logo
Iran strike: Another fuel crisis looming?

Iran strike: Another fuel crisis looming?

The Citizen4 hours ago

Sharp curbs on exports reminiscent of 1973 may follow.
Participants shout slogans during an anti-war demonstration in Boston, Massachusetts, on 22 June 2025, protesting US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Picture: Joseph Prezioso / AFP
Will the history of just over 50 years ago repeat itself in the form of another Middle East oil boycott or shortage, following the US intervention in the war between Israel and Iran?
That's the question consumers – and especially motorists – as well as experts are pondering in the wake of the weekend air strikes by American bombers of Iran's nuclear facilities.
In 1973, the Arab-Israeli war saw the Arab-dominated Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries putting in place sharp curbs on exports. This not only forced a massive rise in fuel prices, but saw many countries in the West hit by sudden fuel shortages.
Drastic steps taken in SA during fuel shortage
In South Africa, the government took drastic steps, including lowering the national speed limit from 120km/h to 80km/h and banning fuel sales after hours and over weekends.
The trauma of that fuel shortage led directly to the then National Party government establishing a Strategic Fuel Reserve for the country.
ALSO READ: Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond?
Economist Dawie Roodt said SA can expect some more clarity on what exactly to expect in the days to come.
'We will have to wait and see,' he said, adding it might affect petrol prices and inflation rate and weaken the rand.
'This could be quite a thing for South Africa. It just depends on how long it goes on and how serious it is,' he said.
Senior political lecturer at North-West University Dr Benjamin Rapanyane said conflicts like this one have a way of disrupting international peace and the flow of trade.
'The worst-case scenario would be the disruptions of shipments in the Strait of Hormuz. This may have a devastating impact on Africa in general and South Africa in particular,' he said.
ALSO READ: US joins Israel-Iran conflict with overnight bombing campaign
Political analyst Piet Croucamp said it could mean nothing or something. 'Nothing in the sense of let's stay out of it, which is hardly possible given the court case SA has against Israel,' he said. 'There's a universal condemnation of Israel for what they have been doing in Gaza and also the attack on Iran, which is against the United Nations resolutions.'
Croucamp said it might be hard for SA to stay out of it.
'So many people around the world are concerned about the consequences of what is being done to Iran, but we are also concerned about Gaza,' he said. 'We dare not shut up. We have to say something. Not from a moral high ground because we cannot afford that, too, but it doesn't mean that we don't get to say something.'
ALSO READ: What Israel–Iran conflict means for South African economy
Political analyst Roland Henwood said there were no immediate implications.
'Indirectly, it will depend on how the situation develops. Politically, the reaction from SA, Brics and other international organisations and governments will be important to follow,' he said. 'If SA reacts very strongly against America and in favour of Iran, it may have negative political consequences. Other outcomes will include the effects of increased oil prices.'
Henwood said this may have short-term or long-term implications for the country. 'So far, the reactions from the rest of the world have been rather muted. We will have to see how this situation develops,' he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US warns against retaliation by Iran as Trump raises ‘regime change'
US warns against retaliation by Iran as Trump raises ‘regime change'

TimesLIVE

timean hour ago

  • TimesLIVE

US warns against retaliation by Iran as Trump raises ‘regime change'

Caine said the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The US has a sizeable force in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops in the region, including air defence systems, fighter aircraft and warships that can detect and shoot down enemy missiles. Reuters reported last week the Pentagon had started to move some aircraft and ships from bases in the Middle East that may be vulnerable to a potential Iranian attack. With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch foe, Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid — intervene militarily in a major foreign war. There were sporadic anti-war demonstrations on Sunday afternoon in some US cities, including New York City and Washington. It was unclear why Trump chose to act on Saturday. At the press conference, Hegseth said there was a moment in time when Trump 'realised it had to be a certain action taken to minimise the threat to us and our troops'. After Trump disputed her original assessment, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday said the US had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months, an assessment disputed by some lawmakers and independent experts. US officials said they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb. US secretary of state Marco Rubio, asked on CBS' Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan whether the US saw intelligence that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had ordered nuclear weaponisation, said: 'That's irrelevant.' Hegseth, who said the Pentagon notified lawmakers about the operation after US aircraft were out of Iran, said the strikes against Iran were not open-ended. Rubio also said no more strikes were planned, unless Iran responded, telling CBS: 'We have other targets we can hit, but we achieved our objective. There are no planned military operations right now against Iran, unless they mess around.'

US strikes on Iran escalate tensions in the Middle East
US strikes on Iran escalate tensions in the Middle East

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

US strikes on Iran escalate tensions in the Middle East

Smoke rises above buildings in Tehran following an Israeli strike. Image: AFP THE US's surprise strikes on Iran at the weekend threaten to deepen the conflict in the Middle East after Israel also launched its own bombing campaign against Iran, with Tehran vowing to retaliate against US involvement. In response to the US attack, Iran's armed forces said they targeted multiple sites in Israel including Ben Gurion airport, the country's main international gateway near Tel Aviv. Israeli rescuers said at least 23 people were wounded. Iran's Huthi allies in Yemen repeated their threat on Sunday to resume attacks in the Red Sea if Washington joined the war, saying they were ready to target US ships and military warships. This was after President Donald Trump claimed total success for the operation in an address to the nation just hours after the attack, and Vice President JD Vance followed up on Sunday morning. "We know that we set the Iranian nuclear program back substantially last night, whether it's years or beyond," he told ABC. "We're not at war with Iran -- we're at war with Iran's nuclear program," he added. "The president took decisive action to destroy that program last night." Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency said it had not detected any increase in radiation levels at the nuclear sites and Tehran said on Sunday there were no signs of contamination. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the US strikes, saying Trump's decision to "target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history." The Israeli military was also checking the results of the US raid on the deeply buried nuclear facility in Fordo, with a spokesperson saying it was "too soon" to know if Iran had removed enriched uranium from the site. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Trump "seeks peace, and Iran should take that path. "This mission was not, and has not been, about regime change." "We devastated the Iranian nuclear program," Hegseth told a Pentagon press briefing, adding that the operation "did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people." Standing beside Hegseth, top US general Dan Caine said that "it would be way too early for me to comment on what may or may not still be there." "Initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," he told reporters. The main US strike group was seven B-2 Spirit bombers flying 18 hours from the US mainland to Iran with multiple aerial refuelings, Caine said. People gathered in the center of Tehran to protest against US and Israeli attacks, waving flags and chanting slogans, state TV showed.

Escalating tensions threaten global oil supplies amidst US strikes on Iran
Escalating tensions threaten global oil supplies amidst US strikes on Iran

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Escalating tensions threaten global oil supplies amidst US strikes on Iran

There has been major concern about international oil prices and supply following news breaking on Sunday that the United States had attacked three major nuclear sites in Iran Image: AFP Concerns about international oil prices and global supply chains surged on Sunday following the United States' military strike on three major nuclear sites in Iran. This move, which has escalated ongoing tensions in the Middle East, comes less than two weeks after Iran and Israel reignited hostilities. Analysts on Sunday warned that the fallout from these attacks could have dire implications for the global economy. In a recent televised address, US President Donald Trump described the airstrikes as a "spectacular military success," proclaiming that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities—located in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—have been "completely and totally obliterated." Of biggest concern now is that Iran is mulling the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway at the mouth of the Persian Gulf controlled by Iran, which is now in the centre of global supply chain as it handles more than 26% of the world's oil trade. According to reports, there are currently close to 50 large oil tankers scrambling to leave the Strait of Hormuz. Nigel Green, CEO of financial advisory giant deVere Group, said a conflict that had remained largely contained was now threatening to trigger broad-based repricing across the global economy. Green added that Brent crude had already been climbing steadily in recent weeks, but the decision to target Iranian nuclear facilities has dramatically increased fears of retaliation and disruption. 'Any closure or threat to the Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 20% of the world's oil flows, would send prices sharply higher.' Brent crude oil futures rose 0.7% on Sunday above $77 per barrel, a third consecutive weekly gain as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East escalated. Green said that some analysts now warn that crude could spike toward $130 per barrel, depending on Iran's next move. 'Such a price shock would filter through to global inflation, which remains elevated and/or sticky in many regions. Market participants had been pricing in rate cuts from central banks, including the Federal Reserve, in the second half of the year.' Momentum Investments chief economist, Sanisha Packirisamy, said although South Africa mostly imports its oil from Angola, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia (with very little to no direct reliance on Iran), a blockage of the Strait of Hormuz could negatively affect the international price of oil given that between 25% and 30% of global oil supply passes through this Strait. 'As such, higher international oil prices, in the event of a shutdown of the Strait, could result in higher transport prices for South Africans. Moreover, a shutdown of the Strait would trigger a major risk-off event in markets and it is likely that the rand would sell off in that scenario, adding to domestic inflationary pressures,' she said. 'South Africa's oil reserves would likely be insufficient to cover a significant and prolonged supply disruption in the Middle East. In an extreme case, South Africa could ration fuel and prioritise essential sectors to stretch reserves, while securing emergency imports and pivoting to new suppliers.' Professor Irrshad Kaseeram from the University of Zululand's economics department said the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could have significant global economic repercussions; high production costs and increasing inflation, forcing central banks to delay interest rate reductions. 'Thus, any disruptions extending to transit/supply routes involving the Straits of Hormuz, where 20% of global oil supply passes through, are significant,' he said. 'Although Saudi Arabia has a stockpile of oil reserves and sufficient spare capacity to ensure continued supply in the short term, a prolonged war or a continued blockade of the Straits of Hormuz is very likely to push oil prices beyond $100 a barrel.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store