
Here's why people are putting grip tape on their $2,000 Galaxy Z Fold 7
TL;DR Despite largely positive reviews, several Galaxy Z Fold 7 users report difficulty opening the device due to its ultra-thin sides and strong magnets.
Community members have tried cases, skins, grip tape, and techniques like optimal thumb placement as workarounds.
Some suggest hardware changes, like grippier textures or indentations, could improve usability without compromising the design too much.
Chinese foldables have dominated the last few years, mainly because Samsung was asleep at the wheel. But with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, Samsung has surprisingly turned the tide in its favor. Not only has the foldable received rave reviews, but users have lapped up on this actually good foldable. However, the first wave of users have encountered a peculiar problem: The Fold 7 is so thin that opening it is a problem.
Reddit user Joneep recently shared that opening the Fold 7 is really difficult. According to them, the sides of the phone are too thin, which doesn't give them enough surface area to grip onto. The magnets holding the phone shut are too strong, so they need a bit of force to unfold the Fold 7. The user complains that they cannot open the phone while they are in the middle of errands, as they need to be careful not to drop the phone at the same time.
And it's not just one user complaining about this; several others in the Reddit thread echo the concerns. A Reddit user mentioned that opening the phone is easier with a case on, but they want to use it without a case to appreciate its thin profile. ZeCoderX agrees that using a complete case makes unfolding the device much easier. Reddit user CriticalDuckky mentions that a lot of reviewers slipped with their first attempt at opening the phone.
Reddit user Djic mentions that Samsung should have added a grippier texture to the frame, while Alternative-Farmer98 wishes Samsung had added an indentation to make it easier to pop open the phone. However, these changes are a bit too late to make on the Fold 7.
Users have also gotten crafty when trying to open the Fold 7. For instance, one Reddit user used CatTongue grip tape on the sides. The phone pictured is a Fold 6, but the same product will also work wonders with the Fold 7.
Others in the thread mention that Dragon Grips also work well. You could use any other grip tape, too, like Reddit user SpaceDandye did on their Fold 7, though the execution could have been better.
Reddit user xRAMBx recommends using a grippy skin like dbrand's Swarm to add more texture for your fingers to grip onto, though note that for the Fold 7, dbrand's skins only cover the back of the device and not the side frame. It's a cleaner application, but will not add any grip to the side frame.
Reddit user KillianReaver recommends using a SleekGrip strip—a collapsible strip that lets you use a phone one-handed and, in this case, confidently grip the phone to make it easier to open.
If you don't want to spend any more money or try quick-fix mods, Reddit user grepresentitive has shared a helpful technique to open the Fold 7 if you're having trouble. When the phone is closed, you need to place a thumb on each of the folding halves, but position your thumb one after the other, not side-by-side. Your middle and ring fingers on both hands should be placed on the hinge on the back. This gives you the best angle to open the fold with gentle downward pressure, without using any fingernails.
For what it's worth, none of our team members have complained about the Fold 7's being too thin to open reliably. Samsung's foldables have long been challenging to open with one hand, even the Flip foldables, but that's more due to the sturdy hinge than anything else. The Fold 7 is admittedly more challenging to open than previous Folds because of its thinness, but it's not difficult by itself.
What about you? Do you find the Fold 7 difficult to open? Vote and let us know more in the comments below:
Do you find the Galaxy Z Fold 7 difficult to open?
0 votes
Yes, the Fold 7 is difficult to open. I prefer using the phone without a case.
NaN %
Yes, the Fold 7 is difficult to open, but I use a case which makes it easier.
NaN %
No, the Fold 7 is easy to open, even without a case.
NaN %
I don't own a Fold 7.
NaN %
Follow

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Google Issues ‘Critical Security' Warning For All Pixel Users
Google surprised Pixel users in July, with a monthly security update lacking any actual security updates. But we're back on train for August. Google has confirmed a 'critical security vulnerability' that opens phones to remote attacks. Ironically, despite all its other security benefits, this threat only affects Android 16. So there's some good news for Samsung users who would otherwise continue to harbor frustration at the company's latest Android upgrade delays—maybe. Google warns CVE-2025-48530 'could lead to remote code execution in combination with other bugs, with no additional execution privileges needed.' It emphasizes that 'user interaction is not needed for exploitation' of this System level flaw. This isn't the only fix, with a number of high-severity vulnerabilities addressed as well. But the critical bug will generate the most attention, especially as it affects just the latest version of the Android OS. As ever, Pixels have been first to this new software. The update will now be released for Pixels and you can expect it to roll out to phones within days. Again a stark difference between Google's phones and Samsung's, with Android's leading OEM still subject to a patchwork quilt of updates by region, model and carrier, and lacking 'seamless' updates across almost all devices. As ever you can check your Pixel device has the latest security updates installed. Owners of other smartphones, Samsung included, should check their own monthly bulletins to confirm the fixes, the timing and the model eligibility. Samsung's own August monthly security release has also just been issued.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asian Market Value Picks: 3 Companies That May Be Trading Below Intrinsic Estimates
Amidst global economic uncertainties and fluctuating trade policies, Asian markets have shown resilience, with varying impacts on indices across the region. This environment presents opportunities for discerning investors to explore stocks that may be trading below their intrinsic value, particularly those with strong fundamentals and potential for growth despite external pressures. Top 10 Undervalued Stocks Based On Cash Flows In Asia Name Current Price Fair Value (Est) Discount (Est) Xi'an NovaStar Tech (SZSE:301589) CN¥155.51 CN¥309.46 49.7% SpiderPlus (TSE:4192) ¥506.00 ¥997.79 49.3% Ningbo Sanxing Medical ElectricLtd (SHSE:601567) CN¥22.88 CN¥45.72 50% Nanya Technology (TWSE:2408) NT$43.75 NT$87.13 49.8% Nan Ya Printed Circuit Board (TWSE:8046) NT$176.50 NT$350.51 49.6% Insource (TSE:6200) ¥926.00 ¥1843.53 49.8% H.U. Group Holdings (TSE:4544) ¥3254.00 ¥6446.96 49.5% Elan (TSE:6099) ¥850.00 ¥1696.06 49.9% cottaLTD (TSE:3359) ¥441.00 ¥871.25 49.4% Astroscale Holdings (TSE:186A) ¥676.00 ¥1333.68 49.3% Click here to see the full list of 274 stocks from our Undervalued Asian Stocks Based On Cash Flows screener. Let's take a closer look at a couple of our picks from the screened companies. Beijing HyperStrong Technology Overview: Beijing HyperStrong Technology Co., Ltd. designs, develops, integrates, and operates energy storage power stations across China, Europe, North America, and Australia with a market cap of CN¥16.64 billion. Operations: The company's revenue segments include the design, development, integration, and operation of energy storage power stations across its key markets in China, Europe, North America, and Australia. Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 37.2% Beijing HyperStrong Technology is trading at CN¥92.37, significantly below its estimated fair value of CN¥147.06, suggesting it may be undervalued based on cash flows. Its revenue and earnings are forecast to grow over 30% annually, outpacing the Chinese market's growth rates. However, its dividend yield of 1.19% is not well covered by free cash flows. Recent innovations like the HyperBlock M enhance its competitive edge in energy storage solutions through modularity and efficiency improvements. Upon reviewing our latest growth report, Beijing HyperStrong Technology's projected financial performance appears quite optimistic. Unlock comprehensive insights into our analysis of Beijing HyperStrong Technology stock in this financial health report. Shenzhen KSTAR Science and Technology Overview: Shenzhen KSTAR Science and Technology Co., Ltd. operates in the technology sector, focusing on power electronics and renewable energy solutions, with a market cap of CN¥13.86 billion. Operations: Unfortunately, the provided text does not contain specific revenue segment information for Shenzhen KSTAR Science and Technology Co., Ltd. Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 48.5% Shenzhen KSTAR Science and Technology is trading at CN¥23.8, well below its estimated fair value of CN¥46.24, indicating potential undervaluation based on cash flows. The company's revenue is projected to grow 22.3% annually, surpassing the Chinese market's average growth rate. Despite a forecasted earnings growth of 32.4%, profit margins have declined from last year, and the dividend track record remains unstable with recent reductions in payouts for 2024 dividends. The growth report we've compiled suggests that Shenzhen KSTAR Science and Technology's future prospects could be on the up. Click here to discover the nuances of Shenzhen KSTAR Science and Technology with our detailed financial health report. Qingdao Baheal Medical Overview: Qingdao Baheal Medical INC. is involved in the research, development, production, wholesale, and retail of pharmaceutical products across China, the United States, Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom with a market cap of CN¥11.77 billion. Operations: Qingdao Baheal Medical INC. generates revenue through its activities in the research, development, production, wholesale, and retail sectors of pharmaceutical products across several international markets including China, the United States, Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom. Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 18.5% Qingdao Baheal Medical, trading at CN¥22.39, is priced below its fair value estimate of CN¥27.46, reflecting potential undervaluation based on cash flows. Despite a volatile share price recently, earnings are projected to grow significantly at 20.05% annually over the next three years, although this lags behind the broader Chinese market's growth rate. The company affirmed a dividend payout for 2024, which may appeal to income-focused investors amid stable revenue growth projections of 13% per year. In light of our recent growth report, it seems possible that Qingdao Baheal Medical's financial performance will exceed current levels. Click here and access our complete balance sheet health report to understand the dynamics of Qingdao Baheal Medical. Turning Ideas Into Actions Unlock more gems! Our Undervalued Asian Stocks Based On Cash Flows screener has unearthed 271 more companies for you to here to unveil our expertly curated list of 274 Undervalued Asian Stocks Based On Cash Flows. Hold shares in these firms? Setup your portfolio in Simply Wall St to seamlessly track your investments and receive personalized updates on your portfolio's performance. Streamline your investment strategy with Simply Wall St's app for free and benefit from extensive research on stocks across all corners of the world. Searching for a Fresh Perspective? Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention. Diversify your portfolio with solid dividend payers offering reliable income streams to weather potential market turbulence. Fuel your portfolio with companies showing strong growth potential, backed by optimistic outlooks both from analysts and management. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include SHSE:688411 SZSE:002518 and SZSE:301015. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I biked 12 miles with the Apple Watch 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, and there's a clear winner
The Apple Watch Series 10 is the best smartwatch for iPhone users in 2025, and also one of my favorite smartwatches ever. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is similarly one of the best smartwatches for Android, especially if you're after useful Gemini AI features. But which one is the best for biking? To find out, I biked 12 miles wearing the Apple Watch Series 10 on my left wrist and the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic on my right wrist to determine which of these two popular smartwatches is the more competent fitness tracker. As a control, I ran Strava on my handlebar-mounted iPhone 12 Mini. I also set a course for a familiar route, one I've recorded with Strava multiple times prior. Each smartwatch is packed to the gills with fitness tracking and wellness monitoring tech, including built-in GPS, altimeters, heart rate sensors, body temp sensors, and more. You also get a wide variety of fitness tracking modes. In fact, either can autodetect basic workouts like walks, runs, swims, and bike rides without user input. However, for this test, I manually started the tracking app on both to ensure the best results possible. So, which smartwatch, the Apple Watch Series 10 or Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, proved to be more accurate when it comes to tracking a roughly 12-mile bike ride through a mix of forested and urban areas? Read on. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Galaxy Watch 8 is the world's only wearable device with the brilliant Gemini AI voice assistant app built right in. In fact, you can customize a button to open it with ease. The Classic model also features a nifty rotating bezel for navigation. You additionally get best-in-class sleep tracking insight and loads of fitness and wellness tools. Apple's newest device is the brand's thinnest and lightest, while boasting the largest display to date. Sleek and comfortable on the wrist, the Series 10 is a supremely well-rounded smartwatch with more wellness monitoring, fitness tracking, smart, and safety features than you'll know what to do with. The Apple Watch Series 10 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 are fairly evenly matched spec-wise across the board. They each represent the non-tough-built, i.e., non-Ultra, flagship models in either brand's respective lineups. While the Apple Watch Series 10 comes in two sizes (42mm and 46mm), the Galaxy Watch 8 comes in three: 41mm, 44mm, and the 46mm "Classic" edition with rotating bezel. For this test, I used the larger Apple Watch and the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. Comfort-wise, the Series 10 felt a lot better on my wrist throughout my ride than the larger/heavier Samsung. The Galaxy Watch 8's larger case size does allow for a multi-band GPS antenna, compared to a single-band antenna in the Series 10. With my bike route winding through a mix of heavily wooded and densely urban portions of Seattle, Washington, I fully expected the Samsung watch to slightly outperform the Apple Watch regarding distance and elevation tracking data. However, the previous time I pitted the Apple Watch 10 vs the Galaxy Watch 8 in a 5,000-step walk test, the Apple Watch came out on top despite its single-band GPS. Did Apple have a repeat upset win here? Check the results for yourself below. Apple Watch Series 10 Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Strava Distance 11.66 miles 11.73 miles 11.79 miles Elevation gain 735 feet 639 feet 665 feet Average speed (moving) 11.3 mph 12.3 mph 12.2 mph Max speed 20.5 mph 23.8 mph 25.4 mph Average heart rate 165 bpm 166 bpm n/a Max heart rate 178 bpm 180 bpm n/a Calories burned 652 calories 621 calories n/a Battery drain 16% 10% n/a According to Strava, during my one-hour bike ride, I covered nearly twelve miles in distance and gained 660+ feet in elevation. My average moving speed was around 12.2 mph, and my fastest speed was a little over 25 mph. Across the board, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic churned out nearly the same stats as Strava. Sure, the device likely undercounted my total elevation gain by as much as 26 feet, but that's better than overcounting by as much as 70 feet, as the Apple Watch appears to have done. While Apple's total distance data is close enough, both the average speed and max speed appear quite low. As noted above, having recorded this route numerous times prior, I've come to expect a max speed of right around 25 mph and an average speed somewhere between 12 and 15 mph. (Note: Neither smartwatch was piggybacking off a smartphone's location data for this test; I didn't even bring a Samsung phone with me and disabled the ability in the Watch app on my iPhone.) Moving on, heart rate and calories data match up nicely between the Apple Watch and Samsung, something that's oh-so heart-warming to see. However, the Apple Watch Series 10 used a bit more battery to track my excursion compared to the Galaxy Watch 8. Interestingly, in my previous test between these two, it was the Samsung that exhausted more battery. Cupertino may've taken the crown in the first showdown between these two fitness-tracking wearables, but in this bout, it's Mountain View coming out on top with the more accurate workout tracking data. That said, having extensively tested both of these devices, either is a great choice to help you keep tabs on your workout journey. We may be splitting hairs with the results here, but I'd trust either to accurately track my progress over time. In fact, the Galaxy Watch 8's new Running Coach feature and Apple's new Workout Buddy tool both promise personalized, real-time AI coaching. Stay tuned for more in-depth reporting on both, along with a deep dive comparison of these two watches. Which smartwatches or fitness trackers should I test next in a head-to-head competition? And what workout should I do? Let me know in the comments below.