Investing platform offers temporary 8.5% annual interest rate on cash balances this month
Investing and trading platform IG is offering a temporary cash interest rate of 8.5 per cent AER (annual equivalent rate) - twice the current Bank of England base rate.
The boosted rate will be available to people who open a stocks and shares ISA, SIPP (self-invested personal pension) or a General Investment Account (GIA) and make an initial investment before May 31.
Once they have made an initial investment, any additional money that qualifying customers have deposited and are holding in cash on the account would earn 8.5 per cent interest until August 31, provided they keep any investment position open for this period. After this date, interest reverts to IG's standard 4.25 per cent rate.
IG does not offer a dedicated cash savings account, so the rate would apply to uninvested cash in its ISAs, SIPPs or GIAs. IG pays interest on cash balances up to £100,000.
Michael Healy, UK managing director of IG, said: 'Many investors are sitting on the sidelines right now as they wait for market clarity - this offer gives them a place to park their money and still earn a serious return.'
Existing account holders could also be eligible for the offer, providing they have not yet placed their first trade and do so by May 31.
The announcement was made the day after the Bank of England base rate was reduced from 4.5 per cent to 4.25 per cent, prompting suggestions that savings providers may cut their return rates.
Global economic and political uncertainties, including over US tariffs, have prompted market volatility in recent weeks.
Rachel Springall, a finance expert at Moneyfactscompare.co.uk, said: 'The high interest rate looks enticing, and it is positive to see appetite to draw in savers who are looking to make their money work harder for them. However, it is essential savers carefully check the terms and conditions of the account before they invest.
'Savers need to understand that the interest rate is applied to money sitting in a specific type of account, which should entice investors who are waiting for the market storm to calm. Offering a high interest rate is a great way to entice the more risk-averse saver, and it gives them an opportunity to consider the longer-term benefits of investing in the stock market once they feel comfortable to do so.
'In the meantime, they can earn an attractive rate on their hard-earned cash, but they need to make sure they review it once the offer expires. Investing puts any capital at risk, so this option will not be suitable for every saver.'
In another boost to savings rates, West Brom Building Society announced a rate increase on its Four Access Saver account on Friday. The interest rate has been increased from 4.40 per cent to 4.65 per cent AER (variable).
The improved rate will apply to all new and existing customers holding issues one and two of the product, the Society said. Applications can be made online. Account holders can make up to four withdrawals per year.
Sophie Dwyer, product manager at West Brom Building Society, said: 'As a mutual, our customers are at the heart of everything we do.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
12 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves can't afford to ignore the cost of government waste
The Government has let public sector waste, incompetence and inefficiency run out of control. No wonder Rachel Reeves is having to tell the Home Secretary there's not enough cash for the police and Border Force when the public wants an end to illegal migration and anti social behaviour, and no surprise the Deputy Prime Minister is railing against the shortage of cash for councils and housing when she needs billions extra to help all the new arrivals to the UK find subsidised accommodation and the public services to go with the homes. But we are not in an entirely hopeless situation. There is plenty of money to be better spent, budgets to be switched and losses to be stopped. Fraud takes large sums from the welfare budget. Too many people claim benefits on a sickness note for life when they could work, some desperately manoeuvre for a false (but helpful) diagnosis. We need a fairer system which is generous to those who are seriously disabled without threatening them with cuts, but does much more to help all the others into work. If you can work, and a job is available, you should not stay on benefits. There are the continuing over the top losses on bonds by the Bank of England which taxpayers have to pay for. No other Central bank sells bonds at big losses in the market as ours does, to add to taxpayer woes. Total losses from mid 2022 to the full wind up of their bond portfolio next decade are estimated by the OBR to stand at a stunning £250 billion. Tell the bank to cut these losses, as the European Central Bank has done with its badly bought bonds. Then there in the inexcusable waste that comes from big subsidies for the nationalised industries. Some of this waste is a direct response to prior poor policy. There is no statement from the Government of how it will control the likely big cost of its steel intervention, necessitated by an energy policy that sells industry unaffordable power. The Budget gave a large pay award to well paid train drivers without asking for smarter working to boost productivity. This blank cheque system is utterly unsustainable: tell the management they will only get bonuses and high pay in future if losses are reduced and fare revenue is boosted from more travel. The civil service expanded greatly to tackle vaccinations and lockdowns over Covid. It has grown more as we recover from the pandemic. It is unreasonable that when Ministers ask for some restoration of lost productivity, they are told they need to spend to save. Those holding out hope for an AI moonshot may see some gains in due course, but we literally cannot afford to delay an enforced return to 2019 levels of productivity (hardly impressive at the time) any longer. That need not await a study of how to buy better computers. There should be a ban on all external recruitment to the public sector, exempting key NHS personnel, uniformed staff and teachers. Ministers could authorise other special cases. Natural wastage in the civil service could save 7 per cent per cent a year on staff bills as we seek to get back to 2016 manning levels. This high rate of industry churn means more opportunities for bright and energetic public officials, as there will be more internal opportunities as staffing is rearranged and focused on main tasks. Such individuals must be empowered to take real ownership over bureaucratic structures. Perhaps the greatest cost – certainly in electoral terms – is the growing number of illegal migrants. The Government made changes to inherited policy which made a bad situation far worse. Numbers have shot up and the hotels are full. Again, a ruthless dedication to getting value for money already being spent would help, and we are certainly not getting value for the big money we give to France to police their coast. How come the French can safely intercept a UK fishing boat and take it to France for a court action over its paperwork, but they cannot stop a single people trafficking vessel at sea and do not prosecute the boat drivers? The country will not accept paying more for less every year. If the Labour Government is able to get this reckless waste under control, the Chancellor's future Budgets will only condemn the party to electoral oblivion.
Reuters
19 hours ago
- Reuters
UK private-sector pay settlements fall despite higher minimum wage, data shows
LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - Typical annual pay settlements offered by British companies in the three months to April fell slightly, despite a rise in the minimum wage which boosted pay significantly for some lower-paid workers, industry data showed on Monday. The news is likely to be welcomed by the Bank of England, which has forecast a sharp slowdown in pay growth this year that it says is needed for consumer price inflation to return to its 2% target. Incomes Data Research said the median private-sector wage deal edged downwards to 3.4% in the three months to April from 3.5% in the three months to March. However, the proportion of employers offering pay settlements of more than 6% jumped to 11% from March's 2%, reflecting a 6.7% increase in the minimum wage to 12.21 pounds ($16.51) an hour that took effect in April, IDR said. April also marked the start of higher national insurance contributions for employers, which have made some businesses more reluctant to hire. For the whole economy, pay settlements were unchanged at 3.2%, reflecting a 2.7% rise in pay at not-for-profit employers. Very few public-sector employers were in the sample of 129 pay deals which covered 1.3 million workers, mostly at large companies, IDR said. Britain's Office for National Statistics is due to publish wage data for the three months to April on Tuesday. Preliminary Reuters polling data on Friday showed average earnings growth, excluding bonuses, is forecast by economists to slow to 5.4% from 5.6%. The BoE sees pay growth of around 3% as consistent with on-target inflation over the medium term. Average earnings data in Britain tends to exceed pay settlements by some margin as the former also captures the boost to pay when employers offer more higher-paid roles. ($1 = 0.7396 pounds)
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Reeves has been captured by Bank of England orthodoxy
Ahead of her spending review on Wednesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a set of national accounts drenched in red ink. But Nigel Farage's upstart Reform party has a plan which, at a stroke, will apparently bring about a multibillion-pound improvement, paving the way for higher public spending without more borrowing and even allowing for tax cuts. Richard Tice, Reform's deputy leader, has this weekend written an explosive letter to Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey, accusing the UK's central bank of 'systemic misuse of taxpayers' money ... at a time when the nation's accounts are already under very severe pressure'. Despite the sud den resignation of chairman Zia Yusuf and Labour's victory in last week's Hamilton by-election, Reform has come out fighting. Still leading in most opinion polls, the party has launched a broadside against the financial establishment, publicly claiming the Bank of England 'is unnecessarily wasting tens of billions of pounds of taxpayers' money, whilst enriching City institutions'. Tice's letter to Bailey focuses on the merit of interest payments made on balances held at the Bank of England, resulting from the UK's 15-year-long quantitative easing (QE) programme. The detail behind these issues is understood by just a few – expert policymakers, specialist investors and a handful of overly curious economic commentators. But Reform's now boldly stated policy aim of forcing the Bank of England to stop paying interest to commercial banks on QE reserves, resulting in potential savings of £35bn per year, is not outlandish. I believe it should be taken seriously and openly debated – as do a range of widely respected, politically agnostic economists, including two former deputy governors of the Bank of England. Public sector net borrowing for the financial year ending March 2025 was £151.9bn, a massive £14.6bn above the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) forecast and £20.7bn more than the previous year. With public sector net debt at £2,770bn – equivalent to 97.2pc of GDP, the highest ratio since the early 1960s – the Government is making annual interest payments of £105bn, which is the schools and transport budget combined and almost twice what it spends on defence. But with Reeves facing competing spending demands from all departments and Labour Left-wing activists out to get her, Reform's policy of ending obscure interest payments buried deep in the national accounts, barely recognised and even less widely understood, could unlock serious money – an average of some four times the fast-diminishing £9.9bn of fiscal headroom she has allowed for 2028/29, each and every year for the rest of this parliament. This is why Tice has written this public letter now, piling pressure on a desperately cash-strapped Chancellor who has already pointed to the 'dangers' of curtailing these interest payments, accepting the Bank of England's self-serving arguments against change, just as she swallowed whole the Treasury's long-cherished idea of scrapping of winter fuel payments that has turned out to be politically disastrous. QE was launched in response to the 2008 financial crisis, as the Bank of England 'printed' virtual money to try to revive the UK economy. Threadneedle Street created balances 'ex nihilo', using them to buy government bonds (known as gilts) from investors, mainly commercial banks, in an attempt to drive down borrowing costs. Those banks then parked the cash they received for their gilts back at the Bank of England, helping to stabilise their own balance sheets and the broader financial system, while earning the 'base interest' on those deposits. When rates were just 0.5pc following the financial crisis and 0.1pc during the Covid lockdown, the Bank earned far more on returns from gilts than it paid commercial banks in interest, reaping handsome profits which were duly passed on to the Exchequer. But when QE inevitably led to inflation, interest rates started rising – especially over the past few years, up above 5pc. And that has resulted in big losses on QE balances, which the Government is obliged to indemnify, with some £85.9bn being transferred from the Treasury to the Bank since the end of 2022. Even more controversially, the profits of commercial banks have since then been much higher than before Covid – with some of the same institutions perceived to have helped cause the financial crisis making money years down the line, again at taxpayers' expense, from the very emergency measures designed to clear up the mess. And on top of that, as Tice points out in his letter, the Bank has also been selling its stockpile of gilts back to the market – so-called quantitative tightening (QT) – crystallising billions of pounds of losses for the taxpayer. Again, many serious economists think this is a mistake, with some of the bonds bought during times of genuine distress now being sold at knockdown prices. 'Once again this is a voluntary decision by the Bank of England, that is imposing tens of billions of pounds of unnecessary losses on the taxpayer,' wrote Tice to Governor Bailey. 'QT is also partly responsible for keeping gilt yields higher than they otherwise would be, resulting in even more punitive interest costs, imposing yet more strain on the Government's profit and loss account,' Tice continued. He is right. And, of course, the Bank decided to begin its QT programme just a couple of days before Liz Truss's 'mini-Budget', piling pressure on government debt markets by flooding them with additional gilts, just as a Tory prime minister was launching policies designed to scale back the size of the state. The timing of that decision, at the very least an important contributory factor in the chaos which ensued, is almost never remarked upon. It certainly will be if the political and media class, at Tice's behest, now becomes seriously interested in the inner workings of the Bank of England's balance sheet.
