Evolve plan for effective functioning of CCTV cams in police stations: Andhra HC
VIJAYAWADA: The Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed the Director General of Police (DGP) to formulate a detailed plan to ensure the effective functioning of CCTV cameras in all police stations across the State.
A division bench comprising Justices R Raghunandan Rao and K Manmadha Rao, issued these orders in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Tandava Yogesh, highlighting the State's failure to comply with a 2015 Supreme Court directive mandating CCTV installation in police stations and jails.
The court instructed the DGP to establish a dedicated authority to oversee the implementation. This authority shoud monitor the performance of CCTV cameras, ensure proper footage storage, and address issues such as equipment malfunctions, it said.
The court emphasised that any complaints regarding faulty cameras or storage problems must be promptly reported to the authority.
Further, the court mandated the creation of district-level authorities to supervise CCTV operations. These bodies should track details of complaints received, including their timing, and ensure accountability.
The court further ordered that defective cameras be repaired or replaced within a specified timeframe, with mechanisms to identify individuals responsible for any delays. The State was directed to maintain an inventory of CCTV equipment and ensure adequate footage storage in every district. The court had given the DGP until June 17, 2025, to submit a comprehensive report on the plan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Amarnath Yatra duration reduced to 38 days in 2025, security beefed up
The annual Amarnath Yatra will be held this year from July 3 to August 9, reducing its duration to 38 days from the 52 days observed in 2024. The decision to shorten the pilgrimage period was made before the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 people, mostly tourists, and is unrelated to any immediate security threat. Heightened security amid upcoming events Security arrangements in Jammu and Kashmir have been intensified in light of the upcoming Eid-Ul-Adha, Amarnath Yatra, and other key events. Earlier this week, Director General of Police (DGP) Nalin Prabhat directed forces to deploy anti-sabotage teams along the yatra routes and strengthen risk mitigation strategies. A police spokesperson said the DGP convened a joint meeting with officers from the police and Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) to review preparations. SOPs and vigilance stressed During the review, the DGP emphasised the strict enforcement of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and called for proactive security measures to safeguard pilgrims. He also urged field officers to intensify efforts to dismantle terror networks in the region. These instructions follow a high-level meeting chaired by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Jammu to assess security arrangements for the pilgrimage. The meeting focused on evaluating threat levels, deployment plans, and improving coordination between security forces, intelligence agencies, and civil administration. Shah underscored the importance of real-time intelligence sharing and maintaining high vigilance to ensure peace and stability throughout the pilgrimage period.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Bengaluru Stampede: CM Siddaramaiah Summons Senior Cops, Bureaucrats After Cabinet Meeting
Last Updated: The focus of the meeting held by Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah was on the ongoing investigation into the stampede incident, court proceedings, and the next steps in the case Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Thursday summoned senior cops and bureaucrats after a cabinet meeting to take stock of the situation, a day after the stampede outside Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium during victory celebrations for IPL winners, Royal Challengers Bengaluru. According to sources, Siddaramaiah held a crucial discussion with senior police and administrative officials at the Vidhana Soudha. The focus of the meeting was on the ongoing investigation into the stampede, court proceedings, and the next steps in the matter. The meeting was attended by director general of police (DGP) MA Saleem, Bengaluru police commissioner B Dayananda, and intelligence chief Hemant Nimbalkar. Deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar, state home minister G Parameshwara, and chief secretary Shalini Rajneesh were also present. The state government has assured strict action against those responsible for the lapses that led to the incident, which claimed 11 lives. State minister MB Patil said the focus of the government's focus is to give best treatment to those injured and if needed they will be provided treatment in private hospitals also. 'Our focus is to give them the best treatment, if needed we will provide them treatment in the best private hospitals also and act as per humanity… But at the same time, we should look into lapses. Whoever it is and however big the person might be, the lapses will be unearthed in 15 days…and strict action will be taken against them," he said. The Karnataka Police has registered a case on charges of criminal negligence against the Karnataka Cricket Board Administrative Committee, Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), among others. According to the deputy commissioner of police, Central Bengaluru, Shekar H Tekkannanavar, an FIR has been filed against RCB, DNA (event manager), Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) Administrative Committee and others at Cubbon Park police station. Earlier in the day, the Karnataka High Court issued a notice to the state government over the stampede incident. It took suo motu cognisance of the incident and asked for a further status report. 'News items have been published in various newspapers, narrating the tragedy that happened when 11 persons died and 75 were injured during the course of the victory celebration of RCB. This court is taking cognisance of the incident," the court said. 'Senior Advocate Arun Shyam submitted that two events took place at Vidhana Souda and the stadium, let them give details of where the ambulances were deployed." Issuing notice to the state government, the high court said: 'To ascertain the cause of the tragedy and how to prevent it in future, we have also received communications from several persons on this subject matter. We issue a notice to the state government." The court listed the matter for hearing again on June 10.
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
In relief for SP Sanjeev Gandhi, Himachal HC partially allows appeal on order directing CBI probe into HPPCL chief engineer's death
The Himachal Pradesh High Court on Thursday partially allowed the Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) filed by Superintendent of Police (SP) Sanjeev Gandhi on a court order handing over the probe into the death of HPPCL Chief Engineer Vimal Negi to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). An LPA is an appeal against a decision of a single judge to another bench of the same court. A division bench of Chief Justice J S Sandhawalia and Justice Ranjan Sharma allowed the appeal only to the extent that it concerned the professional integrity of SP Gandhi and other members of the Special Investigation Team (SIT), stating that their professional standing should not be undermined. The bench clarified that it would not interfere with the core decision of transferring the investigation to the CBI, as this would ensure a fair and effective inquiry. The LPA, filed by SP Gandhi in his personal capacity, contended that the May 23 order by a single-judge bench of Justice Ajay Mohan Goel had heavily relied on the affidavits submitted by Director General of Police (DGP) Atul Verma and Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) Onkar Sharma, which allegedly cast aspersions on his professional integrity. In the appeal, Gandhi argued that he had not been provided with the status report submitted by ACS Sharma. He further claimed that the DGP's status report, which termed the SIT probe as 'questionable', was submitted without the knowledge of the Advocate General's office. Gandhi also maintained that he had not been given sufficient time to present his case before the single bench that passed the order to transfer the probe to the CBI. Advocate Sanjeev Bhushan, appearing on behalf of Gandhi, said, 'Our LPA was partially accepted. It is a relief for us. We had raised concerns about doubts being cast on SP Sanjeev Gandhi's professional integrity. The bench accepted our prayer and directed issuance of notices to the concerned respondents.' In his plea, Gandhi had prayed, '…the LPA kindly be allowed and the impugned judgment dated May 23 be modified to the extent that, instead of handing over the probe to the CBI, it be handed over to a Special Investigation Team constituted by the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, rather than any central agency under the control of the Union of India, in order to avoid any conflict of interest.' The petition further stated, 'It is also prayed that the affidavit filed by the DGP (Atul Verma), being motivated by ulterior intent, be disregarded, and that the scathing observations regarding the investigation—based on said affidavit—be very kindly set aside.' On May 29, the state government led by Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu directed SP Gandhi, ACS Sharma, and then DGP Verma to proceed on leave. Verma was subsequently retired from police service on May 31. Gandhi is currently on medical leave. In the LPA, Gandhi, who had headed the original SIT probing Negi's death, also mentioned that a 'black diary' recovered during the investigation allegedly contained references to ACS Sharma. Gandhi filed the review petition in his personal capacity, naming the additional chief secretary of HPPCL, the DGP, the CBI, the Union of India, and Vimal Negi's wife, Kiran Negi, as respondents. Meanwhile, the CBI has formally taken over the investigation, registering a fresh FIR at its Delhi headquarters. A four-member CBI SIT is currently in Shimla and has begun recording statements of individuals, including members of the deceased official's family. The review petition stated, 'The LPA appeal is being filed in personal capacity, being aggrieved by the findings and opinions based on the affidavits of respondents, particularly respondent no. 3 (DGP), in the impugned judgment passed by the single judge bench.' The petition further adds, 'The applicant, feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the May 23 order, prefers the present appeal on several grounds—most notably that his professional integrity has been tarnished. The findings against SIT-2 are erroneous, based on misrepresented facts, and have caused grave injustice. The judgment arbitrarily presumed suspicion regarding professional conduct, resulting in adverse observations that have seriously damaged the appellant's reputation. There is a well-founded apprehension of being falsely implicated or penalised unless the matter is redressed.'
