
Trump says banks discriminate against his supporters while White House prepares order
"They totally discriminate against, I think, me maybe even more, but they discriminate against many conservatives," he told CNBC in an interview. "I think the word might be Trump supporters more than conservatives."
Trump made the comments when asked about a report by the Wall Street Journal that said he planned to punish banks that discriminated against conservatives, but did not address the order specifically.
The order instructs regulators to review banks for "politicized or unlawful debanking" practices, according to a draft reviewed by Reuters.
"Well, they did discriminate," Trump said of actions taken by JPMorgan Chase after his first term in office. "I had hundreds of millions, I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash ... and they told me, 'I'm sorry sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.'"
Trump said, without providing evidence, that he believed that the banks' refusal to take his deposits indicated that the administration of former President Joe Biden had encouraged banking regulators to "destroy Trump."
Trump said he subsequently tried to deposit funds with Bank of America and was also refused, and eventually split the cash among a number of smaller banks.
"The banks discriminated against me very badly," he said.
In a statement, JPMorgan did not address the president's specific claim that it had discriminated against him.
'We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed," JPMorgan said. "We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right.'
Bank of America declined to comment.
The Wall Street Journal reported late Monday that the expected executive order would instruct regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions breach the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws by dropping customers for political reasons.
It said the order could be signed as early as this week, authorizing monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures against violators.
The White House had no immediate comment on the reported order.
Trump in January said the CEOs of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America denied services to conservatives. At the time, the two banks denied making banking decisions based on politics.
"This seems to be rhetoric that will likely be forgotten by lunchtime," said David Wagner, head of equities at Aptus Capital Advisors. "I don't see any material impact on banks, as there are many other drivers that will ultimately presage performance for banks, such as deregulation."
JPMorgan and Bank of America shares both fell about 1%, in line with a decline for the broader S&P Bank index.
Banks have consistently argued that any complaints about "debanking" should be aimed at regulators, as they argue onerous rules and bank supervisors policing firms can discourage them from engaging in certain activities.
"The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion," the Bank Policy Institute, an industry group, said in a statement.
"The banking agencies have already taken steps to address issues like reputational risk, and we're hopeful that any forthcoming executive order will reinforce this progress by directing regulators to confront the flawed regulatory framework that gave rise to these concerns in the first place."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Crocs shares plummet as US shoppers rein in spending
Shares of American footwear firm Crocs have plunged nearly 30% after it warned of a drop in sales as US shoppers rein in their rubber clog maker says it expects revenue for the three months to the end of August to fall by about 10% compared with last year, saying that some shoppers are no longer visiting Crocs stores. "We see the US consumer behaving cautiously around discretionary spending," said the firm's chief executive Andrew company's share price is now at its lowest level for nearly three years after suffering the worst single-day drop in almost 15 years. Crocs warned of a "concerning" second half of the year, due to the high cost of living and the potential impact of US President Donald Trump's trade chief financial officer, Susan Healy, said Crocs would take a $40m (£29.8m) hit for the remainder of 2025 due to tariffs."I think we can over the medium-term mitigate the impact of tariffs. That will come from cost savings in our supply chain," said Mr footwear maker also warned that it has seen "ample evidence" that a portion of its customer base is now "super cautious" with their spending."They're not purchasing, they're not even going to the stores, and we see traffic down," Mr Rees said during a call with investors and said it will continue to pull back on discounting its products, cautioning that this could have a further impact on of next year's football World Cup in the US, Mexico and Canada and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, Mr Rees said consumers are "migrating back towards athletic" comments came after Crocs reported second quarter revenue of $1.1bn, a 3% rise compared to the same period last company also owns casual footwear brand HEYDUDE, following a $2.5bn takeover in late 2021.


Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Rupee likely to rise after central bank rattles short NDF bets
MUMBAI, Aug 8 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee is poised to appreciate at open on Friday after traders unwound short positions in the non-deliverable forward (NDF) market, following the central bank's firm defence of a key level. The 1-month non-deliverable forward indicated the rupee will open in the 87.48 to 87.52 range versus the U.S. dollar, higher than 87.7025 on Thursday. The Indian currency had rallied in the NDF market after local trading closed at 3:30 p.m. IST. The 1-month USD/INR NDF dropped nearly 30 paisa within half an hour and largely held that decline through the U.S. trading session. During Thursday's onshore session, the currency traded in a narrow range and posted a modest advance despite additional U.S. tariffs on Indian goods announced by President Donald Trump. A currency trader at a private sector bank said the Reserve Bank of India may have played a role in the rupee's muted reaction to the news. The RBI has been active in the NDF market, and has made it evident that they do not want a new high in USD/INR, at least for now, the trader said, referring to the 87.95 level. The RBI's defence of that threshold, along with a recovery in Indian equities, likely triggered a "mini rush" to unwind long USD/INR positions, a Singapore-based portfolio manager at a hedge fund said. "Weak hands probably decided to exit," the person said. India's equity indices wiped intraday losses to finish flat on Thursday. The announcement of a U.S.-Russia presidential meeting may have been a possible driver of the late-session recovery, analysts said. While Indian equities recovered, foreign investors were net sellers on Thursday, offloading around $600 million worth of shares, according to preliminary exchange data. Meanwhile, the rupee's Asian peers were slightly lower on the day, while the dollar index was little changed and on track for a weekly decline. KEY INDICATORS: ** One-month non-deliverable rupee forward at 87.59; onshore one-month forward premium at 10.75 paise ** Dollar index at 98.10 ** Brent crude futures flat at $66.4 per barrel ** Ten-year U.S. note yield at 4.25% ** As per NSDL data, foreign investors sold a net $501.5mln worth of Indian shares on Aug. 6 ** NSDL data shows foreign investors bought a net $38mln worth of Indian bonds on Aug. 6


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump could target WNBA over Caitlin Clark controversy, warns Stephen A. Smith
Stephen A. Smith isn't dismissing a Wall Street Journal op-ed making the controversial argument that the federal government should investigate the WNBA for its treatment of Caitlin Clark. The opinion piece - written by Sean McLean, a former staffer in the first Trump White House and in two congressional GOP offices - argues that Clark is the victim of a hostile work environment. McLean - who stunningly compared Clark to Michael Jordan - argues that Clark's treatment, and what he perceives to be a lack of response from the WNBA, should be investigated and questioned by Congress and the Labor Department. The piece was divisive - with McLean receiving plenty of backlash on social media WNBA analysts, commentators, and fans; not only for the content of his piece, but also for his 'misleading' use of a quote from Las Vegas Aces star A'ja Wilson. Wilson made a comment to the Associated Press last year in the context of Clark's boosted popularity in the league, where she said Clark's race was a 'huge thing' and that, 'I think a lot of people may say it's not about Black and white, but to me it is... it boils my blood when people say it's not about race, because it is'. Despite this being the context of her words, McLean used that quote to claim Wilson believes Clark is being targeted because she is white. In spite of the fervor the piece stirred up, Smith believes there may be support for an investigation into this matter. 'I'm not here saying the case will be won by the government if it gets to the points. I'm saying they have a case, they have an argument,' Smith said of the idea during an episode of his self-titled podcast on Tuesday. Smith, the host and executive producer of ESPN's 'First Take', also suggested that President Donald Trump could use this investigation to solidify support among his followers. 'Do we doubt that at his discretion, at his disposal, if he finds this to be an issue that is politically expedient to him, that Trump won't use this to feed his base?' Smith said. 'If [Clark] is seen to be physically getting abused on the basketball court in a way that is such a clear and flagrant discrepancy compared to what happens to others, that that man is not going to say something? 'You don't think Catilin Clark could become an issue of national, potentially international, and definitely federal proportions?' 'If the Trump administration can settle with Columbia for a $221 million settlement over what's taken place on a campus, you think you can definitively rule out what kind of noise could be made if the WNBA continues to allow this treatment of Caitlin Clark?'