MTN hits back at US congresswoman's accusations of complicity in terror financing
A fresh volley has been fired at the MTN Group from the US, and this time it comes with congressional weight and accusations that go all the way up to the Union Buildings.
Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, House Republican Conference Chair, has written to Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon), calling for a sweeping investigation into the bank's relationship with MTN, citing 'deeply troubling and well-documented concerns' about the telecom giant's links to Iran, Hamas and, somehow, Cyril Ramaphosa's wallet.
Stefanik's four-pronged call to action includes asking BNY Mellon to halt its role as MTN's American Depository Receipt (ADR) sponsor, cooperate with US authorities investigating MTN's alleged violations of sanctions, and 'review and disclose' the full extent of its involvement with MTN and its Iranian affiliates.
Her letter singles out a pending lawsuit in the Eastern District of New York, Zobay v MTN, which accuses the company of financing terrorism under the US Anti-Terrorism Act. Stefanik claims 'significant legal precedent confirming MTN's complicity' already exists — which MTN flatly rejects.
MTN hits back
MTN's chief sustainability and corporate affairs officer, Nompilo Morafo, said: 'So yes, since 2011, our process of issuance and cancellations of ADRs has always been held by the Bank of New York Mellon. They hold about 0.3% of MTN Group's total issued capital at this point of the ADRs.'
Morafo said Stefanik's claims about the Zobay case were 'incorrect' and 'not factual,' pointing out that 'the anti-terrorism case of MTN at this point is at the stage where parties have exchanged evidence and the factual allegations have not been tested in court'.
The company's official holding statement adds that 'The New York court has not confirmed MTN Group's complicity in anything and no final ruling has been made on the matter.' The statement also expresses 'deep sympathy for those who have been injured or lost loved ones as a result of the tragic conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan'.
'No operational control' in Iran
Morafo also refuted the allegations against Ramaphosa, who chaired MTN two decades ago (the chairperson is a non-executive role).
'The current South African President served as the chairman of MTN Group 20 years ago. He resigned from the directorship in May 2013. Any suggestions that he improperly benefited from his time at MTN are false in our view and misleading,' said Morafo.
And Iran? Morafo insisted MTN has a hands-off role in that country.
'The fact of the matter is that we are minority shareholders [41%] of Irancell. We don't have operating control,' she said.
The holding statement backs her up: 'Since the new sanctions regime was implemented [in 2018], we have not deployed any capital into the business and have not extracted capital or dividends.'
Fighting on home soil
The Zobay litigation — first filed in 2022 — continues to crawl through the US court system. While the court has allowed it to proceed, the substance of the claims remains sealed, and no judicial ruling has yet linked MTN to terror financing.
That, however, hasn't stopped US legislators from leaning on reputational pressure points like BNY Mellon to sever ties.
MTN, for its part, says it is 'committed to respecting and protecting human rights' and that its strategy is to 'lead digital solutions for Africa's progress'. In 2020, the company board declared it would 'simplify its portfolio' and focus on its pan-African strategy.
There's also the Turkcell litigation being heard in South African courts to keep an eye on. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
31 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Iran strike: Another fuel crisis looming?
Sharp curbs on exports reminiscent of 1973 may follow. Participants shout slogans during an anti-war demonstration in Boston, Massachusetts, on 22 June 2025, protesting US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Picture: Joseph Prezioso / AFP Will the history of just over 50 years ago repeat itself in the form of another Middle East oil boycott or shortage, following the US intervention in the war between Israel and Iran? That's the question consumers – and especially motorists – as well as experts are pondering in the wake of the weekend air strikes by American bombers of Iran's nuclear facilities. In 1973, the Arab-Israeli war saw the Arab-dominated Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries putting in place sharp curbs on exports. This not only forced a massive rise in fuel prices, but saw many countries in the West hit by sudden fuel shortages. Drastic steps taken in SA during fuel shortage In South Africa, the government took drastic steps, including lowering the national speed limit from 120km/h to 80km/h and banning fuel sales after hours and over weekends. The trauma of that fuel shortage led directly to the then National Party government establishing a Strategic Fuel Reserve for the country. ALSO READ: Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond? Economist Dawie Roodt said SA can expect some more clarity on what exactly to expect in the days to come. 'We will have to wait and see,' he said, adding it might affect petrol prices and inflation rate and weaken the rand. 'This could be quite a thing for South Africa. It just depends on how long it goes on and how serious it is,' he said. Senior political lecturer at North-West University Dr Benjamin Rapanyane said conflicts like this one have a way of disrupting international peace and the flow of trade. 'The worst-case scenario would be the disruptions of shipments in the Strait of Hormuz. This may have a devastating impact on Africa in general and South Africa in particular,' he said. ALSO READ: US joins Israel-Iran conflict with overnight bombing campaign Political analyst Piet Croucamp said it could mean nothing or something. 'Nothing in the sense of let's stay out of it, which is hardly possible given the court case SA has against Israel,' he said. 'There's a universal condemnation of Israel for what they have been doing in Gaza and also the attack on Iran, which is against the United Nations resolutions.' Croucamp said it might be hard for SA to stay out of it. 'So many people around the world are concerned about the consequences of what is being done to Iran, but we are also concerned about Gaza,' he said. 'We dare not shut up. We have to say something. Not from a moral high ground because we cannot afford that, too, but it doesn't mean that we don't get to say something.' ALSO READ: What Israel–Iran conflict means for South African economy Political analyst Roland Henwood said there were no immediate implications. 'Indirectly, it will depend on how the situation develops. Politically, the reaction from SA, Brics and other international organisations and governments will be important to follow,' he said. 'If SA reacts very strongly against America and in favour of Iran, it may have negative political consequences. Other outcomes will include the effects of increased oil prices.' Henwood said this may have short-term or long-term implications for the country. 'So far, the reactions from the rest of the world have been rather muted. We will have to see how this situation develops,' he added.
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Iran weighs retaliation against US for strikes on nuclear sites
Iran and Israel traded air and missile strikes as the world braced on Monday for Tehran's response to the US attack on its nuclear sites and US President Donald Trump raised the idea of regime change in the Islamic republic. Iran vowed to defend itself on Sunday, a day after the US joined Israel in the biggest Western military action against the country since its 1979 Islamic Revolution, despite calls for restraint and a return to diplomacy from around the world. Commercial satellite imagery indicated the US attack on Saturday on Iran's subterranean Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged or destroyed the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it housed, but the status of the site remained unconfirmed, experts said. In his latest social media comments on the US strikes, Trump said 'monumental damage was done to all nuclear sites in Iran'. 'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. Trump earlier called on Iran to forgo any retaliation and said the government 'must make peace' or 'future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier'. The US launched 75 precision-guided munitions including bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles against three Iranian nuclear sites, chair of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Dan Caine, told reporters. The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the US strikes. Rafael Grossi, the agency's director-general, told CNN it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source told Reuters most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim. Tehran, which denies its nuclear programme is for anything other than peaceful purposes, sent a volley of missiles at Israel in the aftermath of the US attack, wounding scores of people and destroying buildings in Tel Aviv. However, it had not acted on its main threats of retaliation, to target US bases or choke off oil shipments that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Attempting to strangle Gulf oil supply by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite conflict with the US navy's massive fifth fleet based in the Gulf. Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January. Brent crude futures LCOc1 rose $1.88 (R33.84) or 2.44% at $78.89 (R1.420) a barrel as of 11.22 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate crude CLc1 advanced $1.87 (R33.66) or 2.53% at $75.71 (R1,363). Iran's parliament has approved a move to close the strait, which Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's press TV said closing the strait would require approval from the supreme national security council, a body led by an appointee of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Caine said the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The US state department issued a security alert for all US citizens abroad, calling on them to 'exercise increased caution'. The US has a sizeable force in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops and warships that can shoot down enemy missiles. The Israeli military reported a missile launch from Iran in the early hours on Monday, saying it was intercepted by Israeli defences. Air raid sirens blared in Tel Aviv and other parts of central Israel. Iran has repeatedly targeted Greater Tel Aviv, a metropolitan area of around 4-million people and the business and economic hub of Israel where there are also critical military assets. Iranian news agencies reported air defences were activated in central Tehran districts to counter 'enemy targets', and that Israeli air strikes hit Parchin, the location of a military complex southeast of the capital. In a post to the Truth Social platform on Sunday, Trump raised the idea of regime change in Iran. 'It's not politically correct to use the term 'regime change', but if the Iranian Regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change? MIGA,' he wrote. Trump's post came after officials in his administration, including vice president JD Vance and defence secretary Pete Hegseth, stressed they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. Israeli officials, who began the hostilities with a surprise attack on Iran on June 13, have increasingly spoken of their ambition to topple the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi is expected to hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Monday. The Kremlin has a strategic partnership with Iran, but also close links with Israel. Speaking in Istanbul on Sunday, Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses and there would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated. Russia's foreign ministry condemned the US attacks, which it said had undermined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. 'The risk of the conflict spreading in the Middle East, which is gripped by many crises, has increased significantly,' it said. The UN Security Council met on Sunday to discuss the US strikes as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres told the council the US bombings in Iran marked a perilous turn in the region and urged a return to negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
UN Security Council meets on Iran as Russia, China push for a ceasefire
'The bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States marks a perilous turn,' U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the Security Council on Sunday. 'We must act – immediately and decisively – to halt the fighting and return to serious, sustained negotiations on the Iran nuclear programme.' The world awaited Iran's response on Sunday after President Donald Trump said the U.S. had 'obliterated' Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. Russia and China condemned the U.S. strikes. 'Peace in the Middle East cannot be achieved by the use of force,' said China's U.N. Ambassador Fu Cong. 'Diplomatic means to address the Iranian nuclear issue haven't been exhausted, and there's still hope for a peaceful solution.' But acting U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Dorothy Shea told the council the time had come for Washington to act decisively, urging the Security Council to call upon Iran to end its effort to eradicate Israel and terminate its drive for nuclear weapons. 'Iran long obfuscated its nuclear weapons program and stonewalled our good-faith efforts in recent negotiations,' she said. 'The Iranian regime cannot have a nuclear weapon.' Russia's U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia recalled former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell making the case at the U.N. Security Council in 2003 that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein constituted an imminent danger to the world because of the country's stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons. 'Again we're being asked to believe the U.S.'s fairy tales, to once again inflict suffering on millions of people living in the Middle East. This cements our conviction that history has taught our U.S. colleagues nothing,' he said. COST OF INACTION 'CATASTROPHIC' Iran requested the U.N. Security Council meeting on Sunday. Iran's U.N. Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani accused Israel and the U.S. of destroying diplomacy, said all U.S. allegations are unfounded and that the nuclear non-proliferation treaty 'has been manipulated into a political weapon.' 'Instead of guaranteeing parties' legitimate rights to peaceful nuclear energy, it has been exploited as a pretext for aggression and unlawful action that jeopardize the supreme interests of my country,' Iravani told the council. Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon praised the U.S. for taking action against Iran, saying: 'This is what the last line of defense looks like when every other line has failed.' He accused Iran of using negotiations over its nuclear programme as camouflage to buy time to build missiles and enrich uranium. 'The cost of inaction would have been catastrophic. A nuclear Iran would have been a death sentence just as much for you as it would have been for us,' he told the council. It was not immediately clear when the council could vote on the draft resolution. Russia, China and Pakistan have asked council members to share their comments by Monday evening. A resolution needs at least nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the U.S., France, Britain, Russia or China to pass. The U.S. is likely to oppose the draft resolution, seen by Reuters, which also condemns attacks on Iran's nuclear sites and facilities. The text does not name the United States or Israel. 'Military action alone cannot bring a durable solution to concerns about Iran's nuclear program,' Britain's U.N. Ambassador Barbara Woodward told the council. 'We urge Iran now to show restraint, and we urge all parties to return to the negotiating table and find a diplomatic solution which stops further escalation and brings this crisis to an end.' U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said that while craters were visible at Iran's enrichment site buried into a mountain at Fordow, 'no one – including the IAEA – is in a position to assess the underground damage.' Grossi told the Security Council that entrances to tunnels used for the storage of enriched material appear to have been hit at Iran's sprawling Isfahan nuclear complex, while the fuel enrichment plant at Natanz has been struck again. 'Iran has informed the IAEA there has been no increase in off-site radiation levels at all three sites,' said Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency.
