logo
Corporate bonds in India: From institutional stronghold to broader participation

Corporate bonds in India: From institutional stronghold to broader participation

Economic Times21-07-2025
India's fixed-income landscape is undergoing a quiet yet powerful shift. While equity markets have long dominated headlines, a new narrative is emerging in the bond market in India, led by record-breaking corporate bond issuances, deeper institutional involvement, and a growing appetite for predictable, inflation-beating returns.In FY25, companies raised a record ₹9.9 lakh crore through corporate bonds, according to recent data released by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). That's a 28% increase over the previous year. The rise in corporate bond issuance signals growing traction in India's corporate bond market. This also points to an uptick in private corporate capex. The increased corporate debt outlay is likely to power growth, spearheading India to the third-largest economy position by 2028. 1mg looks to become a digital health hub Even as issuance soars, one question remains: Are retail investors benefiting from this growth, or is their participation in the corporate bond market still lagging?
A ₹53.6 lakh crore corporate bond opportunity untapped by retail
India's overall bond market has now touched ₹226 lakh crore in size (around USD 2.6 trillion), as per RBI's June 2025 Financial Stability Report. Of this, corporate bonds in India account for over ₹53.6 lakh crore in outstanding stock. The rest includes government bonds, treasury bills, and state development loans in India.
Yet, despite this expansion, the Indian bond market remains dominated byinstitutional investors. Mutual funds, insurers, banks, and pension funds still hold 96% of outstanding corporate bonds, according to market estimates. Retail participation rate, by contrast, remains in the low single digits—a glaring gap compared to their enthusiasm for equities and gold.
Why retail investors hesitated — and why that may be changing
Retail investor caution wasn't entirely unfounded. Until recently, many top-rated bonds had minimum investment sizes of ₹1 lakh or more. This ruled out many retail investors. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) reduced the minimum ticket size to ₹10,000; these changes have improved the accessibility of the bond market.
Liquidity is the second pain point, as the secondary corporate bond market remains uneven, with only 3.8% of the total outstanding stock traded monthly. This lack of depth made it harder for individuals to exit their positions before maturity. This concern is especially relevant for those accustomed to the liquidity of stocks or mutual funds.
But the winds are shifting. The minimum investment size has come down sharply. The bond market's liquidity is gradually improving, thanks to stronger regulations, better transparency, and greater accessibility and visibility. Online bond platforms such as Jiraaf are also making it easier for retail investors to participate. The macroeconomic environment is shifting. Interest rates are now easing, with the RBI cutting the repo rate by 100 basis points in 2025. Inflation is gradually cooling. This is prompting more investors to turn to fixed income securities to lock in higher yields. Currently, AAA-rated corporate bonds yield 30-50 basis points more than comparable fixed deposits, while AA-rated corporate bonds offer 50-200 basis points higher returns with a similar level of risk to fixed deposits. The return profile shifts dramatically in favour of investors when A and BBB-rated bonds come into play. These bonds offer 200 to 500 basis points more than fixed deposits with a very balanced risk profile.
While some argue that A- and BBB-rated bonds pose a higher risk and thus offer a higher return, the data paints a different picture. The default ratio of investment-grade bonds, which encompasses the AAA to BBB segment, remains low. According to CRISIL, a credit rating agency, BBB-rated bonds witha three-year tenure havethe highest default rate among investment-grade bonds, at just 2.21%. The lower default rates speak to the safety of corporate bonds as an investment alternative to riskier and more volatile asset classes, such as equities, gold, and real estate.
The attached CRISIL data gives a detailed breakdown of the default rates for various credit ratings.
India's fixed-income market is also undergoing a technological revolution. Platforms such as the SEBI-regulated OBPP player Jiraaf are making corporate bond investments more accessible than ever. With entry points as low as ₹1,000, even everyday investors can now build fixed-income portfolios that were once the domain of institutions.
What is driving the corporate bond market depth
Indian corporate balance sheets are at their healthiest, which is giving Indian Inc considerable headroom to borrow. Corporate bonds offer companies more control than bank loans. Strong financials are also allowing firms to raise capital without diluting its stake in the company. Additionally, interest rates are reducing. This has prompted corporates to turn to the bond market to fund expansion while retaining tenure, rates, and repayment cycles. This ease of access is deepening the bond market from the issuer's point of view in FY26. On the other hand, strong demand from foreign portfolio investors (FPIs), as well as institutional and retail demand is driving the supply-side uptick. The FPIs are attracted to the higher returns provided by corporate bonds as G-sec yields decline. Institutional demand is robust, as debt becomes a more attractive asset in the light of equity market volatility. This is also evident in the increasing cash inflow into debt mutual funds over the past months. Equity investments had been the darling of investors for the past decade, with most experts and amateur investors vouching for the growth aspect of the asset class. However, despite market uproar around high returns, the average Nifty50 return over the past decade is 12%. A 12% equity growth barely beats the returns offered by corporate bonds, while posing a much higher risk and volatility. Investors are realising the stability that corporate bonds provide. They are gradually shifting their preference to bonds, focusing on building a well-diversified bond portfolio that includes bonds from different issuers, ratings, and tenures.
Investment platforms, such as Jiraaf, are helping investors access the Indian corporate bond market by offering curated bonds with transparent credit scoring, making corporate bonds more accessible to non-institutional investors. In addition to providing curated deals, Jiraaf is also developing tools that simplify bond analysis and make it accessible to all. The first of its kind Bond Analyzer brings analysis to the fixed-income realm, which was previously limited to equities.
Looking ahead
Despite its growing size and importance, the Indian bond market still lags behind its global peers in terms of retail penetration.
The direction is promising. As awareness grows, tools become easier to use, and yields remain attractive, there's reason to believe that 2025 could mark an inflection point for retail entry into corporate debt.
For investors seeking to balance risk and return amid equity market volatility, corporate bond investment offers a compelling middle path, blending capital preservation with growth.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the story are independent professional judgment of the experts and we do not take any responsibility for the accuracy of their views. The brand is solely liable for the correctness, reliability of the content and/or compliance of applicable laws. The above is non-editorial content and TIL does not guarantee, vouch or endorse any of it. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified.
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
(This article is generated and published by ET Spotlight team. You can get in touch with them on etspotlight@timesinternet.in)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

15 ‘oligarch billionaires' run India: Ex-Trump negotiator Lighthizer on why he failed with New Delhi
15 ‘oligarch billionaires' run India: Ex-Trump negotiator Lighthizer on why he failed with New Delhi

The Print

time25 minutes ago

  • The Print

15 ‘oligarch billionaires' run India: Ex-Trump negotiator Lighthizer on why he failed with New Delhi

Late on Monday, Trump threatened substantial tariffs on India as he accused it of buying and reselling 'massive amounts' of Russian oil 'for big profits'. With Trump repeating the threat days after announcing 25% tariffs and a Russia penalty on India, a reading of Lighthizer's book presents key insights on Trump's India stance. Lighthizer writes in No Trade is Free that he would try to predict India's position in talks by tracking the interests of its 15 billionaires or 'oligarchs who ran the country', giving a rare insider's peek into how the US President's India policy has unfolded over his two terms. New Delhi: As US President Donald Trump has again threatened to raise tariffs on India supposedly for its Russian oil purchase, it's instructive to see what former US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, who set Trump's trade agenda and negotiated with India, had to say in a 2023 book. Lighthizer, a veteran trade negotiator and once a free-trade sceptic, is widely considered to have curated policy moves of US President Donald Trump, who abruptly revoked special trade privileges to India in his first term. He referred to these billionaires as 'oligarchs' and said it was unusual in the extent to which they 'influence government policy' in India. The 77-year-old also said that India 'suffered from an extremely strong professional bureaucracy' in all areas of government. 'When I was in negotiations with Indian officials, I kept a copy of the biography of each of the country's fifteen or so billionaires on my desk. In predicting Indian government positions, I would look to the interests of these men,' Lighthizer wrote in his book, which was published in 2023. India's opposition parties have often alleged that largecorporate houses and industrialists, such as Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani, enjoy easy access to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government, which work in their interests in exchange for funds. 'I can remember at one point telling an Indian friend of mine who had made a fortune in business that I thought there were fifteen oligarchs who basically ran the country. He corrected me. 'Bob, you're wrong. Only about seven of them actually run the country. The others just try to influence the seven',' Lighthizer wrote in the book, which has an entire chapter dedicated to India. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has called Modi's government a 'suit-boot ki sarkar' (government for the rich) to try to corner the Bharatiya Janata Party as recently as during the 2024 general elections. The Prime Minister has outrightly rejected the allegations, saying that such deceitful political vendetta only hurts the electoral prospects of the Congress. While the two industrialists, also two of India's wealthiest men, have not addressed the charges publicly, their business entities have denied allegations by the Opposition on several counts. India's 'protectionism' In his second term, US President Trump is pushing on with a tariff blitz across countries as he attempts to 'reorder the global economy' with the highest rates since the 1930s. Talks between New Delhi and Washington to clinch a trade deal have remained stalled, with experts saying highly protected agriculture and dairy sectors are sticky issues. Lighthizer also referred to India's 'protectionist' stance in his book. 'India is particularly protectionist in the agricultural sector, where it uses tariffs and safety standards to help politically potent farmers groups,' he wrote in his book, which is full of praise for Trump and his style of politics. In fact, he wrote that he once told Prime Minister Modi that India was 'the most protectionist country in the world' and that it was causing a large and growing trade deficit. 'Indian trade policies have long caused tensions with the United States. India uses many of the tools of modern mercantilism. It has high tariffs, a bureaucracy focused on keeping imports out, and a system of industrial policy and protectionism.' Also Read: Pakistan, Dhaka have played Washington well. Back home, Modi ecosystem has an inner conflict 'Natural friends' India & US Lighthizer, however, said India and the US were 'natural friends'. 'Perhaps, most importantly, the rise and growing militarism of China is the greatest geopolitical concern for both our nations… India feels as threatened as we do by the aggressive surge of China. There is truth in the old saying (modified for obvious reasons) that the adversary of my adversary is my friend.' Lighthizer, once called by Trump the 'greatest United States trade representative in American history', played a crucial role in the imposition of hefty tariffs on Chinese imports during the first term of the US President. While India-US relations grew for the most part during the presidency of Joe Biden, they have remained fragmented due to several trade and policy differences under the deceptive exterior of a vibrant bonhomie between 'great friends' Trump and Modi. Lighthizer said that the Trump administration's strategy with India was to maintain good relations but to use what leverage it had to increase its access to India's market to 'obtain fairness and reciprocity in trade'. He also commented on what he thought of as Modi's personality and political vision. 'Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a particularly interesting figure. He came up through the ranks of right-wing political organizations and clearly considers himself a nationalist. His political party, the Bharatiya Janata Party, is a right-wing Hindu party.' He added: 'He is an extremely gifted politician and the first leader of India who was born after its independence in 1947… Of course, Modi is dedicated to raising India out of poverty. He believes in doing it through state control of innovation, high tariffs, mercantilism, and protectionism. There are lots of hangovers from the time of British rule, but free trade is not one of them.' High praise for Piyush Goyal Lighthizer was sworn in as the 18th US Trade Representative (USTR) in May 2017 and worked in the position till 20 January 2021. The USTR is responsible for developing and coordinating international trade, commodity, and direct investment policy, as well as overseeing negotiations with other countries. At the time he was chosen by Trump to serve as USTR, Lighthizer was a partner at the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (Skadden), where he practised international trade law for over 30 years. Before joining Skadden, Lighthizer served as deputy USTR for US President Ronald Reagan. During this tenure, he negotiated over two dozen bilateral international agreements, including pacts on steel, automobiles, and agricultural products. The latest flashpoint in the recent India-US talks came last week when the US President signed an order imposing a 25 percent tariff on India's exports, 'plus an unspecified penalty' for buying Russian oil and weapons. In the 2023 book, Lighthizer also reflected on his time negotiating with the Indian delegation on tariffs. 'I said (to PM Modi) that I had been negotiating with their trade minister, Suresh Prabhu, for two years and had made absolutely no progress. At times, I said, he had not even returned my call for weeks.' 'Soon after that meeting, negotiations began in earnest. This time they were with a new trade minister named Piyush Goyal, a smart, gifted politician from Mumbai. We raised our issues: tariffs, agriculture access, medical device impediments, barriers to e-commerce and insurance, discrimination in the electronic payment sector, fish subsidies, and the list goes on. We made headway but could never quite close a deal.' (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read:Trump tariff forces India to shed illusion. Stop conflating status with power

HC frees Margadarsi from criminal liability in 18-yr-old case
HC frees Margadarsi from criminal liability in 18-yr-old case

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

HC frees Margadarsi from criminal liability in 18-yr-old case

Hyderabad: In a major relief to the successors of the Margadarsi group, founded by the late media baron Ch Ramoji Rao, Telangana high court on Monday quashed the criminal cases filed against Margadarsi Financiers by the former Andhra Pradesh govt in 2008. A division bench comprising Justice P Sam Koshy and Justice K Sujana ruled that the case stood abated following the death of Ramoji Rao last year. The court held that in the absence of the main accused, further prosecution of the company could not continue effectively. The ruling thus brings a long-pending legal battle to a close, nearly 18 years after the original case was filed. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The AP govt had alleged that Margadarsi collected public deposits without legal permission, violating provisions of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Act. The firm, however, argued that it was functioning as a Hindu joint family business, which is not prohibited under law, and that the restrictions cited in the RBI Act applied only to non-banking financial companies. The RBI opposed this argument, asserting that the charges were against the corporate entity, not just Ramoji Rao. It said the business operations of Margadarsi Financiers were still active, and the legal question of whether it had accepted deposits in violation of the RBI Act remained unresolved. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Biggest Real Estate Discounts Ever at M3M India. Enquire Now! M3M India Book Now Undo Therefore, it argued, the case should not be dismissed on the grounds of the founder's death. However, Justice Koshy, announcing the court's decision, stated that prosecution could not move forward in the absence of the key individual accused and allowed the company's plea. Margadarsi was represented by a team of senior advocates, including S Nagamurthy, Mukul Rohatgi, and Siddharth Luthra. The RBI was represented by senior counsel L Ravichander, and the AP govt by public prosecutor Palle Nageshwar Rao. The high court also closed the petitions filed by the current management of the company seeking to be made parties in the case. Since the main petition was allowed and the criminal cases quashed, their applications were declared closed.

Citing "uncertainty" over ISL's future, Bengaluru FC "indefinitely" suspends salaries of players
Citing "uncertainty" over ISL's future, Bengaluru FC "indefinitely" suspends salaries of players

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Citing "uncertainty" over ISL's future, Bengaluru FC "indefinitely" suspends salaries of players

New Delhi [India], August 5 (ANI): Indian Super League (ISL) outfit Bengaluru FC released a statement to confirm that they have suspended the salaries of players and staff members due to the "uncertainty" surrounding the future of the tournament. HT Image The ISL, which is usually held from September to April, has been put on hold due to ongoing differences between the All India Football Federation (AIFF) and the board's partner, Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL). While taking the current situation into account, Bengaluru FC have "indefinitely" suspended the salaries. The 2018-19 ISL title winners claimed that they were left with no choice but to take such an action due to the lack of clarity regarding India's top-tier football league's future. "In view of the uncertainty surrounding the future of the Indian Super League season, Bengaluru Football Club has taken what is a very difficult decision of indefinitely suspending the salaries of players and staff belonging to the First Team. Running and sustaining a football club in India has always been an uphill climb, one that we have put everything aside and made, season after season," BFC said in a statement. Amid the ongoing issue, AIFF on Monday announced that a meeting has been scheduled with CEOs from eight Indian Super League (ISL) clubs for Thursday in the national capital to discuss the matter with the nation's top-tier football tournament. "However, the lack of clarity on the League's future leaves us with no choice but to take this step. The future and well-being of our players, staff, and their families is of utmost importance to us, and we are in touch with them as we wait for a resolution," the statement added. The current decision has resulted in the salaries of captain Sunil Chhetri, other players and staff members being suspended. However, the club confirmed that the youth teams will remain unaffected by this decision. Bengaluru FC urged the AIFF and FSFL to take a prompt decision and end the impasse quickly. "The Club remains committed to growing and developing the sport and our operations with our youth teams - men and women - and BFC Soccer Schools remain unaffected by this decision. We urge the AIFF and FSDL to end this impasse swiftly. The uncertainty benefits no one, and a prompt resolution is vital for the future of Indian football," the statement concluded. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store