After US attack on Iran, Germany in diplomatic no-man's-land – DW – 06/23/2025
Chancellor Friedrich Merz has defended the US attacks on Iran. Once again, Germany was not informed in advance of the attack plans.
Just over 35 hours after the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz addressed the issue in front of cameras for the first time. Merz spoke on Monday at an event organized by the Federation of German Industries (BDI) in Berlin, an engagement that had been scheduled for some time.
The event's title was "New Times, New Answers," and Merz uttered a sentence that hardly any chancellor would have said until recently: "There is no reason for us, nor for me personally, to criticize what Israel started a week ago. Nor is there any reason to criticize what America did last weekend. It is not without risk. But leaving things as they were was not an option either."
In other words: Not only Israel, but also the United States is now doing the "dirty work" in the fight against Iran. Merz used this phrase last week at the G7 summit in Canada to describe and praise the Israeli attacks. Not everybody in Germany liked this harsh choice of words.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The German government spent most of Sunday trying to assess the new situation, with Merz speaking by phone with French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Afterward, the three issued a statement: "Our goal remains to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon." There was no criticism of the US attack.
The statement continued: "We urge Iran not to take any further actions that could destabilize the region."
On Sunday morning following the US strikes, Merz convened a meeting of the Security Cabinet. Germany does not yet have a national security council, but the government intends to introduce one soon.
It quickly became clear that Germany had only been informed by the United States about the attacks after the bombs had already been dropped. This was a repeat of what happened more than a week ago when the Israelis attacked the Iranian nuclear facilities in the middle of the night.
At that time, Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, on a trip to Cairo, wasn't woken up by his Israeli counterpart, Gideon Saar. Wadephul, who had planned to travel to the Middle East to make numerous visits in an effort to promote a peaceful solution, then informed Merz, who in turn spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Wadephul was then forced to cancel his planned visit to Israel.
A similar sequence of events also unfolded after the US attack on Iran. On Friday, Wadephul met with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Geneva, together with his colleagues from France and the United Kingdom, in an attempt to reach a negotiated solution, but without success. Then, on Saturday night, the United States intervened in the war.
On Sunday after the US attack, ministers appeared on television to explain to citizens where Germany stands on this issue and what the government can do. Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, for example, attempted late in the evening to provide some context on public broadcaster ARD when he said: "It is never good when a confrontation escalates militarily and continues. That in itself cannot be good news, because it reveals and demonstrates that the world order of peace is currently under pressure. And that is true everywhere."
But, according to the defense minister, if Iran had indeed progressed so far with its nuclear program that it posed an immediate threat, then "the destruction of the facilities for manufacturing nuclear weapons is certainly not bad news for stability and security in the region and for Israel."
Foreign Minister Wadephul expressed similar views in several interviews. He stated that Iran had crossed a "red line" and must now be prepared to return to negotiations.
Also on Monday morning, the head of the Chancellery, Thorsten Frei, invited all the leaders of the parliamentary groups in the Bundestag to discuss the new situation in the Middle East.
When asked whether the US attack was justified under international law, Frei said: "In my view, we do not yet have all the information that would allow us to make a definitive assessment under international law."
The question of international law was also on the minds of other German politicians on Monday. Agnieszka Brugger, defense expert for the Green Party, wrote on the X platform: "I find the blind allegiance to Donald Trump that leading CDU/CSU [conservative bloc] members of parliament are now demonstrating to be naive and dangerous. It is also a complete departure from international law. This could very soon be met with harsh reality."
Representatives of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), the junior partners in Merz's coalition government, also expressed concerns. SPD Bundestag Deputy Isabel Cademartori wrote on X: "A world in which countries that do not possess nuclear weapons can be attacked at any time by those that do, without any legitimacy under international law, simply because they can, is not a safe world. For anyone."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
15 minutes ago
- DW
ECOWAS gets a new leader at pivotal time for West Africa – DW – 06/24/2025
Sierra Leone's president is assuming the rotating leadership of the Economic Community of West African States. Under previous chairman Bola Tinubu ECOWAS faced some of the greatest challenges in its 50-year history. Nigerian President Bola Tinubu led the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) for just under two years as its rotating chairman. But, in that short period, the main political and economic body in the region witnessed some of the biggest challenges in its history. With terror attacks and other security concerns ongoing, the ability of ECOWAS to respond to threats has been further reduced following the exit of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger from the bloc under the leadership of their respective military rulers. Tinubu acknowledged as much in his speech at the ECOWAS summit over the weekend in Nigeria's capital, Abuja. The president expressed concern about the stalled process of rolling out an expanded ECOWAS Standby Force, which is made up of military, civilian and police components. The force was conceived in 2024 following the departures of the three Sahel nations. "The ECOWAS Standby Force must move from concept to operational reality. I am a little bit worried about the slow pace of its activation, which is taking longer than desired," Tinubu said, highlighting the need for a ready force to combat terrorism as well as other forms of organized crime in West Africa. While also having faith that Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger would eventually "return to the family," Tinubu also highlighted the fact that he had exhausted "all diplomatic means to engage and dialogue with our brothers" during his tenure. The three nations, however, have categorically ruled out any suggestions of rejoining the fold. Beverly Ochieng, a senior associate at Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, says that in the wake of multiple coups in West Africa "you now have a completely fractured region." "So you have three countries that have basically walked out of the bloc; you have one that's still under suspension until it holds its elections, and that is Guinea; and broadly speaking, you have an ECOWAS that sometimes feels as if it is struggling to be able to just maintain a sense of unity in order for them to be able to face some of those challenges as a united front," Ochieng told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video To add insult to injury, the establishment of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) by the three renegade former ECOWAS members in 2023 openly defies the bloc's established authority in the region for the past 50 years, and has been used as an example to underscore accusations of Tinubu showing too much resolve against the junta-led Sahel states during his ECOWAS presidency. "The rhetoric initially in response to the military coups may have been misplaced in the sense of ensuring open dialogue and cooperation," says Ocheing, referring to Tinubu's hardball approach. Perhaps now as a gentle signal of rapprochement — or a final sign of defeat — ECOWAS also announced during its summit in Abuja last week that it had reached an agreement with the military juntas of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger to work together in their fight against terrorism throughout the region. According to Ochieng, however, this move is mainly based on "a realization by ECOWAS that they will ultimately have to find a way to work with the Sahel because the issues that affect the Sahel will ultimately have an impact on ECOWAS." The agreement further stipulates that the principle of freedom of movement of goods and persons between member states of both alliances will also be maintained. Under these circumstances, ECOWAS' new chairman, Sierra Leone's President Julius Maada Bio, clearly has his work cut out for him and knows it, too, as the unity of the bloc and indeed much of the entire region is facing unprecedented threats to its integrity. Bio himself stated in his opening remarks as ECOWAS president that "the democratic space is under strain in parts of our region. In some countries, the constitutional order has been disrupted," referring in no uncertain terms to the military takeovers of Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Guinea in recent years. DW's Ben Shemang, who reported from the ECOWAS summit in Abuja last week, said that Bio had pledged to prioritize democracy, security cooperation, economic integration and the institutional credibility of ECOWAS during his tenure. "Many are expecting a tenure that will not only strengthen security within the regional bloc but also to ensure unity," Shemang explained. But at the same time, there are new issues piling up on the new leader's desk in addition to the widespread erosion of civilian rule and the proliferation of Islamist threats across West Africa: Organized crime is on the rise in West Africa against the backdrop of both political and economic instability, and it often straddles multiple national borders where insurgents mixing with criminals has resulted in growing unrest. Abductions for ransom, a spike in recreational drug abuse and a rise in illegal mining practices highlight the growing despair of people throughout a region with an overall population of 425 million people. If ECOWAS was a country with all its current, as well as former member states, it would be the third most-populous state in the world after Indiaand China. "ECOWAS and some of its departments will talk about levels of crime, they'll talk about the issues affecting criminality. But when it comes to implementing measures to be able to counter to some of those vices, it's quite slow and bureaucratic," says Ochieng. The bloc's coffers, meanwhile, just received a fresh cash injection from the European Union last week of €110 million ($126 million) — though this is still a far cry from the estimated cost of €2.26 billion needed for the activation of ECOWAS' Standby Force — outgoing ECOWAS President Tinubu's pet project. The foundation of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), meanwhile, has also emboldened leaders as well as opposition groups in the region and beyond to seek new directions, with many interpreting the actions of these three countries as an overdue response to the lingering effects of colonialism and attempts at neo-colonialism. A recent survey in Togo carried out by the independent, pan-African research network Afrobarometer found that 64% of Togolese respondents found the establishment of the AES "somewhat" or "very" justified and that that 54% of Togolese thought their country would benefit from leaving ECOWAS to join the Alliance of Sahel States. Meanwhile, Guinea, which has also been under military rule for close to four years now but has not joined the AES, remains suspended from ECOWAS in a delicate balancing act which, if there's further discord, could also lead to the West African nation further distancing itself from the bloc. Such trends can be interpreted as evidence of the waning influence of former colonial powers but also reflect the fact that bodies like ECOWAS appear to have little impact on people's daily lives, as instability and unrest continue to affect millions. "Understandably, there is a feeling that [ECOWAS] is not fit for purpose in terms of being able to address current political pressures, and in doing so, being able to address the issues that then lead to economic and civil unrest," Ochieng told DW. She added that ideas like "joining the AES feel like a more reactionary solution. And even the AES itself is a very reactionary institution." "Perhaps the AES could be moving in a direction that people feel is admirable, that is very purposeful, that is very driven, but it's also on a very fragile foundation. These are military leaderships. They have widespread unrest and instability that they are facing as they are trying to establish this institution," she added. As growing numbers of people in the region nevertheless appear to be showing their support for strongmen tactics over democratic and consensus-led policies, Maada Bio is aware of this big task that lies ahead as he begins his tenure. During his opening speech, the new leader of the bloc acknowledged that "ECOWAS must reform itself, and become more transparent, efficient and responsive to its people's needs." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
35 minutes ago
- DW
Trump's dealmaker claims up tension between India, US – DW – 06/23/2025
There is new friction in the India-US relationship after Washington claimed that it helped broker a ceasefire between India and Pakistan by leveraging trade talks. US President Donald Trump's claim that he personally brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan during May's conflict has caused some diplomatic friction. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi told Trump in a telephone call that the ceasefire was achieved through talks between the Indian and Pakistani militaries and not US mediation, India's foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, said in a statement following the call. "PM Modi told President Trump clearly that during this period, there was no talk at any stage on subjects like India-US trade deal or US mediation between India and Pakistan," Misri said. "Prime Minister Modi emphasized that India has not accepted mediation in the past and never will," Misri added. There was no separate readout of the call from the White House. Modi and Trump were scheduled to meet on the sidelines of the Group of Seven (G7) Summit in Canada, but didn't because of the US president's hasty departure due to the situation in the Middle East. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Although Modi and Trump enjoy a personal rapport, there is a belief that Trump's unpredictability and transactional approach to foreign policy matters may be straining the relationship. India is currently negotiating a trade deal with the United States, but talks have encountered hurdles as the July 9 deadline approaches for the end of a 90-day pause on most tariffs threatened by the Trump administration against US trade partners. Ajay Bisaria, a former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan, told DW that India has so far handled Trump with strategic composure. "But, when the US president repeatedly and publicly claims an outsize role in mediating the recent India-Pakistan conflict, expect public corrections from India," Bisaria said. "Public opinion in India now tends to see the US as an unreliable partner," he added. Though Delhi understands that the India-US relationship is deeper than White House pronouncements, Bisaria said, Indian officials cannot ignore public diplomacy challenges. "Each time Washington indulges Pakistan's military, like President Trump's recent lunch with its army chief, General Asim Munir, it sends the wrong signal," Bisaria said. India has accused Pakistan of "supporting terrorism" from across the border after the April 22 attack on civilians in India-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people. The attack was claimed by a group calling itself the Kashmir Resistance, which India says is also known as The Resistance Front and is linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a UN-designated terrorist organization. New Delhi blamed Islamabad for backing the attack, an allegation Pakistan has denied. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The lunch meeting between Trump and General Munir, which took place at the White House last week, was a unique event as it marked the first time a sitting US president officially hosted a Pakistani army chief who was not also serving as the head of state. Many viewed it as provocative given the recent tensions. "India's diplomatic message to the US will remain clear: Sanction — don't embrace — Pakistan's generals," Bisaria said. Meera Shankar, a former Indian envoy to the United States, had a different take. She told DW that it was perhaps somewhat clumsy to rebut Trump's claims of having brokered an end to the recent India-Pakistan conflict, since India did not seek a full-scale conflict. She said it was possible that the Trump administration had helped persuade Pakistan to pull back. "The Indian government was facing domestic criticism for allowing foreign intervention," Shankar said, "and I think the rebuttal was responding to this." "The feting of Asim Munir in the US must be seen in the context of the US military strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities," she said. "It is likely that the US was seeking some facilities from Pakistan in this context." Shankar said there was concern that the India-US strategic partnership could be coming under stress because of missteps from the Trump administration. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "There is a need to show sensitivity to each other's concerns and to strengthen communication," Shankar said. The United States cannot afford to isolate India in countering China's rise in the Indo-Pacific region. India will host the 2025 Quad Summit in September, with Trump expected to attend. The group — made up of the United States, Japan, Australia and India — focuses on promoting stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region, particularly in response to China's assertiveness. The last time the Indian and US leaders met was in February after Trump was sworn in for his second presidential term, with the visit underscoring the importance both men placed on their relationship. Amitabh Mattoo, dean of the School of International Studies at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, told DW that the recent developments have introduced friction and mistrust into the relationship. "The US has pursued short-term and deal-based diplomacy," Mattoo said, "and this transactional approach has undermined mutual trust and fostered a sense of unpredictability." "This raises concerns about India's relations with the Trump administration … but the partnership can overcome challenges and shape a better, durable future — and also offer an opportunity for renewal," Mattoo said.
Local Germany
an hour ago
- Local Germany
Merz says NATO spending boost to counter Russia
"We are not doing this, as some claim, to do the United States and its president a favour," he told the German parliament before setting off for the gathering in The Hague. "We are doing this based on our own observations and convictions. Russia, above all, is actively and aggressively threatening security and freedom" across Europe, he added. "We have to fear that Russia will continue its war beyond Ukraine." The summit has been viewed as heavily focused on keeping Trump happy after he made comments that sparked concern about Washington's commitment to NATO and insisted that other member states spend at least five percent of their GDP on defence. NATO's 32 countries have thrashed out a compromise deal to dedicate 3.5 percent to core military spending by 2035, and 1.5 percent to broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. On Monday, Europe's biggest economy revealed plans to reach the 3.5 percent level for core spending six years early -- in 2029 -- with the vast extra outlays necessary made possible after Germany eased its rules on taking on debt. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Tuesday that he would head to the NATO summit with the message that "external security and defence capability are once again an absolute priority in (German) government policy". Advertisement "We are bringing about a historic turnaround in defence spending." On the summit, he said there were "good signs" about "the broad consensus on how to proceed... I see no reason to assume that we will be given the cold shoulder". Since taking office in May, Merz has been racing to build up Germany's long-neglected armed forces, with the aim of turning them into the "strongest conventional army" in Europe -- a radical shift in a country with strong pacifist traditions due to its dark wartime past. A drive has been launched to boost military personnel, which aims to attract 11,000 fresh recruits this year alone -- and Pistorius has suggested conscription, which was halted in Germany in 2011, could be reintroduced if too few people sign up voluntarily. Germany is also building up a permanent military brigade in Lithuania -- the country's first such overseas deployment since World War II -- to bolster NATO's eastern flank against Russia. © Agence France-Presse
