
'No money, no plan, no safety net': Shark Tank India's Anupam Mittal shares his bold move that helped build his startup
Anupam Mittal recalls being advised to play it safe and rebuid slowly.
In a world where conventional wisdom often rewards caution, Shaadi.com founder Anupam Mittal is flipping the script. In a recent viral LinkedIn post, the entrepreneur and Shark Tank India judge shared an unfiltered reflection on risk, resilience, and rewriting the rulebook. For anyone chasing exponential success, Mittal warns: following the 'safe' path won't take you far.According to Mittal, most people dream of 100x returns but operate with a 1x mindset. He admitted that figuring out money took him time, but understanding wealth took even longer. What stood out through the years, though, was a pattern: the biggest wins often came not from playing by the book, but from bending the rules—not illegally, but unapologetically.Sharing a glimpse into his own journey post-dot-com, Mittal recalled moving back to India with no money, no plan, and no safety net. While well-wishers advised him to play it safe and rebuild slowly, he chose the path less travelled—launching an Internet company in a country that barely had Internet. With no direct-to-consumer (D2C) ecosystem, no dating app culture, and no e-commerce playbook, Mittal didn't follow demand. He created it.
He also pointed out how this pattern continues across generations, whether it's content creators starting before content was 'cool,' or founders launching when the market wasn't ready, or brands that thrive by defying conventional paths. The rules, he admits, are useful—but only until you learn when and how to bend them. Ending his post with a powerful note for builders and dreamers alike, Mittal wrote: 'First learn the rules. Then, write your own. Because 'play it safe' rarely makes history.'
Users flooded Anupam Mittal's post with praise, calling his story a powerful reminder that real breakthroughs often stem not from outright defiance, but from the courage to think differently, with intention rather than impulse. Many resonated with the idea that while understanding the rules is crucial, true impact often comes from knowing when to rewrite them. Others reflected on how personal growth and game-changing success can come from trusting one's gut over the conventional rulebook, even if it means being a little bold—or a little crazy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
After Jeff Bezos closes down 5th Avenue, video shows ‘crane' delivering furniture to billionaire's penthouse
A new video has hit the Internet that shows furniture being delivered to Jeff Bezos' penthouse on 5th Avenue by a crane. In the video, the huge piece of wrapped furniture was seen being delivered using a crane at 212 5th Avenue, which is a 24-story building. The item was being delivered at the top section of this building, where Bezos reportedly owns five apartments spanning the top four floors worth $119 million, according to NY Post. Raffi Arslanian, who is the owner of luxury candle company Thompson Ferrier, captured the commotion at 5th Avenue on video. Arslanian can be heard saying in the video, "You want to see how Jeff Bezos delivers his furniture? Let me show you!" Arslanian's office is a block away from the place where the entire ruckus was taking place, and workers and units could be seen gathered around the area. "Now back to reality, where, when we move, we get a U-Haul and we do it ourselves, or at best, we get a company to do it — but we don't close the street," Arslanian commented about the closure of 5th Avenue by Bezos for this furniture-delivery activity. The Internet has gone gaga over this clip and the NY Post's clip has gone insanely viral on X. A user commented while retweeting the video,"Jeff Bezos had furniture delivered to his NYC penthouse by crane, shutting down part of Fifth Avenue. The items were hoisted up to the 24th floor. It's said this kind of service costs over $20,000 a day, plus permits. Ordinary things." Another user reacted saying,"18 people and the police had a reason to come to work for the day. Time to be mad about it."


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
AI versus first jobbers: Here are six tips for bright young students as AI threatens entry-level jobs
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT founder Dario Amodei has set the cat among the pigeons by predicting that AI could eliminate half of all entry-level, white-collar jobs within five years. Aneesh Raman, a senior leader in LinkedIn, sees 'the bottom rung of the job ladder breaking', with entry-level coding, para-legal and consulting analyst jobs under threat of being 'replaced with AI'.Molly Kinder of Brookings says, 'These tools are so good that I no longer need marketing analysts, finance analysts and research assistants.'Even in my tiny company, we have 'replaced' a couple of junior researchers with deep research AI agents from OpenAI and phenomenon of entrylevel jobs being under AI threat is not only anecdotal. Raman sees hard evidence of this on LinkedIn, with 63% of VPs and above agreeing that AI might eventually take on some of the entry-level roles and tasks. The latest US job data reveals that the unemployment rate for college grads has risen by 30%, compared with about 18% for all by big tech and consulting firms support this assertion. PwC recently laid off 1,500 US employees, most of them recent hires. Microsoft got rid of about 3% of its workforce, most of them software engineers and project managers. A now-famous memo by the Spotify CEO froze all hiring, insisting that employees must first prove that AI can't do that job before they hire a human has always impacted jobs, destroying many old ones, but also creating new, unexpected ones. The IT wave put old-school clerks and stenographers to pasture, but created millions of software developers and search engine marketers. Manufacturing went through a similar however, is different in the sense that it is a cognitive technology—one of the brain, rather than of the hand. So, it squarely takes aim at the knowledge worker and the creative seems different with AI is how it is impacting first jobbers and entry-level workers. This is dangerous, as it is in the formative years that youngsters learn skills and gain basic code and debugging are how they rise to become great software engineers; junior paralegals and associates draft clauses and contracts that prepares them for partner-level tasks; and retail and customer service agents learn the basics before they can rise up the hierarchy. These are, coincidentally, the tasks that AI can do best. Deep Research can do the job of researchers; vibe coding with Cursor AI of entry-level software; while Harvey AI and NotebookLM draft excellent curiously, AI seems to be favouring the older people—with their human qualities of judgement, experience, institutional memory and collaboration, sharpened over years. It is in these human skills that young people need to be groomed. But if entry jobs go away, it will create a massive unemployment and educational crisis, and choke the pipeline of young people who can replace the our obsession for software and STEM, it was not only computer or software engineering graduates who joined tech firms as software engineers. Legions of mechanical, electronics and even civil engineers did the same. There is a whole world to build out there outside of software. Manufacturing firms desperately need engineers to run their machines, there are bridges to be built, roads to be repaired and data centres to be run. For instance, Google recently announced a $10 million grant, among other things, to train electricians for the power plant and data centre boom that AI has sowed. This huge shortage means electrical engineers in data centre clusters in the US are earning significantly more than software engineers do. Simply put, say hello to the revolutionary idea that mechanical engineers do mechanical definition of literacy has changed. It was about reading, writing and arithmetic; now it is beyond that to working naturally with AI tools and agents. Young people, including those I teach at Ashoka and other universities, are fast adapting to be AI literate and use AI tools in everything they do, to get a leg up in their job search. At KPMG, recent graduates are reportedly leveraging AI tools and handling tax jobs that used to be done by employees with three-plus years' experience. Big legal firms are encouraging early-career lawyers to work on complex contracts that once senior people will have to rediscover humanities with subjects of logic, grammar, ethics, philosophy and literature to keep our competitive advantage. With AI agents increasingly handling the technical 'how-to' of tasks, the human edge will lie in the 'why' and the 'what next'. The 'humble' subjects of humanities like language, philosophy, grammar and the arts are the ones that provide us critical frameworks for understanding context, ethics, human motivation, creativity and critical judgment —skills that are inherently difficult for AI to replicate meaningfully. As answers become commoditised, questions or prompts become important, and increasingly employers will prefer graduates with a mix of humanities and technical and SMEs build economies, not large monolithic organisations. More and more first jobbers will choose to become entrepreneurs. The New York Times writes about how at Stanford University, fewer grads are considering tech and finance careers, and more of them are plunging into starting companies — 'on the theory that if humans are about to lose their labor advantages to powerful AI systems, they had better hurry and do something big'.There is no rule that people must do only one job at a time. As AI rolls in, multiple skills will become much more important. Be a software engineer and a chef; qualify as a designer and run a pet foster home; build websites as well as toys for children. Think of your career not as a linear progression in a single industry, but a portfolio you are before this era, young people entered jobs as apprentices. They would pay a master blacksmith or surgeon to teach them their craft, before setting up a practice of their own. The modern corporate organisation reversed that trend; young people were paid to learn during their initial years. As AI replaces basic skills and reinvents work, there could be a reversal. There could be a future where humans would invest to do our first job, before we claim the right to earn.


The Hindu
12 hours ago
- The Hindu
Evaluate your options
I am in the first year of BBA (Marketing Management). My college does not provide internships and I feel the course is not going to help. I am interested in Law but didn't get admission. Should I continue this expensive course or quit and focus on something else? Kaksh Dear Kaksh, You seem to be at a crossroads and quite confused. Weigh your options carefully before making a final decision. Seek career counselling to gain an understanding of what you want and then explore your choices. Connect with alumni from your college or other BBA programmes to understand their career trajectories. Assess the actual curriculum of your college. Create networking opportunities by attending industry events, connecting with professionals on LinkedIn, and seeking mentorship to enhance your learning experience. Calculate the financial burden and consider the potential return on investment. Research the current job market and identify in-demand skills and career paths. Where do you see yourself in a few years from now? What kind of job would interest you? If Law remains your primary interest, plan properly and re-take CLAT or MH-CET Law. Also explore other options that align with your interests and career goals. A degree in Economics, Political Science, or Mass Communication can be a good base for law and also other careers. Take your time to research and evaluate your options, and do not be in a rush. I have done BSMS, MA in Sociology through distance learning, and qualified in the SET. Should I do a or What are my career options? Alisha Dear Alisha, You have a unique and interesting combination of qualifications! First, identify your personal interests and career aspirations. Do you enjoy teaching, research, or community outreach? Research the job market in your region to identify in-demand skills and qualifications. If your primary goal is to teach in schools, a is the most direct and necessary qualification. Your BSMS degree and M.A. Sociology can be valuable assets in teaching related subjects or offering a unique perspective. If you are interested in higher education, research or educational administration, then an would be a more suitable choice. Your M.A. Sociology and SET qualification provide a strong foundation for advanced studies in education. You could also consider further studies, like a Ph.D., to enhance your career prospects in academia or research. Career options would be available across school teaching, higher education role, educational research, health education and community outreach, (with NGOs, government agencies, or healthcare organisations to promote health awareness and education), civil service roles particularly those related to education, health, or social welfare, content development and consulting. I am in Class 12 (Commerce stream). I wish to be a company secretary. Should I do a or BBA? Varada Dear Varada, Both have their own merits and approach the subject matter with different focus. However, if your primary goal is to become a Company Secretary, a is generally considered more suitable, as it emphasises accounting, finance, taxation, and business law and provides a strong foundation in accounting and law, which are highly relevant for a company secretary. BBA, on the other hand, focuses on management principles, including marketing, human resources, and organisational behaviour and provides a broader understanding of business operations. While management skills are valuable, the core of a Company Secretary leans towards legal and financial compliance. Regardless of your undergraduate degree, focus on preparing for the Company Secretary (CS) exams conducted by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI). I am going to start preparing for the NEET from next year. Can you give me tips on how I can do this properly? Parvati Dear Parvati, Starting your preparation a year in advance is a good strategy. Understand the NEET exam, the syllabus (which is based on the Class 11 and 12 NCERT syllabus for Physics, Chemistry, Botany and Zoology), the exam pattern (number of questions, marking scheme, and duration), and the pattern of the past papers. Create a realistic study plan that allocates sufficient time for each subject. Split this up into daily, weekly, and monthly goals based on weightage given to the topic and difficulty level. Spend time on numericals in Physics and Chemistry, and gain conceptual understanding across all subjects. Spend extra time to learn concepts that are unclear. Revise regularly to reinforce learned concepts by using flashcards, mind maps, and short notes. Make sure that you have the right study resources: NCERT textbooks, reference books, online resources, test series, and relevant study materials. Consider joining a reputable coaching institute if you need structured guidance and mentorship. Consistency is key to success. Stick to your study plan and avoid procrastination. Eat a balanced diet and maintain your energy levels and focus. Get enough sleep and allow your brain the rest it deserves. Engage in regular physical activity to reduce stress and improve concentration. Practise stress management techniques like meditation, yoga, or deep breathing exercises. Take regular short breaks during your study sessions to avoid burnout. Most importantly, maintain a positive attitude and believe in your abilities. Minimise distractions like social media and unnecessary use of devices. Don't compare yourself to others. Focus on your own progress.