Delegation of Apni Party meets J&K L-G Sinha
In the meeting several issues related to J&K were discussed, especially in the backdrop of Pahalgam attack and recent India Pakistan confrontation and Operation Sindoor.
The delegation, comprising of senior leaders, highlighted various issues of public importance, including welfare of families affected due to Pak shelling, promotion of tourism sector and strengthening of disaster management mechanism.
'We discussed range of issues about political and security situation in J&K with Lt governor today,' said Rafi Ahmad Mir, chief spokesman of Apni Party. He said the delegation also discussed important matters pertaining to the smooth conduct of Muharram.
Sinha, the government spokesman said, assured the delegation that appropriate action will be taken to address the issues projected by them during the interaction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
16 BSF personnel awarded gallantry medals for Operation Sindoor
Sixteen Border Security Force (BSF) personnel have been awarded gallantry medals for their exceptional bravery during Operation Sindoor, in which they shot down enemy drones, rescued injured comrades, supplied ammunition under fire, destroyed Pakistani posts and surveillance equipment along the border. Among the awardees are five personnel deployed at the sensitive Kharkhola border outpost in Jammu. (BSF Facebook photo) The citation shared by the government showed the acts of the personnel during Operation Sindoor - India's successful response to the Pakistan-sponsored April 23 terror attack in Pahalgam. Among the awardees are five personnel deployed at the sensitive Kharkhola border outpost in Jammu. According to the citation, six personnel—Assistant Commandant Abhishek Srivastav, Head Constable Brij Mohan Singh, and Constables Bhupendra Bajpai, Rajan Kumar, Basavaraja Shivappa Sunkada, and Depeswar Barman—displayed exemplary courage under direct enemy assault. After the Indian Army launched Operation Sindoor, Pakistani forces positioned barely 200 meters from the Kharkhola post initiated heavy shelling using flat and high-trajectory weapons, followed by a drone attack. 'In the early hours of May 10, 2025, multiple Pakistani drones were spotted in the area. Upon hearing the humming sound, the troops took defensive positions. Under the command of Sub-Inspector Mohd Imtiyaz, they successfully neutralised one drone. However, a mortar shell—likely dropped by another drone—exploded just outside their bunker, causing serious injuries to Head Constable Brij Mohan Singh and four constables,' the citation stated. Also Read: Op Sindoor success to feature in I-Day event Despite their injuries, the personnel continued to engage the enemy. Assistant Commandant Srivastav, a young probationary officer, rushed to their aid and successfully evacuated them under intense enemy fire. The BSF has also named a post in Jammu under the name of Sub-Inspector Imitiyaz, who was killed in action that morning. Apart from Singh, another constable, Deepak Chimngakham, was also killed in action at the border during the Indo-Pak hostilities. Another medal recipient, assistant sub-inspector Udai Vir Singh, was posted at the Jabowal border outpost in the Jammu sector when it came under heavy assault from Pakistani forces. 'Amid intense enemy fire, ASI Singh destroyed a Pakistani surveillance camera, denying them real-time monitoring of Indian positions. Even after sustaining a life-threatening shrapnel wound to his upper lip from heavy machine gun fire, he refused evacuation and continued to engage the enemy, ultimately neutralising their HMG nest,' the citation read. 'His actions ensured uninterrupted domination by Indian forces and inspired fellow troops.' Assistant Sub-Inspector Rajappa B.T. and Constable Manohar Xalxo were also honoured for their bravery in resupplying ammunition to frontline troops at Karotana Khurd, Karotana Forward, and Suchetagarh border outposts. These posts had come under intense 82mm mortar and machine gun fire from Pakistan. 'On May 10 at 0740 hrs, BOP Karotana Khurd reported a critical shortage of AGS ammunition. ASI Rajappa and CT Xalxo were tasked with the replenishment mission. While executing it, a mortar shell exploded near their magazine. ASI Rajappa sustained fatal splinter injuries, and CT Xalxo was wounded in his right hand. Despite their injuries, both completed the mission successfully,' the citation stated. Assistant Commandant Alok Negi was recognised for leading his troops during a prolonged engagement at the forward defence line at Mukhyari between May 7 and 10. His leadership ensured operational dominance and sustained retaliatory strikes for over 48 hours, using mortars and other heavy weapons. Apart from securing the border, BSF troops during Operation Sindoor bombed terror launchpads such as Looni and Dhandhar in Pakistan, destroyed posts of Pakistan Rangers, and also neutralised terrorists infiltrating into India using cover fire by Pak Rangers. In an official statement, the BSF said, 'This Independence Day, 16 brave Seema Praharis are being awarded Gallantry Medals for their conspicuous bravery and unmatched valour. Their resolute and steadfast actions during Operation Sindoor are a testament to the nation's faith and trust reposed in India's First Line of Defence.' In response to India's Operation Sindoor, Pakistan launched drones and loitering munitions against Indian military installations and civilian infrastructure, but failed to inflict any damage as the threats were thwarted by India's robust multi-layered air defence network.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US declines to comment on Pakistan F-16 losses during Operation Sindoor despite IAF Chief's claims
The United States government is silent on whether Pakistan lost F-16 fighter jets during Operation Sindoor. This is unlike previous instances where the US confirmed the status of Pakistan's F-16 fleet. India claims to have shot down Pakistani aircraft and damaged an F-16 hangar. Pakistan denies these claims and suggests a third-party review. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US contractors have access to Pakistani F-16's Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads IAF claims F-16 damage at Jacobabad during airfield strikes Air-to-air claims and Pakistan's rebuttal No response from US to formal information requests The United States government has declined to comment on whether Pakistan lost any of its US-supplied F-16 fighter jets during Operation Sindoor , the 88-hour conflict between India and Pakistan from May 7 to May 10. Responding to NDTV 's queries, the US State Department stated, "We refer you to the Government of Pakistan to discuss its F-16s."This position contrasts with previous disclosures highlighted in an NDTV report, which cited a 2019 article by Foreign Policy magazine. At the time, shortly after India's Balakot air strikes, the magazine reported that two senior US defence officials with direct knowledge of the situation had said all of Pakistan's F-16s were accounted for. The clarification followed India's claim that it had shot down a Pakistani F-16 fleet is governed by detailed end-use agreements with the United States. Under these agreements, American contractors—known as Technical Support Teams (TSTs)—are deployed in Pakistan around the clock to monitor the aircraft. These teams are contractually obligated to ensure that the aircraft are used in compliance with the agreements and to maintain full knowledge of the operational status of each presence of these oversight mechanisms has typically allowed the US to confirm or deny reports of losses, making its silence in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor believes several F-16s may have been lost during the operation, either destroyed on the ground or shot down in aerial combat. On Saturday, Indian Air Force Chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh said that Shahbaz Jacobabad airfield , which houses an F-16 hangar, was among the major Pakistani air bases targeted."One half of the hangar is gone. And I'm sure there were some aircraft inside which have got damaged there," he to the Air Chief, the IAF carried out strikes on three critical airfield hangars: a UAV hangar at Sukkur, an AEW&C facility at Bholari, and the F-16 hangar at Jacobabad. He said indications pointed to at least one AEW&C aircraft and several F-16s under maintenance being present at the time of the air base is home to Pakistan's 39 Tactical Wing and is located west of Indian Air Force also claims to have shot down six Pakistani aircraft during the operation—five fighters and one larger platform, possibly an electronic intelligence (ELINT) or AEW&C aircraft. The IAF has not disclosed the exact types of fighter jets it believes were shot meanwhile, has rejected India's claims. Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif challenged India to allow a third-party review of both sides' air force inventories. "If the truth is in question, let both sides open their aircraft inventories to independent verification – though we suspect this would lay bare the reality India seeks to obscure," he said. India has not responded to this also submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the US Department of Defense, asking similar questions to those recently posed to the State Department. The Pentagon replied that the FOIA does not require agencies to 'compile information, conduct research, answer questions, or create new documents in response to FOIA requests.' Subsequent queries to the Pentagon and the office of the Secretary of Defense received no response.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
China-US-Pakistan: Why questions need to be asked about India's diplomacy
Decision-making in foreign policy is not an isolated act. In the economically interdependent and security-centred world, it takes domestic issues into account. Therefore, serious public debate and critical public scrutiny of foreign policy matters are essential. Unlike in an authoritarian state, a mature democracy provides sufficient space where interested individuals can critically examine an event, differently from the government of the day. Constitutional and political responsibility to create such free space lies with democratic institutions, including the media. It becomes even more important in the context of recent developments in India's foreign policy and diplomatic affairs. US President Donald Trump's imposition of exorbitant tariffs on India mainly for buying crude oil from Russia, the external affairs minister S Jaishankar's proposed visit to Moscow, possibly paving the way for Vladimir Putin's early visit to New Delhi,Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi' is visiting New Delhi and Indian PM Modi's plans to meet the Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the SCO meetings, indicates how fast changes can happen in international affairs and bilateral ties. Further, threatening statements made by Pakistani Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and his seemingly growing relations with Washington give us an increasing reason to critically assess the future of India-Pakistan ties. Post-Operation Sindoor debates largely remain one-sided. Most conclude with supporting the government's position or raising comfortable questions. The government and its supporters defend the ceasefire, while the Opposition questions it. In this political slugfest, some of the relevant questions remain untouched: How to deal with Pakistan? All previous Indian Prime Ministers have dealt with Pakistan in their own way. Soon after his election, PM Modi briefly engaged in talks with Pakistan, but they could not be taken forward, largely due to historical and structural reasons. Then, what options does India have? Are we going to fight with Pakistan for years? Should India engage in talks with Pakistan? How do continuous tensions with Pakistan impact communal ties in India? These and related questions need critical public debate. After India and the US began developing close ties in the early post-Cold War years, many Indian analysts started believing that Washington would support New Delhi in dealing with Beijing. Conversely, over the years, the US leadership has supported India's stance against China mainly to secure its interests and not those of New Delhi. The Donald Trump administration has always been seen as the friendliest American government by a big section of the Indian population, obviously, before the latest tariff war. Many Indian Americans supported Trump, and some Indians publicly celebrated Trump's last presidential win. But India failed to learn from history. Historically, the US has never been a reliable friend to many countries. The past of US-Pakistan ties is an example. Until a few weeks before, a big section of Indian media had discussed India-US ties without critically evaluating the history and politics of its foreign relations. Now, the same anchors are against the Trump administration. Even though China has remained India's important trading partner, most public debates in the country mainly consider Beijing as a 'threat' to New Delhi's security and larger strategic interests. At present, the two countries are in the process of resetting their bilateral ties, which were affected after the confrontation in Galwan Valley. However, political differences and disputes remain intact. During India-Pakistan tensions in April-May this year, several Indians accused China of backing Pakistan against India. Wang Yi's visit to New Delhi and Modi's visit to China may help the two countries to clear some of the obstacles on the road. However, as the talks will be held in the backdrop of India-US tensions over tariffs, New Delhi may not be in a strong position vis-à-vis Beijing. In such a situation, the following questions need to be critically examined: How should India deal with the US and China? Does India need friendly ties with China to deal with Trump's administration? Will a 'Dragon-Elephant Tango' benefit India and China? How can India secure its interests in Asia without the US? Modi's 151 foreign visits to 72 countries, including 10 to the US, in the last 11 years, have certainly improved bilateral ties with some of those countries. These visits have also helped in deepening India's ties with them. However, many foreign policy-related challenges remain unsettled. Foreign policy has its politics and economics affecting a big population in a country like India, and thus, critical debate is essential. In a democracy, serious debates, differences in opinion, and dissenting views on any matters, including foreign policy-related issues, should be accepted even if one strongly disagrees with the state and the elites. The writer is a fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies, NUS, Singapore
