logo
Despite World Bank raising threshold, India achieves big dip in extreme poverty

Despite World Bank raising threshold, India achieves big dip in extreme poverty

Time of India08-06-2025
NEW DELHI: India's extreme poverty rate has fallen sharply over the past decade after the World Bank updated its international poverty line definition and included updated data in its June upgrade of the methodology.
Based on the update, the latest World Bank data showed that the extreme poverty rate had declined from 27.1% in 2011-12 to 5.3% in 2022-23. The number of people living in extreme poverty also fell sharply during this period from 344.47 million in 2011-12 to 75.24 million in 2022-23. This would mean that nearly 270 million were lifted out of extreme poverty during the same period.
In a blog, the World Bank said that the international poverty line for low-income countries has been raised to $3 per person per day from the existing $2.15 per person per day, and for lower middle-income countries it's changed from $3.65 to $4.20 per day and for upper middle-income countries it went up from $6.85 to $8.40.
Given India's inflation rate, between 2017 and 2021, a revised extreme poverty line of $3 would constitute a 15% higher threshold than $2.15 expressed in 2021 prices and result in a 5.3% poverty rate in 2022-23. A new LMIC line of $4.20 would imply a 5% lower threshold for poverty than $3.65 adjusted in 2021 prices and yield a poverty rate of 23.9%, according to the World Bank.
Using the new poverty line for low middle income countries (LMIC), which is at $4.20 per day per person, India's poverty rate fell to 23.9% in 2022-23 from 57.7% in 2011-12.
The number of people in extreme poverty was down from 732.48 million in 2011-12 to 342.32 million in 2022-23, according to the data available on the World Bank's Poverty and Inequality Platform.
Free and subsidised food transfers supported poverty reduction, and the rural-urban poverty gap narrowed. The five most populous states account for 54% of the extremely poor, it had said.
According to the poverty and equity brief published by World Bank in April, extreme poverty (living on less than $2.15 per day) fell from 16.2% in 2011- 12 to 2.3% in 2022-23, lifting 171 million people above this line.
Rural extreme poverty dropped from 18.4% to 2.8% , and urban from 10.7% to 1.1% , narrowing the rural-urban gap from 7.7 to 1.7 percentage points-a 16% annual decline.
The poverty report had also said India has transitioned into the lower-middle-income category. Using the $3.65 per day LMIC poverty line, poverty fell from 61.8% to 28.1%, lifting 378 million people out of poverty. Rural poverty dropped from 69% to 32.5%, and urban poverty from 43.5% to 17.2%, reducing the rural-urban gap from 25 to 15 percentage points with a 7% annual decline, the April report had said.
The updated World Bank data is expected to come as a shot in the arm for the govt and bolster its record of handling the economy and pursuing policies to push inclusive growth and lift millions out of poverty.
Last year, Niti Aayog CEO BVR Subhramanyam had indicated that the poverty level could be less than 5% based on preliminary estimates on the household consumption expenditure (HCES) data released by the statistics office.
World Bank has said that in recent years, the scope and quality of information provided by household surveys has improved enormously, particularly in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, offering a clearer view into people's welfare and day-to-day lives.
Several research papers have also indicated the reduction in extreme poverty over the last decade thanks to robust growth. A survey released last year estimated poverty to have declined to 8.5% from 21% in 2011-12 and pointed out that chronic poverty has come down but there is a significant proportion of people who can slip back into poverty due to "accident of life".
World Bank, which introduced the international poverty line (IPL) in 1990, has undertaken several updates to include changing prices and costs, and the latest update was undertaken on June 5.
The first update to IPL happened in 2001, with subsequent revisions in 2008, 2015, 2022, and more recently this month. This latest update, which also applies to the poverty lines for middle-income countries, follows the release last year of a new set of PPPs based on prices collected in 2021 by the International Comparison Programme.
It also reflects changes in national poverty lines, which is a big reason for the increase, especially for the line that tracks extreme poverty, according to the World Bank.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Interference won't work, innovation will: Fadnavis
Interference won't work, innovation will: Fadnavis

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Interference won't work, innovation will: Fadnavis

PUNE : Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis on Friday said that if local 'dadagiri' and interference continue, Pune would lose its leadership role in the industrial sector. He reminded Punekars that Sambhajinagar is already emerging as the new EV capital and in all likelihood will go ahead of Pune. Even other cities are catching up, he said, and, hence, Pune should now concentrate on innovative hubs to stay ahead in the race. Interference won't work, innovation will: Fadnavis Fadnavis was in the city to sign a MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) with Niti Aayog for Pune Metropolitan Region Growth Hub. Pune is the fifth growth hub in the country. While giving his speech, the chief minister said, 'A big bottleneck of Pune's industrial development is 'local dadagiri' - the interference in the industries by local leaders and goons. They are the ones determining terms about manpower, raw material and others. This is affecting development.' Fadnavis said that this can be achieved only if the socio-political system for industries undergoes change. 'We cannot ask them to work under pressure. Pune has a lot of potential but other centres like Sambhajinagar and Nagpur are fast emerging. Industries are going there even though Pune's biggest capital is manpower and innovation. Hence, the city should concentrate on innovation. Sambhajinagar is the leading EV capital and very soon, it will cross Pune,' he added. Niti Aayog's chief executive officer V R Subramanyham spoke about Pune's advantages, potential, and the weak points it needs to tackle to become a world-class city. 'The central government has already identified and started work for four economic growth hubs and the project implementations have started. Now, we are going to declare five more economic growth hubs, including Pune and Katak. Pune is leading in manufacturing, IT, automobile and education but there are many more sectors which have a lot of potential. For example, agri processing and urban tourism.' He also touched on poor public transport, road network, less open spaces, and traffic issues, calling them hindrances to Pune's growth. Earlier, the chief minister had announced with regard to infrastructure that his government is planning a new Airport Road and a Ring Road. 'It would create more positive impact for the city. Earlier, land and capital used to attract industries but nowadays, industries are going where skilled manpower is available,' he said. Fadnavis also said that to meet global standards, a place need to have ease of business and hassle-free policies. 'Government needs to change its mindset and approve the required permissions within a timeframe. Execution of project on time is important, otherwise the projects become generation projects which keep on progressing but with no output,' he added.

Growth's losing steam, govts must steer better
Growth's losing steam, govts must steer better

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Growth's losing steam, govts must steer better

Infinite growth won't end poverty, better distribution will A motorcar is made of steel, aluminium, copper, glass, rubber, and numerous other things. All of these are finite resources. Steel is also needed for buildings and machinery. Glass for bottles and watch dials. Aluminium for pressure cookers and soda cans. When finite resources have competing uses, it's a miracle that the production of cars, etc, keeps increasing year after year, and the world becomes a wealthier place with it. It wasn't always so, though. Two centuries ago, economists were a grim lot, and Robert Malthus was more pessimistic than most. He worried that there wasn't enough land on Earth to feed the increasing population, which was nudging 1bn then. But we're 8bn-plus now, and growing, without exhausting Earth's carrying capacity. In fact, we've become so used to the idea of growth that a 6.5% increase in GDP seems lacklustre, 5% dismal. In his new book, The Invention of Infinite Growth: How Economists Came to Believe a Dangerous Delusion, Christopher F Jones, associate professor of history at Arizona State University, examines how growth became a modern 'ideal', and its impact on the planet. GDP may be an abstruse idea for most, but it's become the default measure of growth – up is good, down bad, and the faster it rises the better. Some say it's the most powerful number in the world. But as Jones points out, GDP is a relatively recent concept, developed in 1934, and applied only after WW2. The real big change that came with it was that growth – through its proxy GDP – came to be seen as key to jobs, peace and prosperity. Hence, for the first time in history, it became govt's responsibility. Using different policy tools, govts were expected to make national economies run faster. Those that couldn't were booted out in democracies. The idea of infinite growth, however, didn't form for almost 20 years after. It happened in the 1960s when US and USSR were pursuing growth intensely during the Cold War, and oil production in West Asia doubled in a decade, even as the known oil reserves trebled. These developments gave rise to irrational exuberance among economists and policymakers. In 1992, when he was World Bank's chief economist, Larry Summers declared: 'There are no limits to the carrying capacity of the Earth.' But ask scientists if infinite growth is possible, and they'll say no. They're also deeply concerned about the ecological impacts of unbridled growth. So, why are economists divorced from observed reality? Jones says it's because they trust technology to overcome natural limits, and don't concern themselves with the natural world. As long as the 'delusion' of infinite growth shapes policy, clearing forests for highways and mines will be seen as 'progress'. But Jones says it's time economists started taking the environment – and its limits – seriously. The 'false confidence' about 'managing' the consequences of climate change and biodiversity loss should be abandoned. It's known that economic growth and well-being don't increase in tandem beyond the mid-income level. Billionaires are not happier than millionaires – at least not because of their wealth. Since infinite growth is not sustainable, govts should now focus on income distribution rather than maximisation, Jones says. Growth can't be an end anymore – it has to be targeted at those who need it most, and away from those who don't. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

Who is Adriana Kugler? U.S. Fed Governor resigns early. Will Jerome Powell step down as Federal Reserve chair in August?
Who is Adriana Kugler? U.S. Fed Governor resigns early. Will Jerome Powell step down as Federal Reserve chair in August?

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

Who is Adriana Kugler? U.S. Fed Governor resigns early. Will Jerome Powell step down as Federal Reserve chair in August?

U.S. Federal Reserve announced on Friday that Adriana Kugler will step down from her position as a governor of the Federal Reserve Board on August 8. Her term was due to expire in January, but her early resignation gives President Donald Trump an opportunity to more quickly appoint someone who could eventually replace Jerome Powell as chair. Kugler missed the Fed's most recent policy meeting this week and did not vote. In a recent speech, she said the Fed should not cut interest rates "for some time" as tariffs trickle through to consumer prices. The Fed statement about Kugler's early resignation did not give a reason for her decision. The central bank declined to comment beyond the announcement. "It has been an honor of a lifetime to serve on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System," Kugler said in a statement. Powell said in a statement that Kugler "brought impressive experience and academic insights to her work on the board." Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Artificial Intelligence Leadership Project Management Public Policy PGDM Design Thinking others Digital Marketing Product Management Finance Data Science healthcare Healthcare Others Data Science Cybersecurity Data Analytics Operations Management Technology CXO Degree MBA MCA Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details Who is Adriana Kugler? Adriana Kugler has served as a governor at the Fed since September 2023 after being nominated by former President Joe Biden. She plans to return to her job as a public policy professor at Georgetown University in the fall. Kugler is an economist with a background in labor economics who has Colombian heritage and was the U.S. executive director of the World Bank. Live Events When will Jerome Powell Retire? Kugler's decision means that Trump will have the ability to reshape the top ranks of the central bank, both in terms of picking a new chair and filling Kugler's seat. If Trump makes clear that whomever he chooses for Kugler's seat is his pick for the chair, that could make for an awkward and potentially market-rattling situation in which the new governor is seen as something of a shadow chair, potentially undercutting Powell. The opening on the board comes as Trump pressures the Fed to cut interest rates and publicly berates Powell, saying he should lower borrowing costs or resign. The president has also toyed with firing Powell or naming a successor before Powell's term as chair ends in May. On Friday, he went so far as to call on the board to remove Powell from his position as chair. FAQs Q1. Who is U.S. Fed Chair? A1. U.S. Fed Chair is Jerome Powell. Q2. Who is Adriana Kugler? A2. Adriana Kugler is an economist with a background in labor economics who has Colombian heritage and was the U.S. executive director of the World Bank.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store