MGNREGS job cardholders have to complete e-KYC verification within three months: Odisha minister
The move has come after Union minister of state for Rural Development Kamlesh Paswan in a reply in the Lok Sabha, revealed that Odisha has deleted over 1.44 lakh fake job cards in the last three years. State Panchayati Raj and Rural Development minister Rabi Narayan Naik, however, described the presence of fake cards as a legacy issue inherited from the previous BJD government.
'In the last one year, we have issued around 2 lakh job cards to genuine beneficiaries who were previously left out. Our government is committed to transparency and accountability. Misuse of public money will not be tolerated,' Naik said.
He also said the government has been proactive in ensuring that all eligible individuals are covered under welfare schemes such as ration cards, PMAY, PM-Kisan, CM Kisan, and Subhadra Yojana. The e-KYC process, he said, will help weed out ghost entries and ineligible people who have obtained job cards to avail other government benefits.
According to official data, the state has issued 66.5 lakh job cards to 1.09 crore people, of which 43.19 lakh cards are currently active. The number of active workers stands at 65.53 lakh.
In his reply in the Parliament, the Union minister said that Odisha deleted 1,14,454 fake job cards in 2022-23, 22,226 cards in 2023-24, and 7,566 cards in 2024-25.
'Since the responsibility for implementing MGNREGS lies with the state governments, it is up to them to take appropriate action in cases of irregularities. This may include investigations and legal action, depending on the severity of the issue,' Paswan stated.
The mandatory e-KYC for job cards comes after a similar verification exercise was undertaken to identify and remove ghost and ineligible ration cards from circulation across the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 minutes ago
- First Post
Op Sindoor debate in Parl today, PM Modi says precision strikes a message for terrorists
PM Modi set the tone of the government as the Parliament prepares for a fiery debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. The Prime Minister warned that there will be no safe havens for terrorists read more As the Indian parliament gears up to debate the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Sunday that the precision strikes of Pakistani terror camps in May were India's message that there are no safe havens for terrorists and their masters. While speaking at an event in Tamil Nadu's Gangaikonda Cholapuram, the prime minister said that India places the highest priority on its national security. He emphasised that Operation Sindoor has created a new awakening and a new self-confidence across the country. PM Modi was attending the event to honour Chola emperor Rajendra Chola when he made his stance on the matter clear. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The world witnessed India's firm and decisive response to the threat against its sovereignty during Operation Sindoor, and it has sent a clear message: there is no haven for terrorists and enemies of the nation,' the prime minister said in his address. PM Modi sets the tone of the government ahead of the debate Many believe that with this address, the prime minister has set the tone for the government's response to the debate in parliament, which will take place in the Lok Sabha on Monday. Meanwhile, the Opposition is planning to open the front by talking about the big terror attacks under 'PM Modi's watch'. The debate in Lok Sabha is coming after a first week of disruption of Parliament's Monsoon session and is expected to be a fiery one. The two sides have agreed to a marathon 16-hour debate in each House, which invariably stretches longer in practice. Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is likely to initiate the debate immediately after the question hour in the Lok Sabha. Sources close to the matter told The Times of India that Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar will be speaking on the issues amid indications that the PM may intervene to convey his government's 'robust' stand against terrorism. Meanwhile, the Leader of the Opposition in LS and RS - Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge - would lead the charge against the government along with Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav. It is believed that Congress is planning to attack the government and particularly PM Modi over national security. The Opposition is most likely to point toward the repeated big terror attacks under PM Modi's watch. Since the Pahalgam terror attack, Congress and the opposition have been pointing out that the terrorists singled out the tourists by religion to execute them. Ahead of the debate, Congress also raised the issue of US President Donald Trump's claims of halting Operation Sindoor and calling for a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. On Sunday, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh pointed out that since May 10, Trump has claimed '26 times' that he stopped the operation by 'threatening to cut off trade with India, and claimed that five fighter jets may have been shot down'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Even though Congress had been demanding a special two-day session of Parliament immediately after Operation Sindoor was abruptly halted, that demand was ignored. Nevertheless, better late than never,' he wrote in a post on X.
The Wire
3 minutes ago
- The Wire
Operation Sindoor: Narendra Modi's Image Versus National Interest
Prime minister Narendra Modi should know that seeking the cooperation of opposition parties to project India's case abroad after Operation Sindoor must necessarily be accompanied by showing some respect for the opposition in domestic politics. You cannot seek opposition cooperation to present a unified foreign policy position abroad and continue to treat opposition parties as "enemies" in domestic politics. After all, it was the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat who had advised the Bharatiya Janata Party not to treat the opposition as enemies and also constructive engagement after the BJP's disappointing performance at the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. In this regard has Modi learnt any lessons from the 2024 Lok Sabha results? The basic attitude and approach doesn't seem to have changed. Modi still believes that he can cynically manipulate the opposition through coercive politics without showing any sincerity of purpose. It is common knowledge now that Operation Sindoor, though a limited success, was badly bungled at several levels and mistakes were made which could have been avoided. This is something the government is yet to admit buy responsible Indian military officers have dropped adequate hints in public fora. When an honest military officer cited " restraint from political leadership" as a reason for some Indian fighter planes going down, he was serving the interest of truth. The Modi government's initial silence on the other hand was meant to protect the prime minister's image. Modi was clearly on the backfoot after operation Sindoor and was unable to fully convince his own constituency (including the RSS) that it was an unqualified success. He therefore swallowed his ego for the first time and approached the opposition parties to take part in a joint delegation to present India's case abroad as no country had explicitly condemned Pakistan's role in the Pahalgam terror attack. The Congress party led by Rahul Gandhi has been been raising tough questions around Operation Sindoor and sought a special session of parliament to discuss everything threadbare. Other opposition parties wanted the same. But then the cynical, coercive and manipulative template of politics is embedded in the regime's DNA. The opening of the parliament session was marked by the unprecedented resignation of vice-president Jagdeep Dhankhar. This was the distraction the BJP needed to create chaos and disrupt what might have been a relatively more orderly parliament session with the citizens eager to learn more about the critical issues of national interest such as Operation Sindoor and the stupendous claims by US president Donald Trump on India-Pakistan ceasefire linked to trade talks. The reality is that the president of the world's biggest military power has repeated 25 times that he stopped the India-Pakistan military exchange which was about to spillover to the nuclear domain with the threat of trade. Whether Modi likes it or not, this issue will have to be discussed in parliament. The people of this country cannot be kept in the dark simply because Modi's personal image is to be kept intact. This, in fact, is the nub of the issue. Operation Sindoor and the multiple issues it has thrown up demands an open discussion in parliament to further national interests. But the regime's ecosystem is bent upon creating distractions and confusion to protect Modi's image. So national interest and the ruling ecosystem's attempt to save Modi's image are totally at odds with each other today. This was apparent even during Operation Sindoor. The BJP's media ecosystem projected Modi as a warrior who will not spare Pakistan but the moment the ceasefire happened, Modi's picture was withdrawn and replaced with that of government spokesperson Vikram Misri who announced the ceasefire. This was undisguised manipulation. Similarly, people noticed how Modi used the opposition's cooperation to burnish his own image with his domestic constituency. Even before the opposition delegation had returned, external affairs minister S. Jaishankar was boasting at a public forum that Modi had achieved with the opposition parties what even Indira Gandhi couldn't have done in the 1970s. Thus everything is a personal image building exercise for Modi first, and then something else. One only hopes that Shashi Tharoor and Manish Tiwari have internalised this aspect of Modi's narcissism when they lend unqualified support to Operation Sindoor in "national interest." Don't they see how "national interest" seamlessly converts to Modi's interest in domestic politics? Don't they see how the hyphenation of India with Pakistan, which they speak against in global fora, is paradoxically a key component of Modi's image building politics in the cow belt? They might see more of it in the current parliament session as the ruling party cynically manages everything as it has done in the past. Indeed how Modi treats the opposition parties in domestic politics, as aptly articulated by Mohan Bhagwat himself, is fundamentally the bane of Indian politics and the primary cause of democratic backsliding today. If this is not fixed nothing is fixed.
Hans India
3 minutes ago
- Hans India
Investments in crypto, is it a catalyst or cataclysm
The cryptocurrency world, born from the cypherpunk dream of circumventing traditional financial gatekeepers and government oversight, finds itself in a profound and deeply ironic moment. With each passing day, the US administration isn't just tolerating crypto; it's actively formalising and legalising it, providing the very structure its creators sought to avoid. This unexpected embrace, far from stifling the industry, is fueling a new wave of institutional euphoria and mainstream acceptance, fundamentally reshaping crypto's trajectory and granting it fresh legs for growth. What many early proponents aimed to subvertironically became the wing of the dominant power. Bitcoin, the cryptocurrencies' genesis block famously contained the headline decrying bank bailouts. The repulsion from the fiat currency with foundational thesis on decentralization, privacy, and freedom from government-controlled monetary systems. Yet, the current surge in legitimacy and capital inflow is undeniably abetted by the deliberate U.S. government policy. This isn't accidental tolerance but a calculated, sometimes contentious, move to bring the unruly asset class within the regulatory perimeter. The pivotal shift began not with sweeping legislation, but with a crucial, though reluctant regulatory nod of introducing futures-based Bitcoin ETFs. This provided a familiar, regulated wrapper for institutional investors wary of direct crypto exposure. It was a signal that the SEC, albeit cautiously, was opening a door. The trickle of institutional capital the true watershed moment arrived with the long-awaited approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024. This wasn't just another product, it was a game-changer. Suddenly, major Wall Street players like BlackRock, Fidelity, and VanEck could offer funds holding the actual Bitcoin, traded on traditional exchanges. The GENIUS Act not only legitimised the digital tokens but mandated stablecoin issuers to maintain reserves backing outstanding payment stable coins on at least one-on-one basis. The reserves may consist of certain assets including US dollars, federal reserve notes, funds held at certain insured or regulated depository institutions, short-term treasuries, reverse repo agreements and money market funds. The law while providing leeway to the stablecoins to enter the mainstream has also addressed a consistent market for the dollar assets, which is being increasingly shunned by the foreign sovereigns. The legislation has brought clarity on the asset classification, regulatory framework while streamlining anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines. This wave of regulation, even if incomplete, grants the industry a form of 'pseudo-legitimacy'. The US is charging ahead with these policy formulations even as the rest of the world is in a 'wait-and-watch' mode. The EU while a pioneer in MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) is restrictive and complex in implementation. The UK and Switzerland are actively working on the framework but still finalising the details. Singapore and UAE have built progressive crypto-friendly regulations to foster innovation while enforcing investor protection. The other major economies like China and India are often maintained stricter stances or even outright bans, creating a fragmented global with this backdrop, would an investment in cryptos make sense for investors? Post pandemic, increasingly Indians have participated in crypto trading extending beyond the urban areas into smaller cities, primarily driven by the younger population. Though, many of burnt their hands with the tokens beyond the blue-chips (like Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc.) the lure for quick returns has allowed to continue to pursue. Domestic crypto exchanges like CoinDCX, ZebPay are legally allowed to operate with FIU-IND (Financial Intelligence Unit) along with the basic KYC compliance. Lack of legislation puts them beyond the purview of SEBI, RBI currently while a flat 30 per cent tax plus applicable surcharge and 4 per centcess is levied over the gains made in these digital assets. Also, a 1 per cent TDS is automatically deducted by the Indian exchanges exceeding Rs. 10K. Stable coins are gaining currency thanks to the recent US legislations, are increasingly finding interest among the 100 million crypto users in India. Though better than the 'rug-pulls' of ICO (Initial Coin Offering) frenzy of '17, the crypto heists are now becoming a menace. Two Indian exchanges were breached with WazirX reportedly loosing $230mn and recently CoinDCX lost about $44mn. Despite the cybersecurity breaches and lack of regulation, the historical returns (though limited period of history) aren't allowing to investors to ignore this burgeoning asset class. (The author is a partner at 'Wealocity Analytics', a SEBI registered Research Analyst firm and could be reached at [email protected])
