Elon Musk's xAI permits challenged by NAACP, environmental groups in Memphis
When xAI, which is run by Elon Musk, first set up in Memphis last year, the artificial intelligence startup said the turbines it installed initially were temporary and too small to require permits. The company categorized them as "nonroad engine" style generators.
Residents living near the facility complained for months that emissions from the turbines were creating a stench, worsening air pollution in Memphis, and disproportionately impacting people in nearby majority-Black communities.
Still, the Shelby County Health Department issued a permit on July 2, allowing xAI to use up to 15 of the turbines. The department agreed that the turbines were small enough to be considered nonroad engines.
In the appeal, dated July 15, the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), which is representing the NAACP, and an environmental group called Young, Gifted & Green claim that the county's health department had ignored residents' concerns.
The SELC also argued that the health department miscategorized the turbines used by xAI and issued the permits improperly, a violation of the Clean Air Act and some local environmental regulations.
NAACP CEO Derrick Johnson said in a statement that, "Our health shouldn't be threatened at the hands of billionaires who circumvent the law."
The gas-burning turbines emit nitrogen oxides and formaldehyde, among other pollutants, according to spec sheets on the website of Solaris Energy Infrastructure, xAI's partner and installer. Exposure to high levels of nitrogen oxides, which are precursors to ozone formation, have been associated with higher risk of death from respiratory disease.
In a statement to CNBC on Wednesday evening, xAI said it was "disheartened (but not surprised)" to see the SELC's appeal. The company accused the firm of making a "baseless, politically driven appeal," and said it has "and will continue to comply with all federal, state and local laws."
Environmental concerns aren't the only controversy facing xAI as the company tries to challenge OpenAI, Google, Meta and others in developing large AI models and services on top of them.
Grok, xAI's chatbot, recently began to generate and spread antisemitic posts across X, including some that praised Hitler. The company apologized days later for making code updates that caused Grok to spit out the offensive content.
Recently, xAI also launched a new Grok feature allowing users to access "AI companions." In tests by NBC News, some of the companions pressured Grok users into sexually explicit or violent conversations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
37 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Tesla's ability to sell cars in California hangs in the balance after a weeklong 'high-stakes' court hearing
The California DMV sued Tesla, accusing the company of misleading consumers about its technology. In a hearing this week, the DMV argued Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" technology is false advertising. The DMV wants to suspend Tesla's license to manufacture and sell in the state for at least 30 days. Tesla's ability to sell cars in California hangs in the balance after a weeklong court hearing that ended on Friday. The company's terminology for its driver assistance technologies is under scrutiny. California's Department of Motor Vehicles sued Tesla in 2022 and is seeking to suspend Tesla's ability to sell cars in the state for at least 30 days and award consumers monetary damages. Following the hearing, no final ruling has been made. The DMV suit alleges that the company falsely advertised its " Full Self-Driving" and " Autopilot" driver assistance technologies, misleading consumers into thinking the cars were more autonomous than they were. The hearing comes at a pivotal moment for the company. Its sales have slumped in the first half of 2025, and its brand took a hit earlier this year after CEO Elon Musk became the face of the White House DOGE Office. Protesters directed their anger at Tesla, organizing nationwide protests at Tesla dealerships in March. Attorney Matthew Benedetto, a member of Tesla's legal team, told Administrative Judge Juliet E. Cox on Monday that the company never tried to conceal the fact that its vehicles cannot fully drive themselves and has always informed buyers that they "cannot fully rely" on FSD or Autopilot. "Cars with Full Self-Driving capabilities are currently not capable of driving themselves," Benedetto said again on Tuesday while cross-examining a witness brought to the stand by DMV. The DMV said in its complaint that Tesla's website advertised its driver assistance system on multiple occasions in 2021 and 2022 as being "designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat." "From Home - All you will need to do is get in and tell your car where to go," the complaint says, quoting from Tesla's website. "But vehicles equipped with those ADAS features could not, at the time of those advertisements, and cannot now, operate as autonomous vehicles," Ailene Short, branch chief for the licensing department at the California DMV, wrote in the complaint. Melanie Rosario, commander-sergeant of the DMV Valley Area Command, was called as a witness by attorneys representing the DMV and told the judge she found "conflicting information" in Tesla's advertising of its FSD and Autopilot systems. "To me, 'Autopilot' means it can drive itself or do things on its own," Rosario said. She added that the word "autopilot" is "contradictory" when placed alongside instructions in the fine print that ask the driver to be attentive and prepared to take over the car at any moment. Bryant Walker Smith, a voting member of the Society of Automotive and Aerospace Engineers, testified that the line separating driver assistance and automated driving features is "a dam that separates the land from the sea." "Every driver needs to know without ambiguity or doubt or any confusion an answer to this basic question: am I driving?" Smith said. A witness for Tesla, Stephen Nowlis, a professor of marketing at Washington University in St. Louis, took the stand on Friday to present a survey he conducted. He told the judge the survey found that consumers were "not confused" by Tesla's terminology. The survey, which Tesla commissioned at a cost, did not take into account every person who may come into contact with a Tesla car. Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law who studies advertising law, told Business Insider that the DMV's lawsuit is "very high-stakes" for Tesla. "Even if Tesla defeats this lawsuit, it's not in the legal clear — it's still going to have to answer in court for its claims elsewhere," Goldman said. Tesla's driver assistance technologies are facing multiple other legal challenges. A wrongful death complaint against Tesla in Florida says a Tesla driver was using Autopilot and briefly looked away when his vehicle T-boned a parked SUV, killing a 22-year-old woman. Tesla argued that the driver was responsible for the crash. Separately, Tesla is facing a class-action lawsuit and an ongoing investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over the phenomenon known as " phantom braking," which is when the vehicle suddenly slams on the brakes for no reason, often at high speeds.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
A More Affordable EV Won't Save Tesla
Key Points Tesla fell 5% after hours on its second-quarter earnings report. Some investors saw production of a new, more affordable vehicle as a positive sign. The company launched its robotaxi network in June. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) issued another disappointing earnings report on Tuesday. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The leading electric vehicle (EV) maker finished the after-hours session down 5%, but the sell-off could have been worse. The company reported a decline in both sales and profit. Revenue was down 12% to $22.5 billion, and adjusted net income was down 23% to $1.39 billion, or $0.40 per share. Those numbers actually topped a muted revenue estimate at $22.13 billion, while the bottom-line consensus matched the results at $0.40. Tesla's problems have been well-documented at this point. CEO Elon Musk's turn in the political spotlight seemed to backfire after his relationship with President Donald Trump went sour. Due in part to Musk's involvement with politics, the brand has become unappealing in the eyes of some potential buyers, leading to a 16% decline in automotive revenue. Sales have plunged in Europe, and the company is losing ground to more affordable Chinese EVs. One seemingly bright spot Musk has a long history of overcoming weak results by telling investors what they want to hear on the earnings call, including making big promises about its robotaxi network and other initiatives in autonomy like its Optimus robot. He seemed to do that again on the latest earnings call, with some comments about the more affordable model he has long promised, which some have dubbed the Tesla Model 2. Musk said that the company started production of the vehicle in June and is ramping up production now. He added: "The goal with those products was not to negatively impact revenue or gross margin, but just to make a car that everyone loves and wants at a more affordable price." Musk has long argued that price competition was one of the biggest headwinds facing the company, but the brand crisis seems to have overshadowed that. By introducing its own lower-priced model, Tesla may end up cannibalizing its more expensive vehicles. Customers may be choosing between a more expensive Tesla and that lower-priced model, rather than another brand. The new vehicle is just a cheaper Model Y, rather than a brand-new vehicle model. The robotaxi initiative The biggest reason Tesla has maintained its premium valuation even as sales and profits have tumbled is that investors believe that Tesla's robotaxi network could go mainstream, fulfilling Musk's long-term vision. However, the robotaxi has gotten off to only a modest start after launching in June, and it seemed to get less attention on Tuesday's earnings call, though Musk reminded the audience: "As you can tell, autonomy is the story." Management said that robotaxis in Austin, Texas have topped 7,000 miles with no significant safety interventions. The company is aiming to launch the robotaxi in the San Francisco Bay Area next. Tesla needs growth in its core business Investors have bid up Tesla stock on hopes for its initiatives in robotaxis and more affordable vehicles, but the company needs to return to growth in selling EVs for the stock to be successful over the long term. The decline in EV sales is a reflection of a backlash against Tesla's brand. The company is also expected to struggle over the next few quarters due to the elimination of the EV tax credit and a change in other federal policies that supported EV adoption. The company also faces a $300 million effect from tariffs. Tesla could get back on track, especially if the robotaxi network takes off. But the current valuation in the stock leaves little room for upside if it does, especially given the persistent challenges in EV sales. While a more affordable vehicle might be a step in the right direction, it seems more likely to undercut demand for Tesla's more expensive vehicles, rather than competing with alternatives. Should you buy stock in Tesla right now? The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Jeremy Bowman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. A More Affordable EV Won't Save Tesla was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Tesla (TSLA) Sold Most of Its Bitcoin Holdings During ‘Crypto Winter'
Electric vehicle maker Tesla (TSLA) sold most of its Bitcoin (BTC) holdings during the last market low, known as a ' crypto winter,' losing out on billions of dollars in the process. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The company run by CEO Elon Musk was a trailblazer when it bought $1.5 billion of Bitcoin in 2021. But unfortunately, Tesla sold three-quarters (75%) of its holdings in 2022 as the market for digital assets was tanking and BTC was trading around $16,000. Bitcoin has since rebounded in a big way, jumping 80% higher in the past year to currently trade at $116,000. This means that Tesla has lost out on billions of dollars in potential gains, missing a huge market opportunity. Current Holdings In its latest earnings release, dated July 23, Tesla said its current cryptocurrency holdings stand at $1.24 billion, up 72% from $722 million a year ago, mostly due to Bitcoin's strong rally that has taken its price to an all-time high of just over $123,000 in recent weeks. Although Musk is focused on developing electric vehicles, self-driving robotaxis, and humanoid robots rather than cryptocurrencies, there's no denying that Tesla lost out when it sold most of its BTC at a market low. The company's business, which is struggling with poor electric vehicle sales and a consumer backlash against Musk's politics, could use the cash boost from crypto. Is TSLA Stock a Buy? The stock of Tesla has a consensus Hold rating among 35 Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on 14 Buy, 14 Hold, and seven Sell recommendations issued in the last three months. The average TSLA price target of $314.48 implies 0.36% downside from current levels.
