You can't 'beet' this Prime Day deal: Save up to $30 on 'life-changing' SuperBeets supplements that support your heart and blood pressure
There's nothing more important than your cardiovascular health. It's at the 'heart' of everything that you do. A healthy ticker equates to a healthy life, affording you the opportunity to live fully and joyfully.
Whether you want to preventatively support your heart or you're concerned about your blood pressure and circulation, you can rely on HumanN SuperBeets to promote healthy heart function in an easy, manageable, and affordable way.
HumanN SuperBeets Heart Chews
These bestselling pomegranate-berry chews support healthy circulation and heart energy with clinically researched grape seed extract and non-GMO beetroot powder.
Adding them to your daily regimen is easy. Just pop two for the day and you're good to go.
Sweet, chewable, and hugely beneficial, this is the ultimate easy option for anyone looking to boost their heart health.
$49.95 (was $79.90) Shop
HumanN SuperBeets Heart Chews Advanced
This triple action formula enhances the effects of the original, combining beetroot powder and grape seed extract with CoQ10 to support circulation, blood pressure, and heart health.
Just two a day is all that you need to experience a difference that benefits your long-term health.
It's ideal for those who want to replenish their CoQ10 levels. The compound naturally declines with age (and statin use), and is vital for cellular support.
$34.95 (was $44.95) Shop
HumanN SuperBeets Beetroot Powder
This easy-to-mix powder is formulated with beetroot, a natural source of dietary nitrates that help your body produce nitric oxide. That's essential for supporting healthy circulation and blood pressure!
Just mix one scoop in four to six ounces of water, juice, or a smoothie, The powder has a pleasant black cherry flavor that you'll enjoy!
With no added sugar or artificial stimulants, it's a clean and easy way to support your cardiovascular health every single day.
$29.95 (was $37.95) Shop
In fact, right now it's more affordable than ever as the brand has slashed prices across many of its bestselling products — and you can now score up to 41 percent off in Prime Day savings on Amazon through July 11, 2025.
Why SuperBeets? The brand's products are backed by over 12 years of research and trusted by thousands of medical professionals. These blends are carefully formulated to support your wellbeing, focusing on core heart health concerns.
The product that started it all, SuperBeets Heart Chews, is formulated by doctors to promote healthy blood pressure while improving circulation and heart health.
In fact, studies have found it's at least twice as effective in these areas than diet and exercise on their own. At the heart of the blend is non-GMO beetroot, which is packed with nitrates that help relax the blood vessels.
That's key to potentially reducing blood pressure while improving flow of blood to your heart. Beets are also packed with antioxidants and anti-inflammatories, protecting you from free radical damage and reducing inflammation.
Potent grape seed extract is added to the blend to promote availability of nitric oxide, which naturally plummets with age. The yummy pomegranate berry flavor is just a bonus!
Other HumanN products are also on sale, including the acai berry-flavored SuperBeets Heart Chews Advanced (which contain CoQ10, a compound that naturally declines with age) and SuperBeets Beetroot Powder.
Users have high praise for the chews. 'Product definitely cut my blood pressure almost in half. My PCP was very surprised this works. I immediately went off of my blood pressure prescription,' shared one thrilled shopper.
'It really does what it claims,' wrote another. 'Recommend by my Dr and took away one BP med that I had been taking.'
'Life-changing,' commented a third. 'Taking for three months and had my labs done. My numbers are so much better! I feel great, more energy and they taste great!'
Don't miss this opportunity to snag up to 41 percent off bestselling HumanN SuperBeets formulas. Your heart will thank you!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
I feared sharp chest pains at 25 were a heart attack – it was ‘popcorn lung' after vaping left ‘OIL filling my organs'
HAVING switched from smoking to vaping two years ago, Cloey Eyes thought she was avoiding the smell of smoke she hated so much, as well as opting for a healthier alternative. But when she woke up with sharp chest pains one morning and feared the worst - that she was having a heart attack and was going to die - she claims doctors discovered a sinister side effect of using e-cigarettes. 5 5 Cloey made the switch to vaping in August 2023 after smoking cigarettes for three years, mainly over her dislike of the smell. But when the mum-of-five woke up with "sharp" pains in her chest on July 12 this year, she called an ambulance as she feared she was having a heart attack. The 25-year-old was rushed to hospital in Ocala, Florida, where she was hooked up to oxygen and a heart monitor. But after undergoing tests, she was told she had "popcorn lung"-type injuries and claims doctors discovered an oily substance had been found building up in her lungs. Vaping has been known to lead to lipoid pneumonia, in which oily substances inhaled during vaping lead to a build-up in the lungs, causing inflammation and damage. The stay-at-home mum is now raising awareness about her vaping experience and is urging others to stop smoking them before it's too late. Cloey says: "I woke up at 2:30am in the morning and my chest felt like it was having a heart attack. "I had really bad pains in my chest and had to lean over. I couldn't catch my breath, and I had to hit myself in the chest multiple times to be able to catch my breath. "I was terrified at the pain, and I felt like I was going to die as I was scared I was going to not be able to breathe at all. "It was a sharp pain in my chest, but it also was a suffocating feeling. Teen told he was coughing up 'pints' of blood due to a stomach ulcer caused by kebabs - 'excessive vaping' was to blame "The ambulance came and got me, and I was taken to hospital, and they said my left lung had an oil pocket in it. "Around both my lungs was oil. It was scary to hear this. It's the oil from the vape, and this is thickening up as you hit it [the vape] and attaching itself to your lungs. "I technically at that point had popcorn lung. That's what they call it here." 'Non-stop' vaping Cloey said she would go through one 5000-puff disposable vape every two weeks and would use it "non-stop" due to the convenience. After staying overnight in hospital, she was discharged and prescribed antibiotics, an inhaler and cough suppressant medication. Cloey claims it will take a year for her lungs to heal completely and is now raising awareness to others about the dangers of vaping. As a person I would tell people to put the vape down, especially if you're a parent. You don't think it's going to happen to you. I didn't think it would Cloey Eyes She said: "I would smoke the vape every day non-stop. I used the vape more than when I smoked, as it was handy and right there. "I would never pick up a vape again, especially because I'm a mum. I went cold turkey and quit vaping. "I'm not struggling with it at all, as what happened to me scared me, and I don't want to do it anymore. "I feel 10 times better now as I have stopped completely. My lungs feel better, and I don't feel out of breath all the time. "As a person, I would tell people to put the vape down, especially if you're a parent. You don't think it's going to happen to you. I didn't think it would. "Even if you don't go through the pain, the amount of chemicals going through your lungs is probably knocking about 10 years off your life. "I turned 25 last Saturday and to think I could have lost my life from vaping is just not worth it." 5 5 What is 'popcorn lung'? Popcorn lung, also known as bronchiolitis obliterans, is a rare and severe lung disease caused by a build-up of scar tissue in the lungs, which then blocks the flow of air. The condition is caused by inhaling certain chemicals, like diacetyl - an organic compound which occurs naturally in alcoholic beverages and some cheeses and is added as a flavouring to some foods to impart its buttery flavour. Around the year 2000, a group of popcorn factory workers in the USA developed the condition, which led to the name 'popcorn lung'. Diacetyl was used as a flavouring in the popcorn, which meant workers were breathing in the chemical. Other common causes of bronchiolitis obliterans include infections, such as RSV and the flu, breathing in toxic chemicals like sulfur mustard gas, and autoimmune conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis. Popcorn lung and vaping There haven't been any confirmed cases of popcorn lung linked to vaping. But people have connected the two because some of the liquids in e-cigarettes used to contain diacetyl. In the UK, diacetyl was banned in e-cigarettes and e-liquids under the EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) in 2016. Another condition that's been linked to vaping and oil build-up in the lungs is lipoid pneumonia. As vaping involves heating e-liquids, which often contain oils, into an aerosol that is then inhaled, these oily substances can deposit in the lungs' air sacs (alveoli), leading to an inflammatory reaction and potentially lipoid pneumonia. Diagnosing vaping-associated lipoid pneumonia can be challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other lung conditions. But signs to look out for include a cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, and fever. IS VAPING HARMFUL? WHILE vaping is generally considered less harmful than smoking cigarettes, it's not completely harmless and its long-term effects are still being studied. Vaping products generally contain fewer toxic chemicals than cigarette smoke, as they don't involve the combustion of tobacco. They may also expose users to fewer cancer-causing substances compared to smoking. But vaping delivers nicotine, which is addictive, and the long-term effects of this on the body are still being researched. And there have been reports of lung irritation and respiratory problems, including lung damage. Cancer Research UK advises: "There is no good evidence that vaping causes cancer. "But e-cigarettes are not risk-free. They can cause side effects such as throat and mouth irritation, headache, cough and feeling sick. These side effects tend to reduce over time with continued use. "We don't know yet what effects they might have in the long term. "E-cigarettes should only be used to help you stop smoking, or to stop you going back to tobacco. "Most e-cigarettes contain nicotine, which is addictive. "If you have never smoked, you shouldn't use e-cigarettes."
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I had to wait FOUR years for a breast reconstruction after my mastectomy, due to secret postcode lottery EVERY cancer patient must be aware of
After the trauma of undergoing a mastectomy for breast cancer followed by months of gruelling chemotherapy and radiotherapy, Laura Wilson was looking forward to rebuilding both her body and her life. Key to that was reconstructive surgery after her left breast was removed in January 2021 when a tumour had been found. Studies show that for many women who have a mastectomy, breast reconstruction restores self-image and has a powerful effect on their psychological wellbeing. While many undergo reconstruction at the same time as the mastectomy, not everyone is suitable. Some may be at risk of the cancer recurring and need to wait around two years in case further surgery is needed; others may be judged unable to withstand the major surgery involved and the lengthy recovery that follows. In Laura's case, after the breast removal she needed radiotherapy, which can cause the rebuilt breast to become hardened and misshapen. She was told the NHS waiting time for reconstruction surgery following treatment would be no more than 12 to 18 months. In fact, it was nearly four years before Laura underwent the surgery. 'At first, I wasn't concerned about getting the reconstruction immediately - I was grateful my treatment had been a success so I just got on with it,' recalls Laura, 43, a secondary school teacher from Rugeley, Staffordshire. Experts say the long delays are due to a complex mix of factors - from a shortage of medics with the right experience to a 'postcode lottery' where women in remote, rural areas are much less likely to have access to the treatment they need than those closer to centres specialising in this type of surgery. Laura Wilson had to wait nearly four years for breast reconstructive surgery following her mastectomy in 2021 Studies show that for many women who have a mastectomy, breast reconstruction restores self-image and has a powerful effect on their psychological wellbeing Breast Cancer Now is calling for more surgeons to be trained in such procedures, as well as greater theatre capacity to tackle backlogs. Meanwhile, women such as Laura are left in limbo. 'Remaining on a long waiting list for delayed reconstructive surgery can take a huge toll on a woman's emotional wellbeing and body image,' explains Louise Grimsdell, a senior clinical nurse specialist with the charity. 'They are often struggling to adjust to how their bodies have changed, as well as the emotional impact of their breast cancer diagnosis.' Laura, who lives with her partner Scott Philpott, 44, an electrician, says the hardest part 'was feeling like my life was always on hold'. 'As I didn't know when the operation would be, I couldn't make any plans,' she says. 'I even put off moving jobs in case a date came through. It was always hanging over me. 'Initially, I was told the delays were partly down to Covid backlogs, but there was a point, after I'd been waiting for around 18 months, when I thought they'd forgotten about me.' Around 55,000 women a year are diagnosed with breast cancer and about 14,850 undergo a mastectomy. Roughly two-thirds of those who opt for reconstruction have it at the same time and the rest delay it, says Breast Cancer Now. Reconstructive surgery is done with either an artificial implant or using tissue and blood vessels from the patient. Artificial implants are a relatively straightforward procedure, taking around three hours and requiring only one surgeon and shorter recovery time. But autologous reconstruction (where doctors use the patient's own fat and tissue, harvested from elsewhere on the body, to rebuild the breast) is a highly complex operation, requiring two or three specialist surgeons trained in microsurgery. 'It can take six hours or more,' says Joanna Franks, a consultant breast and oncoplastic surgeon at the London Clinic. As a result, the lengthy waits are mostly suffered by women who have chosen an autologous procedure and who, for whatever reason, did not have a reconstruction at the same time as their mastectomy. Naren Basu, a consultant oncoplastic breast surgeon at University Hospitals Birmingham, says the backlog is partly due to a shortage of surgeons with the specialist training to carry out such operations, as well as the necessary theatre capacity for the lengthy procedures. But it's not the only factor. 'Guidelines say that all women should be offered all options but in reality a woman who lives in a remote rural area may not find it easy to access surgery for an autologous breast reconstruction,' says Mr Basu. Lobbying by Breast Cancer Now and some health professionals has resulted in NHS England including breast reconstructive surgery in its recent referral to treatment target - this sets out that surgery must happen within 18 weeks of a surgeon giving the go-ahead for the treatment. Naren Basu, a consultant oncoplastic breast surgeon at University Hospitals Birmingham, says the backlog is partly due to a shortage of surgeons with the specialist training to carry out such operations The charity is also funding a pilot scheme in partnership with the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons to help train another UK plastic surgeon in breast microsurgery, which it hopes represents a step, however small, towards meeting the shortage. Waiting lists have also grown as delayed reconstructions are 'unfortunately bottom of the list', says Mr Basu. He says 'immediate' reconstructions take priority, then reconstructions done when a woman is having a preventive mastectomy due to a high genetic risk of the disease. Delayed reconstructions are the lowest priority. At least 2,255 women are waiting for autologous reconstructive surgery following a mastectomy, according to a study in the Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery in September 2024. It was in 2020 when Laura first noticed a 'strange' pain deep in her left armpit and chest. As her mother had been diagnosed with breast cancer, Laura went to her GP, who examined her but couldn't find a lump. But the odd pain persisted - 'it felt as though it was deep inside me,' recalls Laura - 'it was almost as though my heart was hurting.' On one occasion, she rang 111 and was transferred to hospital by ambulance with suspected heart problems, but tests revealed nothing. However, soon after, she found a lump near to the nipple - so returned to her GP. Following ultrasound tests and biopsies, Laura was diagnosed with a 2.2cm aggressive tumour - she also had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a pre-cancerous condition where abnormal cells grow in the milk duct lining, which covered a 10cm area. As well as a mastectomy to remove the entire left breast, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, Laura was given hormone treatments to reduce her oestrogen levels, causing debilitating menopausal symptoms of hot flushes, aches and pains. 'I felt like an old lady,' recalls Laura, who was still in her 30s at the time. 'My friends were having babies - and Scott and I had been due to start IVF when I was diagnosed. 'It felt like not only was I dealing with a serious disease but all my hopes and plans for the future had been snatched away.' Her treatment concluded, successfully, in November 2021. 'It then became really important for me to try to get my body back to normal.' She was keen to get back into her regular gym routine but her temporary prosthetic breast made running or other vigorous movement uncomfortable. She struggled to find clothes - her remaining breast was a size 34DD. 'My prosthetic breast didn't fit very well so I was often having to adjust it. I became paranoid people could see if it was off-centre. I felt I couldn't put my cancer behind me until I had my reconstruction.' Finally, in November 2024 - nearly four years after her breast removal - she underwent a six-hour procedure using blood vessels and fat from her stomach to build a new breast. 'The first moment I looked down and saw I had two breasts again was amazing. I felt whole - finally,' she says. Now she's back to exercising five times a week and wearing the clothes she loves. 'My hair's grown back after the chemotherapy, I'm fit again - and I finally feel back to being me,' she says. 'I am so grateful to be alive but this should never have taken so long. 'For me, having both breasts wasn't about my appearance, it's about my internal identity too and the way I want to live my life.' For more information visit
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
RFK Jr slammed by Trump's own surgeon general for 'tepid' response to deadly CDC shooting
Donald Trump 's former surgeon general called out Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for his 'failed' response to the shootings at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. On Friday, a gunman who believed the COVID-19 vaccine made him sick went on a shooting spree outside the CDC headquarters in Atlanta. The shooting resulted in the deaths of one police officer, David Rose, and the shooter himself, leaving multiple buildings damaged from gunfire as students at the nearby Emory University took shelter. During a Sunday interview with CBS' Margaret Brennan 'Face the Nation,' former surgeon general Dr. Jerome Adams said Kennedy's response was 'tepid' while criticizing the secretary for the delay in addressing the violence. 'How you respond to a crisis defines a leader, and quite frankly Secretary Kennedy has failed in his first major test in this regard,' Adams told Brennan. 'It took him over 18 hours to issue a tepid response to these horrific shootings, and that's not even considering how his inflammatory rhetoric in the past has actually contributed to a lot of what's been going on.' The CDC shooter blamed the vaccine for adding to his depression by making him suicidal. Back in May, Kennedy announced that the CDC would no longer recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women. Following the shooting, Kennedy issued a response on Saturday giving extended to the family of the slain officer. 'No one should face violence while working to protect the health of others,' Kennedy wrote on X.' 'We honor their service. We stand with them. And we remain united in our mission to protect and improve the health of every American.' Adams flamed Kennedy for previously referring to the CDC as a 'cesspool of corruption' before adding his criticisms of the agency may have influenced the shooter's actions 'He made this statement just last year,' Adams said. 'And he still has not unequivocally condemned the violence.' 'He said no one should be harmed while working to protect the public,' Adams added. 'There's an out there, Margaret. If you don't believe that people are working to protect the public, then that means it's OK to commit violence, at least in some people's eyes.' Throughout the entire first Trump administration, Adams served as surgeon general where he oversaw the development of the mRNA vaccines during Operation Warp Speed. Adams has praised the administration's development of the vaccine as one of Trump's greatest achievements, while expressing concern as the department begins cutting funds from mRNA research. Only 24-hours before the shooting, Kennedy announced HHS would slash approximately half a billion dollars of funding for vaccine development programs for mRNA technology. The Daily Mail has reached out to the Department of Health and Humans services for comment regarding Adams' recent criticisms of Kennedy. Kennedy said the department 'has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.'
