Majhi meets Patil, discusses Mahanadi water dispute
In a social media post, Majhi said, 'Had a courtesy call with Hon'ble Union Home Minister Shri Amit Shah Ji in New Delhi. Discussed Centre-State coordination and various developmental initiatives of the State.' Majhi, who, along with BJP State president Manmohan Samal, was in the national capital on Tuesday night, also met Union Jal Shakti Minister C R Patil on Wednesday.
'Called on Union Jal Shakti Minister Shri C R Patil in New Delhi. Raised Odisha's concerns over the Mahanadi water dispute and stressed the need for a fair and just resolution. On this occasion, handed over the 'Vision Odisha 2036/2047' document, outlining the State's long-term development approach,' the Chief Minister said in an X post.
Earlier, Majhi had said his government was trying to resolve the Mahanadi water dispute with Chhattisgarh amicably through negotiations. He had written a letter to Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai and pitched for a discussion on the matter for the resolution of the issue. The State government, meanwhile, has also stated that the Mahanadi Water Tribunal has allowed more time for negotiations between the two States to resolve the dispute amicably.
Majhi's meeting with Patil holds significance as the Centre has a key role to play in resolving the matter. The Centre, as well as Odisha and Chhattisgarh, are governed by the BJP. Accompanied by Union minister Dharmendra Pradhan and Odisha's Deputy Chief Minister K V Singh Deo, Majhi also met Union Minister for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution Pralhad Joshi. The Chief Minister said he has urged the Centre to enhance the rice procurement target from Odisha for the upcoming Kharif season. He sought an increase in the monthly lifting of rice by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) to ensure timely evacuation, which is critical for smooth procurement in the upcoming season.
The Chief Minister also informed the Union Food Minister about the State's proactive steps, such as promotion of millets and expansion of storage infrastructure to strengthen food security and safeguard farmers' interests.
'Called on Union Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Shri @JoshiPralhad ji at New Delhi. Requested enhancement of the rice procurement target for the upcoming season in view of the anticipated surplus in the State,' Majhi said in the X post.
Majhi also met Union Minister of Heavy Industries, Public Enterprises, and Steel Minister H D Kumaraswamy and discussed the expansion of the Rourkela Steel Plant in Sundergarh district.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
SC issues notice on plea challenging validity of BNS Section 152
The Supreme Court Friday issued a notice on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The petition contends that the provision 'reintroduces the colonial sedition law'. A bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria also tagged it with a pending matter challenging the provision. Section 152 of BNS states that 'whoever, purposely or knowingly, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or by electronic communication or by use of financial mean, or otherwise, excites or attempts to excite, secession or armed rebellion or subversive activities, or encourages feelings of separatist activities or endangers sovereignty or unity and integrity of India; or indulges in or commits any such act shall be punished with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.' The plea, filed by retired Army officer S G Vombatkere, says that the provision, 'in effect, reintroduces the colonial sedition law previously codified as Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, under a new nomenclature. Though the language is altered, its substantive content — criminalising vague and broad categories of speech and expression such as 'subversive activity', 'encouragement of separatist feelings' and acts 'endangering unity or integrity of India' — remains the same or is even more expansive'. Hearing the petitions challenging section 124A of the IPC, the Supreme Court on May 11, 2022, put on hold trial in all sedition cases pending before courts across the country until the Centre completed a promised exercise 'to re-examine and re-consider the provision'. 'All pending trials, appeals and proceedings with respect to the charge framed under Section 124A of IPC be kept in abeyance. Adjudication with respect to other sections, if any, could proceed if the courts are of the opinion that no prejudice would be caused to the accused,' the SC had directed.
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
Ajit Pawar asks Maharashtra police to curb vigilantes from checking livestock vehicles
Taking note of law and order issues created by 'private individuals' over the transportation of legally allowed animals, Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister and NCP chief Ajit Pawar has asked the police top brass to direct district police heads to prevent such persons from inspecting vehicles transporting livestock. Pawar's instruction followed a meeting between him and a delegation of the Qureshi community Wednesday, where state Director General of Police Rashmi Shukla and Mumbai Police Commissioner Deven Bharti, among other officials, were present. 'The Qureshi community is traditionally associated with the meat trade and is a part of Maharashtra's agriculture-based economy. Therefore, no injustice will be allowed to be done to the traders of this community and the farmers who transport animals,' Pawar said at the meeting as per an official statement from the Deputy CM's office. In a memorandum of demands submitted to Pawar, the Qureshi community delegation demanded a ban on illegal gau rakshaks (cow vigilantes), protection for transporting legally allowed animals, withdrawal of false cases, and a reduction in restrictions on transport licences. The delegation, while raising the issue of 'harassment' of animal traders by illegal gau rakshaks, in a letter to Pawar, said, 'The violent acts against the traders from Qureshi community and farmers who transport legally allowed animals has led to many losing their lives. The community is forced to call for a strike… This will affect the farmers as well due to unavailability of buyers. Following the 2015 ban on cow slaughter, the transport is already limited. Now, the ongoing actions will affect the legal transport of animals such as buffaloes as well.' The delegation's demand was to 'not allow private individuals to check vehicles', said NCP MLA Sana Shaikh, who was present at the meeting. Along with her, NCP MLC Sanjay Khodke said a number of 'anti-social elements' have started harassing genuine animal transporters. 'As per the law, only police should inspect the vehicles. Despite this clarity, the menace is growing and it needs to be tackled,' Khodke said. According to sources present in the Wednesday meeting, Pawar directed DGP Shukla to issue a circular across all districts. 'The circular will ask police authorities to ensure that no private individual will have any right to check the vehicles transporting animals,' said an official present at the meeting. Despite attempts to contact DGP Shukla, she was not available for comment. During the meeting, sources said, Pawar spoke to Union Minister of Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari over the phone and informed him about the difficulties faced while transporting animals. He requested Gadkari to discuss the issue with the Qureshi delegation and take a decision on changes in the law related to the transportation of animals.
Scroll.in
3 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Petition alleges Section 152 of BNS reintroduces sedition law, SC seeks Centre's reply
The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Union government to respond to a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Live Law reported. Section 152 of the criminal law pertains to acts that endanger India's sovereignty, unity and integrity. It criminalises a wide spectrum of expressive conduct, including those who 'purposely or knowingly' use words to 'excite or attempt to excite' secession, rebellion or subversive activities. The petition claimed that the provision effectively reintroduces the colonial-era sedition law. A bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria issued notice on the petition filed by SG Vombatkere, a retired major general in the Indian Army, and tagged it with another pending matter challenging the same provision. In his petition, Vombatkere said that the court had in May 2022 ordered proceedings and criminal prosecutions for sedition under Section 124A of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code to be kept in abeyance, The Hindu reported. However, Section 124A was slipped in again into the law in the guise of Section 152 when the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the Indian Penal Code in July 2024, the petitioner argued. 'The provision, in effect, reintroduces the colonial sedition law previously codified as Section 124A of the IPC, 1860, under a new nomenclature,' the newspaper quoted the petition as having said. 'Though the language is altered, its substantive content – criminalising vague and broad categories of speech and expression such as 'subversive activity', 'encouragement of separatist feelings', and acts 'endangering unity or integrity of India' – remains the same or is even more expansive,' it added. The petition also said that Section 152 was violative of fundamental rights under Article 14, Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21 of the Constitution. While Article 14 pertains to equality, Article 19(1)(a) talks about free speech and Article 21 about right to life and personal liberty. The 'sweeping' language used in Section 152, 'including phrases like encouraging feelings of separatist activities, failed the test of constitutional validity due to vagueness, overbreadth, chilling effect, disproportionate punishment, and absence of proximate nexus to public disorder', it added. New criminal laws Three new criminal laws – the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – came into effect on July 1, 2024. They replaced the British-era Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. When introducing the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Union Home Minister Amit Shah had claimed that the new law ' completely repealed ' the sedition law under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code. 'Everyone has the right to speak,' the home minister had said at the time. 'We are completely repealing sedition.' However, critics have argued that Section 152 of the BNS is a 'new version' of a colonial-era sedition law, which had been misused to harass, intimidate and persecute human rights defenders, activists, journalists, among others, for exercising their right to freedom of expression.
