The Art Of Solitude
Ben and Principal Investigator of The Solitude Lab, Dr. Thuy-Vy Nguyen, explores the misconception that solitude is the absence of connection, as opposed to the positive presence of self.
Dr. Nguyen provides insight on how intention is a moderator between solitude and loneliness, understanding the difference between choosing to be alone vs. being in a state of isolation.
Later, they discuss how our time alone can be the answer to some of life's toughest questions.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
4 days ago
- Medscape
Loneliness May Drive Depression, Poor Physical Health
TOPLINE: Frequent loneliness was associated with a higher probability of depression and an increased number of poor mental and physical health days per month than never feeling lonely in a new survey-based study. Additionally, significant disparities were observed across sex, race/ethnicity, and age groups. METHODOLOGY: Investigators assessed data for more than 47,000 US adults (62% women; 73% White individuals) obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System between 2016 and 2023. They analyzed the potential association between loneliness and key health outcomes, including a diagnosis of depression and the self-reported number of days in the past month with poor mental or physical health. Participants self-reported the frequency of feeling lonely, which was categorized as always, usually, sometimes, rarely, and never. TAKEAWAY: Participants who reported always, usually, sometimes, and rarely feeling lonely had a significantly higher probability of depression (50%, 48%, 31%, and 16%, respectively; P < .001 for all) than those who reported never feeling lonely (10%). Those who reported always feeling lonely had 10.9 more poor mental health days and 5 more poor physical health days in a month on average than those who were never lonely (P < .001 for all). Women had a higher probability of depression than men across all loneliness levels (P < .001). There was also a significantly greater number of poor mental health days in women vs men who felt lonely sometimes (mean difference, 0.8 days; P = .002) and rarely (mean difference, 0.7 days; P = .003). Black and Hispanic individuals reporting loneliness had significantly lower probabilities of depression than their White peers (P < .05 for both). Among participants who felt always lonely, Black individuals reported fewer poor mental health days (mean difference, -3.8 days; P = .005) and fewer poor physical health days (mean difference, -3.6 days; P = .01) in a month than White individuals. Middle-aged (45-64 years) and older adults (> 64 years) with loneliness reported a greater number of poor physical health days in a month than younger adults (18-44 years) across all loneliness categories (P < .001 for all). However, older adults had a significantly lower risk for depression than younger adults across most loneliness levels. IN PRACTICE: 'Addressing loneliness may not only improve individual well-being but also reduce societal healthcare burdens,' the investigators wrote. 'The findings of this study carry urgent policy and practice implications. Given the pervasiveness and potency of loneliness, it should be prioritized alongside traditional risk factors in public health planning,' they added. SOURCE: The study was led by Oluwasegun Akinyemi, MD, PhD, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC. It was published online on July 9 in PLOS One. LIMITATIONS: Key limitations included the study's cross-sectional design, residual confounding by unmeasured factors, and its reliance on self-reported measures. Additionally, telephone-based survey methods may have underrepresented the most socially isolated individuals. DISCLOSURES: The study was funded in part by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. The investigators reported having no relevant conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Forbes
4 days ago
- Forbes
Why Some Professionals Still Hide Who They Are At Work
The healthiest workplaces allow multiple definitions of success. They don't push people up a ladder. ... More They build space for growth in multiple directions. For all the messaging around psychological safety, inclusion and modern leadership, many professionals still carry unspoken weights. Not because they lack skill. Not because they lack confidence. But because they quietly suspect that showing certain parts of themselves might cost them. Some keep quiet about mental health. Others downplay caregiving responsibilities. Many avoid drawing attention to career breaks, disabilities or even the fact that they prefer depth over hierarchy. These aren't flaws. They're facts of life. And yet, inside many firms, they still come with risk. A stigma isn't a rule. It's more like a whisper. A sense that being too honest could shift how others treat you. That your reputation might change if you reveal what's really going on. And so people edit. They conceal. They show up as only part of who they are. This has consequences. When people don't feel they can bring their full selves to work, the entire culture suffers. When Vulnerability Gets Mistaken for Weakness The idea that professionals should always show confidence is deeply ingrained. But when confidence becomes performance rather than expression, something gets lost. People push through even when exhausted. They commit to deadlines they cannot sustain. They smile in meetings while quietly bracing themselves inside. Why? Because showing doubt feels dangerous. Because saying, 'I'm not okay today,' could be misunderstood as being unreliable. What results is surface-level strength. Not the kind that fosters trust, but the kind that hides what's really happening underneath. And when everyone is pretending, no one gets to be real. The team cannot grow. Hard conversations get avoided. Decisions suffer. Creativity stalls. All because people are scared to say what they really need. Trust isn't built through perfection. It is built through shared honesty. And when the environment punishes vulnerability, people stop investing emotionally altogether. The Quiet Bias Against Nonlinear Careers Another stigma that still holds strong is around careers that do not follow a straight line. People who have paused to care for a parent, moved industries or taken time out for health often find themselves under quiet scrutiny. It shows up in tone. In interview questions. In how quickly assumptions get made. Someone who took time off to raise children might be seen as rusty. A professional who left a fast-paced sector could be labeled less ambitious. Even lateral moves within a company can get read as aimless rather than intentional. This is short-sighted. Because those who step off the traditional path often return with sharper focus, stronger boundaries and greater emotional range. The problem is not the career break. The problem is the lens. The belief that constant forward motion is the only sign of growth. That view ignores the value of reflection, redirection and recovery. Organizations that understand this will gain access to talent others overlook. When Being Different Comes at a Cost There is a subtle penalty that often follows people who look, speak or operate differently than the dominant group. The bias might not be loud. But it's there. It shows up in how ideas get received. In who gets interrupted. In whose competence is quietly double-checked. Professionals from underrepresented backgrounds are often expected to adjust. To mirror tone. To anticipate discomfort. To soften their presence so others feel at ease. That self-management is exhausting. It reduces visibility. It makes people shrink rather than lead. It's not just about hiring more diverse candidates. It's about creating environments where they don't have to carry the weight of someone else's bias. That means leadership has to go beyond optics and confront how status is conferred in the day-to-day. When people feel they need to conform just to be heard, the workplace loses out on originality, risk-taking and trust. Choosing Not to Lead Shouldn't Be Judged There is a quiet stigma around those who opt out of leadership. Not because they lack skill. But because they understand what they want. If you do not aspire to lead a team or run a department, you are often seen as less ambitious. The assumption is that you are plateauing. That you are less invested. That you have somehow stopped progressing. But that is a narrow way to define ambition. Some professionals are motivated by mastery. Others by freedom. Some want to deepen their work without managing others. That is not a lack of drive. That is clarity. And forcing people into roles they don't want leads to disengaged managers and frustrated teams. No one wins. The healthiest workplaces allow multiple definitions of success. They don't push people up a ladder. They build space for growth in multiple directions.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Belite Bio to Participate in the BTIG Virtual Biotechnology Conference
SAN DIEGO, July 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Belite Bio, Inc (NASDAQ: BLTE), a clinical-stage drug development company focused on advancing novel therapeutics targeting degenerative retinal diseases that have significant unmet medical needs, today announced that the executive management team will be participating in the BTIG Virtual Biotechnology Conference being held July 29-30, 2025. To schedule a one-on-one meeting with management, please reach out to your BTIG representative. About Belite BioBelite Bio is a clinical-stage drug development company focused on advancing novel therapeutics targeting degenerative retinal diseases that have significant unmet medical needs, such as Stargardt disease type 1 (STGD1) and Geographic Atrophy (GA) in advanced dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), in addition to specific metabolic diseases. Belite's lead candidate, Tinlarebant, an oral therapy intended to reduce the accumulation of toxins in the eye, is currently being evaluated in a Phase 3 study (DRAGON) and a Phase 2/3 study (DRAGON II) in adolescent STGD1 subjects and a Phase 3 study (PHOENIX) in subjects with GA. For more information, follow us on X, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Facebook or visit us at Media and Investor Relations Contact:Jennifer Wu ir@ Julie Fallonbelite@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
