in Hisar, alleged irregularities in the exam for the recruitment of assistant professors (Geography) saying that 32 questions for the exam conducted by the Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC) were taken from the question paper for geography conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission. The HPSC had advertised 2,424 posts for assistant professors in 26 subjects in August last year and around 1.5 lakh candidates had applied for it. The posts were advertised after a gap of around five years. 'Seals broken' Mr. Surjewala said seals of envelopes carrying question papers for assistant professor (Hindi) exam were found broken at six centres and the HPSC had to cancel the exam two days later. The HPSC initially maintained that the process was not compromised, but later cancelled the exam, which was the 'biggest proof of scam', alleged Mr. Surjewala. Addressing the delegation of the candidates appearing for the Assistant Professor exam, Mr. Hooda said that 'paper leaks, copy-paste exams and scams have become synonymous with the recruitments conducted under the BJP government'.