AI could send Texas power prices soaring
Why it matters: The AI boom could drive up power bills, adding to the financial strain as inflation hits household essentials.
By the numbers: The national average retail price for 1 kilowatt-hour of electricity rose from 16.41 cents to 17.47 cents between May 2024 and May 2025, a 6.5% jump, per the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Texas' price increased from 14.84 cents to 15.49 cents.
Maine saw the largest spike at 36.3%, followed by Connecticut (18.4%) and Utah (15.2%).
Between the lines: Power prices vary by region and depend on a mix of supply, demand, fuel costs and infrastructure.
Many analysts say energy-intensive data centers are a growing factor, especially in regions where they're booming.
That's due to their immediate consumption, plus grid operators' investments in new transmission infrastructure to meet projected demand.
What they're saying: "Anywhere you're seeing a massive takeoff in load growth, the most likely cause is data centers, and that is almost certainly going to have an impact on electric rates," says Cathy Kunkel, energy consultant at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.
Zoom in: In Texas, demand could double or quadruple by 2035, according to University of Houston researchers. Without upgrades, that risks a 27– to 40-gigawatt annual shortfall.
State of play: After the passage of Senate Bill 6 in June, Texas is one of the first states to require emergency shutoff switches for data centers, giving the Electric Reliability Council of Texas the power to cut service during crises like heat waves or winter storms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
The decline of coal isn't a conspiracy — it's pragmatic market reality
There is a core misunderstanding fueling a recent lawsuit that has made headlines. The Texas attorney general and 10 other GOP attorneys generals have accused some of the nation's largest asset managers of 'colluding' to harm coal companies, making the altogether false claim that the decline of coal is the result of some coordinated political vendetta rather than simple, demonstrable market economics. With the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission joining the conversation, it's important to delve into the details and consider market trends over the past few decades. The simple reality is that coal's decline in the United States did not start with asset managers or ESG ('environmental, social and governance') investment policies. It started decades ago with the shale gas revolution, when fracking technology unleashed an abundant, cheap and cleaner-burning alternative. U.S. Energy Information Administration data show that U.S. coal production was 1.127 trillion short tons in 2001, but by 2020 that number declined to 535 billion short tons — its lowest level since 1965. Natural gas outcompeted coal because it made economic sense — lower operating costs, fewer regulatory burdens and, perhaps most importantly, reduced environmental impact. Add in the drop in the cost of renewables, and coal's decline was not only inevitable, it was predictable. These asset managers saw the writing on the wall and adjusted their investments aligned with their fiduciary duty to their clients. This is about economics, not ideology. Business decisions, not politics. Power utilities, manufacturers and even global markets have made decisions based on price, efficiency and reliability. Coal decline happened in both public and private coal companies. Coal companies themselves have noted the decline in prior annual reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Capital flows to create a competitive advantage, not political talking points. What these attorneys general attempt to frame as 'coal collusion' is, in fact, a textbook example of fiduciary responsibility and following industry direction. Asset managers have a legal duty to evaluate long-term risks and returns for their clients. When coal projects increasingly face uncertain demand, regulatory headwinds and operational volatility, choosing to limit exposure is prudent investing. The lawsuit itself notes that coal production increased (incrementally) in 2021, the first year of the supposed 'conspiracy.' This further shows the inconsistency of this lawsuit, raising questions about whether this lawsuit is really about coal, or rather about weaponizing an economic trend — a dangerous precedent to set. We must be honest about what's happening to coal — and to energy more broadly. Rather than distorting reality for short-term political gain, let's focus on developing solutions that respect our economic system, support innovation and ensure energy security. The real conversation we should be having is about ensuring energy abundance through all means. Let's talk about how to accelerate nuclear energy, streamline permitting for cleaner domestic production, invest in resilient grid infrastructure, and maintain American leadership in next-generation energy technologies. Allowing for a truly 'all of the above' energy strategy enables investments in diverse, dependable and secure energy sources. Climate, energy and market decisions are complex, and intertwined. They deserve meticulous debate. It's time to refocus the conversation on pragmatism and opportunity — not partisan politicking. We should all care about America's energy future, and to best do so, we have to stop pretending market evolution is sabotage. The decline of coal in the United States is simply capitalism doing exactly what conservatives have always trusted it to do: adapt and allocate capital where it best serves growth, stability and prosperity. Benji Backer is the founder and CEO of Nature Is Nonpartisan. He also serves as the executive chairman of the American Conservation Coalition and is the best-selling author of
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
EIA Shows US Crude Oil Inventories Growing
Crude oil inventories in the United States increased by 3.0 million barrels during the week ending August 8, after dropping by 3 million barrels in the week prior, according to new data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) released on Wednesday. The build brings commercial stockpiles to 426.7 million barrels according to government data, which is 6% below the five-year average for this time of year. The EIA's data release follows API's figures that were released a day earlier, which suggested that crude oil inventories grew by 1.5 million barrels. Crude prices were trading down ahead of the EIA data release. At 9:57 a.m. in New York, Brent was trading at $66.06 per barrel—down $0.06 (-0.09%) on the day but a $2.70 per barrel loss from last week's level. WTI was also trading down, by $0.14 per barrel (-0.22%) in mid-morning trade. For total motor gasoline, the EIA reported a decrease of 800,000 barrels, with daily production increasing slightly to 9.8 million barrels. For middle distillates, inventories increased 700,000 barrels, with production increasing to 5.1 million barrels daily. Distillate inventories are still 15% below the five-year average for this time of year. Total products supplied over the last four weeks rose to 21.2 million barrels per day, up 2.9% compared to the same period last year. Gasoline demand averaged 9 million barrels per day over the last four weeks, while the distillate four-week average supplied was 3.6 million barrels—down 1.6 percent year over year. By Julianne Geiger for More Top Reads From this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
AI could send Texas power prices soaring
Texas electricity prices rose 4.4% over the past year — less than the national average — but experts say a surge in energy-hungry data centers could soon send costs soaring. Why it matters: The AI boom could drive up power bills, adding to the financial strain as inflation hits household essentials. By the numbers: The national average retail price for 1 kilowatt-hour of electricity rose from 16.41 cents to 17.47 cents between May 2024 and May 2025, a 6.5% jump, per the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Texas' price increased from 14.84 cents to 15.49 cents. Maine saw the largest spike at 36.3%, followed by Connecticut (18.4%) and Utah (15.2%). Between the lines: Power prices vary by region and depend on a mix of supply, demand, fuel costs and infrastructure. Many analysts say energy-intensive data centers are a growing factor, especially in regions where they're booming. That's due to their immediate consumption, plus grid operators' investments in new transmission infrastructure to meet projected demand. What they're saying: "Anywhere you're seeing a massive takeoff in load growth, the most likely cause is data centers, and that is almost certainly going to have an impact on electric rates," says Cathy Kunkel, energy consultant at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Zoom in: In Texas, demand could double or quadruple by 2035, according to University of Houston researchers. Without upgrades, that risks a 27– to 40-gigawatt annual shortfall. State of play: After the passage of Senate Bill 6 in June, Texas is one of the first states to require emergency shutoff switches for data centers, giving the Electric Reliability Council of Texas the power to cut service during crises like heat waves or winter storms.
